DISPATCH R. Avasarala, Ed.
Internet-Draft Motorola Inc
Intended status: Informational J. Bakker
Expires: August 13, 2010 Research In Motion Corporation
February 9, 2010
A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Communication
Diversion Information in support of the Communication Diversion (CDIV)
Notification (CDIVN) CDIV service
draft-avasarala-dispatch-comm-div-notification-03.txt
Abstract
3GPP and TISPAN are defining the protocol specification for the
Communication Diversion (CDIV) service using IP Multimedia (IM) Core
Network (CN) subsystem supplementary service. As part of CDIV, a SIP
based Event package framework is used for notifying users about
diversions (re-directions or forwarding) of their incoming
communication sessions. This document proposes a new SIP event
package for allowing users to subscribe to and receive such
notifications. Users can further define filters to control the rate
and content of such notifications. The proposed event package is
applicable to the CDIV supplementary service in IMS and may not be
applicable to the general internet.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 13, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the BSD License.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. Applicability Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. Abbreviations and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Package Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6.1. Event Package Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6.2. Event Package Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.3. SUBSCRIBE bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.4. Subscription Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.5. Notify bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.6. Notifier Processing of SUBSCRIBE requests . . . . . . . . 9
6.6.1. Authentication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.6.2. Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.7. Notifier Generation of NOTIFY requests . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.8. Subscriber Processing of NOTIFY Requests . . . . . . . . . 10
6.9. Handling of Forked Requests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6.10. Rate of Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6.11. State Agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6.12. Use of URIs to Retrieve State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7. Comm-div-info Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. Structure of Comm-div-info Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.1. Comm-div-info Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.1.1. comm-div-subs-info Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8.1.2. Comm-div-ntfy-info Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
8.1.3. Comm-div-info-selection-criteria . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8.2. Sample Notification body . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8.2.1. Instance of communication diversion subscription
document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8.2.2. Instance of communication diversion notification
document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
8.3. Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
9. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10.1. Communication Diversion Information Event Package
Registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Appendix A. Change log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
1. Introduction
3GPP is currently maintaining and specifying communication diversion
mechanisms which allow users to forward and/or redirect incoming
communications to other destinations. The intention of such
mechanisms is to provide users with sufficient flexibility to manage
their incoming communications in a better way. The most common
example is Communication Forward On Busy (CFB) where in users can
forward any incoming calls, whilst they are busy on some other call,
to their voice mail or a suitable alternative (e.g. some other user).
Similarly other variants of communication diversion are well defined
and used in practice such as Communication Forward on No Answer
(CFNA), Communication Forward Unconditional (CFU). Similarly 3GPP is
currently maintaining and specifying a mechanism for Users to
configure Communication Diversion Services ([1] and [2]) for their
incoming communications. The intention of such mechanisms is to
provide Users with sufficient flexibility to manage their incoming
communications in a better way.
However, with the increasing usage of Communication Diversion
services, users may have many different variants and configurations
active at the same time. For instance, a user may have various CFU
services configured differently based on the time-of-the-day and the
Calling party's identity, or CFB based on the time-of-the-day. This
is possible by having various such configured diversions by
subscribing to different Communication Diversion (CDIV) services as
specified by 3GPP. Though, there has been quite active work in the
area of better customization and configuration of such Communication
Diversion mechanisms, not much attention has been paid to how the
Users can manage these services in an effective manner. With the
various advanced options and high flexibility provided, it is
possible that the user loses track of the various Communication
Diversion configurations or services they have registered for.
One of the basic ways, by which a user can manage a CDIV service is
to be informed of which services they have registered for. For
example, [1] and [2] allow for such indications to be received by the
subscriber, at the time of initiating an outgoing call. However,
simply showing the registered services is not sufficient, since each
service may be customized in numerous and different ways for
different criteria. For example various instantiations of CFB may be
configured for different times-of-the-day and different calling party
identities. Even if subscribers are shown information about all the
Communication Diversion services and their variants that they are
registered for, they may not be able to make sense or verify that
each of them is correct as per their expectation. Such a mismatch in
terms of service behavior expectation and actual execution, may
happen due to incorrect configuration on behalf of the User, which
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
cannot be easily detected if there are various communication
diversion services and their different configurations for handling
incoming communications.
