<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY rfcs PUBLIC '' 'blah'>
<!ENTITY I-D.ietf-isms-tmsm SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-isms-tmsm.xml">
<!ENTITY I-D.seggelmann-tls-dtls-heartbeat SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.seggelmann-tls-dtls-heartbeat.xml">
]>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc toc="yes" ?>
<?rfc tocdepth="4" ?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<rfc category="std" ipr="pre5378Trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-FILLVERSION.txt">
    <front>
    <title abbrev="TLS Transport Model for SNMP">
      Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for SNMP
    </title>
    <author initials="W.H." surname="Hardaker" fullname="Wes Hardaker">
      <organization>Sparta, Inc.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>P.O. Box 382</street>
          <city>Davis</city>
          <region>CA</region>
          <code>95617</code>
          <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <phone>+1 530 792 1913</phone>
        <email>ietf@hardakers.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date month="FILLMONTH" year="FILLYEAR"/>
    <area>Security</area>
    <workgroup>ISMS</workgroup>
    <keyword>Network Management</keyword>
    <keyword>Management Information Base</keyword>
    <keyword>MIB</keyword>
    <keyword>SMIv2</keyword>
    <keyword>TLS</keyword>
    <keyword>DTLS</keyword>
    <keyword>SNMP</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t>
	This document describes a Transport Model for the Simple
	Network Management Protocol (SNMP), that uses either the
	Transport Layer Security protocol or the Datagram Transport
	Layer Security (DTLS) protocol.  The TLS and DTLS protocols
	provide authentication and privacy services for SNMP
	applications.  This document describes how the TLS Transport
	Model (TLSTM) implements the needed features of a SNMP
	Transport Subsystem to make this protection possible in an
	interoperable way.
      </t>
      <t>
	This transport model is designed to meet the security and
	operational needs of network administrators.  It supports
	sending of SNMP messages over TLS/TCP and DTLS/UDP.  The TLS
	mode can make use of TCP's improved support for larger packet
	sizes and the DTLS mode provides potentially superior
	operation in environments where a connectionless (e.g. UDP)
	transport is preferred.  Both TLS and DTLS integrate well into
	existing public keying infrastructures.
      </t>
      <t>
	This document also defines a portion of the Management
	Information Base (MIB) for use with network management
	protocols.  In particular it defines objects for managing the
	TLS Transport Model for SNMP.
      </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction">
      <t>
	<!-- Begin text copied from 5591 -->
	It is important to understand the modular SNMPv3 architecture
	as defined by <xref target="RFC3411" /> and enhanced by the
	Transport Subsystem <xref target="RFC5590" />.
	<!-- End text copied from 5591 -->
	It is also important to understand the terminology of the
	SNMPv3 architecture in order to understand where the Transport
	Model described in this document fits into the architecture
	and how it interacts with the other architecture subsystems.
	<!-- Begin Network Management Boiler Text -->
	For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the
	current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer
	to Section 7 of <xref target="RFC3410" />.
	<!-- End Network Management Boiler Text -->
      </t>
      <t>
	This document describes a Transport Model that makes use of
	the Transport Layer Security (TLS) <xref target="RFC5246" />
	and the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol
	<xref target="RFC4347" />, within a transport subsystem <xref
	target="RFC5590" />.  DTLS is the datagram variant of the
	Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol <xref target="RFC5246"
	/>.  The Transport Model in this document is referred to as
	the Transport Layer Security Transport Model (TLSTM).  TLS and
	DTLS take advantage of the X.509 public keying infrastructure
	<xref target="RFC5280" />.  While (D)TLS supports multiple
	authentication mechanisms, this document only discusses X.509
	certificate based authentication.  Although other forms of
	authentication are possible they are outside the scope of this
	specification.  This transport model is designed to meet the
	security and operational needs of network administrators,
	operating in both environments where a connectionless
	(e.g. UDP) transport is preferred and in environments where
	large quantities of data need to be sent (e.g. over a TCP
	based stream).  Both TLS and DTLS integrate well into existing
	public keying infrastructures.  This document supports sending
	of SNMP messages over TLS/TCP and DTLS/UDP.
      </t>
      <t>
	This document also defines a portion of the Management
	Information Base (MIB) for use with network management
	protocols.  In particular it defines objects for managing the
	TLS Transport Model for SNMP.
      </t>
