Network Working Group R. Rahman, Ed. Internet-Draft Cisco Systems Intended status: Standards Track L. Zheng, Ed. Expires: January 1, 2018 Huawei Technologies M. Jethanandani, Ed. Cisco Systems S. Pallagatti G. Mirsky ZTE Corporation June 30, 2017 YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt Abstract This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure and manage Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD). Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 1, 2018. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 1] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Design of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Design of Configuration Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1. Common BFD configuration parameters . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.2. Single-hop IP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.3. Multi-hop IP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.4. MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.5. MPLS Label Switched Paths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.6. Link Aggregation Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.2. Design of Operational Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.4. RPC Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.5. BFD top level hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.6. BFD IP single-hop hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.7. BFD IP multi-hop hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.8. BFD over LAG hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.9. BFD over MPLS LSPs hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.10. BFD over MPLS-TE hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.11. Interaction with other YANG modules . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.11.1. Module ietf-interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.11.2. Module ietf-ip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.11.3. Module ietf-mpls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.11.4. Module ietf-te . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.12. IANA BFD YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.13. BFD top-level YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.14. BFD IP single-hop YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.15. BFD IP multi-hop YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.16. BFD over LAG YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2.17. BFD over MPLS YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.18. BFD over MPLS-TE YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.19. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 2] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.20. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 2.20.1. IANA-Maintained iana-bfd-types module . . . . . . . 51 2.21. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 3.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Appendix A. Echo function configuration example . . . . . . . . 54 A.1. Example YANG module for BFD echo function . . . . . . . . 55 Appendix B. Change log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 B.1. Changes between versions -05 and -06 . . . . . . . . . . 57 B.2. Changes between versions -04 and -05 . . . . . . . . . . 57 B.3. Changes between versions -03 and -04 . . . . . . . . . . 57 B.4. Changes between versions -02 and -03 . . . . . . . . . . 57 B.5. Changes between versions -01 and -02 . . . . . . . . . . 58 B.6. Changes between versions -00 and -01 . . . . . . . . . . 58 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 1. Introduction This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure and manage Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) [RFC5880]. BFD is a network protocol which is used for liveness detection of arbitrary paths between systems. Some examples of different types of paths over which we have BFD: 1) Two systems directly connected via IP. This is known as BFD over single-hop IP, a.k.a. BFD for IPv4 and IPv6 [RFC5881] 2) Two systems connected via multiple hops as described in BFD for Multiple Hops. [RFC5883] 3) Two systems connected via MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs) as described in BFD for MPLS LSP [RFC5884] 4) Two systems connected via a Link Aggregation Group (LAG) interface as described in BFD on LAG Interfaces [RFC7130] 5) Two systems connected via pseudowires (PWs), this is known as Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) as described in BFD for PW VCCV [RFC5885]. This is not addressed in this document. BFD typically does not operate on its own. Various control protocols, also known as BFD clients, use the services provided by BFD for their own operation as described in Generic Application of BFD [RFC5882]. The obvious candidates which use BFD are those which do not have "hellos" to detect failures, e.g. static routes, and routing protocols whose "hellos" do not support sub-second failure detection, e.g. OSPF and IS-IS. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 3] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2. Design of the Data Model Since BFD is used for liveliness detection of various forwarding paths, there is no uniform key to identify a BFD session. So the BFD data model is split in multiple YANG modules where each module corresponds to one type of forwarding path. For example, BFD for IP single-hop is in one YANG module and BFD for MPLS-TE is in another YANG module. The main difference between these modules is how a BFD session is uniquely identified, i.e the key for the list containing the BFD sessions for that forwarding path. To avoid duplication of BFD definitions, we have common types and groupings which are used by all the modules. A new control-plane protocol "bfdv1" is defined and a "bfd" container is created under control-plane-protocol as specified in A YANG Data Model for Routing Management [RFC8022]. This new "bfd" node is augmented by all the YANG modules for their respective specific information. BFD can operate in the following contexts: 1. Network devices as described in Network Device YANG Organizational Models [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-device-model] 2. Logical Network Elements as described in YANG Logical Network Element [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lne-model] 3. Network instances as described in YANG Logical Network Element [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ni-model] The approach taken is to do a schema-mount (see Schema Mount [I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount]) of the BFD model in the appropriate locations. For example, if an implementation supports BFD IP multi- hop in network instances, the implementation would do schema-mount of the BFD IP multi-hop model in a mount-point which resides in a network instance. The data models in this document strive to follow the "Network Management Datastore Architecture" (NMDA) guidelines described in [I-D.dsdt-nmda-guidelines]. This means that the data models do NOT have separate top-level or sibling containers for configuration and operational data. One exception at the moment is the model for MPLS- TE in Section 2.1.4 Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 4] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.1. Design of Configuration Model The configuration model consists mainly of the parameters specified in BFD [RFC5880]. Some examples are desired minimum transmit interval, required minimum receive interval, detection multiplier, etc BFD clients are applications that use BFD for fast detection of failures. Some implementations have BFD session configuration under the BFD clients. For example, BFD session configuration under routing applications such as OSPF, IS-IS, BGP etc. Other implementations have BFD session configuration centralized under BFD, i.e. outside the multiple BFD clients. The BFD parameters of interest to a BFD client are mainly the multiplier and interval(s) since those parameters impact the convergence time of the BFD clients when a failure occurs. Other parameters such as BFD authentication are not specific to the requirements of the BFD client. To avoid splitting the BFD configuration between BFD clients and this centralized model of BFD, all the configuration is kept under this centralized model of BFD. The only BFD configuration under BFD clients should be an "enable" knob which makes those clients react to BFD liveliness detection events. 