Sandelman Software Works

mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca

Internet CBOR Working Group Internet-Draft This document proposes an on-disk format for CBOR objects that is friendly to common on-disk recognition systems like the Unix file(1) command. This document is being discussed at: https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-magic-number

Introduction Since very early in computing, operating systems have sought ways to mark which files could be processed by which programs. For instance, the Unix file(1) command, which has existed since 1973 , has been able to identify many file formats for decades. Many systems (Linux, MacOS, Windows) will select the correct application based upon the file contents, if the system can not determine it by other means: for instance, the classic MacOS maintained a resource fork that includes media type ("MIME type") information and therefore ideally never needs to know what anything about the file. Other systems do this by file extensions. While having a media type associated with the file is a better solution in general, when files become disconnected from their type information, such as when attempting to do forensics on a damaged system, then being able to identify a file type can become very important. It is noted that in the media type registration, that a magic number is asked for, if available, as is a file extension. A challenge for the file(1) program is often that it can be confused by the encoding vs the content. For instance, an Android "apk" used to transfer and store an application may be identified as a ZIP file. Both OpenOffice or MSOffice files are ZIP files of XML files. (Unless OpenOffice files are flat (fodp) files, in which case they may appear to be generic XML files.) As CBOR becomes a more and more common encoding for a wide variety of artifacts, identifying them as just "CBOR" is probably not sufficient. This document provides a way to encode a magic number into the beginning of a CBOR format file. Two options are presented: typically a CBOR Protocol author will specify one. A CBOR Protocol is a specification which uses CBOR as its encoding. Examples of CBOR Protocols currently under development include CoSWID , and EAT . COSE itself is considered infrastructure, however the encoding of public keys in CBOR as described in would be an identified CBOR Protocol. A major inspiration for this document is observing the mess in ASN.1 based systems where most files are PEM encoded, identified by the extension "pem", confusing public keys, private keys, certificate requests and SIME content. These proposals are invasive to how CBOR protocols are written to disk, but in both cases, the proposed envelope does not require that the tag be transfered on the wire. In addition to the on-disk identification aspects, there are some protocols which may benefit from having such a magic number on the wire if they presently using a different (legacy) encoding scheme. The presence of the identifiable magic sequence signals that CBOR is being used or a legacy scheme.

Requirements for a Magic Number A magic number is ideally a unique fingerprint, present in the first 4 or 8 bytes of the file, which does not change when the contents change, and does not depend upon the length of the file. Less ideal solutions have a pattern that needs to be matched, but in which some bytes need to be ignored. While the Unix file(1) command can be told to ignore bytes, this can lead to ambiguities.

Protocol There are two variations of this practice. Both use CBOR Tags in a way that results in a deterministic first 8 to 12 bytes.

The CBOR Protocol Specific Tag CBOR Protocol designers should obtain a tag for each major type of object that they might store on disk. As there are more than 4 million available 4-byte tags, there should be little issue in allocating a few to each available CBOR Protocol. The policy is First Come First Served, so all that is required is an email to IANA, having filled in the small template provided in section 9.2 of . This tag should be allocated by the author of the CBOR Protocol, and to be in the four-byte range, it should be at least 0x01000000 (decimal 16777216) in value. The use of a sequence of four US-ASCII codes which are mnemonic to the protocol is encouraged, but not required.

CBOR Tag Wrapped This proposal starts with the Self-described CBOR tag, 55799, as described in section 3.4.6. A second CBOR Tag is then allocated to describe the specific Protocol involved, as described above. This proposal wraps the CBOR value as tags usually do. Applications that need to send the CBOR value across a constrained link may wish to remove the two tags if the use is implicitly understood. This is a decision of the CBOR Protocol specification.

CBOR Tag Sequence This proposal makes use of CBOR Sequences as described in . This proposal consists of two tags and a constant string for a total of 12 bytes.

1. The file shall start with the Self-described CBOR Sequence tag, 55800.
2. The file shall continue with a CBOR tag, from the First Come First Served space, which uniquely identifies the CBOR Protocol. The use of a four-byte tag is encouraged.
3. The three byte CBOR byte string containing 0x42_4F_52. When encoded it shows up as "CBOR"

The first part identifies the file as being CBOR, and does so with all the desirable properties explained in section 3.4.6. Specifically, it does not seem to conflict with any known file types, and it is not valid Unicode in any Unicode encoding. The second part identifies which CBOR Protocol is used, as described above. The third part is a constant value 0x43_42_4f_52, "CBOR". That is, it the three byte sequence 0x42_4f_52 ("BOR"). This is the data item that is tagged. The actual CBOR Protocol value then follows as the next data item(s) in the CBOR sequence, without a need for any further specific tag. The use of a CBOR Sequence allows the application to trivially remove the first item with the two tags. This means that should a file be reviewed by a human (directly in an editor, or in a hexdump display), it will include the string "CBOR" prominently. This value is also included simply because the two tags need to tag something.

Security Considerations This document provides a way to identify CBOR Protocol objects. Clearly identifying CBOR contents on disk may have a variety of impacts. The most obvious is that it may allow malware to identify interesting objects on disk, and then corrupt them.

IANA Considerations There are no IANA actions. This section documents the allocation that was done.