      <t>
	Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store,
	termed the Management Information Base or MIB.  MIB objects
	are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management
	Protocol (SNMP).  Objects in the MIB are defined using the
	mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information
	(SMI).  This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to
	the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58: <xref
	target="RFC2578"/>, <xref target="RFC2579"/> and <xref
	target="RFC2580"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
	The diagram shown below gives a conceptual overview of two
	SNMP entities communicating using the TLS Transport Model
	(shown as "TLS TM").  One entity contains a command
	responder and notification originator application, and the
	other a command generator and notification responder
	application.  It should be understood that this particular mix
	of application types is an example only and other combinations
	are equally valid.  Note: this diagram shows the Transport
	Security Model (TSM) being used as the security model which is
	defined in <xref target="RFC5591" />.
      </t>
      <t>
	<figure>
	  <artwork>
 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                              Network                                |
 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
     ^                     |            ^               |
     |Notifications        |Commands    |Commands       |Notifications
 +---|---------------------|-------+ +--|---------------|--------------+
 |   |                     V       | |  |               V              |
 | +------------+  +------------+  | | +-----------+   +----------+    |
 | |  (D)TLS    |  |  (D)TLS    |  | | | (D)TLS    |   | (D)TLS   |    |
 | |  (Client)  |  |  (Server)  |  | | | (Client)  |   | (Server) |    |
 | +------------+  +------------+  | | +-----------+   +----------+    |
 |       ^             ^           | |       ^              ^          |
 |       |             |           | |       |              |          |
 |       +-------------+           | |       +--------------+          |
 | +-----|------------+            | | +-----|------------+            |
 | |     V            |            | | |     V            |            |
 | | +--------+       |   +-----+  | | | +--------+       |   +-----+  |
 | | | TLS TM |&lt;---------&gt;|Cache|  | | | | TLS TM |&lt;---------&gt;|Cache|  |
 | | +--------+       |   +-----+  | | | +--------+       |   +-----+  |
 | |Transport Subsys. |      ^     | | |Transport Subsys. |      ^     |
 | +------------------+      |     | | +------------------+      |     |
 |    ^                      |     | |    ^                      |     |
 |    |                      +--+  | |    |                      +--+  |
 |    v                         |  | |    V                         |  |
 | +-----+ +--------+ +-------+ |  | | +-----+ +--------+ +-------+ |  |
 | |     | |Message | |Securi.| |  | | |     | |Message | |Securi.| |  |
 | |Disp.| |Proc.   | |Subsys.| |  | | |Disp.| |Proc.   | |Subsys.| |  |
 | |     | |Subsys. | |       | |  | | |     | |Subsys. | |       | |  |
 | |     | |        | |       | |  | | |     | |        | |       | |  |
 | |     | | +----+ | | +---+ | |  | | |     | | +----+ | | +---+ | |  |
 | |    &lt;---&gt;|v3MP|&lt;--&gt; |TSM|&lt;--+  | | |    &lt;---&gt;|v3MP|&lt;---&gt;|TSM|&lt;--+  |
 | |     | | +----+ | | +---+ |    | | |     | | +----+ | | +---+ |    |
 | |     | |        | |       |    | | |     | |        | |       |    |
 | +-----+ +--------+ +-------+    | | +-----+ +--------+ +-------+    |
 |    ^                            | |    ^                            |
 |    |                            | |    |                            |
 |    +-+------------+             | |    +-+----------+               |
 |      |            |             | |      |          |               |
 |      v            v             | |      v          V               |
 | +-------------+ +-------------+ | | +-------------+ +-------------+ |
 | |   COMMAND   | | NOTIFICAT.  | | | |  COMMAND    | | NOTIFICAT.  | |
 | |  RESPONDER  | | ORIGINATOR  | | | | GENERATOR   | | RECEIVER    | |
 | | application | | application | | | | application | | application | |
 | +-------------+ +-------------+ | | +-------------+ +-------------+ |
 |                     SNMP entity | |                     SNMP entity |
 +---------------------------------+ +---------------------------------+
          </artwork>
        </figure>
      </t>
      <section title="Conventions" anchor="conventions">
        <!-- BEGIN Copied From RFC5592 -->
        <t>
	  For consistency with SNMP-related specifications, this
	  document favors terminology as defined in STD 62, rather
	  than favoring terminology that is consistent with non-SNMP
	  specifications.  This is consistent with the IESG decision
	  to not require the SNMPv3 terminology be modified to match
	  the usage of other non-SNMP specifications when SNMPv3 was
	  advanced to Full Standard.
	</t>
	
