TOC 
HTTPbis Working GroupR. Fielding, Ed.
Internet-DraftDay Software
Obsoletes: 2616 (if approved)J. Gettys
Intended status: Standards TrackAlcatel-Lucent
Expires: April 28, 2011J. Mogul
 HP
 H. Frystyk
 Microsoft
 L. Masinter
 Adobe Systems
 P. Leach
 Microsoft
 T. Berners-Lee
 W3C/MIT
 Y. Lafon, Ed.
 W3C
 J. Reschke, Ed.
 greenbytes
 October 25, 2010


HTTP/1.1, part 5: Range Requests and Partial Responses
draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-12

Abstract

The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. HTTP has been in use by the World Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. This document is Part 5 of the seven-part specification that defines the protocol referred to as "HTTP/1.1" and, taken together, obsoletes RFC 2616. Part 5 defines range-specific requests and the rules for constructing and combining responses to those requests.

Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)

Discussion of this draft should take place on the HTTPBIS working group mailing list (ietf-http-wg@w3.org). The current issues list is at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/report/3 and related documents (including fancy diffs) can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/.

The changes in this draft are summarized in Appendix D.13 (Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-11).

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

This Internet-Draft will expire on April 28, 2011.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.



Table of Contents

1.  Introduction
    1.1.  Requirements
    1.2.  Syntax Notation
        1.2.1.  Core Rules
        1.2.2.  ABNF Rules defined in other Parts of the Specification
2.  Range Units
    2.1.  Range Specifier Registry
3.  Status Code Definitions
    3.1.  206 Partial Content
    3.2.  416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable
4.  Combining Ranges
5.  Header Field Definitions
    5.1.  Accept-Ranges
    5.2.  Content-Range
    5.3.  If-Range
    5.4.  Range
        5.4.1.  Byte Ranges
        5.4.2.  Range Retrieval Requests
6.  IANA Considerations
    6.1.  Status Code Registration
    6.2.  Header Field Registration
    6.3.  Range Specifier Registration
7.  Security Considerations
8.  Acknowledgments
9.  References
    9.1.  Normative References
    9.2.  Informative References
Appendix A.  Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges
Appendix B.  Compatibility with Previous Versions
    B.1.  Changes from RFC 2616
Appendix C.  Collected ABNF
Appendix D.  Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)
    D.1.  Since RFC 2616
    D.2.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-00
    D.3.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-01
    D.4.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-02
    D.5.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-03
    D.6.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-04
    D.7.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-05
    D.8.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-06
    D.9.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-07
    D.10.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-08
    D.11.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09
    D.12.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-10
    D.13.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-11
§  Index




 TOC 

1.  Introduction

HTTP clients often encounter interrupted data transfers as a result of cancelled requests or dropped connections. When a cache has stored a partial representation, it is desirable to request the remainder of that representation in a subsequent request rather than transfer the entire representation. There are also a number of Web applications that benefit from being able to request only a subset of a larger representation, such as a single page of a very large document or only part of an image to be rendered by a device with limited local storage.

This document defines HTTP/1.1 range requests, partial responses, and the multipart/byteranges media type. The protocol for range requests is an OPTIONAL feature of HTTP, designed so resources or recipients that do not implement this feature can respond as if it is a normal GET request without impacting interoperability. Partial responses are indicated by a distinct status code to not be mistaken for full responses by intermediate caches that might not implement the feature.

Although the HTTP range request mechanism is designed to allow for extensible range types, this specification only defines requests for byte ranges.



 TOC 

1.1.  Requirements

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).

An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the "MUST" or "REQUIRED" level requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation that satisfies all the "MUST" or "REQUIRED" level and all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its protocols is said to be "unconditionally compliant"; one that satisfies all the "MUST" level requirements but not all the "SHOULD" level requirements for its protocols is said to be "conditionally compliant".



 TOC 

1.2.  Syntax Notation

This specification uses the ABNF syntax defined in Section 1.2 of [Part1] (Fielding, R., Ed., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., Berners-Lee, T., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing,” October 2010.) (which extends the syntax defined in [RFC5234] (Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” January 2008.) with a list rule). Appendix C (Collected ABNF) shows the collected ABNF, with the list rule expanded.