A probable and suitable instance, when the subscriber may easily
judge whether a communication diversion is correct, is when it
actually takes place. The subscriber is already aware of the current
conditions (time-of-day, current presence and availability etc) and
hence is in a position to decide, whether the communication diversion
which just occurred, was indeed as per their expectation. For e.g.
the subscriber wanted to divert all incoming calls to voice-mail,
between 3.00 p.m. to 4.00 p.m. Yet, by mistake she configures the
time-duration as 3.00 to 4.00 p.m. It would be very difficult for
her to spot this error while manually reviewing her complete set of
communication diversion services, with their various configurations.
Instead, if the subscriber receives a real-time notification of any
communication diversion occurring after 4 p.m., she would be able to
immediately guess that something is 'wrong' or not as per her
intention and take corrective action. Such corrective action could
be manual verification of the specific rule which triggered the
communication diversion, wherein she will be able to spot the
*mistake* more easily.
Thus, for effective subscriber services management of multiple
configurations of various Communication Diversion services, a
notification-based mechanism may work well. Such a mechanism would
involve notifying subscribers about diversions of their incoming
communications, as and when the communication diversion happens or
with a slight delay (as per subscriber service configuration). As
such diversion-related information is conveyed almost instantly or
within a small time-frame, the subscribers can verify whether the
particular communication diversion is indeed correct at that instant
of time.
This document defines a SIP event package that allows a SIP User
Agents to subscribe to and be notified of communication diversions
enacted on their behalf. .
2. Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
3. Applicability Statement
It is believed that the SIP event package defined here is not
applicable to the general Internet and has been designed to serve the
architecture of the CDIV service in IMS core networks. The aim of
this memo is to follow the procedure indicated in RFC 3427 [4] and to
register a new event package with event name "comm-div-info" with
IANA.
4. Abbreviations and Definitions
4.1. Abbreviations
CDIV: Communication Diversion.
CDIVN: Communication Diversion Notification.
TISPAN: Telecommunications and Internet Converged Services and
Protocols for Advanced Networking.
4.2. Definitions
Subscriber - The User Agent who has subscribed to the
Communication diversion notification service.
User - Another term for the subscriber.
Diverting User - The User Agent who has configured a Communication
Diversion. This could be the User Agent who has configured the
Communication DIversion service rules in the network.
Diverted-To Entity/User - The User Agent who is the new target of
the incoming communication, post execution of any configured
Communication Diversion service.
Originating User - The User Agent who is the originator of the
incoming communication, which was initially targeted towards the
Diverting User, but finally sent to the Diverted-To User. The
Originating User is also referred to as the Caller.
IMS Core Network - This refers to the IMS based SIP based network
that conforms to the [7] and not the general SIP network as
defined in [5].
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
5. Requirements
A comprehensive description of all the requirements that affect the
CDIV service developed by 3GPP can be found in the 3GPP web page at
http://www.3gpp.org and http://www.etsi.org.
For the sake of simplicity, we briefly discuss here those
requirements that affect the solution described in this document.
These requirements can be summarized as follows:
o There must be a mechanism that allows subscriber-controlled
notification of communication diversions to the diverting user,
including the option to control which notifications the user wants
to receive and to control the rate at which notifications are
received.
o There must be a mechanism that enables filtering of notifications
of communication diversion.
o There must be a mechanism that enables triggering of notifications
of communication diversion.
o There must be a mechanism that enables selecting information to be
included in notifications of communication diversion.
These requirements lead to a solution whereby the user can indicate
to a network node his interest in receiving certain type of
notifications of communication diversion. Pushing these settings to
a network node allows the network node to conserve scarce resources
while still notifying the user of communication diversions enacting
on the user's behalf.
6. Package Definition
This section fills in the details needed for an event package as
defined in Section 4.4 of [6].
6.1. Event Package Name
The SIP Events specification requires package definitions to specify
the name of their package or template-package.
