idnits 2.17.1 draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-10.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** It looks like you're using RFC 3978 boilerplate. You should update this to the boilerplate described in the IETF Trust License Policy document (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info), which is required now. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3978, Section 5.1 on line 16. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3978, Section 5.5, updated by RFC 4748 on line 1327. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 1 on line 1338. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 2 on line 1345. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 3 on line 1351. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The copyright year in the IETF Trust Copyright Line does not match the current year -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore this comment. If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. (See the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.) -- The document date (May 14, 2008) is 5819 days in the past. Is this intentional? Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4646 (Obsoleted by RFC 5646) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4566 (Obsoleted by RFC 8866) Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 8 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 SIMPLE WG M. Lonnfors 3 Internet-Draft K. Kiss 4 Intended status: Standards Track Nokia 5 Expires: November 15, 2008 May 14, 2008 7 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Capability Extension to 8 Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) 9 draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-10 11 Status of this Memo 13 By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any 14 applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware 15 have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes 16 aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. 18 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 19 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that 20 other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- 21 Drafts. 23 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 24 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 25 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 26 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 28 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 29 http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 31 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 32 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 34 This Internet-Draft will expire on November 15, 2008. 36 Abstract 38 Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) defines a common presence 39 data format for Common Profile for Presence (CPP) compliant Presence 40 protocols. This memo defines an extension to represent SIP User 41 Agent capabilities in the Presence Information Document Format (PIDF) 42 compliant presence documents. 44 Table of Contents 46 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 47 1.1. Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 48 1.2. Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 49 2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 50 3. Extension for "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the 51 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)" in PIDF documents . . . . . 5 52 3.1. Overview of operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 53 3.2. Service capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 54 3.2.1. element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 55 3.2.2.