YAM Working Group                                      S. Moonesamy, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                            August 5, 2009
Intended status: Informational
Expires: January 4, 2010


 Preliminary Evaluation of RFC XXX "[PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TITLE HERE]",
         for advancement from Draft Standard to Full Standard
                       by the YAM Working Group
               draft-ietf-yam-pre-evaluation-template-00

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on January 4, 2010.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
   publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.

Abstract

   This memo is a preliminary evaluation of RFC XXX "[PLACEHOLDER:



Moonesamy                Expires January 4, 2010                [Page 1]

Internet-Draft            Preliminary Eval: XXX                July 2009


   INSERT TITLE HERE]" for advancement from Draft to Full Standard.  It
   has been prepared by the Yet Another Mail Working Group.

   THIS INTERNET DRAFT IS NOT MEANT TO BE PUBLISHED AS AN RFC, BUT IS
   WRITTEN TO FACILITY PROCESSING WITHIN THE IESG.


1.  Introduction

   A preliminary evaluation has been made of RFC XXX [RFCXXX]
   "[PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TITLE HERE]" by the Yet Another Mail (YAM)
   Working Group for advancing it from Draft to Full Standard.  The YAM
   WG requests feedback from the IESG on this decision.

1.1.  Note to RFC Editor

   This Internet-Draft is not meant to be published as an RFC.  It is
   written to facilitate processing within the IESG.


2.  Preliminary Evaluation

   Title: [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TITLE HERE]

   Link: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXX

   Date published: [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT DATE HERE]

   Confidence document meets RFC 2026 section 4.1.3 (Standard) test:

      [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TEXT HERE]

   Link to Draft Standard interoperability report:

      [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TEXT HERE]

   Proposed Changes (the YAM WG proposes making the following changes in
   a revision:

      [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TEXT HERE]

   Non-Changes (the YAM WG discussed and chose not to make the following
   changes):








Moonesamy                Expires January 4, 2010                [Page 2]

Internet-Draft            Preliminary Eval: XXX                July 2009


      [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TEXT HERE]

   Downward references (At Full Standard, the following references would
   be downward references):

      [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TEXT HERE]


3.  IESG Feedback

   The YAM WG requests feedback from the IESG on this decision.  In
   particular:

   o  Does the IESG believe the proposed changes are suitable during a
      move from Draft to Full Standard?

   o  Does the IESG believe any other proposed changes are necessary to
      satisfy IESG requirements to advance to Full Standard?

   o  Does the IESG consider the downward references acceptable for a
      Full Standard?


4.  Security Considerations

   This document requests IESG feedback.  There are no security
   considerations.


5.  Normative References

   [RFCXXX]  [PLACEHOLDER: INSERT TEXT HERE]



Author's Address

   S. Moonesamy (editor)
   76, Ylang Ylang Avenue
   Quatre Bornes
   Mauritius

   Email: sm+ietf@elandsys.com








Moonesamy                Expires January 4, 2010                [Page 3]