The following core rules are included by reference, as defined in [RFC5234] (Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” January 2008.), Appendix B.1: ALPHA (letters), CR (carriage return), CRLF (CR LF), CTL (controls), DIGIT (decimal 0-9), DQUOTE (double quote), HEXDIG (hexadecimal 0-9/A-F/a-f), LF (line feed), OCTET (any 8-bit sequence of data), SP (space), VCHAR (any visible USASCII character), and WSP (whitespace).



 TOC 

1.2.1.  Core Rules

The core rules below are defined in Section 1.2.2 of [Part1] (Fielding, R., Ed., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., Berners-Lee, T., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing,” October 2010.):

  token      = <token, defined in [Part1], Section 1.2.2>
  OWS        = <OWS, defined in [Part1], Section 1.2.2>


 TOC 

1.2.2.  ABNF Rules defined in other Parts of the Specification

The ABNF rules below are defined in other parts:

  HTTP-date  = <HTTP-date, defined in [Part1], Section 6.1>
  entity-tag = <entity-tag, defined in [Part4], Section 2>


 TOC 

2.  Range Units

HTTP/1.1 allows a client to request that only part (a range of) the representation be included within the response. HTTP/1.1 uses range units in the Range (Section 5.4 (Range)) and Content-Range (Section 5.2 (Content-Range)) header fields. A representation can be broken down into subranges according to various structural units.

  range-unit       = bytes-unit / other-range-unit
  bytes-unit       = "bytes"
  other-range-unit = token

HTTP/1.1 has been designed to allow implementations of applications that do not depend on knowledge of ranges. The only range unit defined by HTTP/1.1 is "bytes". Additional specifiers can be defined as described in Section 2.1 (Range Specifier Registry).

If a range unit is not understood in a request, a server MUST ignore the whole Range header field (Section 5.4 (Range)). If a range unit is not understood in a response, an intermediary SHOULD pass the response to the client; a client MUST fail.



 TOC 

2.1.  Range Specifier Registry

The HTTP Ranger Specifier Registry defines the name space for the range specifier names.

Registrations MUST include the following fields:

Values to be added to this name space are subject to IETF review ([RFC5226] (Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” May 2008.), Section 4.1).

The registry itself is maintained at http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-range-specifiers.



 TOC 

3.  Status Code Definitions



 TOC 

3.1.  206 Partial Content

The server has fulfilled the partial GET request for the resource. The request MUST have included a Range header field (Section 5.4 (Range)) indicating the desired range, and MAY have included an If-Range header field (Section 5.3 (If-Range)) to make the request conditional.

The response MUST include the following header fields:

If the 206 response is the result of an If-Range request, the response SHOULD NOT include other representation header fields. Otherwise, the response MUST include all of the representation header fields that would have been returned with a 200 (OK) response to the same request.

A cache MUST NOT combine a 206 response with other previously cached content if the ETag or Last-Modified header fields do not match exactly, see Section 4 (Combining Ranges).

A cache that does not support the Range and Content-Range header fields MUST NOT cache 206 (Partial Content) responses. Furthermore, if a response uses a range unit that is not understood by the cache, then it MUST NOT be cached either.



 TOC 

3.2.  416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable

A server SHOULD return a response with this status code if a request included a Range request-header field (Section 5.4 (Range)), and none of the ranges-specifier values in this field overlap the current extent of the selected resource, and the request did not include an If-Range request-header field (Section 5.3 (If-Range)). (For byte-ranges, this means that the first-byte-pos of all of the byte-range-spec values were greater than the current length of the selected resource.)

When this status code is returned for a byte-range request, the response SHOULD include a Content-Range header field specifying the current length of the representation (see Section 5.2 (Content-Range)). This response MUST NOT use the multipart/byteranges content-type.



 TOC 

4.  Combining Ranges

A response might transfer only a subrange of a representation, either because the request included one or more Range specifications, or because a connection closed prematurely. After several such transfers, a cache might have received several ranges of the same representation.

If a cache has a stored non-empty set of subranges for a representation, and an incoming response transfers another subrange, the cache MAY combine the new subrange with the existing set if both the following conditions are met:

If either requirement is not met, the cache MUST use only the most recent partial response (based on the Date values transmitted with every response, and using the incoming response if these values are equal or missing), and MUST discard the other partial information.



