
|
Diameter Compatibility Discussion in RADEXT Draft does not contain a suitable section on Diameter compatibility and this led to passionate debate At IETF 64 tenuous consensus was to: a. Not split-up attribute into multiple attributes b. Use existing practices to allow Diameter to translate NAS-Traffic-Rule attribute Consensus fell apart on point B “Diameter community should get their say on rule syntax” “We shouldn’t have two related yet non-compatible rule dialects” |