eap-1----Page:5
1 2 3 4 5
|
Drafts (3/3) Methods [individual] Methods submitted for RFC publication: EAP FAST was reviewed by IESG and needs to be revised, due to TLS extension IANA rules EAP SIM and AKA have been submitted to the RFC Editor, but need an AD sponsored review RFC 3748 compliance review by EAP WG would be useful All the security properties required in 3748 are documented? Follows other MUSTs and SHOULDs in RFC 3748? Binding problem definition Draft-puthenkulam-eap-binding-04.txt Not updated since IETF-58; abandoned |