        <t>
	  "Authentication" in this document typically refers to the
	  English meaning of "serving to prove the authenticity of"
	  the message, not data source authentication or peer identity
	  authentication.
	</t>
	
        <t>
	  The terms "manager" and "agent" are not used in this
	  document because, in the <xref target="RFC3411"/>
	  architecture, all SNMP entities have the capability of
	  acting as manager, agent, or both depending on the SNMP
	  application types supported in the implementation.  Where
	  distinction is required, the application names of command
	  generator, command responder, notification originator,
	  notification receiver, and proxy forwarder are used.  See
	  "SNMP Applications" <xref target="RFC3413"/> for further
	  information.
	</t>
	
        <!-- END Copied From RFC5592 -->
	
        <t>
	  Large portions of this document simultaneously refer to both
	  TLS and DTLS when discussing TLSTM components that function
	  equally with either protocol.  "(D)TLS" is used in these
	  places to indicate that the statement applies to either or
	  both protocols as appropriate.  When a distinction between
	  the protocols is needed they are referred to independently
	  through the use of "TLS" or "DTLS".  The Transport Model,
	  however, is named "TLS Transport Model" and refers not to
	  the TLS or DTLS protocol but to the standard defined in this
	  document, which includes support for both TLS and DTLS.
	</t>

        <t>
	  Throughout this document, the terms "client" and "server"
	  are used to refer to the two ends of the (D)TLS transport
	  connection.  The client actively opens the (D)TLS
	  connection, and the server passively listens for the
	  incoming (D)TLS connection.  An SNMP entity may act as a
	  (D)TLS client or server or both, depending on the SNMP
	  applications supported.
	</t>

        <t>
	  The User-Based Security Model (USM) <xref
	  target="RFC3414"></xref> is a mandatory-to-implement
	  Security Model in STD 62.  While (D)TLS and USM frequently
	  refer to a user, the terminology preferred in RFC3411 and in
	  this memo is "principal".  A principal is the "who" on whose
	  behalf services are provided or processing takes place.  A
	  principal can be, among other things, an individual acting
	  in a particular role; a set of individuals, with each acting
	  in a particular role; an application or a set of
	  applications, or a combination of these within an
	  administrative domain.
	</t>

	<t>
	  Throughout this document, the term "session" is used to
	  refer to a secure association between two TLS Transport
	  Models that permits the transmission of one or more SNMP
	  messages within the lifetime of the session.  The (D)TLS
	  protocols also have an internal notion of a session and
	  although these two concepts of a session are related, when
	  the term "session" is used this document is referring to the
	  TLSTM's specific session and not directly to the (D)TLS
	  protocol's session.
	</t>