 TOC 

5.  Header Field Definitions

This section defines the syntax and semantics of HTTP/1.1 header fields related to range requests and partial responses.



 TOC 

5.1.  Accept-Ranges

The "Accept-Ranges" response-header field allows a resource to indicate its acceptance of range requests.

  Accept-Ranges     = "Accept-Ranges" ":" OWS Accept-Ranges-v
  Accept-Ranges-v   = acceptable-ranges
  acceptable-ranges = 1#range-unit / "none"

Origin servers that accept byte-range requests MAY send

  Accept-Ranges: bytes

but are not required to do so. Clients MAY generate range requests without having received this header field for the resource involved. Range units are defined in Section 2 (Range Units).

Servers that do not accept any kind of range request for a resource MAY send

  Accept-Ranges: none

to advise the client not to attempt a range request.



 TOC 

5.2.  Content-Range

The "Content-Range" header field is sent with a partial representation to specify where in the full representation the payload body is intended to be applied.

Range units are defined in Section 2 (Range Units).

  Content-Range = "Content-Range" ":" OWS Content-Range-v
  Content-Range-v = content-range-spec

  content-range-spec      = byte-content-range-spec
                          / other-content-range-spec
  byte-content-range-spec = bytes-unit SP
                            byte-range-resp-spec "/"
                            ( instance-length / "*" )

  byte-range-resp-spec    = (first-byte-pos "-" last-byte-pos)
                          / "*"

  instance-length         = 1*DIGIT

  other-content-range-spec = other-range-unit SP
                             other-range-resp-spec
  other-range-resp-spec    = *CHAR

The header field SHOULD indicate the total length of the full representation, unless this length is unknown or difficult to determine. The asterisk "*" character means that the instance-length is unknown at the time when the response was generated.

Unlike byte-ranges-specifier values (see Section 5.4.1 (Byte Ranges)), a byte-range-resp-spec MUST only specify one range, and MUST contain absolute byte positions for both the first and last byte of the range.

A byte-content-range-spec with a byte-range-resp-spec whose last-byte-pos value is less than its first-byte-pos value, or whose instance-length value is less than or equal to its last-byte-pos value, is invalid. The recipient of an invalid byte-content-range-spec MUST ignore it and any content transferred along with it.

In the case of a byte range request: A server sending a response with status code 416 (Requested range not satisfiable) SHOULD include a Content-Range field with a byte-range-resp-spec of "*". The instance-length specifies the current length of the selected resource. A response with status code 206 (Partial Content) MUST NOT include a Content-Range field with a byte-range-resp-spec of "*".

Examples of byte-content-range-spec values, assuming that the representation contains a total of 1234 bytes:

When an HTTP message includes the content of a single range (for example, a response to a request for a single range, or to a request for a set of ranges that overlap without any holes), this content is transmitted with a Content-Range header field, and a Content-Length header field showing the number of bytes actually transferred. For example,

  HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
  Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 06:25:24 GMT
  Last-Modified: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:58:08 GMT
  Content-Range: bytes 21010-47021/47022
  Content-Length: 26012
  Content-Type: image/gif

When an HTTP message includes the content of multiple ranges (for example, a response to a request for multiple non-overlapping ranges), these are transmitted as a multipart message. The multipart media type used for this purpose is "multipart/byteranges" as defined in Appendix A (Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges).

A response to a request for a single range MUST NOT be sent using the multipart/byteranges media type. A response to a request for multiple ranges, whose result is a single range, MAY be sent as a multipart/byteranges media type with one part. A client that cannot decode a multipart/byteranges message MUST NOT ask for multiple ranges in a single request.

When a client requests multiple ranges in one request, the server SHOULD return them in the order that they appeared in the request.

If the server ignores a byte-range-spec because it is syntactically invalid, the server SHOULD treat the request as if the invalid Range header field did not exist. (Normally, this means return a 200 response containing the full representation).

If the server receives a request (other than one including an If-Range request-header field) with an unsatisfiable Range request-header field (that is, all of whose byte-range-spec values have a first-byte-pos value greater than the current length of the selected resource), it SHOULD return a response code of 416 (Requested range not satisfiable) (Section 3.2 (416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable)).