The name of this package is "comm-div-info". As specified in [6],
this value appears in the Event header present in SUBSCRIBE and
NOTIFY requests.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
6.2. Event Package Parameters
The SIP Events specification [6] requires package and template-
package definitions to specify any package specific parameters of the
Event header that are used by it.
The name of this package is "comm-div-info". As specified in
[6],this value appears in the Event header present in SUBSCRIBE and
NOTIFY requests .
6.3. SUBSCRIBE bodies
The SIP Events specification requires package or template-package
definitions to define the usage, if any, of bodies in SUBSCRIBE
requests.
A SUBSCRIBE for Communication Diversion event MAY contain a body.
The purpose of the body depends on its type. Subscriptions to the
Comm-div-info event package typically include a body of MIME type
"application/comm-div-info+xml".
A body of the SUBSCRIBE request with content type set to MIME type
"application/comm-div-info+xml" contains information about filtering
communication diversions, trigger communication diversion
notifications and selecting information to be included in
communication diversions notifications.
6.4. Subscription Duration
The SIP Events specification requires package definitions to define a
default value for subscription durations, and to discuss reasonable
choices for durations when they are explicitly specified.
No expiration time for subscriptions within this package is defined
in this document. The subscriber MAY specify an expiration value in
the expires header field.
6.5. Notify bodies
The SIP Events specification requires package definitions to define a
default value for subscription durations, and to discuss reasonable
choices for durations when they are explicitly specified.
The NOTIFY message contains bodies. This body is a format listed in
the Accept header field of the SUBSCRIBE request or a package
specific default format if the Accept header field was omitted from
the SUBSCRIBE request.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
In this event package, the body of the notification contains comm-
div-info information when the diversion notifications occur. See
Section 8.
All subscribers and notifiers of the "comm-div-info" event package
MUST support the "application/comm-div-info+xml" data format
described in Section 8. The SUBSCRIBE request MAY contain an Accept
header field. If no such header field is present, it has a default
value of "application/comm-div-info+xml" (assuming Event header has a
value of "comm-div-info"). If the Accept header field is present, it
MUST contain the value "application/comm-div-info+xml".
6.6. Notifier Processing of SUBSCRIBE requests
The contents of a document containing comm-div-info information can
contain sensitive information that can reveal some privacy
information. Therefore, such comm-div-info documents MUST only be
sent to authorized subscribers. In order to determine if a
subscription originates in an authorized user, the subscriber MUST be
authenticated as described in Section 6.6.1 and then the user MUST be
authorized to be a subscriber as described in Section 6.6.2.
6.6.1. Authentication
Notifiers MUST authenticate all subscription requests. This
authentication can be done using any of the mechanisms defined in [5]
and other authentication extensions.
6.6.2. Authorization
Once authenticated, the notifier makes an authorization decision. A
notifier MUST NOT accept a subscription unless authorization has been
provided by the user. The means by which authorization are provided
are outside the scope of this document. Authorization may have been
provided ahead of time through access lists, perhaps specified in a
web page. Authorization may have been provided by means of uploading
some kind of standardized access control list document
6.7. Notifier Generation of NOTIFY requests
The SIP Events specification details the formatting and structure of
NOTIFY messages. However, packages are mandated to provide detailed
information on when to send a NOTIFY, how to compute the state of the
resource, how to generate neutral or fake state information, and
whether state information is complete or partial. This section
describes those details for the "comm-div-info" event package.
A notifier MAY send a NOTIFY at any time. Typically, it will send
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
one when a communication diversion is enacted on behalf of the user.
The NOTIFY request MAY contain a body containing a comm-div-info
document. The times at which the NOTIFY is sent for a particular
subscriber, and the contents of the body within that notification,
are subject to any rules specified by the authorization policy that
governs the subscription and to preferences indicated at the time of
subscription.
The body of the NOTIFY MUST be sent using the type "application/
comm-div-info+xml".
Notifiers could detect that a communication diversion was enacted on
behalf of the subscriber via a "History-Info" header field value, per
[2] or [1], sent from an application server hosting the CDIV
application.