        <t>
	  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
	  "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
	  and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
	  described in <xref target="RFC2119" />.
	</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="The Transport Layer Security Protocol">
      <t>
	(D)TLS provides authentication, data message integrity, and
	privacy at the transport layer.  (See <xref target="RFC4347" />)
      </t>
      <t>
	The primary goals of the TLS Transport Model are to provide
	privacy, peer identity authentication and data integrity
	between two communicating SNMP entities.  The TLS and DTLS
	protocols provide a secure transport upon which the TLSTM is
	based.  Please refer to <xref target="RFC5246" /> and <xref
	target="RFC4347" /> for complete descriptions of the
	protocols.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section title="How the TLSTM fits into the Transport Subsystem">
      <t>
	A transport model is a component of the Transport Subsystem.
	The TLS Transport Model thus fits between the underlying
	(D)TLS transport layer and the Message Dispatcher <xref
	target="RFC3411" /> component of the SNMP engine and the
	Transport Subsystem.
      </t>
      <t>
	The TLS Transport Model will establish a session between itself and
	the TLS Transport Model of another SNMP engine.  The sending transport
	model passes unencrypted and unauthenticated messages from the
	Dispatcher to (D)TLS to be encrypted and authenticated, and the
	receiving transport model accepts decrypted and
	authenticated/integrity-checked incoming messages from (D)TLS and
	passes them to the Dispatcher.
      </t>
      <t>
	After a TLS Transport Model session is established, SNMP
	messages can conceptually be sent through the session from one
	SNMP message Dispatcher to another SNMP Message Dispatcher.
	If multiple SNMP messages are needed to be passed between two
	SNMP applications they MAY be passed through the same session.
	A TLSTM implementation engine MAY choose to close the session
	to conserve resources.
      </t>
      <t>
	The TLS Transport Model of an SNMP engine will perform the
	translation between (D)TLS-specific security parameters and
	SNMP- specific, model-independent parameters.
      </t>
      <t>
	The diagram below depicts where the TLS Transport Model (shown
	as "(D)TLS TM") fits into the architecture described in
	RFC3411 and the Transport Subsystem:
      </t>
      <t>
	<figure>
	  <artwork>
   +------------------------------+
   |    Network                   |
   +------------------------------+
      ^       ^              ^
      |       |              |
      v       v              v
   +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
   | +--------------------------------------------------+              |
   | |  Transport Subsystem                             |  +--------+  |
   | | +-----+ +-----+ +-------+             +-------+  |  |        |  |
   | | | UDP | | SSH | |(D)TLS |    . . .    | other |&lt;---&gt;| Cache  |  |
   | | |     | | TM  | | TM    |             |       |  |  |        |  |
   | | +-----+ +-----+ +-------+             +-------+  |  +--------+  |
   | +--------------------------------------------------+         ^    |
   |              ^                                               |    |
   |              |                                               |    |
   | Dispatcher   v                                               |    |
   | +--------------+ +---------------------+  +----------------+ |    |
   | | Transport    | | Message Processing  |  | Security       | |    |
   | | Dispatch     | | Subsystem           |  | Subsystem      | |    |
   | |              | |     +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |    |
   | |              | |  +-&gt;| v1MP       |&lt;---&gt;| | USM        | | |    |
   | |              | |  |  +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |    |
   | |              | |  |  +------------+  |  | +------------+ | |    |
   | |              | |  +-&gt;| v2cMP      |&lt;---&gt;| | Transport  | | |    |
   | | Message      | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Security   |&lt;--+    |
   | | Dispatch    &lt;----&gt;|  +------------+  |  | | Model      | |      |
   | |              | |  +-&gt;| v3MP       |&lt;---&gt;| +------------+ |      |
   | |              | |  |  +------------+  |  | +------------+ |      |
   | | PDU Dispatch | |  |  +------------+  |  | | Other      | |      |
   | +--------------+ |  +-&gt;| otherMP    |&lt;---&gt;| | Model(s)   | |      |
   |              ^   |     +------------+  |  | +------------+ |      |
   |              |   +---------------------+  +----------------+      |
   |              v                                                    |
   |      +-------+-------------------------+---------------+          |
   |      ^                                 ^               ^          |
   |      |                                 |               |          |
   |      v                                 v               v          |
   | +-------------+   +---------+   +--------------+  +-------------+ |
   | |   COMMAND   |   | ACCESS  |   | NOTIFICATION |  |    PROXY    | |
   | |  RESPONDER  |&lt;-&gt;| CONTROL |&lt;-&gt;|  ORIGINATOR  |  |  FORWARDER  | |
   | | application |   |         |   | applications |  | application | |
   | +-------------+   +---------+   +--------------+  +-------------+ |
   |      ^                                 ^                          |
   |      |                                 |                          |
   |      v                                 v                          |
   | +----------------------------------------------+                  |
   | |             MIB instrumentation              |      SNMP entity |
   +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
          </artwork>
        </figure>
      </t>
      <section title="Security Capabilities of this Model">
	<section title="Threats">
	  <t>
	    The TLS Transport Model provides protection against the
	    threats identified by the RFC 3411 architecture <xref
	    target="RFC3411" />:
	    <list style="format %d." counter="threats">
	      <t>
		Modification of Information - The modification threat
		is the danger that an unauthorized entity may alter
		in-transit SNMP messages generated on behalf of an
		authorized principal in such a way as to effect
		unauthorized management operations, including
		falsifying the value of an object.

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		(D)TLS provides verification that the content of each
		received message has not been modified during its
		transmission through the network, data has not been
		altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner, and
		data sequences have not been altered to an extent
		greater than can occur non-maliciously.
              </t>

	      <!-- Mostly verbatim copy from RFC3411 -->
	      <t>
		Masquerade - The masquerade threat is the danger that
		management operations unauthorized for a given
		principal may be attempted by assuming the identity of
		another principal that has the appropriate
		authorizations.
		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		The TLSTM verifies of the identity of the (D)TLS
		server through the use of the (D)TLS protocol and
		X.509 certificates.  A TLS Transport Model
		implementation MUST support authentication of both the
		server and the client.
              </t>
	      <t>
		Message stream modification - The re-ordering, delay
		or replay of messages can and does occur through the
		natural operation of many connectionless transport
		services.  The message stream modification threat is
		the danger that messages may be maliciously
		re-ordered, delayed or replayed to an extent which is
		greater than can occur through the natural operation
		of connectionless transport services, in order to
		effect unauthorized management operations.

