This Working Group did not meet
Last Modified: 2003-03-11
The Internet network-layer and transport-layer protocols are designed to accommodate a very wide range of networking technologies and characteristics. Nevertheless, experience has shown that the particular properties of different network links can have a significant impact on the performance of Internet protocols operating over those links, and on the performance of connections along paths that include such links. This is especially of concern to the wireless networking community.
The PILC working group will produce several BCP/Informational documents. The first document will discuss considerations for link-layer designers from the perspective of best supporting existing IETF protocols will be produced. The next document will discuss the capabilities, limitations and pitfalls of 'performance enhancing proxies' (PEPs), that is, active network elements that modify or splice end-to-end flows in an attempt to enhance the performance they attain in the face of particular link characteristics. The remaining documents will either discuss the impact and mitigations for a problematic link-layer characteristic (or group of closely related characteristics), or provide overviews of which other PILC documents apply to particular problem domains.
As one of its first work items, the WG will review an existing I-D on considerations for "long, thin" networks (one of the salient characteristics of terrestrial wireless links). This will be published as a preliminary assessment of the problem domain, to be refined by later PILC documents.
All documents will identify which of their considerations remain research topics versus which are established as advanced development. Research topics will be explicitly flagged as not part of any recommendations. All documents will also identify any security implications associated with their considerations.
The working group will also serve as a forum for discussing possible modifications to IETF protocols to improve performance in environments with problematic link characteristics - however, not to the detriment of performance and stability in the general Internet, nor to undermine existing security models.
It is incumbent upon the chairs to ensure that the WG maintains good communications with other groups interested in related technology issues, such as wireless forums.
Done | Submit Internet-Draft on significantly low bandwidth links. | |
Done | Submit Internet-Draft on significantly lossy links. | |
Done | Submit Internet-Draft on long-thin networks (based on draft-montenegro-pilc-ltn-01.txt) submitted to the IESG for publication. | |
Done | Draft of link-layer design considerations document. | |
Done | Draft of PEP capabilities and limitations document. | |
Done | Draft on asymmetric network paths. | |
Done | Document on lossy links to IESG for publication as BCP. | |
Done | Document on PEP capabilities and limitations submitted for publication as Informational. | |
Done | Document on low bandwidth links to IESG for publication as BCP. | |
Done | Draft of TCP Over Wireless document to the IESG as BCP | |
Done | Document on link-layer design considerations submitted for publication as BCP. | |
Done | Document on asymmetric network paths submitted to the IESG for publication as BCP. |
RFC | Status | Title |
---|---|---|
RFC3135 | I | Performance Enhancing Proxies Intended to Mitigate Link-Related Degradations |
RFC3150 | BCP | End-to-end Performance Implications of Slow Links |
RFC3155 | BCP | End-to-end Performance Implications of Links with Errors |
RFC3366 | BCP | Advice to link designers on link Automatic Repeat reQues (ARQ) |
RFC3449 | BCP | TCP Performance Implications of Network Path Asymmetry |
RFC3481 | BCP | TCP over Second (2.5G) and Third (3G) Generation Wireless Networks |