6.8. Subscriber Processing of NOTIFY Requests
The SIP Events specification expects event packages to describe the
process followed by the subscriber upon receipt of a NOTIFY request.
In this specification, each NOTIFY request contains a comm-div-info
document
6.9. Handling of Forked Requests
The SIP Events specification requires each package to describe
handling of forked Requests.
This specification only allows a single dialog to be constructed as a
result of emitting an initial SUBSCRIBE request. This guarantees
that only a single notifier is generating notifications for a
particular subscription to a particular user.
6.10. Rate of Notifications
The SIP Events specification requires each package to specify maximum
rate at which notifications can be sent .
Comm-div-info notifiers SHOULD NOT generate notifications for a
single subscription at a rate of more than once every five seconds.
6.11. State Agents
The SIP Events specification requires each package to consider the
role of state agents in the package and, if they are used, to specify
how authentication and authorization are done
This specification does not require state agents to be located in the
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
network
6.12. Use of URIs to Retrieve State
The SIP Events specification allows packages to use URIs to retrieve
large state documents.
Comm-div-info documents are fairly small. This event package does
not provide a mechanism to use URIs to retrieve large state
documents.
7. Comm-div-info Document
Comm-div-info document is an XML document [8] that MUST be well-
formed and SHOULD be valid. Communication Diversion Information
documents MUST be based on XML 1.0 and MUST be encoded using UTF-8
[9].
8. Structure of Comm-div-info Format
A Communications Diversion Information document starts with a "comm-
div-info" element. The comm-div-info element has a series of
elements describing the particular communication diversion or the
filter criteria for receiving the communication diversion
information.
8.1. Comm-div-info Element
The comm-div-info element gives information about the specific
communication diversion or it could give information about a
particular selection criteria for the user receiving the
communication diversion information.
8.1.1. comm-div-subs-info Element
The comm-div-subs-info element is used by the subscribing user to
specify the communication diversion information selection criteria
and the communication diversion notification trigger criteria. It
contains the following elements:
8.1.1.1. comm-div-selection-criteria
This element contains information about communication diversion
information selection criteria. It contains following sub-elements
for specifying the selection criteria.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
8.1.1.1.1. originating-user-selection-criteria
This element specifies the originating user information for the
communication i.e the caller. This is specified in the form of
"user-name" and "user-uri". E.g. sip:Alice@domain.com. The Username
as well as User-URI specified will be compared with the originating
user information of the current user and if there is a match, then
information about the diversion of this specific communication would
be selected for notification to the Diverting user. It consists of
the following sub-elements.
8.1.1.1.1.1. user-info
This element gives user details like username and URI. This element
has further sub-elements for describing username and user URI
8.1.1.1.1.1.1. User-name
This element gives Username. "Alice".
8.1.1.1.1.1.2. User-URI
This element gives User URI. E.g "sip:Alice@domain.com". It takes
the form of any URI scheme like sip. sips, tel or any other URI
scheme
8.1.1.1.2. diversion-time-selection-criteria
This element specifies the time range for receiving notifications.
It contains following additional elements .
8.1.1.1.2.1. time-range
This element specifies the time range at which notifications for
communication diversions can be sent to the subscriber. This could
be specified in the form of a time-interval to enable periodic
triggering of notifications of communication diversions which took
place in that time-interval.
NOTE: If the time-range element is not specified, then notifications
about every communication diversion that occurs is sent to the
subscriber.
8.1.1.1.2.1.1. start-time
This element specifies the start time for receiving notifications.
Its value is expressed in YYYY:MM:DDTHH:MM:SS:Z format.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
8.1.1.1.2.1.2. end-time
This element specifies the end time for receiving notifications. Its
value is expressed in YYYY:MM:DDTHH:MM:SS:Z format.
8.1.1.1.3. diverting-user-selection-criteria
This element gives details of diverting user. The URI specified over
here will be compared with the Request URI of the diverting user for
whom a communication has been diverted. Only if there is a match,
then information about the diversion of this specific communication
would be selected for notification to the Diverting user. This is an
optional parameter. This element consists of sub-elements defined
for "user-info" element Section 8.1.1.1.1.1.1.
