speechsc-5 Page:4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
|
EVALUATION CRITERIA The evaluation follows the methodology described in section 3 of http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speechsc-protocol-eval-01.txt. Caveats: The web service framework is generic and extensible There is no syntax and semantics associated to the control of speech engines. Such syntax and semantics can be easily specified following the web service framework (could be inspired from MRCP or other Speech API) The framework remains extensible This practice is integral part of the Web Service framework and does not require any modification. The framework can be bound to numerous transport protocols Additional features are available today through tools and middleware offering rather than standard specifications. This is considered to demonstrate that such capabilities are supported by the web service framework. The evaluation assumes that these inherent characteristics of the web service framework are exploited: If no change is required and only syntax and semantics must be defined, the framework is considered to support the requirements (total compliance: T). |