ccamp-1----Page:3
1 2 3 4 5 6
|
ITU-T Liaison #1 Response to CCAMP reply from 11/06 request for more information especially on discussions between CCAMP/OSPF also distribution of information between layers on failure reaffirm ITU-T interest e.g., m:n relationship between RC and NE multi-layer networks (pointers to ITU-T docs) language concerns with routing solutions draft “optional” vs. “MUST” vs. “SHOULD” how to indicate what is mandatory to meet ASON reqts call/connection separation clarification liaisons vs. individual participation |