INTERNET-DRAFT Eric A. Hall Document: draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 Expires: December, 2003 Category: Experimental Defining and Locating IPv4 Address Blocks in the Federated Internet Registry Service Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This document defines LDAP schema and searching rules for IPv4 address blocks, in support of the Internet Resource Query Service described in [FIRS-ARCH] and [FIRS-CORE]. Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 Table of Contents 1. Introduction..............................................2 2. Prerequisites and Terminology.............................2 3. Naming Syntax.............................................3 4. Object Classes and Attributes.............................5 5. Query Processing Rules....................................7 5.1. Query Pre-Processing...................................8 5.2. Query Bootstrapping....................................8 5.3. LDAP Matching..........................................9 5.4. Example Query.........................................10 6. Security Considerations..................................11 7. IANA Considerations......................................11 8. Author's Addresses.......................................12 9. Normative References.....................................12 10. Acknowledgments..........................................13 11. Changes from Previous Versions...........................13 12. Full Copyright Statement.................................14 1. Introduction This specification defines the naming syntax, object classes, attributes, matching filters, and query processing rules for storing and locating IPv4 address blocks in the FIRS service. Refer to [FIRS-ARCH] for information on the FIRS architecture and [FIRS-CORE] for the schema definitions and rules which govern the FIRS service as a whole. Note that reverse-lookup DNS domains for IPv4 address blocks are managed as DNS domain entries in [FIRS-DNS]. These are entirely different network resources, and should not be confused with IPv4 address block entries. The definitions in this specification are intended to be used with FIRS. Their usage outside of FIRS is not prohibited, but any such usage is beyond this specification's scope of authority. 2. Prerequisites and Terminology The complete set of specifications in the FIRS collection cumulative define a structured and distributed information service using LDAPv3 for the data-formatting and transport functions. This specification should be read in the context of the complete set of specifications, which currently include the following: Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 2] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 draft-ietf-crisp-firs-arch-00, "The Federated Internet Registry Service: Architecture and Implementation" [FIRS-ARCH] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-core-00, "The Federated Internet Registry Service: Core Elements" [FIRS-CORE] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-dns-00, "Defining and Locating DNS Domains in the Federated Internet Registry Service" [FIRS-DNS] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-dnsrr-00, "Defining and Locating DNS Resource Records in the Federated Internet Registry Service" [FIRS-DNSRR] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-contact-00, "Defining and Locating Contact Persons in the Federated Internet Registry Service" [FIRS-CONTCT] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-asn-00, "Defining and Locating Autonomous System Numbers in the Federated Internet Registry Service" [FIRS-ASN] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00, "Defining and Locating IPv4 Address Blocks in the Federated Internet Registry Service" (this document) [FIRS-IPV4] draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv6-00, "Defining and Locating IPv6 Address Blocks in the Federated Internet Registry Service" [FIRS-IPV6] The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. 3. Naming Syntax The naming syntax for IPv4 address blocks in FIRS MUST follow the form of "cn=,cn=inetResources,", where is the IPv4 address block resource, and where is a sequence of domainComponent relative distinguished names which identifies the scope of authority for the selected directory partition. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 3] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 The inetIpv4NetworkSyntax rules use the traditional "dotted-quad" notation, where each of four sub-components provide a decimal value that represents one octet from a 32-bit IPv4 address, with the sub-components being separated by a full-stop (period) character, and with the four-part sequence being followed by a "/" character and a three-digit decimal "prefix" value. Entries which use the inetIpv4NetworkSyntax MUST use the starting address from a range of inclusive addresses, and MUST use CIDR prefix notation. In this manner, it is possible to create an inetIpv4Network entry for a range of addresses of any size (including a single host). The leading zeroes from each octet MUST be removed before the value is stored or used in a query. Octets which have a value of zero MUST be represented by the single-digit numeric value of "0". If an input string does not match this syntax, a FIRS-aware application MAY attempt to manipulate the input string to form a valid value. For example, if a user enters a traditional IPv4 address without specifying a prefix value, the application MAY append "/32" to the end of the input string to form a valid assertion value. Similarly, if a user provides an octal or hexadecimal value, the client MAY attempt to convert the input string to the traditional dotted-quad IPv4 address notation. An augmented BNF for this syntax is as follows: inetIpv4NetworkSyntax = inetIpv4Octet "." inetIpv4Octet "." inetIpv4Octet "." inetIpv4Octet "/" inetIpv4Prefix inetIpv4Octet = decimal value between "0" and "255" inclusive, with the non-affective