8.1.1.1.4. diverted-to-user-selection-criteria
This element gives details of the final target of the communication,
the divered-to user. The URI specified in the Request URI of the new
request is compared with the specified diverted-to URI. Only if
there is a match, then information about the diversion of this
specific communication would be selected for notification to the
Diverting user. This element consists of sub-elements defined for
"user-info" element Section 8.1.1.1.1.1.1.
8.1.1.1.5. diversion-reason-selection-criteria
This element contains the reason for communication diversion. It
contains following sub-element:
8.1.1.1.5.1. diversion-reason-info
This element gives the actual reason for the communication diversion.
E.g. "Call Forward on Busy".
8.1.1.2. comm-div-ntfy-trigger-criteria
8.1.1.2.1. notification-time-selection-criteria
This element informs the server about the time at which the
notification should be triggered.
8.1.1.2.2. presence-status-selection-criteria
This element gives the presence status of the subscriber, based on
which the decision can be made, whether the subscriber wishes to
receive notification information or not.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
8.1.1.2.2.1. presence-selection-info
This element specifies the presence status of the subscriber within
which the subscriber expects to receive notifications about
communication diversions.
8.1.1.2.3. notification-buffer-interval
This element specifies an optional element (in seconds) to overwrite
the CDIVN Buffer Timer for which the CDIVN Application Server should
store the CDIV Notification, if it cannot be delivered to the
subscriber, For example this would be required for buffering the
notifications, if the user is logged out and the diversion is
triggered due to CFNL/CFNRc, resulting in CDIVN for that diversion.
The user may set Notification Buffer Interval value in seconds to a
maximum value of 1 day. Also, if not configured by the user, the
default value of 1 day (as configured by the network provider) is
applicable.
8.1.2. Comm-div-ntfy-info Element
This element gives the notification information. This element has
following sub-elements:
8.1.2.1. originating-user-info
Refer to Section 8.1.1.1.1 for details of this element.
8.1.2.2. diverting-user-info
This element gives details of the diverting user.
8.1.2.3. diverted-to-user-info
This element gives details of the final target of the communication
i.e the divered-to user. This element consists of sub-elements
defined for "user-info" element.
8.1.2.4. diversion-time-info
This element gives the time of communication diversion. Its value is
expressed in YYYY:MM:DDTHH:MM:SS format.
8.1.2.5. diversion-reason-info
This element gives the actual reason for the communication diversion.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
8.1.3. Comm-div-info-selection-criteria
This element gives the subscriber various to select communication
diversion information. This element has following sub-elements.
8.1.3.1. disable-originating-user-info
This element gives the subscriber option of adding originating user
information to the notification information. The default value is
false which means the subscriber wants the originating-user-info
element to be present in the notification information.
8.1.3.2. disable-diverting-user-info
This element gives the subscriber option of adding diverting-user
information to the notification information. The default value is
false which means the subscriber wants the diverting-user-info
element to be present in the notification information.
8.1.3.3. disable-diverted-to-user-info
This element gives the subscriber option of adding diverting-to-user
information to the notification information. The default value is
false which means the subscriber wants the diverted-to-user-info
element to be present in the notification information.
8.1.3.4. disable-diversion-time-info
This element gives the subscriber option of adding diversion-time
information to the notification information. The default value is
false which means the subscriber wants the diversion-time-info to be
present in the notification information.
8.1.3.5. disable-diversion-reason
This element gives the subscriber option of adding diversion-time
information to the notification information. The default value is
false which means the subscriber wants the diversion-reason
information to be present in the notification information.
8.1.3.6. disable-diversion-rule
This element gives the subscriber option of adding diversion-rule
information to the notification information. The default value is
false which means the subscriber wants the diversion-rule information
to be present in the notification information.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
8.2. Sample Notification body
8.2.1. Instance of communication diversion subscription document
Boss
sip:boss@office.com
1999-05-31T13:20:00-05:00
2006-05-06T13:20:00-05:00
404 302
1999-05-31T13:20:00-05:00
2006-05-06T13:20:00-05:00
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
8.2.2. Instance of communication diversion notification document
Boss
sip:boss@office.com
sip:alice@office.com
sip:bob@office.com
1999-06-01T13:20:00-05:00
404
8.3. Schema
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
9. Security Considerations
Authentication and authorization of subscriptions have been discussed
in Section 6.6. Lack of authentication or authorization may provide
comm-div-info information to unauthorized parties and can reveal
sensitive information with regards to the user's call receiving
patterns. For example, who calls the user and at what time, etc.