Note: Clients cannot depend on servers to send a 416 (Requested range not satisfiable) response instead of a 200 (OK) response for an unsatisfiable Range request-header field, since not all servers implement this request-header field.



 TOC 

5.3.  If-Range

If a client has a partial copy of a representation in its cache, and wishes to have an up-to-date copy of the entire representation in its cache, it could use the Range request-header field with a conditional GET (using either or both of If-Unmodified-Since and If-Match.) However, if the condition fails because the representation has been modified, the client would then have to make a second request to obtain the entire current representation.

The "If-Range" request-header field allows a client to "short-circuit" the second request. Informally, its meaning is "if the representation is unchanged, send me the part(s) that I am missing; otherwise, send me the entire new representation".

  If-Range   = "If-Range" ":" OWS If-Range-v
  If-Range-v = entity-tag / HTTP-date

If the client has no entity-tag for a representation, but does have a Last-Modified date, it MAY use that date in an If-Range header field. (The server can distinguish between a valid HTTP-date and any form of entity-tag by examining no more than two characters.) The If-Range header field SHOULD only be used together with a Range header field, and MUST be ignored if the request does not include a Range header field, or if the server does not support the sub-range operation.

If the entity-tag given in the If-Range header field matches the current cache validator for the representation, then the server SHOULD provide the specified sub-range of the representation using a 206 (Partial Content) response. If the cache validator does not match, then the server SHOULD return the entire representation using a 200 (OK) response.



 TOC 

5.4.  Range



 TOC 

5.4.1.  Byte Ranges

Since all HTTP representations are transferred as sequences of bytes, the concept of a byte range is meaningful for any HTTP representation. (However, not all clients and servers need to support byte-range operations.)

Byte range specifications in HTTP apply to the sequence of bytes in the representation body (not necessarily the same as the message-body).

A byte range operation MAY specify a single range of bytes, or a set of ranges within a single representation.

  byte-ranges-specifier = bytes-unit "=" byte-range-set
  byte-range-set  = 1#( byte-range-spec / suffix-byte-range-spec )
  byte-range-spec = first-byte-pos "-" [ last-byte-pos ]
  first-byte-pos  = 1*DIGIT
  last-byte-pos   = 1*DIGIT

The first-byte-pos value in a byte-range-spec gives the byte-offset of the first byte in a range. The last-byte-pos value gives the byte-offset of the last byte in the range; that is, the byte positions specified are inclusive. Byte offsets start at zero.

If the last-byte-pos value is present, it MUST be greater than or equal to the first-byte-pos in that byte-range-spec, or the byte-range-spec is syntactically invalid. The recipient of a byte-range-set that includes one or more syntactically invalid byte-range-spec values MUST ignore the header field that includes that byte-range-set.

If the last-byte-pos value is absent, or if the value is greater than or equal to the current length of the representation body, last-byte-pos is taken to be equal to one less than the current length of the representation in bytes.

By its choice of last-byte-pos, a client can limit the number of bytes retrieved without knowing the size of the representation.

  suffix-byte-range-spec = "-" suffix-length
  suffix-length = 1*DIGIT

A suffix-byte-range-spec is used to specify the suffix of the representation body, of a length given by the suffix-length value. (That is, this form specifies the last N bytes of a representation.) If the representation is shorter than the specified suffix-length, the entire representation is used.

If a syntactically valid byte-range-set includes at least one byte-range-spec whose first-byte-pos is less than the current length of the representation, or at least one suffix-byte-range-spec with a non-zero suffix-length, then the byte-range-set is satisfiable. Otherwise, the byte-range-set is unsatisfiable. If the byte-range-set is unsatisfiable, the server SHOULD return a response with a 416 (Requested range not satisfiable) status code. Otherwise, the server SHOULD return a response with a 206 (Partial Content) status code containing the satisfiable ranges of the representation.

Examples of byte-ranges-specifier values (assuming a representation of length 10000):



 TOC 

5.4.2.  Range Retrieval Requests

The "Range" request-header field defines the GET method (conditional or not) to request one or more sub-ranges of the response representation body, instead of the entire representation body.