leading zeroes removed inetIpv4Prefix = decimal value between "1" and "32" inclusive, with the non-affective leading zeroes removed The schema definition for inetIpv4NetworkSyntax is as follows: inetIpv4NetworkSyntax ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.1 NAME 'inetIpv4NetworkSyntax' DESC 'An IPv4 address and prefix.' ) For example, an IPv4 address block with a range of addresses between "10.0.0.0" and "10.0.255.255" inclusive would be written Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 4] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 as "cn=10.0.0.0/16", while a host address of "192.0.2.14" would be written as "cn=192.0.2.14/32". Note that the entry name of "cn=0.0.0.0/0" encompasses the entire IPv4 address space. Note that the use of "/" is illegal as data in URLs, and MUST be escaped before it is stored in a URL as data. 4. Object Classes and Attributes IPv4 address block entries in FIRS MUST use the inetIpv4Network object class, in addition to the mandatory object classes defined in [FIRS-CORE]. IPv4 address block entries MUST be treated as containers capable of holding subordinate entries. If an entry exists as a referral source, the entry MUST also be defined with the referral object class, in addition to the above requirements. The inetIpv4Network object class is a structural object class which is subordinate to the inetResources object class. The inetIpv4Network object class has no mandatory attributes, although it does have several optional attributes. The inetIpv4Network object class also inherits the attributes defined in the inetResources object class, including the "cn" naming attribute. The schema definition for the inetIpv4Network object class is as follows: inetIpv4Network ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.0 NAME 'inetIpv4Network' DESC 'IPv4 network attributes.' SUP inetResources STRUCTURAL MAY ( inetIpv4DelegationStatus $ inetIpv4DelegationDate $ inetIpv4Registrar $ inetIpv4Registry $ inetIpv4Contacts $ inetIpv4RoutingContacts $ ) ) The attributes from the inetIpv4Network object class are described below: inetIpv4Contacts ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.2 NAME 'inetIpv4Contacts' DESC 'Contacts for general administrative issues concerning this IPv4 address block.' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX inetContactSyntax ) Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 5] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 inetIpv4DelegationDate ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.3 NAME 'inetIpv4DelegationDate' DESC 'Date this IPv4 address block was delegated.' EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch SYNTAX generalizedTime SINGLE-VALUE ) inetIpv4DelegationStatus ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.4 NAME 'inetIpv4DelegationStatus' DESC 'Delegation status of this IPv4 address block.' EQUALITY numericStringMatch SYNTAX numericString{2} SINGLE-VALUE ) NOTE: In an effort to facilitate internationalization and programmatic processing, the current status of a delegation is identified by a 16-bit integer. The values and status mapping is as follows: 0 Reserved delegation (permanently inactive) 1 Assigned and active (normal state) 2 Assigned but not yet active (new delegation) 3 Assigned but on hold (disputed) 4 Assignment revoked (database purge pending) Additional values are reserved for future use, and are to be administered by IANA. Note that there is no status code for "unassigned"; unassigned entries SHOULD NOT exist, and SHOULD NOT be returned as answers. inetIpv4Registrar ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.5 NAME 'inetIpv4Registrar' DESC 'Registrar who delegated this IPv4 address block.' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX directoryString ) NOTE: The inetIpv4Registrar attribute uses a URL to indicate the registrar who delegated the address block. The attribute structure is identical to the labeledURI attribute, as defined in [RFC2798], including the URL and textual comments. The data can refer to any valid URL. inetIpv4Registry ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.6 NAME 'inetIpv4Registry' DESC 'Registry where this IPv4 address block is managed.' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch SYNTAX directoryString ) Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 6] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 NOTE: The inetIpv4Registry attribute uses a URL to indicate the registry who is ultimately responsible for the address block. The attribute structure is identical to the labeledURI attribute, as defined in [RFC2798], including the URL and textual comments. The data can refer to any valid URL. inetIpv4RoutingContacts ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.7 NAME 'inetIpv4RoutingContacts' DESC 'Contacts for routing-related problems with this IPv4 address block.' EQUALITY caseExactMatch SYNTAX inetContactSyntax ) An example of the inetIpv4Network object class is shown in Figure 1 below. The example includes attributes from the inetIpv4Network, inetResources, and inetAssociatedResources object classes. cn=192.0.2.0/24,cn=inetResources,dc=arin,dc=net [top object class] [inetResources object class] [inetIpv4Network object class] [inetAssociatedResources object class] | +-attribute: description | value: "Example Hosting's IPv4 address block" | +-attribute: inetIpv4Contacts | value: "hostmaster@example.com" | +-attribute: inetAssociatedAsNumbers | value: "65535" | +-attribute: inetIpv4Registrar value: "http://www.arin.net/ (ARIN)" Figure 1: The entry for the 192.0.2.0/24 address block in the dc=arin,dc=net partition. 5. Query Processing Rules Queries for IPv4 address blocks have several special requirements, as discussed in the following sections. Refer to [FIRS-CORE] for general information about FIRS queries. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 7] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 5.1. Query Pre-Processing Clients MUST ensure that the query input is normalized according to the rules specified in section 3 before the input is used as the assertion value to the resulting LDAP query. The authoritative partition for an IPv4 address block is determined by mapping the normalized input to an associated reverse-lookup DNS domain name, and then mapping the resulting DNS domain name to a sequence of domainComponent labels. The least-significant octet MUST include the subnet prefix in this mapping process, except in those cases where the address falls on an eight-bit boundary. In those cases where the address block specifies a 32-bit host address, the subnet prefix MUST be stripped from the input during the mapping process. In those cases where the address block specifies a legacy "address class", the least-significant octet and subnet prefix MUST both be stripped from the input during the mapping process. These steps are necessary in order to ensure that the reverse-pointer delegations in the public DNS are correctly matched to the authoritative partitions (note that these rules only apply to the mapping process by which an authoritative partition is constructed, and does not apply to the process by which the entry-specific relative distinguished name is constructed). For example, a host-specific IPv4 address block of "192.0.2.14/32" would be mapped to the reverse-lookup DNS domain name of "14.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa." which would in turn be mapped to "dc=14,dc=2,dc=0,dc=192,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa". Meanwhile, the "Class C" block of "192.0.2.0/24" would be mapped to the reverse-lookup DNS domain name of "2.0.192.in-addr.arpa." which would in turn be mapped to "dc=2,dc=0,dc=192,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa". Finally, a classless IPv4 address block of "192.0.2.0/20" would be mapped to the reverse-lookup DNS domain name of "0/14.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa" which would in turn be mapped to the fully-qualified distinguished name of "dc=0/14,dc=2,dc=0,dc=192,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa". 5.2. Query Bootstrapping FIRS clients MUST use the top-down bootstrap model by default for IPv4 address block queries. As such, the search base for default queries would be set to "dc=arpa" rather than being set to the fully-qualified distinguished name of the authoritative partition. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 8] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 FIRS clients MAY use the targeted or bottom-up bootstrap models for queries if necessary or desirable. However, it is not likely that entries will be found for all IPv4 address block resources using these models. As such, the top-down bootstrap model will be the most useful in most cases, and MUST be used by default. 5.3. LDAP Matching FIRS clients MUST use the inetIpv4NetworkMatch extensible matching filter in LDAP searches for IPv4 address block entries. The inetIpv4NetworkMatch filter provides an identifier and search string format which collectively inform a queried server that a specific IPv4 address should be searched for, and that any matching inetIpv4network object class entries should be returned. The inetIpv4NetworkMatch extensibleMatch filter is defined as follows: inetIpv4NetworkMatch ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.8 NAME 'inetIpv4NetworkMatch' SYNTAX inetIpv4NetworkSyntax ) The assertion value MUST be a normalized IPv4 address, using the inetIpv4NetworkSyntax defined in section 3. A FIRS server MUST compare the assertion value against the RDN of all entries in the inetResources container of the partition specified in the search base which have an object class of inetIpv4Network. Any entry with an object class of inetIpv4Network and with a relative distinguished name which clearly encompasses the IPv4 address provided in the assertion value MUST be returned. Entries which do not clearly encompass the queried address MUST NOT be returned. Entries which do not have an object class of inetIpv4Network MUST NOT be returned. In order to ensure that all of the relevant entries are found (including any referrals), the search filters for these resources MUST specify the inetIpv4Network object class along with the search criteria. For example, "(&(objectclass=inetIpv4Network) (1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.8:=192.0.2.0/24))" with a search base of "cn=inetResources,dc=arin,dc=net" would find all of the inetIpv4Network object class entries which were superior to the "192.0.2.0/24" address block in the "dc=arin,dc=net" partition. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 9] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 Note that the entry name of "cn=0.0.0.0/0" encompasses the entire IPv4 address space. When used in conjunction with referrals, this entry MAY be used to redirect all inetIpv4NetworkMatch queries to another partition for subsequent processing. The matching filters defined in this specification MUST be supported by FIRS clients and servers. FIRS servers MAY support additional sub-string filters, soundex filters, or any other filters they wish (these may be required to support generic LDAP clients), although FIRS clients MUST NOT expect any additional filters to be available. 5.4. Example Query The following example assumes that the user has specified "192.0.2.14/32" as the query value: a. Normalize the input, which is "192.0.2.14/32" in this case. b. Determine the authoritative partition. 1. Map the input sequence to the reverse-lookup domain name, which is "14.