BGP Link-State Information Distribution Implementation Report

In order to share network link-state and traffic engineering information collected with external components using the BGP routing protocol a new BGP Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) encoding format is required. This document provides an implementation report for the BGP Link-State Information Distribution NLRI Format as defined in . The scope of the interoperability test is sucessful encoding and decoding of BGP-LS advertisements. No application specific logic has been verified. The editors did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by respondents or by any alternative means. The respondents are experts with the implementations they reported on, and their responses are considered authoritative for the implementations for which their responses represent. Respondents were asked to only use the YES answer if the feature had at least been tested in the lab.

Contact and implementation information for person filling out this form: Name: Manish Bhardwaj Email:manbhard@cisco.com Vendor: Cisco Systems, Inc. Release: IOS-XR Protocol Role: Sender, Receiver, Originator Name: Balaji Rajagopalan Email: balajir@juniper.net Vendor: Juniper Networks, Inc. Release: JUNOS Protocol Role: Sender, Receiver, Originator Name: Dana Kutenicsova Email: dkutenic@cisco.com Vendor: OpenDaylight Project, Inc. Release: ODL Hydrogen Protocol Role: Receiver

Does the implementation support the Network Layer Reachability (NLRI) subtypes as described in Section 3.2 of ? Node NLRI Link NLRI IPv4 Topology Prefix NLRI IPv6 Topology Prefix NLRI IOS-XR JUNOS ODL Rcv.N1 YES YES YES Snd.N1 YES YES NO Org.N1 YES YES NO Rcv.N2 YES YES YES Snd.N2 YES YES NO Org.N2 YES YES NO Rcv.N3 YES YES YES Snd.N3 YES YES NO Org.N3 YES NO NO Rcv.N4 YES YES YES Snd.N4 YES YES NO Org.N4 YES NO NO

Does the implementation support the TLVs described in Section 7 of ? Local Node Descriptor Remote Node Descriptor Link Local/Remote Identifier IPv4 Interface address IPv4 Neighbor address IPv6 Interface address IPv6 Neighbor address Multi-Topology IDs Autonomous System BGP-LS Identifier Area ID IGP Router ID IPv4 router-ID of Local Node IPv6 router-ID of Local Node IPv4 router-ID of Remote Node IPv6 router-ID of Remote Node Administrative group (color) Maximum link bandwidth Maximum reservable link bandwidth Unreserved link bandwidth TE default Metric Link Protection Type MPLS Protocol Mask IGP Metric Shared Risk Link Group Opaque Link attribute Link name attribute IOS-XR JUNOS ODL Rcv.TLV 256 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 256 YES YES NO Org.TLV 256 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 257 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 257 YES YES NO Org.TLV 257 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 258 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 258 YES YES NO Org.TLV 258 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 259 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 259 YES YES NO Org.TLV 259 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 260 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 260 YES YES NO Org.TLV 260 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 261 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 261 YES YES NO Org.TLV 261 NO NO NO Rcv.TLV 262 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 262 YES YES NO Org.TLV 262 NO NO NO Rcv.TLV 263 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 263 YES YES NO Org.TLV 263 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 512 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 512 YES YES NO Org.TLV 512 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 513 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 513 YES YES NO Org.TLV 513 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 514 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 514 YES YES NO Org.TLV 514 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 515 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 515 YES YES NO Org.TLV 515 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1028 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1028 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1028 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1029 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1029 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1029 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1030 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1030 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1030 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1031 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1031 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1031 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1088 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1088 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1088 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1089 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1089 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1089 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1090 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1090 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1090 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1091 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1091 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1091 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1092 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1092 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1092 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1093 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1093 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1093 NO NO NO Rcv.TLV 1094 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1094 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1094 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1095 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1095 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1095 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1096 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1096 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1096 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1097 YES YES NO Snd.TLV 1097 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1097 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1098 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1098 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1098 NO NO NO

Does the implementation support the TLVs described in Section 7 of ? Local Node Descriptor Multi-Topology IDs Autonomous System BGP-LS Identifier Area ID IGP Router ID Node flag bits Opaque Node properties Node name IS-IS Area Identifier IPv4 router-ID of Local Node IPv6 router-ID of Local Node IOS-XR JUNOS ODL Rcv.TLV 256 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 256 YES YES NO Org.TLV 256 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 263 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 263 YES YES NO Org.TLV 263 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 512 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 512 YES YES NO Org.TLV 512 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 513 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 513 YES YES NO Org.TLV 513 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 514 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 514 YES YES NO Org.TLV 514 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 515 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 515 YES YES NO Org.TLV 515 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1024 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1024 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1024 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1025 YES YES NO Snd.TLV 1025 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1025 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1026 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1026 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1026 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1027 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1027 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1027 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1028 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1028 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1028 YES YES NO Rcv.TLV 1029 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1029 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1029 YES NO NO

Does the implementation support the TLVs described in Section 7 of ? Local Node Descriptor Multi-Topology IDs OSPF route type IP Reachability information IGP Flags Route Tag Extended Tag Prefix Metric OSPF Forwarding Address Opaque Prefix Atrribute IOS-XR JUNOS ODL Rcv.TLV 256 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 256 YES YES NO Org.TLV 256 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 263 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 263 YES YES NO Org.TLV 263 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 264 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 264 YES YES NO Org.TLV 264 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 265 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 265 YES YES NO Org.TLV 265 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1152 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1152 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1152 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1153 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1153 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1153 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1154 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1154 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1154 NO NO NO Rcv.TLV 1155 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1155 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1155 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1156 YES YES YES Snd.TLV 1156 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1156 YES NO NO Rcv.TLV 1157 YES YES NO Snd.TLV 1157 YES YES NO Org.TLV 1157 YES NO NO

List other implementations that you have tested interoperability of BGP-LS Protocol Implementation.

Cisco: The Cisco Systems, Inc. IOS-XR implementation should be interoperable with other vendor BGP-LS Protocol implementations. In particular, we have tested our interoperability with Juniper's JUNOS implementation.

Juniper: The Juniper Networks, Inc. JUNOS implementation should be interoperable with other vendor BGP-LS Protocol implementations. In particular, we have tested our interoperability with the Cisco Systems, Inc. IOS-XR implementation and the Opendaylight implementation.

Opendaylight: The Opendaylight implementation should be interoperable with other vendor BGP-LS Protocol implementations. In particular, we have tested our interoperability with Juniper's JUNOS implementation and the Cisco Systems, Inc. IOS-XR implementation. BGP receiver is implemented in the OpenDaylight Hydrogen release. BGP sender functionality is planned in the upcoming Helium release.

This document makes no request of IANA. Note to RFC Editor: The IANA has requested that this section remain in the document upon publication as an RFC. This note to the RFC Editor, however, may be removed.

No new security issues are introduced by the BGP Link-State Information Distribution Protocol defined in .

The authors would like to thank Stefano Previdi and Jan Medved for their contributions to this document.