TCP/UDP Over CLNP-Addressed Networks (tuba)
































Charter































Status: Concluded May, 1995 































































Chair(s):































































 Peter Ford 































 Mark Knopper 































































Description of Working Group:































The TUBA Working Group will work on extending the Internet Protocol































suite and architecture by increasing the number of end-systems which































can be effectively addressed and routed.  The TUBA effort will expand































the ability to route Internet packets by using addresses which support































more hierarchy than the current Internet Protocol (IP) address space.































TUBA specifies the continued use of Internet transport protocols, in































particular TCP and UDP, but specifies their encapsulation in ISO 8473































(CLNP) packets.  This will allow the continued use of Internet































application protocols such as FTP, SMTP, TELNET, etc. An enhancement































to the current system is mandatory due to the limitations of the































current 32-bit IP addresses.  TUBA seeks to upgrade the current system































by a transition from the use of IPv4 to































ISO/IEC 8473 (CLNP) and the corresponding large Network Service Access































Point address space.































































In addition to protocol layering issues and ``proof of concept'' work,































the TUBA approach will place significant emphasis on the engineering































and operational requirements of a large, global, multilateral public































data network.  TUBA will work to maximize interoperatability with the































routing and addressing architecture of the global CLNP infrastructure.































The TUBA Working Group will work closely with the IETF NOOP and































OSI IDRP for IP Over IP Working Groups to coordinate a viable CLNP-based































Internet which supports the applications which Internet users depend on































such as TELNET, FTP, SMTP, NFS, X, etc.  The TUBA Working Group will also































work collaboratively with communities which are using CLNP, and will































consider issues such as interoperability,































applications coexisting on top of multiple transports, and the































evolution of global public connectionless datagram networks, network































management and instrumentation using CLNP and TUBA, and impact on































routing architecture and protocols given the TUBA transition.































































The TUBA Working Group will consider how the TUBA scheme will support































transition from the current IP address space to the future NSAP































address space without discontinuity of service, although different































manufacturers, service providers, and sites will make the transition































at different times. In particular, the way in which implementations































relying on current 32-bit IP addresses will migrate must be































considered.  TUBA will ensure that IP addresses can be assigned, for































as long as they are used, independently of geographical and routing































considerations. One option is to embed IP addresses in NSAP addresses,































possibly as the NSAP end-system identifier. Whatever scheme is chosen































must run in a majority of *-GOSIPs and other NSAP spaces. The TUBA































strategy will require a new mapping in the DNS from NAMEs to NSAP































addresses.































































The rationale RFC (RFC 1347) documents issues of transition and































coexistence, among unmodified IPv4 hosts and hosts which support































TUBA hosts.  Hosts wishing full Internet connectivity will need to































support TUBA.































































Request for Comments:

  • RFC1526 Assignment of System Identifiers for TUBA/CLNP Hosts (Informational)
  • RFC1561 Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments (Experimental)
  • RFC1768 Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting (Experimental)