  Range   = "Range" ":" OWS Range-v
  Range-v = byte-ranges-specifier
          / other-ranges-specifier
  other-ranges-specifier = other-range-unit "=" other-range-set
  other-range-set = 1*CHAR

A server MAY ignore the Range header field. However, HTTP/1.1 origin servers and intermediate caches ought to support byte ranges when possible, since Range supports efficient recovery from partially failed transfers, and supports efficient partial retrieval of large representations.

If the server supports the Range header field and the specified range or ranges are appropriate for the representation:

In some cases, it might be more appropriate to use the If-Range header field (see Section 5.3 (If-Range)) in addition to the Range header field.

If a proxy that supports ranges receives a Range request, forwards the request to an inbound server, and receives an entire representation in reply, it MAY only return the requested range to its client.



 TOC 

6.  IANA Considerations



 TOC 

6.1.  Status Code Registration

The HTTP Status Code Registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes shall be updated with the registrations below:



ValueDescriptionReference
206 Partial Content Section 3.1 (206 Partial Content)
416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable Section 3.2 (416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable)



 TOC 

6.2.  Header Field Registration

The Message Header Field Registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-header-index.html shall be updated with the permanent registrations below (see [RFC3864] (Klyne, G., Nottingham, M., and J. Mogul, “Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields,” September 2004.)):



Header Field NameProtocolStatusReference
Accept-Ranges http standard Section 5.1 (Accept-Ranges)
Content-Range http standard Section 5.2 (Content-Range)
If-Range http standard Section 5.3 (If-Range)
Range http standard Section 5.4 (Range)

The change controller is: "IETF (iesg@ietf.org) - Internet Engineering Task Force".



 TOC 

6.3.  Range Specifier Registration

The registration procedure for HTTP Range Specifiers is defined by Section 2.1 (Range Specifier Registry) of this document.

The HTTP Range Specifier Registry shall be created at http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-range-specifiers and be populated with the registrations below:



Range Specifier NameDescriptionReference
bytes a range of octets (this specification)

The change controller is: "IETF (iesg@ietf.org) - Internet Engineering Task Force".



 TOC 

7.  Security Considerations

No additional security considerations have been identified beyond those applicable to HTTP in general [Part1] (Fielding, R., Ed., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., Berners-Lee, T., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing,” October 2010.).



 TOC 

8.  Acknowledgments

Most of the specification of ranges is based on work originally done by Ari Luotonen and John Franks, with additional input from Steve Zilles, Daniel W. Connolly, Roy T. Fielding, Jim Gettys, Martin Hamilton, Koen Holtman, Shel Kaplan, Paul Leach, Alex Lopez-Ortiz, Larry Masinter, Jeff Mogul, Lou Montulli, David W. Morris, Luigi Rizzo, and Bill Weihl.



 TOC 

9.  References



 TOC 

9.1. Normative References

[Part1] Fielding, R., Ed., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., Berners-Lee, T., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “HTTP/1.1, part 1: URIs, Connections, and Message Parsing,” draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-12 (work in progress), October 2010.
[Part4] Fielding, R., Ed., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., Berners-Lee, T., Lafon, Y., Ed., and J. Reschke, Ed., “HTTP/1.1, part 4: Conditional Requests,” draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-12 (work in progress), October 2010.
[RFC2046] Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types,” RFC 2046, November 1996.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.


 TOC 

9.2. Informative References

[RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1,” RFC 2616, June 1999.
[RFC3864] Klyne, G., Nottingham, M., and J. Mogul, “Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields,” BCP 90, RFC 3864, September 2004.
[RFC4288] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, “Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures,” BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, “Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs,” BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008.


 TOC 

Appendix A.  Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges

When an HTTP 206 (Partial Content) response message includes the content of multiple ranges (a response to a request for multiple non-overlapping ranges), these are transmitted as a multipart message-body ([RFC2046] (Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types,” November 1996.), Section 5.1). The media type for this purpose is called "multipart/byteranges". The following is to be registered with IANA [RFC4288] (Freed, N. and J. Klensin, “Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures,” December 2005.).

Note: Despite the name "multipart/byteranges" is not limited to the byte ranges only.

The multipart/byteranges media type includes one or more parts, each with its own Content-Type and Content-Range fields. The required boundary parameter specifies the boundary string used to separate each body-part.