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		(D)TLS provides replay protection with a MAC that
		includes a sequence number.  Since UDP provides no
		sequencing ability, DTLS uses a sliding window
		protocol with the sequence number used for replay
		protection (see <xref target="RFC4347" />).
              </t>
	      <t>
		Disclosure - The disclosure threat is the danger of
		eavesdropping on the exchanges between SNMP engines.

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		(D)TLS provides protection against the disclosure of
		information to unauthorized recipients or
		eavesdroppers by allowing for encryption of all
		traffic between SNMP engines.  A TLS Transport Model
		implementation SHOULD support message encryption to
		protect sensitive data from eavesdropping attacks.
              </t>
	      <t>
		Denial of Service - the RFC 3411 architecture <xref
		target="RFC3411" /> states that denial of service
		(DoS) attacks need not be addressed by an SNMP
		security protocol.  However, connectionless transports
		(like DTLS over UDP) are susceptible to a variety of
		denial of service attacks because they are more
		vulnerable to spoofed IP addresses.  See <xref
		target="dtlsusage" /> for details how the cookie
		mechanism is used.  Note, however, that this mechanism
		does not provide any defense against denial of service
		attacks mounted from valid IP addresses.
	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    See <xref target="securityconsiderations" /> for more
	    detail on the security considerations associated with the
	    TLSTM and these security threats.
	  </t>
	</section>
	<section title="Message Protection" anchor="seclevel">
	  <t>
	    The RFC 3411 architecture recognizes three levels of security:
	    <list style="symbols">
	      <t>without authentication and without privacy (noAuthNoPriv)</t>
	      <t>with authentication but without privacy (authNoPriv)</t>
	      <t>with authentication and with privacy (authPriv)</t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The TLS Transport Model determines from (D)TLS the
	    identity of the authenticated principal, the transport
	    type and the transport address associated with an incoming
	    message.  The TLS Transport Model provides the identity
	    and destination type and address to (D)TLS for outgoing
	    messages.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    When an application requests a session for a message it
	    also requests a security level for that session.  The TLS
	    Transport Model MUST ensure that the (D)TLS connection
	    provides security at least as high as the requested level
	    of security.  How the security level is translated into
	    the algorithms used to provide data integrity and privacy
	    is implementation-dependent.  However, the NULL integrity
	    and encryption algorithms MUST NOT be used to fulfill
	    security level requests for authentication or privacy.
	    Implementations MAY choose to force (D)TLS to only allow
	    cipher_suites that provide both authentication and privacy
	    to guarantee this assertion.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    If a suitable interface between the TLS Transport Model
	    and the (D)TLS Handshake Protocol is implemented to allow
	    the selection of security level dependent algorithms (for
	    example a security level to cipher_suites mapping table)
	    then different security levels may be utilized by the
	    application.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The authentication, integrity and privacy algorithms used
	    by the (D)TLS Protocols may vary over time as the science
	    of cryptography continues to evolve and the development of
	    (D)TLS continues over time.  Implementers are encouraged
	    to plan for changes in operator trust of particular
	    algorithms.  Implementations should offer configuration
	    settings for mapping algorithms to SNMPv3 security levels.
	  </t>
	</section>
	<section title="(D)TLS Connections" anchor="sessions">
	  <t>
	    (D)TLS connections are opened by the TLS Transport Model
	    during the elements of procedure for an outgoing SNMP
	    message.  Since the sender of a message initiates the
	    creation of a (D)TLS connection if needed, the (D)TLS
	    connection will already exist for an incoming message.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    Implementations MAY choose to instantiate (D)TLS
	    connections in anticipation of outgoing messages.  This
	    approach might be useful to ensure that a (D)TLS
	    connection to a given target can be established before it
	    becomes important to send a message over the (D)TLS
	    connection.  Of course, there is no guarantee that a
	    pre-established session will still be valid when needed.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    DTLS connections, when used over UDP, are uniquely
	    identified within the TLS Transport Model by the
	    combination of transportDomain, transportAddress,
	    tmSecurityName, and requestedSecurityLevel associated with
	    each session.  Each unique combination of these parameters
	    MUST have a locally-chosen unique tlstmSessionID for each
	    active session.  For further information see <xref
	    target="eop" />.  TLS over TCP sessions, on the other
	    hand, do not require a unique pairing of address and port
	    attributes since their lower layer protocols (TCP) already
	    provide adequate session framing.  But they must still
	    provide a unique tlstmSessionID for referencing the
	    session.
	  </t>