2.1.1. Common BFD configuration parameters The basic BFD configuration parameters are: local-multiplier This is the detection time multiplier as defined in BFD [RFC5880]. desired-min-tx-interval This is the Desired Min TX Interval as defined in BFD [RFC5880]. required-min-rx-interval This is the Required Min RX Interval as defined in BFD [RFC5880]. Although BFD [RFC5880] allows for different values for transmit and receive intervals, some implementations allow users to specify just one interval which is used for both transmit and receive intervals or separate values for transmit and receive intervals. The BFD YANG model supports this: there is a choice between "min-interval", used for both transmit and receive intervals, and "desired-min-tx- interval" and "required-min-rx-interval". This is supported via a Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 5] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 grouping which is used by the YANG modules for the various forwarding paths. For BFD authentication we have: key-chain This is a reference to key-chain defined in YANG Data Model for Key Chains [RFC8177]. The keys, cryptographic algotihms, key lifetime etc are all defined in the key-chain model. replay-protection This specifies meticulous v/s non-meticulous mode as per BFD [RFC5880]. 2.1.2. Single-hop IP For single-hop IP, there is an augment of the "bfd" data node in Section 2. The "ip-sh" node contains a list of IP single-hop sessions where each session is uniquely identified by the interface and destination address pair. For the configuration parameters we use what is defined in Section 2.1.1 [RFC5880] and [RFC5881] do not specify whether echo function is continuous or on demand. Therefore the mechanism used to start and stop echo function is implementation specific and should be done by augmentation: 1) Configuration. This is suitable for continuous echo function. An example is provided in Appendix A. 2) RPC. This is suitable for on-demand echo function. 2.1.3. Multi-hop IP For multi-hop IP, there is an augment of the "bfd" data node in Section 2. Because of multiple paths, there could be multiple multi-hop IP sessions between a source and a destination address. We identify this as a "session-group". The key for each "session-group" consists of: source address Address belonging to the local system as per BFD for Multiple Hops [RFC5883] destination address Address belonging to the remote system as per BFD for Multiple Hops [RFC5883] Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 6] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 For the configuration parameters we use what is defined in Section 2.1.1 Here are some extra parameters: tx-ttl TTL of outgoing BFD control packets. rx-ttl Minimum TTL of incoming BFD control packets. 2.1.4. MPLS Traffic Engineering Tunnels For MPLS-TE tunnels, BFD is configured under the MPLS-TE tunnel since the desired failure detection parameters is a property of the MPLS-TE tunnel. This is achieved by augmenting the MPLS-TE data model in YANG Data Model for TE Topologies [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]. For BFD parameters which are specific to the TE application, e.g. whether to tear down the tunnel in the event of a BFD session failure, these parameters will be defined in the YANG model of the MPLS-TE application. On top of the usual BFD parameters, we have the following per MPLS-TE tunnel: encap Encapsulation for the BFD packets: choice between IP, G-ACh and IP with G-ACh as per MPLS Generic Associated Channel [RFC5586] For general MPLS-TE data, "mpls-te" data node is added under the "bfd" node in Section 2. Since some MPLS-TE tunnels are uni- directional there is no MPLS-TE configuration for these tunnels on the egress node (note that this does not apply to bi-directional MPLS-TP tunnels). The BFD parameters for the egress node are added under "mpls-te". 2.1.5. MPLS Label Switched Paths Here we address MPLS LSPs whose FEC is an IP address. The "bfd" node in Section 2 is augmented with "mpls" which contains a list of sessions uniquely identified by an IP prefix. Because of multiple paths, there could be multiple MPLS sessions to an MPLS FEC. We identify this as a "session-group". Since these LSPs are uni-directional there is no LSP configuration on the egress node. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 7] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 The BFD parameters for the egress node are added under "mpls". 2.1.6. Link Aggregation Groups Per BFD on LAG Interfaces [RFC7130], configuring BFD on LAG consists of having micro-BFD sessions on each LAG member link. Since the BFD parameters are an attribute of the LAG, they should be under the LAG. However there is no LAG YANG model which we can augment. So a "lag" data node is added to the "bfd" node in Section 2, the configuration is per-LAG: we have a list of LAGs. The destination IP address of the micro-BFD sessions is configured per-LAG and per address-family (IPv4 and IPv6) 2.2. Design of Operational Model The operational model contains both the overall statistics of BFD sessions running on the device and the per session operational information. The overall statistics of BFD sessions consist of number of BFD sessions, number of BFD sessions up etc. This information is available globally (i.e. for all BFD sessions) under the "bfd" node in Section 2 and also per type of forwarding path. For each BFD session, mainly three categories of operational items are shown. The fundamental information of a BFD session such as the local discriminator, remote discriminator and the capability of supporting demand detect mode are shown in the first category. The second category includes a BFD session running information, e.g. the remote BFD state and the diagnostic code received. Another example is the actual transmit interval between the control packets, which may be different from the desired minimum transmit interval configured, is shown in this category. Similar examples are actual received interval between the control packets and the actual transmit interval between the echo packets. The third category contains the detailed statistics of the session, e.g. when the session transitioned up/down and how long it has been in that state. For some session types, there may be more than 1 session on the virtual path to the destination. For example, with IP multi-hop and MPLS LSPs, there could be multiple BFD sessions from the source to the same destination to test the various paths (ECMP) to the destination. This is represented by having multiple "sessions" under each "session-group". Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 8] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.3. Notifications This YANG model defines notifications to inform clients of BFD of important events detected during the protocol operation. Pair of local and remote discriminator identifies a BFD session on local system. Notifications also give more important details about BFD sessions; e.g. new state, time in previous state, network-instance and the reason that the BFD session state changed. The notifications are defined for each type of forwarding path but use groupings for common information. 2.4. RPC Operations None. 2.5. BFD top level hierarchy At the "bfd" node under control-plane-protocol, there is no configuration data, only operational data. The operational data consist of overall BFD session statistics, i.e. for BFD on all types of forwarding paths. The "bfd" node under control-plane-protocol can be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network instance. module: ietf-bfd augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol: +--rw bfd +--ro bfd-session-statistics +--ro session-count? uint32 +--ro session-up-count? uint32 +--ro session-down-count? uint32 +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 2.6. BFD IP single-hop hierarchy An "ip-sh" node is added under "bfd" node in control-plane-protocol. The configuration and operational data for each BFD IP single-hop session is under this "ip-sh" node. The "ip-sh" node can be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network instance. module: ietf-bfd-ip-sh augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-protoco l/bfd:bfd: +--rw ip-sh +--ro bfd-session-statistics | +--ro session-count? uint32 Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 9] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 | +--ro session-up-count? uint32 | +--ro session-down-count? uint32 | +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 +--rw sessions* [interface dest-addr] +--rw interface if:interface-ref +--rw dest-addr inet:ip-address +--rw source-addr? inet:ip-address +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--rw (interval-config-type)? | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | +--:(single-interval) | +--rw min-interval uint32 +--rw demand-enabled? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--rw admin-down? boolean +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--rw desired-min-echo-tx-interval? uint32 +--rw required-min-echo-rx-interval? uint32 +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean +--ro local-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--ro demand-capability? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--ro source-port? inet:port-number +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number +--ro session-running | +--ro session-index? uint32 | +--ro local-state? bfd-state | +--ro remote-state? bfd-state | +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean | +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types: bfd-auth-type | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32 | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32 | +--ro detection-time? uint32 | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {bfd-echo-mode}? +--ro sesssion-statistics Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 10] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro down-count? uint32 +--ro admin-down-count? uint32 +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64 +--ro send-packet-count? uint64 +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64 +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64 notifications: +---n bfd-singlehop-notification +--ro local-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro new-state? bfd-state +--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic +--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time +--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro session-index? uint32 +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro interface? if:interface-ref +--ro echo-enabled? boolean 2.7. BFD IP multi-hop hierarchy An "ip-mh" node is added under the "bfd" node in cntrol-plane- protocol. The configuration and operational data for each BFD IP multi-hop session is under this "ip-mh" node. In the operational model we support multiple BFD multi-hop sessions per remote address (ECMP), the local discriminator is used as key. The "ip-mh" node can be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network instance. module: ietf-bfd-ip-mh augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd: +--rw ip-mh +--ro bfd-session-statistics | +--ro session-count? uint32 | +--ro session-up-count? uint32 | +--ro session-down-count? uint32 | +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 +--rw session-group* [source-addr dest-addr] +--rw source-addr inet:ip-address +--rw dest-addr inet:ip-address +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--rw (interval-config-type)? Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 11] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | +--:(single-interval) | +--rw min-interval uint32 +--rw demand-enabled? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--rw admin-down? boolean +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--rw tx-ttl? bfd:hops +--rw rx-ttl bfd:hops +--ro sessions* +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean +--ro local-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--ro demand-capability? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--ro source-port? inet:port-number +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number +--ro session-running | +--ro session-index? uint32 | +--ro local-state? bfd-state | +--ro remote-state? bfd-state | +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean | +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types: bfd-auth-type | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32 | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32 | +--ro detection-time? uint32 | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {bfd-echo-mode}? +--ro session-statistics +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro down-count? uint32 +--ro admin-down-count? uint32 +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64 +--ro send-packet-count? uint64 +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64 +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64 Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 12] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 notifications: +---n bfd-multihop-notification +--ro local-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro new-state? bfd-state +--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic +--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time +--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro session-index? uint32 +--ro path-type? identityref 2.8. BFD over LAG hierarchy A "lag" node is added under the "bfd" node in control-plane-protocol. The configuration and operational data for each BFD LAG session is under this "lag" node. The "lag" node can be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network instance. module: ietf-bfd-lag augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd: +--rw lag +--rw micro-bfd-ipv4-session-statistics | +--ro bfd-session-statistics | +--ro session-count? uint32 | +--ro session-up-count? uint32 | +--ro session-down-count? uint32 | +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 +--rw micro-bfd-ipv6-session-statistics | +--ro bfd-session-statistics | +--ro session-count? uint32 | +--ro session-up-count? uint32 | +--ro session-down-count? uint32 | +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 +--rw sessions* [lag-name] +--rw lag-name if:interface-ref +--rw ipv4-dest-addr? inet:ipv4-address +--rw ipv6-dest-addr? inet:ipv6-address +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--rw (interval-config-type)? | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | +--:(single-interval) | +--rw min-interval uint32 +--rw demand-enabled? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--rw admin-down? boolean Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 13] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--rw use-ipv4? boolean +--rw use-ipv6? boolean +--ro member-links* [member-link] +--ro member-link if:interface-ref +--ro micro-bfd-ipv4 | +--ro path-type? identityref | +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean | +--ro local-discriminator? bfd-discriminator | +--ro remote-discriminator? bfd-discriminator | +--ro remote-multiplier? bfd-multiplier | +--ro demand-capability? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? | +--ro source-port? inet:port-number | +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number | +--ro session-running | | +--ro session-index? uint32 | | +--ro local-state? bfd-state | | +--ro remote-state? bfd-state | | +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | | +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean | | +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types: bfd-auth-type | | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration | | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32 | | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32 | | +--ro detection-time? uint32 | | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {bfd-echo-mode}? | +--ro sesssion-statistics | +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro down-count? uint32 | +--ro admin-down-count? uint32 | +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64 | +--ro send-packet-count? uint64 | +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64 | +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64 +--ro micro-bfd-ipv6 +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean +--ro local-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discriminator? bfd-discriminator Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 14] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 +--ro remote-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--ro demand-capability? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--ro source-port? inet:port-number +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number +--ro session-running | +--ro session-index? uint32 | +--ro local-state? bfd-state | +--ro remote-state? bfd-state | +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean | +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types: bfd-auth-type | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32 | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32 | +--ro detection-time? uint32 | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {bfd-echo-mode}? +--ro sesssion-statistics +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time +--ro down-count? uint32 +--ro admin-down-count? uint32 +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64 +--ro send-packet-count? uint64 +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64 +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64 notifications: +---n bfd-lag-notification +--ro local-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro new-state? bfd-state +--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic +--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time +--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro session-index? uint32 +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro lag-name? if:interface-ref +--ro member-link? if:interface-ref Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 15] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.9. BFD over MPLS LSPs hierarchy An "mpls" node is added under the "bfd" node in control-plane- protocol. The configuration is per MPLS FEC under this "mpls" node. In the operational model we support multiple BFD sessions per MPLS FEC (ECMP), the local discriminator is used as key. The "mpls" node can be used in a network device (top-level), or mounted in an LNE or in a network instance. module: ietf-bfd-mpls augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd: +--rw mpls +--ro bfd-session-statistics | +--ro session-count? uint32 | +--ro session-up-count? uint32 | +--ro session-down-count? uint32 | +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 +--rw egress | +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier | +--rw (interval-config-type)? | | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | | +--:(single-interval) | | +--rw min-interval uint32 | +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--rw session-group* [mpls-fec] +--rw mpls-fec inet:ip-prefix +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--rw (interval-config-type)? | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | +--:(single-interval) | +--rw min-interval uint32 +--rw demand-enabled? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--rw admin-down? boolean +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--ro sessions* +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean +--ro local-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discriminator? bfd-discriminator Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 16] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 +--ro remote-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--ro demand-capability? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--ro source-port? inet:port-number +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number +--ro session-running | +--ro session-index? uint32 | +--ro local-state? bfd-state | +--ro remote-state? bfd-state | +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types: bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean | +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types: bfd-auth-type | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32 | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32 | +--ro detection-time? uint32 | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {bfd-echo-mode}? +--ro sesssion-statistics | +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro down-count? uint32 | +--ro admin-down-count? uint32 | +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64 | +--ro send-packet-count? uint64 | +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64 | +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64 +--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address notifications: +---n bfd-mpls-notification +--ro local-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro new-state? bfd-state +--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic +--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time +--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro session-index? uint32 +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 17] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.10. BFD over MPLS-TE hierarchy YANG Data Model for TE Topologies [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] is augmented. BFD is configured per MPLS-TE tunnel, and BFD session operational data is provided per MPLS-TE LSP. module: ietf-bfd-mpls-te augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd: +--rw mpls-te +--rw config | +--rw egress | +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier | +--rw (interval-config-type)? | | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | | +--:(single-interval) | | +--rw min-interval uint32 | +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--ro oper +--ro bfd-session-statistics +--ro session-count? uint32 +--ro session-up-count? uint32 +--ro session-down-count? uint32 +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32 augment /te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:config: +--rw local-multiplier? bfd-multiplier +--rw (interval-config-type)? | +--:(tx-rx-intervals) | | +--rw desired-min-tx-interval uint32 | | +--rw required-min-rx-interval uint32 | +--:(single-interval) | +--rw min-interval uint32 +--rw demand-enabled? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--rw admin-down? boolean +--rw authentication-parms! {bfd-authentication}? | +--rw key-chain? kc:key-chain-ref | +--rw replay-protection? identityref +--rw encap? identityref augment /te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp: +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro ip-encapsulation? boolean +--ro local-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discriminator? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-multiplier? bfd-multiplier Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 18] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 +--ro demand-capability? boolean {bfd-demand-mode}? +--ro source-port? inet:port-number +--ro dest-port? inet:port-number +--ro session-running | +--ro session-index? uint32 | +--ro local-state? bfd-state | +--ro remote-state? bfd-state | +--ro local-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-diagnostic? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic | +--ro remote-authenticated? boolean | +--ro remote-authentication-type? iana-bfd-types:bfd-auth-type {bfd-authentication}? | +--ro detection-mode? enumeration | +--ro negotiated-tx-interval? uint32 | +--ro negotiated-rx-interval? uint32 | +--ro detection-time? uint32 | +--ro echo-tx-interval-in-use? uint32 {bfd-echo-mode}? +--ro sesssion-statistics | +--ro create-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro last-down-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro last-up-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro down-count? uint32 | +--ro admin-down-count? uint32 | +--ro receive-packet-count? uint64 | +--ro send-packet-count? uint64 | +--ro receive-bad-packet? uint64 | +--ro send-failed-packet? uint64 +--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address notifications: +---n bfd-mpls-te-notification +--ro local-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro remote-discr? bfd-discriminator +--ro new-state? bfd-state +--ro state-change-reason? iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic +--ro time-of-last-state-change? yang:date-and-time +--ro dest-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro source-addr? inet:ip-address +--ro session-index? uint32 +--ro path-type? identityref +--ro mpls-dest-address? inet:ip-address +--ro tunnel-name? string 2.11. Interaction with other YANG modules Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless OAM protocols [I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam] describes how the LIME connectionless OAM model could be extended to support BFD. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 19] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 Also, the operation of the BFD data model depends on configuration parameters that are defined in other YANG modules. 2.11.1. Module ietf-interfaces The following boolean configuration is defined in A YANG Data Model for Interface Management [RFC7223]: /if:interfaces/if:interface/if:enabled If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD packets can be transmitted or received on that interface. 2.11.2. Module ietf-ip The following boolean configuration is defined in A YANG Data Model for IP Management [RFC7277]: /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:enabled If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv4 packets can be transmitted or received on that interface. /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/ip:forwarding If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv4 packets can be transmitted or received on that interface. /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:enabled If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv6 packets can be transmitted or received on that interface. /if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/ip:forwarding If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD IPv6 packets can be transmitted or received on that interface. 2.11.3. Module ietf-mpls The following boolean configuration is defined in A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base [I-D.ietf-mpls-base-yang]: /rt:routing/mpls:mpls/mpls:interface/mpls:config/mpls:enabled If this configuration is set to "false", no BFD MPLS packets can be transmitted or received on that interface. 2.11.4. Module ietf-te The following configuration is defined in the "ietf-te" YANG module YANG Data Model for TE Topology [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te]: Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 20] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 /ietf-te:te/ietf-te:tunnels/ietf-te:tunnel/ietf-te:config/ietf- te:admin-status If this configuration is not set to "state-up", no BFD MPLS packets can be transmitted or received on that tunnel. 2.12. IANA BFD YANG Module file "iana-bfd-types@2017-06-30.yang" module iana-bfd-types { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-bfd-types"; prefix "iana-bfd-types"; organization "IANA"; contact " Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Postal: ICANN 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Tel: +1 310 823 9358 "; description "This module contains a collection of YANG data types considered defined by IANA and used for BFD. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: IANA BFD YANG Data Types."; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 21] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note typedef bfd-diagnostic { type enumeration { enum none { value 0; description "None"; } enum control-expiry { value 1; description "Control timer expiry"; } enum echo-failed { value 2; description "Echo failure"; } enum neighbor-down { value 3; description "Neighbor down"; } enum forwarding-reset { value 4; description "Forwarding reset"; } enum path-down { value 5; description "Path down"; } enum concatenated-path-down { value 6; description "Concatenated path down"; } enum admin-down { value 7; description "Admin down"; } enum reverse-concatenated-path-down { value 8; description "Reverse concatenated path down"; } enum mis-connectivity-defect { value 9; description "Mis-connectivity defect as specified in RFC6428"; } } description Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 22] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 "BFD diagnostic as defined in RFC5880. Range is 0 to 31."; } typedef bfd-auth-type { type enumeration { enum reserved { value 0; description "Reserved"; } enum simple-password { value 1; description "Simple password"; } enum keyed-md5 { value 2; description "Keyed MD5"; } enum meticulous-keyed-md5 { value 3; description "Meticulous keyed MD5"; } enum keyed-sha1 { value 4; description "Keyed SHA1"; } enum meticulous-keyed-sha1 { value 5; description "Meticulous keyed SHA1"; } } description "BFD authentication type as defined in RFC5880. Range is 0 to 255."; } } 2.13. BFD top-level YANG Module file "ietf-bfd@2017-06-30.yang" module ietf-bfd { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd"; prefix "bfd"; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 23] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 import iana-bfd-types { prefix "iana-bfd-types"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; } import ietf-yang-types { prefix "yang"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } import ietf-key-chain { prefix "kc"; } organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains the YANG definition for BFD parameters as per RFC5880. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 24] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note identity bfdv1 { base "rt:control-plane-protocol"; description "BFD protocol version 1 as per RFC5880."; } typedef bfd-discriminator { type uint32 { range 1..4294967295; } description "BFD discriminator"; } typedef bfd-state { type enumeration { enum adminDown { value 0; description "admindown"; } enum down { value 1; description "down"; } enum init { value 2; description "init"; } enum up { value 3; description "up"; } } description "BFD state as defined in RFC5880"; } typedef bfd-multiplier { type uint8 { range 1..255; } description "Multiplier"; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 25] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 typedef hops { type uint8 { range 1..255; } description "This corresponds to Time To Live for IPv4 and corresponds to hop limit for IPv6"; } /* * Identity definitions */ identity bfd-path-type { description "Base identity for BFD path type. The session type indicates the type of path on which BFD is running"; } identity bfd-path-ip-sh { base bfd-path-type; description "BFD on IP single hop"; } identity bfd-path-ip-mh { base bfd-path-type; description "BFD on IP multi hop"; } identity bfd-path-mpls-te { base bfd-path-type; description "BFD on MPLS Traffic Engineering"; } identity bfd-path-mpls-lsp { base bfd-path-type; description "BFD on MPLS Label Switched Path"; } identity bfd-path-lag { base bfd-path-type; description "Micro-BFD on LAG member links"; } identity bfd-encap-type { description "Base identity for BFD encapsulation type."; } identity bfd-encap-ip { base bfd-encap-type; description "BFD with IP encapsulation."; } identity bfd-auth-replay-protection { Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 26] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 description "Base identity for BFD authentication replay protection. " + "See section 6.7 of RFC5880."; } identity bfd-auth-replay-protection-non-meticulous { base bfd-auth-replay-protection; description "Non-meticulous (see section 6.7.3 of RFC5880)"; } identity bfd-auth-replay-protection-meticulous { base bfd-auth-replay-protection; description "Meticulous (see section 6.7.3 of RFC5880)"; } /* * Feature definitions. */ feature bfd-authentication { description "BFD authentication supported"; } feature bfd-demand-mode { description "BFD demand mode supported"; } feature bfd-echo-mode { description "BFD echo mode supported"; } /* * Groupings */ grouping bfd-auth-parms { description "Grouping for BFD authentication parameters (see section 6.7 of RFC5880)."; container authentication-parms { if-feature bfd-authentication; presence "Enables BFD authentication (see section 6.7 of RFC5880)."; description "Parameters for BFD authentication"; leaf key-chain { type kc:key-chain-ref; description "Name of key-chain"; } leaf replay-protection { type identityref { Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 27] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 base bfd-auth-replay-protection; } description "Protection against replays"; } } } grouping bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms { description "BFD grouping for base config parameters"; leaf local-multiplier { type bfd-multiplier; default 3; description "Multiplier transmitted by local system"; } choice interval-config-type { description "Two interval values or 1 value used for both tx and rx"; case tx-rx-intervals { leaf desired-min-tx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; mandatory true; description "Desired minimum transmit interval of control packets"; } leaf required-min-rx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; mandatory true; description "Required minimum receive interval of control packets"; } } case single-interval { leaf min-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; mandatory true; description "Desired minimum transmit interval and required " + "minimum receive interval of control packets"; } } } } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 28] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 grouping bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms { description "BFD grouping for common config parameters"; uses bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms; leaf demand-enabled { if-feature bfd-demand-mode; type boolean; default false; description "To enable demand mode"; } leaf admin-down { type boolean; default false; description "Is the BFD session administratively down"; } uses bfd-auth-parms; } grouping bfd-grouping-echo-cfg-parms { description "BFD grouping for echo config parameters"; leaf desired-min-echo-tx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; default 0; description "Desired minumum transmit interval for echo"; } leaf required-min-echo-rx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; default 0; description "Required minimum receive interval for echo"; } } grouping bfd-client-base-cfg-parms { description "BFD grouping which could be used by a protocol which is a client of BFD to enable its use of BFD"; container bfd-cfg { description "BFD configuration"; leaf enabled { type boolean; default false; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 29] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 description "True if BFD is enabled"; } } } grouping bfd-all-session { description "BFD session operational information"; leaf path-type { type identityref { base bfd-path-type; } config "false"; description "BFD session type, this indicates the path type that BFD is running on"; } leaf ip-encapsulation { type boolean; config "false"; description "Whether BFD encapsulation uses IP"; } leaf local-discriminator { type bfd-discriminator; config "false"; description "Local discriminator"; } leaf remote-discriminator { type bfd-discriminator; config "false"; description "Remote discriminator"; } leaf remote-multiplier { type bfd-multiplier; config "false"; description "Remote multiplier"; } leaf demand-capability { if-feature bfd-demand-mode; type boolean; config "false"; description "Local demand mode capability"; } leaf source-port { when "../ip-encapsulation = 'true'" { description "Source port valid only when IP encapsulation is used"; } type inet:port-number; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 30] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 config "false"; description "Source UDP port"; } leaf dest-port { when "../ip-encapsulation = 'true'" { description "Destination port valid only when IP encapsulation is used"; } type inet:port-number; config "false"; description "Destination UDP port"; } container session-running { config "false"; description "BFD session