MediaCtrl Requirements - Presented by Roni Even

- Result of the merging of two documents - draft-dolly-xcon-mediacntrlframe-03.txt 
and draft-even-media-server-req-02.txt.

- CONSENSUS -From mailing list that REQ-MCP-31/32 is definitely in scope.

- CONSENSUS - This document will be adopted as a work group item.


MediaCtrl Framework Document - Lorenzo Miniero

- Chair thanks to MediaCtrl Framework design team members for their effort.

- This document will not discuss reliability at the media control level.

- Tom Taylor - Is Qos in scope?  Where is QOS handled?

- Christer Holmberg/Chris Boulton - Need to define what QOS means in this context before 
making decisions. 

- CONSENSUS - That QOS should NOT be included in this document.

- Christer Holmberg - Document definitely needs more refinement - inclusion + deletion 
of certain concepts.

- Mary Barnes - Is this informational OR standards track document?

- Jon Peterson (AD) If document contains specific implementation detail - should be standards 
track.

- CONSENSUS - Consensus that it should be informational from the room.

- CONSENSUS - Should this be a work group item - Strong consensus - YES.


Media Resource Broker - Chris Boulton 
(notes by Mary Barnes since notetaker was presenting)

- Clarification that this is not resource management. 

- Discussion of appropriate models, with no clear consensus on which are most appropriate. Different views on where the MRB resides

- CONSENSUS - Document is not ready to be a WG document (even editor agrees). 


Draft-burke-xml

- CONSENSUS - Adopt as a Work Group item - of those who have read the document - Should 
be adopted as WG.

NEXT STEPS

- Chairs - SIP Control Framework (draft-sip-control-framework) - ACTION - Take to 
the list - will it be adopted as a work item?

- Chris + Chairs - Probably will require other WG interaction/expert review (SIP + MMUSIC).

- Mary - Might be good use for RAI review team.