	  <t>
	    The tlstmSessionID identifier MUST NOT change during the
	    entire duration of the session from the TLSTM's
	    perspective, and MUST uniquely identify a single session.
	    As an implementation hint: note that the (D)TLS internal
	    SessionID does not meet these requirements, since it can
	    change over the life of the connection as seen by the
	    TLSTM (for example, during renegotiation), and does not
	    necessarily uniquely idenfify a TLSTM session (there can
	    be multiple TLSTM sessions sharing the same D(TLS)
	    internal SessionID).
	  </t>
	</section>
      </section>
      <section title="Security Parameter Passing">
	<t>
	  For the (D)TLS server-side, (D)TLS-specific security
	  parameters (i.e., cipher_suites, X.509 certificate fields,
	  IP address and port) are translated by the TLS Transport
	  Model into security parameters for the TLS Transport Model
	  and security model (e.g., tmSecurityLevel, tmSecurityName,
	  transportDomain, transportAddress).  The transport-related
	  and (D)TLS-security-related information, including the
	  authenticated identity, are stored in a cache referenced by
	  tmStateReference.
	</t>
	<t>
	  For the (D)TLS client-side, the TLS Transport Model takes
	  input provided by the Dispatcher in the sendMessage()
	  Abstract Service Interface (ASI) and input from the
	  tmStateReference cache.  The (D)TLS Transport Model converts
	  that information into suitable security parameters for
	  (D)TLS and establishes sessions as needed.
	</t>
	<t>
	  The elements of procedure in <xref target="eop" /> discuss
	  these concepts in much greater detail.
</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Notifications and Proxy">
	<t>
	  (D)TLS connections may be initiated by (D)TLS clients on
	  behalf of SNMP appplications that initiate communications,
	  such as command generators, notification originators, proxy
	  forwarders.  Command generators are frequently operated by a
	  human, but notification originators and proxy forwarders are
	  usually unmanned automated processes.  The targets to whom
	  notifications and proxied requests should be sent is
	  typically determined and configured by a network
	  administrator.
	</t>
	<t>
	  The SNMP-TARGET-MIB module <xref target="RFC3413" />
	  contains objects for defining management targets, including
	  transportDomain, transportAddress, securityName,
	  securityModel, and securityLevel parameters, for
	  notification originator, proxy forwarder, and
	  SNMP-controllable command generator applications.  Transport
	  domains and transport addresses are configured in the
	  snmpTargetAddrTable, and the securityModel, securityName,
	  and securityLevel parameters are configured in the
	  snmpTargetParamsTable.  This document defines a MIB module
	  that extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's snmpTargetParamsTable to
	  specify a (D)TLS client-side certificate to use for the
	  connection.
	</t>
	<t>
	  When configuring a (D)TLS target, the snmpTargetAddrTDomain and
	  snmpTargetAddrTAddress parameters in snmpTargetAddrTable should be set
	  to the snmpTLSTCPDomain or snmpDTLSUDPDomain object and an
	  appropriate snmpTLSAddress value.  When used with the SNMPv3 message
	  processing model, the snmpTargetParamsMPModel column of the
	  snmpTargetParamsTable should be set to a value of 3.  The
	  snmpTargetParamsSecurityName should be set to an appropriate
	  securityName value and the snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint parameter of
	  the snmpTlstmParamsTable should be set a value that refers to a locally
	  held certificate (and the corresponding private key) to be used.
	  Other parameters, for example cryptographic configuration such as
	  which cipher suites to use, must come from configuration mechanisms
	  not defined in this document.
</t>
	<t>
	  The securityName defined in the snmpTargetParamsSecurityName
	  column will be used by the access control model to authorize
	  any notifications that need to be sent.
	</t>
      </section>
    </section>

