XCON Meeting Minutes - Tuesday 29th July 2008 _____________________________________________ Agenda Bash ___________ - One new new RFC - A Framework for Centralized Conferencing (RFC 5239). CCMP - Mary Barnes __________________ - Mary has reviewed current status of document including changes + added new author (Simon Romano). - Mary provides information based on implementation from the University of Napoli. Includes example message flows and interface screen shots. - OPEN ISSUES: - If SOAP is to be used we need an .xsd file - either in Data Model OR protocol document. This will make life easier when using many industry tools and wizards. - Do we require aditional methods such as allowed user list etc? ****ACTION**** - Mary to mail the list. - Policies - role based XACML is a potential candidate. ****ACTION**** - Authors to research and bring the results back to the work group. - Adam - sounds like work has already been done? - Mary - would need adaption for our use. - Adam - more analysis needed. Notification mechanism - Andrew Allen - Should we not just use SIP? Mary Barnes - What about the PSTN user case with a web interface (or other non signalling participating member). Simon Romano - This is just a side issue - we should separate from the core CCMP protocol and use an appropriate notification mechanism. Roni Even - If more than one user - you need a notification mechanism. YOu have to have something that enables you to receive changes. Adam Roach - potentially need an ETAG type mechanism to avoid race conditions. ****ACTION**** - Mary Barnes - Move forward and authors talk to App area directors for additional advice and guidance. Unknown participant - Notification mechanism should be defined separately. Example Call Flow Document - Mary Barnes ________________________________________ - Objectives covered in presentation - Initial scenarios from section 9 of XCON Framework + XCON chat draft. - Provides logical view for implementing protocol - including state diagrams. - Includes intro text, ladder diagram, text for ladder diagram and call flow. - Feedback requested on format and content before authors dive into the detailed flows. - Add flow? - more text upfront? etc. - Moving forward - complete initial flows - add details as prototype evolve. - Comments? Questions? Implementation Demo - Simon Romano __________________________________ - Simon steps through message flows. - Unknown - Parent child issue could be got rid of in favor of explicit blueprints. - Mary - goes against fundamental framework layout. - Simon - Object is a real existence of a conference while blueprint is really just a description. MEETING COMPLETE