Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa) Last Modified: 2006-03-24 Additional information is available at tools.ietf.org/wg/aaa Chair(s):
Operations and Management Area Director(s):Operations and Management Area Advisor:Mailing Lists:General Discussion: aaa-wg@merit.eduTo Subscribe: majordomo@merit.edu In Body: subscribe aaa-wg Archive: http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/aaa-wg/ Description of Working Group:The Authentication, Authorization and Accounting Working Groupfocused on the development of requirements for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting as applied to network access. Requirements were gathered from NASREQ, MOBILE IP, and ROAMOPS Working Groups as well as TIA 45.6. The AAA WG then solicited submission of protocols meeting the requirements, and evaluated the submissions. This incarnation of the AAA Working Group will focus on development of an IETF Standards track protocol, based on the DIAMETER submission. In this process, it is to be understood that the IETF does not function as a rubber stamp. It is likely that the protocol will be changed significantly during the process of development. The immediate goals of the AAA working group are to address the following issues: - Clarity. The protocol documents should clearly describe the contents of typical messages and the requirements for interoperability. - Error messages. The protocol should define categories of error messages, enabling implementations to respond correctly based on the category. The set of error messages should cover the full range of operational problems. - Accounting. The accounting operational model should be described for each type of network access. - IPv6. The protocol must include attributes in support for IPv6 network access and must be transportable over IPv6. - Transport. The protocol should be transport independent and must define at least one mandatory-to-implement transport mapping. Other transport mappings may also be defined. All transport mappings must effectively support congestion control. - Explicit proxy support. The protocol should offer explicit support for proxies, including support for automated message routing, route recording, and (where necessary) path hiding. - RADIUS compatibility. The protocol should provide improved RADIUS backward compatibility in the case where only RADIUS attributes are used or where RADIUS proxies or servers exist in the path. - Security. The protocol should define a lightweight data object security model that is implementable on NASes. - Data model. The proposal should offer logical separation between the protocol and the data model and should support rich data types. - MIBs. A MIB must be defined, supporting both IPv4 and IPv6 operation. Goals and Milestones:
No Current Internet-DraftsRequest For Comments:Accounting Attributes and Record Formats (RFC 2924) (75561 bytes)Introduction to Accounting Management (RFC 2975) (129771 bytes) Criteria for Evaluating AAA Protocols for Network Access (RFC 2989) (53197 bytes) Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting:Protocol Evaluation (RFC 3127) (170579 bytes) Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) Transport Profile (RFC 3539) (93110 bytes) Diameter Base Protocol (RFC 3588) (341261 bytes) Diameter Mobile IPv4 Application (RFC 4004) (128210 bytes) Diameter Network Access Server Application (RFC 4005) (198871 bytes) Diameter Credit-Control Application (RFC 4006) (288794 bytes) Diameter Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Application (RFC 4072) (79965 bytes) Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application (RFC 4740) (174175 bytes) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||