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa" in this case. 2. Map the domain name to an authoritative partition, which is "dc=14,dc=2,dc=0,dc=192,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa" in this case. By default, queries for IPv4 address blocks use the top-down model, meaning that the right- most relative distinguished name of "dc=arpa" will be used as the authoritative partition. c. Determine the search base for the query, which will be "cn=inetResources,dc=arpa" if the defaults are used. d. Initiate a DNS lookup for the SRV resource records associated with "_ldap._tcp.arpa." For the purpose of this example, assume that this lookup succeeds, with the DNS response message indicating that "firs.iana.org" is the preferred LDAP server. e. Submit an LDAPv3 query to the specified server, using "(&(objectClass=inetIpv4Network) (1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.8:=192.0.2.14/32))" as the matching filter, "cn=inetResources,dc=arpa" as the search base, and the global query defaults defined in [FIRS-CORE]. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 10] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 f. Assume that the queried server returns a continuation reference referral which points to "ldap:///cn=inetResources,dc=arin,dc=net". The distinguished name element of "cn=inetResources,dc=arin,dc=net" will be used as the new search base, while "dc=arin,dc=net" will be used as the new authoritative partition. g. Initiate a DNS lookup for the SRV resource records associated with "_ldap._tcp. arin.net." For the purpose of this example, assume that this lookup succeeds, with the DNS response message indicating that "firs.arin.net" is the preferred LDAP server. h. Submit an LDAPv3 query to the specified server, using "(&(objectClass=inetIpv4Network) (1.3.6.1.4.1.7161.1.2.8:=192.0.2.14/32)" as the matching filter, "cn=inetResources,dc=arin,dc=net" as the search base, and the global query defaults defined in [FIRS-CORE]. i. Assume that no other referrals are received. Display the answer data which has been received and exit the query. 6. Security Considerations Security considerations are discussed in [FIRS-ARCH]. 7. IANA Considerations This specification uses the "dc=arpa" directory partition by default, with the expectation that FIRS-capable LDAP servers will be established, with this partition containing IPv4-specific entries which will provide referrals to the appropriate registrar's partitions. It is further expected that IANA will oversee the creation and management of the ARPA domain's LDAP SRV resource records, the "dc=arpa" LDAP partition, and the necessary LDAP servers. The inetIpv4DelegationStatus attribute uses numeric code values. It is expected that IANA will manage the assignment of these values. Additional IANA considerations are discussed in [FIRS-ARCH]. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 11] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 8. Author's Addresses Eric A. Hall ehall@ehsco.com 9. Normative References [RFC2247] Kille, S., Wahl, M., Grimstad, A., Huber, R., and Sataluri, S. "Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 DNs", RFC 2247, January 1998. [RFC2251] Wahl, M., Howes, T., and Kille, S. "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997. [RFC2252] Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T., and Kille, S. "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute Syntax Definitions", RFC 2252, December 1997. [RFC2254] Howes, T. "The String Representation of LDAP Search Filters", RFC 2254, December 1997. [FIRS-ARCH] Hall, E. "The Federated Internet Registry Service: Architecture and Implementation Guide", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-arch-00, May 2003. [FIRS-ASN] Hall, E. "Defining and Locating Autonomous System Numbers in the Federated Internet Registry Service", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-asn- 00, May 2003. [FIRS-CONTCT] Hall, E. "Defining and Locating Contact Persons in the Federated Internet Registry Service", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-contact-00, May 2003. [FIRS-CORE] Hall, E. "The Federated Internet Registry Service: Core Elements", draft-ietf-crisp- firs-core-00, May 2003. [FIRS-DNS] Hall, E. "Defining and Locating DNS Domains in the Federated Internet Registry Service", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-dns-00, May 2003. [FIRS-DNSRR] Hall, E. "Defining and Locating DNS Resource Records in the Federated Internet Registry Service", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-dnsrr-00, May 2003. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 12] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 [FIRS-IPV4] Hall, E. "Defining and Locating IPv4 Address Blocks in the Federated Internet Registry Service", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00, May 2003. [FIRS-IPV6] Hall, E. "Defining and Locating IPv6 Address Blocks in the Federated Internet Registry Service", draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv6-00, May 2003. 10. Acknowledgments Funding for the RFC editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society. Portions of this document were funded by Verisign Labs. The first version of this specification was co-authored by Andrew Newton of Verisign Labs, and subsequent versions continue to be developed with his active participation. 11. Changes from Previous Versions draft-ietf-crisp-fir-ipv4-00: * Restructured the document set. * "Attribute references" have been eliminated from the specification. All referential attributes now provide actual data instead of URL pointers to data. Clients that wish to retrieve these values will need to start new queries using the data values instead of URLs. * The attribute-specific operational attributes have been eliminated as unnecessary. * The inetIpv4Registrar and inetIpv4Registry attributes were added. * Several attributes had their OIDs changed. NOTE THAT THIS IS AN INTERNET DRAFT, AND THAT THE OIDS ARE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL CHANGES AS THIS DOCUMENT IS EDITED. * Several typographical errors have been fixed. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 13] Internet Draft draft-ietf-crisp-firs-ipv4-00.txt May 2003 * Some unnecessary text has been removed. 12. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Hall I-D Expires: December 2003 [page 14]