CBOR Sequence Tag IANA has allocated tag 55800 as the CBOR Sequence tag. This tag is from the First Come/First Served area. The value has been picked to have properties similiar to the 55799 tag. The hexadecimal representation is: 0xd9_\d9_f8. This is not valid UTF-8: the first 0xd9 puts the value into the three-byte value of UTF-8, but the 0xd9 as the second value is not a valid second byte for UTF-8. This is not valid UTF-16: the byte sequence 0xd9d9 (in either endian order), puts this value into the UTF-16 high-half zone, which would signal that this a 32-bit Unicode value. However, the following 16-bit big-endian value 0xf8.. is not a valid second sequence according to . On a little-endian system, it would be necessary to examine the fourth byte to determine if it is valid. That next byte is determined by the subsequent encoding, and section 3.4.6 has already determined that no valid CBOR encodings result in a valid UTF-16.

Acknowledgements The CBOR WG brainstormed this protocol on January 20, 2021.

Changelog

References Normative References RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings. The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format whose design goals include the possibility of extremely small code size, fairly small message size, and extensibility without the need for version negotiation. These design goals make it different from earlier binary serializations such as ASN.1 and MessagePack. This document obsoletes RFC 7049, providing editorial improvements, new details, and errata fixes while keeping full compatibility with the interchange format of RFC 7049. It does not create a new version of the format. This document describes the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Sequence format and associated media type "application/cbor-seq". A CBOR Sequence consists of any number of encoded CBOR data items, simply concatenated in sequence. Structured syntax suffixes for media types allow other media types to build on them and make it explicit that they are built on an existing media type as their foundation. This specification defines and registers "+cbor-seq" as a structured syntax suffix for CBOR Sequences. Informative References Wikipedia Wikipedia Fraunhofer SIT National Security Agency The MITRE Corporation National Institute of Standards and Technology ISO/IEC 19770-2:2015 Software Identification (SWID) tags provide an extensible XML-based structure to identify and describe individual software components, patches, and installation bundles. SWID tag representations can be too large for devices with network and storage constraints. This document defines a concise representation of SWID tags: Concise SWID (CoSWID) tags. CoSWID supports a similar set of semantics and features as SWID tags, as well as new semantics that allow CoSWIDs to describe additional types of information, all in a more memory efficient format. Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Security Theory LLC Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Qualcomm Technologies Inc. An Entity Attestation Token (EAT) provides a signed (attested) set of claims that describe state and characteristics of an entity, typically a device like a phone or an IoT device. These claims are used by a relying party to determine how much it wishes to trust the entity. An EAT is either a CWT or JWT with some attestation-oriented claims. To a large degree, all this document does is extend CWT and JWT. Contributing TBD Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the ability to have basic security services defined for this data format. This document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) protocol. This specification describes how to create and process signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR for serialization. This specification additionally describes how to represent cryptographic keys using CBOR. RISE AB RISE AB Ericsson AB Ericsson AB Nexus Group This document specifies a CBOR encoding of X.509 certificates. The resulting certificates are called C509 Certificates. The CBOR encoding supports a large subset of RFC 5280 and significantly reduces the size of certificates compatible with e.g. RFC 7925, IEEE 802.1AR (DevID), CNSA, and CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements. When used to re-encode DER encoded X.509 certificates, the CBOR encoding can in many cases reduce the size of RFC 7925 profiled certificates with over 50%. The CBOR encoded structure can alternatively be signed directly ("natively signed"), which does not require re-encoding for the signature to be verified. The document also specifies COSE headers as well as a TLS certificate type for C509 certificates. NOTE: "C509" is a placeholder, name to be decided by the COSE WG. This document describes the UTF-16 encoding of Unicode/ISO-10646, addresses the issues of serializing UTF-16 as an octet stream for transmission over the Internet, discusses MIME charset naming as described in [CHARSET-REG], and contains the registration for three MIME charset parameter values: UTF-16BE (big-endian), UTF-16LE (little- endian), and UTF-16. This memo provides information for the Internet community.

Example from Openswan The Openswan IPsec project has a daemon ("pluto"), and two control programs ("addconn", and "whack"). They communicate via a Unix-domain socket, over which a C-structure containing pointers to strings is serialized using a bespoke mechanism. This is normally not a problem as the structure is compiled by the same compiler; but when there are upgrades it is possible for the daemon and the control programs to get out of sync by the bespoke serialization. As a result, there are extra compensations to deal with shutting the daemon down. During testing it is sometimes the case that upgrades are backed out. In addition, when doing unit testing, the easiest way to load policy is to use the normal policy reading process, but that is not normally loaded in the daemon. Instead the IPC that is normally sent across the wire is compiled/serialized and placed in a file. The above magic number is included in the file, and also on the IPC in order to distinguish the "shutdown" command CBOR operation. In order to reduce the problems due to serialization, the serialization is being changed to CBOR. Additionally, this change allows the IPC to be described by CDDL, and for any language that encode to CBOR can be used. IANA has allocated the tag 1330664270, or 0x4f_50_ 53_ 4e for this purpose. As a result, each file and each IPC is prefixed with: In diagnostic notation: ~~~~ 55800(1330664270(h'424F52')) ~~~~ Or in hex: ~~~~ 00000000 d9 d9 f9 da 4f 50 53 4e 43 42 4f 52 |....OPSNCBOR| ~~~~

Contributors

cabo@tzi.org

jeffpc@josefsipek.net