Integrity protection and confidentiality of notifications are also
discussed in Section 6.7. If a notifier does not encrypt bodies of
NOTIFY requests, an eavesdropper could learn the status of a SIP user
agent and use it to create malicious sessions. If the notifier does
not integrity protect the bodies of NOTIFY requests, a man-in- the-
middle attacker or malicious SIP proxy could modify the contents of
the comm-div-info event package notification. Although this does not
cause harm, it can create annoyances.
10. IANA Considerations
This document registers the new SIP Event Package.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
10.1. Communication Diversion Information Event Package Registration
Package Name: Comm-div-info
Type: Package
Contact: Jon Merdith,
Published Specification: RFC XXXX (Note to RFC Editor)
11. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Samir Saklikar and Subir Saha for
editing and being part of the initial versions of the draft and Ban
Al-Bakri, Roland Jesske, Jose Miguel Torres, Paul Kyzivat, John
Elwell , Keith Drage , Gonzalo Camarillo and Dean Willis for their
valuable comments and suggestions.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[1] 3GPP, "Communication Diversion (CDIV) using IP Multimedia
(IM)Core Network (CN) subsystem; Protocol specification", 3GPP
TS 24.604 8.6.0, December 2009.
[2] 3GPP, "TISPAN; PSTN/ISDN simulation services: Communication
Diversion (CDIV); Protocol specification", 3GPP TS 24.404 7.5.0,
June 2009.
[3] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[4] Mankin, A., Bradner, S., Mahy, R., Willis, D., Ott, J., and B.
Rosen, "Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol
(SIP)", BCP 67, RFC 3427, December 2002.
[5] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP:
Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.
[6] Roach, A., "Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event
Notification", RFC 3265, June 2002.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
12.2. Informative References
[7] 3GPP, "Internet Protocol (IP) multimedia call control protocol
based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session
Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3", 3GPP TS 24.229 5.23.0,
September 2009.
[8] Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., Paoli, J., and E. Maler,
"Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)", World
Wide Web Consortium FirstEdition REC-xml-20001006, October 2000,
.
[9] Schulzrinne, H., Tschofenig, H., Morris, J., Cuellar, J., Polk,
J., and J. Rosenberg, "Common Policy: A Document Format for
Expressing Privacy Preferences", RFC 4745, February 2007.
Appendix A. Change log
[RFC EDITOR NOTE: Please remove this section when publishing]
Changes from draft-avasarala-dispatch-comm-div-notification-02
o Modified thw applicability statement to make it more IMS specific.
o Added a definition for IMS Core network.
o Updated authors list and Acknowledgenet sections.
Changes from draft-avasarala-dispatch-comm-div-notification-01
o Incorporated review comments.
o Modified contact details for co author Subir Saha.
Changes from draft-avasarala-sipping-comm-div-notification-00
o Changed contact details of co author Subir Saha.
o Moved from SIPPING to DISPATCH WG.
Changes from draft-avasarala-dispatch-comm-div-notification-00
o Added comm-div-info document structure information and schema for
the event package.
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft SIP Communication Diversion Notification February 2010
o Added more elaborate description for various sections in comm-div-
info document
Authors' Addresses
Ranjit Avasarala (editor)
Motorola India Pvt Ltd
Bagamane Tech Park, C V Raman Nagar
Bangalore 560093
India
Email: ranjit@motorola.com
John Luc Bakker
Research In Motion Corporation
5000 Riverside Drive, Building 6, Suite 100
Irving, Texas 75039
USA
Email: jbakker@rim.com
Avasarala & Bakker Expires August 13, 2010 [Page 25]