    <section title="Elements of the Model">
      <t>
	This section contains definitions required to realize the
	(D)TLS Transport Model defined by this document.
      </t>
      <section title="X.509 Certificates">
	<t>
	  (D)TLS can make use of X.509 certificates for authentication
	  of both sides of the transport.  This section discusses the
	  use of X.509 certificates in the TLSTM.
	</t>
	<t>
	  While (D)TLS supports multiple authentication mechanisms,
	  this document only discusses X.509 certificate based
	  authentication; other forms of authentication are are
	  outside the scope of this specification.  TLSTM
	  implementations are REQUIRED to support X.509 certificates.
	</t>
	<section title="Provisioning for the Certificate" anchor="provisioning">
	  <t>
	    Authentication using (D)TLS will require that SNMP
	    entities have certificates, either signed by trusted
	    certification authorities, or self-signed.  Furthermore,
	    SNMP entities will most commonly need to be provisioned
	    with root certificates which represent the list of trusted
	    certificate authorities that an SNMP entity can use for
	    certificate verification.  SNMP entities SHOULD also be
	    provisioned with a X.509 certificate revocation mechanism
	    which can be used to verify that a certificate has not
	    been revoked.  Trusted public keys from either CA
	    certificates and/or self-signed certificates MUST be
	    installed into the server through a trusted out of band
	    mechanism and their authenticity MUST be verified before
	    access is granted.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    Having received a certificate from a connecting TLSTM
	    client, the authenticated tmSecurityName of the principal
	    is derived using the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable.  This table
	    allows mapping of incoming connections to tmSecurityNames
	    through defined transformations.  The transformations
	    defined in the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB include:
	    <list style="symbols">
	      <t>
		Mapping a certificate's subjectAltName or CommonName
		components to a tmSecurityName, or
	      </t>
	      <t>
		Mapping a certificate's fingerprint value to a
		directly specified tmSecurityName
	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    As an implementation hint: implementations may choose to
	    discard any connections for which no potential
	    snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable mapping exists before performing
	    certificate verification to avoid expending computational
	    resources associated with certificate verification.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    Enterprise configurations are encouraged to map a
	    "subjectAltName" component of the X.509 certificate to the
	    TLSTM specific tmSecurityName.  The authenticated identity
	    can be obtained by the TLS Transport Model by extracting
	    the subjectAltName(s) from the peer's certificate.  The
	    receiving application will then have an appropriate
	    tmSecurityName for use by other SNMPv3 components like an
	    access control model.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    An example of this type of mapping setup can be found in
	    <xref target="examples" />.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    This tmSecurityName may be later translated from a TLSTM
	    specific tmSecurityName to a SNMP engine securityName by
	    the security model.  A security model, like the TSM
	    security model <xref target="RFC5591" />, may perform an
	    identity mapping or a more complex mapping to derive the
	    securityName from the tmSecurityName offered by the TLS
	    Transport Model.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    A pictorial view of the complete transformation process
	    (using the TSM security model for the example) is shown
	    below:
	    <figure>
	      <artwork>
 +-------------+     +-------+                   +-----+
 | Certificate |     |       |                   |     |
 |    Path     |     | TLSTM |  tmSecurityName   | TSM |
 | Validation  | --&gt; |       | -----------------&gt;|     |
 +-------------+     +-------+                   +-----+
                                                     |
                                                     | securityName
                                                     V
                                                 +-------------+
                                                 | application |
                                                 +-------------+
	      </artwork>
	    </figure>
          </t>
	</section>
      </section>
      <section title="(D)TLS Usage" anchor="dtlsusage">
	<t>
	  (D)TLS MUST negotiate a cipher suite that uses X.509
	  certificates for authentication, and MUST authenticate both
	  the client and the server.  The mandatory-to-implement
	  cipher suite is specified in the TLS specification <xref
	  target="RFC5246" />.
	</t>
	<t>
	  TLSTM verifies the certificates when the connection is
	  opened (see Section 5.3).  For this reason, TLS
	  renegotiation with different certificates MUST NOT be done.
	  That is, implementations MUST either disable renegotiation
	  completely (RECOMMENDED), or MUST present the same
	  certificate during renegotiation (and MUST verify that the
	  other end presented the same certificate).
	</t>
	<t>
	  For DTLS over UDP, each SNMP message MUST be placed in a
	  single UDP datagram; it MAY be split to multiple DTLS
	  records.  In other words, if a single datagram contains
	  multiple DTLS application_data records, they are
	  concatenated when received.  The TLSTM implementation SHOULD
	  return an error if the SNMP message does not fit in the UDP
	  datagram, and thus cannot be sent.
	</t>
	<t>
	  For DTLS over UDP, the DTLS server implementation MUST
	  support DTLS cookies (<xref target="RFC4347" /> already
	  requires that clients support DTLS cookies).
	  Implementations are not required to perform the cookie
	  exchange for every DTLS handshake; however, enabling it by
	  default is RECOMMENDED.
	</t>
	<t>
	  For DTLS, replay protection MUST be used.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="SNMP Services ">
	<t>
	  This section describes the services provided by the TLS
	  Transport Model with their inputs and outputs.  The services
	  are between the Transport Model and the Dispatcher.
	</t>
	<t>
	  The services are described as primitives of an abstract
	  service interface (ASI) and the inputs and outputs are
	  described as abstract data elements as they are passed in
	  these abstract service primitives.
	</t>
	<section title="SNMP Services for an Outgoing Message">
	  <t>
	    The Dispatcher passes the information to the TLS Transport
	    Model using the ASI defined in the transport subsystem:
	    <figure>
	      <artwork>
   statusInformation =
   sendMessage(
   IN   destTransportDomain           -- transport domain to be used
   IN   destTransportAddress          -- transport address to be used
   IN   outgoingMessage               -- the message to send
   IN   outgoingMessageLength         -- its length
   IN   tmStateReference              -- reference to transport state
    )
	      </artwork>
	    </figure>
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The abstract data elements returned from or passed as
	    parameters into the abstract service primitives are as
	    follows:
	    <list style="hanging">
	      <t hangText="statusInformation:">
		An indication of whether the sending of the message
		was successful.  If not, it is an indication of the
		problem.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="destTransportDomain:">
		The transport domain for the associated
		destTransportAddress.  The Transport Model uses this
		parameter to determine the transport type of the
		associated destTransportAddress.  This document
		specifies the snmpTLSTCPDomain and the
		snmpDTLSUDPDomain transport domains.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="destTransportAddress:">
		The transport address of the destination TLS Transport
		Model in a format specified by the SnmpTLSAddress
		TEXTUAL-CONVENTION.