running information"; leaf session-index { type uint32; description "An index used to uniquely identify BFD sessions"; } leaf local-state { type bfd-state; description "Local state"; } leaf remote-state { type bfd-state; description "Remote state"; } leaf local-diagnostic { type iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic; description "Local diagnostic"; } leaf remote-diagnostic { type iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic; description "Remote diagnostic"; } leaf remote-authenticated { type boolean; description "Indicates whether incoming BFD control packets are authenticated"; } leaf remote-authentication-type { when "../remote-authenticated = 'true'" { description "Only valid when incoming BFD control packets are authenticated"; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 31] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 } if-feature bfd-authentication; type iana-bfd-types:bfd-auth-type; description "Authentication type of incoming BFD control packets"; } leaf detection-mode { type enumeration { enum async-with-echo { value "1"; description "Async with echo"; } enum async-without-echo { value "2"; description "Async without echo"; } enum demand-with-echo { value "3"; description "Demand with echo"; } enum demand-without-echo { value "4"; description "Demand without echo"; } } description "Detection mode"; } leaf negotiated-tx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; description "Negotiated transmit interval"; } leaf negotiated-rx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; description "Negotiated receive interval"; } leaf detection-time { type uint32; units microseconds; description "Detection time"; } leaf echo-tx-interval-in-use { when "../../path-type = 'bfd-path-ip-sh'" { description "Echo is supported for IP single-hop only."; } if-feature bfd-echo-mode; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 32] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 type uint32; units microseconds; description "Echo transmit interval in use"; } } container sesssion-statistics { config "false"; description "BFD per-session statistics"; leaf create-time { type yang:date-and-time; description "Time and date when session was created"; } leaf last-down-time { type yang:date-and-time; description "Time and date of last time the session went down"; } leaf last-up-time { type yang:date-and-time; description "Time and date of last time the session went up"; } leaf down-count { type uint32; description "Session Down Count"; } leaf admin-down-count { type uint32; description "Session Admin-Down Count"; } leaf receive-packet-count { type uint64; description "Received Packet Count"; } leaf send-packet-count { type uint64; description "Sent Packet Count"; } leaf receive-bad-packet { type uint64; description "Received bad packet count"; } leaf send-failed-packet { type uint64; description "Packet Failed to Send Count"; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 33] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 } } } grouping bfd-session-statistics { description "Grouping for session counters"; container bfd-session-statistics { config false; description "BFD session counters"; leaf session-count { type uint32; description "Number of sessions"; } leaf session-up-count { type uint32; description "Count of sessions which are up"; } leaf session-down-count { type uint32; description "Count of sessions which are down"; } leaf session-admin-down-count { type uint32; description "Count of sessions which are admin-down"; } } } grouping bfd-notification-parms { description "This group describes common parameters that will be sent " + "as part of BFD notification"; leaf local-discr { type bfd-discriminator; description "BFD local discriminator"; } leaf remote-discr { type bfd-discriminator; description "BFD remote discriminator"; } leaf new-state { type bfd-state; description "Current BFD state"; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 34] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 leaf state-change-reason { type iana-bfd-types:bfd-diagnostic; description "BFD state change reason"; } leaf time-of-last-state-change { type yang:date-and-time; description "Calendar time of previous state change"; } leaf dest-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "BFD peer address"; } leaf source-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "BFD local address"; } leaf session-index { type uint32; description "An index used to uniquely identify BFD sessions"; } leaf path-type { type identityref { base bfd-path-type; } description "BFD path type"; } } augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol" { when "rt:type = 'bfd:bfdv1'" { description "This augmentation is only valid for a control-plane protocol instance of BFD (type 'bfdv1')."; } description "BFD augmentation."; container bfd { description "BFD top level container"; uses bfd-session-statistics; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 35] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 } } 2.14. BFD IP single-hop YANG Module file "ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2017-06-30.yang" module ietf-bfd-ip-sh { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-sh"; prefix "bfd-ip-sh"; import ietf-bfd { prefix "bfd"; } import ietf-interfaces { prefix "if"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains the YANG definition for BFD IP single-hop as per RFC5881. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 36] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD IP single-hop"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" { description "BFD augmentation for IP single-hop"; container ip-sh { description "BFD IP single-hop top level container"; uses bfd:bfd-session-statistics; list sessions { key "interface dest-addr"; description "List of IP single-hop sessions"; leaf interface { type if:interface-ref; description "Interface on which the BFD session is running."; } leaf dest-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "IP address of the peer"; } leaf source-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "Local address"; } uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms; uses bfd:bfd-grouping-echo-cfg-parms; uses bfd:bfd-all-session; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 37] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 } } notification bfd-singlehop-notification { description "Notification for BFD single-hop session state change. An " + "implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" + "session is continuously changing state."; uses bfd:bfd-notification-parms; leaf interface { type if:interface-ref; description "Interface to which this BFD session belongs to"; } leaf echo-enabled { type boolean; description "Was echo enabled for BFD"; } } } 2.15. BFD IP multi-hop YANG Module file "ietf-bfd-ip-mh@2017-06-30.yang" module ietf-bfd-ip-mh { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-mh"; // replace with IANA namespace when assigned prefix "bfd-ip-mh"; import ietf-bfd { prefix "bfd"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 38] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains the YANG definition for BFD IP multi-hop as per RFC5883. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD IP multi-hop"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" { description "BFD augmentation for IP multi-hop"; container ip-mh { description "BFD IP multi-hop top level container"; uses bfd:bfd-session-statistics; list session-group { key "source-addr dest-addr"; description "Group of BFD IP multi-hop sessions (for ECMP). A " + "group of sessions is between 1 source and 1 " + "destination, each session has a different field " + "in UDP/IP hdr for ECMP."; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 39] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 leaf source-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "Local IP address"; } leaf dest-addr { type inet:ip-address; description "IP address of the peer"; } uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms; leaf tx-ttl { type bfd:hops; default 255; description "Hop count of outgoing BFD control packets"; } leaf rx-ttl { type bfd:hops; mandatory true; description "Minimum allowed hop count value for incoming BFD control packets. Control packets whose hop count is lower than this value are dropped."; } list sessions { config false; description "The multiple BFD sessions between a source and a " + "destination."; uses bfd:bfd-all-session; } } } } notification bfd-multihop-notification { description "Notification for BFD multi-hop session state change. An " + "implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" + "session is continuously changing state."; uses bfd:bfd-notification-parms; } } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 40] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.16. BFD over LAG YANG Module file "ietf-bfd-lag@2017-06-30.yang" module ietf-bfd-lag { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-lag"; // replace with IANA namespace when assigned prefix "bfd-lag"; import ietf-bfd { prefix "bfd"; } import ietf-interfaces { prefix "if"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains the YANG definition for BFD over LAG interfaces as per RFC7130. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 41] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD over LAG"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" { description "BFD augmentation for LAG"; container lag { description "BFD over LAG top level container"; container micro-bfd-ipv4-session-statistics { description "Micro-BFD IPv4 session counters"; uses bfd:bfd-session-statistics; } container micro-bfd-ipv6-session-statistics { description "Micro-BFD IPv6 session counters"; uses bfd:bfd-session-statistics; } list sessions { key "lag-name"; description "A LAG interface on which BFD is running"; leaf lag-name { type if:interface-ref ; description "Name of the LAG"; } leaf ipv4-dest-addr { type inet:ipv4-address; description "IPv4 address of the peer, for IPv4 micro-BFD."; } leaf ipv6-dest-addr { type inet:ipv6-address; description "IPv6 address of the peer, for IPv6 micro-BFD."; } uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms; leaf use-ipv4 { type boolean; description "Using IPv4 micro-BFD."; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 42] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 } leaf use-ipv6 { type boolean; description "Using IPv6 micro-BFD."; } list member-links { key "member-link"; config false; description "Micro-BFD over LAG. This represents one member link"; leaf member-link { type if:interface-ref; description "Member link on which micro-BFD is running"; } container micro-bfd-ipv4 { when "../../use-ipv4 = 'true'" { description "Needed only if IPv4 is used."; } description "Micro-BFD IPv4 session state on member link"; uses bfd:bfd-all-session; } container micro-bfd-ipv6 { when "../../use-ipv6 = 'true'" { description "Needed only if IPv6 is used."; } description "Micro-BFD IPv6 session state on member link"; uses bfd:bfd-all-session; } } } } } notification bfd-lag-notification { description "Notification for BFD over LAG session state change. " + "An implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" + "session is continuously changing state."; uses bfd:bfd-notification-parms; leaf lag-name { type if:interface-ref; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 43] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 description "LAG interface name"; } leaf member-link { type if:interface-ref; description "Member link on which BFD is running"; } } } 2.17. BFD over MPLS YANG Module file "ietf-bfd-mpls@2017-06-30.yang" module ietf-bfd-mpls { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls"; // replace with IANA namespace when assigned prefix "bfd-mpls"; import ietf-bfd { prefix "bfd"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains the YANG definition for BFD parameters for MPLS LSPs as per RFC5884. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 44] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD over MPLS LSPs"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note identity bfd-encap-gach { base bfd:bfd-encap-type; description "BFD with G-ACh encapsulation as per RFC5586."; } identity bfd-encap-ip-gach { base bfd:bfd-encap-type; description "BFD with IP and G-ACh encapsulation as per RFC5586."; } grouping bfd-encap-cfg { description "Configuration for BFD encapsulation"; leaf encap { type identityref { base bfd:bfd-encap-type; } default bfd:bfd-encap-ip; description "BFD encapsulation"; } } grouping bfd-mpls-dest-address { description "Destination address as per RFC5884"; leaf mpls-dest-address { Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 45] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 type inet:ip-address; config "false"; description "Destination address as per RFC5884. Needed if IP encapsulation is used"; } } augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" { description "BFD augmentation for MPLS"; container mpls { description "BFD MPLS top level container"; uses bfd:bfd-session-statistics; container egress { description "Egress configuration"; uses bfd:bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms; uses bfd:bfd-auth-parms; } list session-group { key "mpls-fec"; description "Group of BFD MPLS sessions (for ECMP). A group of " + "sessions is for 1 FEC, each session has a different " + "field in UDP/IP hdr for ECMP."; leaf mpls-fec { type inet:ip-prefix; description "MPLS FEC"; } uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms; list sessions { config false; description "The BFD sessions for an MPLS FEC. Local " + "discriminator is unique for each session in the " + "group."; uses bfd:bfd-all-session; uses bfd-mpls:bfd-mpls-dest-address; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 46] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 } } } notification bfd-mpls-notification { description "Notification for BFD over MPLS FEC session state change. " + "An implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" + "session is continuously changing state."; uses bfd:bfd-notification-parms; leaf mpls-dest-address { type inet:ip-address; description "Destination address as per RFC5884. Needed if IP encapsulation is used"; } } } 2.18. BFD over MPLS-TE YANG Module file "ietf-bfd-mpls-te@2017-06-30.yang" module ietf-bfd-mpls-te { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls-te"; // replace with IANA namespace when assigned prefix "bfd-mpls-te"; import ietf-bfd { prefix "bfd"; } import ietf-bfd-mpls { prefix "bfd-mpls"; } import ietf-te { prefix "te"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 47] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains the YANG definition for BFD parameters for MPLS Traffic Engineering as per RFC5884. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model for BFD over MPLS-TE"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd" { description "BFD augmentation for MPLS-TE"; container mpls-te { description "BFD MPLS-TE top level container"; container config { description "BFD MPLS-TE configuration container"; container egress { description "Egress configuration"; uses bfd:bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 48] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 uses bfd:bfd-auth-parms; } } container oper { config "false"; description "BFD operational container"; uses bfd:bfd-session-statistics; } } } augment "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:config" { description "BFD configuration on MPLS-TE tunnel."; uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms; uses bfd-mpls:bfd-encap-cfg; } augment "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp" { when "/te:te/te:lsps-state/te:lsp/te:origin-type != 'transit'" { description "BFD information not needed at transit points"; } description "BFD state information on MPLS-TE LSP."; uses bfd:bfd-all-session; uses bfd-mpls:bfd-mpls-dest-address; } notification bfd-mpls-te-notification { description "Notification for BFD over MPLS-TE session state change. " + "An implementation may rate-limit notifications, e.g. when a" + "session is continuously changing state."; uses bfd:bfd-notification-parms; uses bfd-mpls:bfd-mpls-dest-address; leaf tunnel-name { type string; description "MPLS-TE tunnel on which BFD was running."; } } } Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 49] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.19. Security Considerations The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the mandatory to implement secure transport is SSH [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol operations and content. The YANG module has writeable data nodes which can be used for creation of BFD sessions and modification of BFD session parameters. The system should "police" creation of BFD sessions to prevent new sessions from causing existing BFD sessions to fail. For BFD session modification, the BFD protocol has mechanisms in place which allow for in service modification. 2.20. IANA Considerations The IANA is requested to as assign a new namespace URI from the IETF XML registry. This document registers the following namesace URIs in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688]: -------------------------------------------------------------------- URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-sh Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 50] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mh Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-lag Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-mpls-te Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.20.1. IANA-Maintained iana-bfd-types module This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained iana-bfd-types YANG module. The iana-bfd-types YANG module is intended to reflect the "BFD Diagnostic Codes" registry and "BFD Authentication Types" registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/bfd-parameters/bfd-parameters.xhtml Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 51] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 2.21. Acknowledgements We would also like to thank Nobo Akiya and Jeff Haas for their encouragement on this work. We would also like to thank Rakesh Gandhi and Tarek Saad for their help on the MPLS-TE model. We would also like to thank Acee Lindem for his guidance. 