Type name:
multipart
Subtype name:
byteranges
Required parameters:
boundary
Optional parameters:
none
Encoding considerations:
only "7bit", "8bit", or "binary" are permitted
Security considerations:
none
Interoperability considerations:
none
Published specification:
This specification (see Appendix A (Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges)).
Applications that use this media type:
Additional information:
Magic number(s):
none
File extension(s):
none
Macintosh file type code(s):
none
Person and email address to contact for further information:
See Authors Section.
Intended usage:
COMMON
Restrictions on usage:
none
Author/Change controller:
IESG

For example:

  HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
  Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 06:25:24 GMT
  Last-Modified: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:58:08 GMT
  Content-type: multipart/byteranges; boundary=THIS_STRING_SEPARATES

  --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
  Content-type: application/pdf
  Content-range: bytes 500-999/8000

  ...the first range...
  --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
  Content-type: application/pdf
  Content-range: bytes 7000-7999/8000

  ...the second range
  --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES--

Other example:

  HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
  Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 06:25:24 GMT
  Last-Modified: Tue, 14 July 04:58:08 GMT
  Content-type: multipart/byteranges; boundary=THIS_STRING_SEPARATES

  --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
  Content-type: video/example
  Content-range: exampleunit 1.2-4.3/25

  ...the first range...
  --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES
  Content-type: video/example
  Content-range: exampleunit 11.2-14.3/25

  ...the second range
  --THIS_STRING_SEPARATES--

Notes:

  1. Additional CRLFs MAY precede the first boundary string in the body.
  2. Although [RFC2046] (Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, “Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types,” November 1996.) permits the boundary string to be quoted, some existing implementations handle a quoted boundary string incorrectly.
  3. A number of browsers and servers were coded to an early draft of the byteranges specification to use a media type of multipart/x-byteranges, which is almost, but not quite compatible with the version documented in HTTP/1.1.



 TOC 

Appendix B.  Compatibility with Previous Versions



 TOC 

B.1.  Changes from RFC 2616

Clarify that it is not ok to use a weak cache validator in a 206 response. (Section 3.1 (206 Partial Content))

Clarify that multipart/byteranges can consist of a single part. (Appendix A (Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges))



 TOC 

Appendix C.  Collected ABNF

Accept-Ranges = "Accept-Ranges:" OWS Accept-Ranges-v
Accept-Ranges-v = acceptable-ranges

Content-Range = "Content-Range:" OWS Content-Range-v
Content-Range-v = content-range-spec

HTTP-date = <HTTP-date, defined in [Part1], Section 6.1>

If-Range = "If-Range:" OWS If-Range-v
If-Range-v = entity-tag / HTTP-date

OWS = <OWS, defined in [Part1], Section 1.2.2>

Range = "Range:" OWS Range-v
Range-v = byte-ranges-specifier / other-ranges-specifier

acceptable-ranges = ( *( "," OWS ) range-unit *( OWS "," [ OWS
 range-unit ] ) ) / "none"

byte-content-range-spec = bytes-unit SP byte-range-resp-spec "/" (
 instance-length / "*" )
byte-range-resp-spec = ( first-byte-pos "-" last-byte-pos ) / "*"
byte-range-set = ( *( "," OWS ) byte-range-spec ) / (
 suffix-byte-range-spec *( OWS "," [ ( OWS byte-range-spec ) /
 suffix-byte-range-spec ] ) )
byte-range-spec = first-byte-pos "-" [ last-byte-pos ]
byte-ranges-specifier = bytes-unit "=" byte-range-set
bytes-unit = "bytes"

content-range-spec = byte-content-range-spec /
 other-content-range-spec

entity-tag = <entity-tag, defined in [Part4], Section 2>

first-byte-pos = 1*DIGIT

instance-length = 1*DIGIT

last-byte-pos = 1*DIGIT

other-content-range-spec = other-range-unit SP other-range-resp-spec
other-range-resp-spec = *CHAR
other-range-set = 1*CHAR
other-range-unit = token
other-ranges-specifier = other-range-unit "=" other-range-set

range-unit = bytes-unit / other-range-unit

suffix-byte-range-spec = "-" suffix-length
suffix-length = 1*DIGIT

token = <token, defined in [Part1], Section 1.2.2>

ABNF diagnostics:

; Accept-Ranges defined but not used
; Content-Range defined but not used
; If-Range defined but not used
; Range defined but not used


 TOC 

Appendix D.  Change Log (to be removed by RFC Editor before publication)



 TOC 

D.1.  Since RFC 2616

Extracted relevant partitions from [RFC2616] (Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1,” June 1999.).



