TCP/UDP Over CLNP-Addressed Networks (tuba)




Charter



Status: Concluded May, 1995 







Chair(s):







 Peter Ford 



 Mark Knopper 







Description of Working Group:



The TUBA Working Group will work on extending the Internet Protocol



suite and architecture by increasing the number of end-systems which



can be effectively addressed and routed.  The TUBA effort will expand



the ability to route Internet packets by using addresses which support



more hierarchy than the current Internet Protocol (IP) address space.



TUBA specifies the continued use of Internet transport protocols, in



particular TCP and UDP, but specifies their encapsulation in ISO 8473



(CLNP) packets.  This will allow the continued use of Internet



application protocols such as FTP, SMTP, TELNET, etc. An enhancement



to the current system is mandatory due to the limitations of the



current 32-bit IP addresses.  TUBA seeks to upgrade the current system



by a transition from the use of IPv4 to



ISO/IEC 8473 (CLNP) and the corresponding large Network Service Access



Point address space.







In addition to protocol layering issues and ``proof of concept'' work,



the TUBA approach will place significant emphasis on the engineering



and operational requirements of a large, global, multilateral public



data network.  TUBA will work to maximize interoperatability with the



routing and addressing architecture of the global CLNP infrastructure.



The TUBA Working Group will work closely with the IETF NOOP and



OSI IDRP for IP Over IP Working Groups to coordinate a viable CLNP-based



Internet which supports the applications which Internet users depend on



such as TELNET, FTP, SMTP, NFS, X, etc.  The TUBA Working Group will also



work collaboratively with communities which are using CLNP, and will



consider issues such as interoperability,



applications coexisting on top of multiple transports, and the



evolution of global public connectionless datagram networks, network



management and instrumentation using CLNP and TUBA, and impact on



routing architecture and protocols given the TUBA transition.







The TUBA Working Group will consider how the TUBA scheme will support



transition from the current IP address space to the future NSAP



address space without discontinuity of service, although different



manufacturers, service providers, and sites will make the transition



at different times. In particular, the way in which implementations



relying on current 32-bit IP addresses will migrate must be



considered.  TUBA will ensure that IP addresses can be assigned, for



as long as they are used, independently of geographical and routing



considerations. One option is to embed IP addresses in NSAP addresses,



possibly as the NSAP end-system identifier. Whatever scheme is chosen



must run in a majority of *-GOSIPs and other NSAP spaces. The TUBA



strategy will require a new mapping in the DNS from NAMEs to NSAP



addresses.







The rationale RFC (RFC 1347) documents issues of transition and



coexistence, among unmodified IPv4 hosts and hosts which support



TUBA hosts.  Hosts wishing full Internet connectivity will need to



support TUBA.







Request for Comments:

  • RFC1526 Assignment of System Identifiers for TUBA/CLNP Hosts (Informational)
  • RFC1561 Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments (Experimental)
  • RFC1768 Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting (Experimental)