3. References 3.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC5586] Bocci, M., Ed., Vigoureux, M., Ed., and S. Bryant, Ed., "MPLS Generic Associated Channel", RFC 5586, DOI 10.17487/RFC5586, June 2009, . [RFC5880] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010, . [RFC5881] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop)", RFC 5881, DOI 10.17487/RFC5881, June 2010, . [RFC5882] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Generic Application of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)", RFC 5882, DOI 10.17487/RFC5882, June 2010, . [RFC5883] Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multihop Paths", RFC 5883, DOI 10.17487/RFC5883, June 2010, . [RFC5884] Aggarwal, R., Kompella, K., Nadeau, T., and G. Swallow, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs)", RFC 5884, DOI 10.17487/RFC5884, June 2010, . Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 52] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 [RFC5885] Nadeau, T., Ed. and C. Pignataro, Ed., "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for the Pseudowire Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV)", RFC 5885, DOI 10.17487/RFC5885, June 2010, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC7130] Bhatia, M., Ed., Chen, M., Ed., Boutros, S., Ed., Binderberger, M., Ed., and J. Haas, Ed., "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) on Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces", RFC 7130, DOI 10.17487/RFC7130, February 2014, . [RFC7223] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface Management", RFC 7223, DOI 10.17487/RFC7223, May 2014, . [RFC7277] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management", RFC 7277, DOI 10.17487/RFC7277, June 2014, . [RFC8022] Lhotka, L. and A. Lindem, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Management", RFC 8022, DOI 10.17487/RFC8022, November 2016, . 3.2. Informative References [I-D.dsdt-nmda-guidelines] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Guidelines for YANG Module Authors (NMDA)", draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01 (work in progress), May 2017. [I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam] Kumar, D., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Rahman, R., and S. Raghavan, "Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols", draft- ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-07 (work in progress), June 2017. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 53] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 [I-D.ietf-mpls-base-yang] Raza, K., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., Saad, T., Bryskin, I., Chen, X., Jones, R., and B. Wen, "A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base", draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-04 (work in progress), March 2017. [I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount] Bjorklund, M. and L. Lhotka, "YANG Schema Mount", draft- ietf-netmod-schema-mount-05 (work in progress), May 2017. [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-device-model] Lindem, A., Berger, L., Bogdanovic, D., and C. Hopps, "Network Device YANG Logical Organization", draft-ietf- rtgwg-device-model-02 (work in progress), March 2017. [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-lne-model] Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., and D. Bogdanovic, "YANG Logical Network Elements", draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne- model-02 (work in progress), March 2017. [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ni-model] Berger, L., Hopps, C., Lindem, A., and D. Bogdanovic, "YANG Network Instances", draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-02 (work in progress), March 2017. [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te] Saad, T., Gandhi, R., Liu, X., Beeram, V., Shah, H., and I. Bryskin, "A YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering Tunnels and Interfaces", draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-06 (work in progress), March 2017. [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8177] Lindem, A., Ed., Qu, Y., Yeung, D., Chen, I., and J. Zhang, "YANG Data Model for Key Chains", RFC 8177, DOI 10.17487/RFC8177, June 2017, . Appendix A. Echo function configuration example The following intervals are added for the echo function (if supported): desired-min-echo-tx-interval Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 54] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 This is the minimum interval that the local system would like to use when transmitting BFD echo packets. If 0, the echo function as defined in BFD [RFC5880] is disabled. required-min-echo-rx-interval This is the Required Min Echo RX Interval as defined in BFD [RFC5880]. module: example-bfd-echo augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-protoco l/bfd:bfd/bfd-ip-sh:ip-sh/bfd-ip-sh:sessions: +--rw echo {bfd-echo-mode}? +--rw desired-min-echo-tx-interval? uint32 +--rw required-min-echo-rx-interval? uint32 A.1. Example YANG module for BFD echo function module example-bfd-echo { namespace "tag:example.com,2017:example-bfd-echo"; prefix "example-bfd-echo"; import ietf-bfd { prefix "bfd"; } import ietf-bfd-ip-sh { prefix "bfd-ip-sh"; } import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } organization "IETF BFD Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editors: Reshad Rahman (rrahman@cisco.com), Lianshu Zheng (vero.zheng@huawei.com), Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani@gmail.com)"; description "This module contains an example YANG augmentation for configuration of BFD echo function. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 55] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-06-30 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model example augmentation for BFD echo function"; } // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note /* * Groupings */ grouping bfd-grouping-echo-cfg-parms { description "BFD grouping for echo config parameters"; leaf desired-min-echo-tx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; default 0; description "Desired minumum transmit interval for echo"; } leaf required-min-echo-rx-interval { type uint32; units microseconds; default 0; description "Required minimum receive interval for echo"; } } augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/" + "rt:control-plane-protocol/bfd:bfd/bfd-ip-sh:ip-sh/" + "bfd-ip-sh:sessions" { description "Augmentation for BFD echo fucntion."; Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 56] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 container echo { if-feature bfd-echo-mode; description "BFD echo function container"; uses bfd-grouping-echo-cfg-parms; } } } Appendix B. Change log RFC Editor: Remove this section upon publication as an RFC. B.1. Changes between versions -05 and -06 o Adhere to NMDA-guidelines. o Echo function config moved to appendix as example. o Added IANA YANG modules. o Addressed various comments. B.2. Changes between versions -04 and -05 o "bfd" node in augment of control-plane-protocol as per A YANG Data Model for Routing Management [RFC8022]. o Removed augment of network-instance. Replaced by schema-mount. o Added information on interaction with other YANG modules. B.3. Changes between versions -03 and -04 o Updated author information. o Fixed YANG compile error in ietf-bfd-lag.yang which was due to incorrect when statement. B.4. Changes between versions -02 and -03 o Fixed YANG compilation warning due to incorrect revision date in ietf-bfd-ip-sh module. Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 57] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 B.5. Changes between versions -01 and -02 o Replace routing-instance, which has been removed from A YANG Data Model for Routing Management [RFC8022], with network-instance from YANG Network Instances [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-ni-model] B.6. Changes between versions -00 and -01 o Remove BFD configuration parameters from BFD clients, all BFD configuration parameters in BFD o YANG module split in multiple YANG modules (one per type of forwarding path) o For BFD over MPLS-TE we augment MPLS-TE model o For BFD authentication we now use YANG Data Model for Key Chains [RFC8177] Authors' Addresses Reshad Rahman (editor) Cisco Systems Canada Email: rrahman@cisco.com Lianshu Zheng (editor) Huawei Technologies China Email: vero.zheng@huawei.com Mahesh Jethanandani (editor) Cisco Systems Email: mjethanandani@gmail.com Santosh Pallagatti India Email: santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 58] Internet-Draft BFD YANG June 2017 Greg Mirsky ZTE Corporation Email: gregimirsky@gmail.com Rahman, et al. Expires January 1, 2018 [Page 59]