 TOC 

D.2.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-00

Closed issues:



 TOC 

D.3.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-01

Closed issues:

Ongoing work on ABNF conversion (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36):



 TOC 

D.4.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-02

Ongoing work on IANA Message Header Field Registration (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/40):



 TOC 

D.5.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-03



 TOC 

D.6.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-04

Closed issues:

Ongoing work on ABNF conversion (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36):



 TOC 

D.7.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-05

Closed issues:

Ongoing work on Custom Ranges (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/85):

Final work on ABNF conversion (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/36):



 TOC 

D.8.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-06

Closed issues:



 TOC 

D.9.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-07

Closed issues:



 TOC 

D.10.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-08

No significant changes.



 TOC 

D.11.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09

No significant changes.



 TOC 

D.12.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-10

Closed issues:

Ongoing work on Custom Ranges (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/85):



 TOC 

D.13.  Since draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-11

Closed issues:



 TOC 

Index

2 
 206 Partial Content (status code)
4 
 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable (status code)
A 
 Accept-Ranges header
C 
 Content-Range header
G 
 Grammar
   Accept-Ranges
   Accept-Ranges-v
   acceptable-ranges
   byte-content-range-spec
   byte-range-resp-spec
   byte-range-set
   byte-range-spec
   byte-ranges-specifier
   bytes-unit
   Content-Range
   content-range-spec
   Content-Range-v
   first-byte-pos
   If-Range
   If-Range-v
   instance-length
   last-byte-pos
   other-range-unit
   Range
   range-unit
   ranges-specifier
   suffix-byte-range-spec
   suffix-length
H 
 Headers
   Accept-Ranges
   Content-Range
   If-Range
   Range
I 
 If-Range header
M 
 Media Type
   multipart/byteranges
   multipart/x-byteranges
 multipart/byteranges Media Type
 multipart/x-byteranges Media Type
R 
 Range header
S 
 Status Codes
   206 Partial Content
   416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable


 TOC 

Authors' Addresses

  Roy T. Fielding (editor)
  Day Software
  23 Corporate Plaza DR, Suite 280
  Newport Beach, CA 92660
  USA
Phone:  +1-949-706-5300
Fax:  +1-949-706-5305
EMail:  fielding@gbiv.com
URI:  http://roy.gbiv.com/
  
  Jim Gettys
  Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs
  21 Oak Knoll Road
  Carlisle, MA 01741
  USA
EMail:  jg@freedesktop.org
URI:  http://gettys.wordpress.com/
  
  Jeffrey C. Mogul
  Hewlett-Packard Company
  HP Labs, Large Scale Systems Group
  1501 Page Mill Road, MS 1177
  Palo Alto, CA 94304
  USA
EMail:  JeffMogul@acm.org
  
  Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
  Microsoft Corporation
  1 Microsoft Way
  Redmond, WA 98052
  USA
EMail:  henrikn@microsoft.com
  
  Larry Masinter
  Adobe Systems, Incorporated
  345 Park Ave
  San Jose, CA 95110
  USA
EMail:  LMM@acm.org
URI:  http://larry.masinter.net/
  
  Paul J. Leach
  Microsoft Corporation
  1 Microsoft Way
  Redmond, WA 98052
EMail:  paulle@microsoft.com
  
  Tim Berners-Lee
  World Wide Web Consortium
  MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
  The Stata Center, Building 32
  32 Vassar Street
  Cambridge, MA 02139
  USA
EMail:  timbl@w3.org
URI:  http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/
  
  Yves Lafon (editor)
  World Wide Web Consortium
  W3C / ERCIM
  2004, rte des Lucioles
  Sophia-Antipolis, AM 06902
  France
EMail:  ylafon@w3.org
URI:  http://www.raubacapeu.net/people/yves/
  
  Julian F. Reschke (editor)
  greenbytes GmbH
  Hafenweg 16
  Muenster, NW 48155
  Germany
Phone:  +49 251 2807760
Fax:  +49 251 2807761
EMail:  julian.reschke@greenbytes.de
URI:  http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/