</t>
	      <t hangText="outgoingMessage:">
		The outgoing message to send to (D)TLS for
		encapsulation and transmission.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="outgoingMessageLength:">
		The length of the outgoingMessage field.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="tmStateReference:">
		A reference to tmState to be used when securing
		outgoing messages.
	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	</section>
	<section title="SNMP Services for an Incoming Message">
	  <t>
	    The TLS Transport Model processes the received message
	    from the network using the (D)TLS service and then passes
	    it to the Dispatcher using the following ASI:
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    <figure>
	      <artwork>
   statusInformation =
   receiveMessage(
   IN   transportDomain               -- origin transport domain
   IN   transportAddress              -- origin transport address
   IN   incomingMessage               -- the message received
   IN   incomingMessageLength         -- its length
   IN   tmStateReference              -- reference to transport state
    )
	      </artwork>
	    </figure>
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The abstract data elements returned from or passed as
	    parameters into the abstract service primitives are as
	    follows:
	    <list style="hanging">
	      <t hangText="statusInformation:">
		An indication of whether the passing of the message
		was successful.  If not, it is an indication of the
		problem.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="transportDomain:">
		The transport domain for the associated
		transportAddress.  This document specifies the
		snmpTLSTCPDomain and the snmpDTLSUDPDomain transport
		domains.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="transportAddress:">
		The transport address of the source of the received
		message in a format specified by the SnmpTLSAddress
		TEXTUAL-CONVENTION.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="incomingMessage:">
		The whole SNMP message after being processed by (D)TLS
		and the (D)TLS transport layer data has been removed.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="incomingMessageLength:">
		The length of the incomingMessage field.
	      </t>
	      <t hangText="tmStateReference:">
		A reference to tmSecurityData to be used by the
		security model.
	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	</section>
      </section>
      <!-- Begin boiler plate from RFC5592 -->
      <section title="Cached Information and References">
	<t>
	  When performing SNMP processing, there are two levels of
	  state information that may need to be retained: the
	  immediate state linking a request-response pair, and
	  potentially longer-term state relating to transport and
	  security.  <xref target="RFC5590">"Transport Subsystem for
	  the Simple Network Management Protocol" </xref> defines
	  general requirements for caches and references.
	</t>
	<!-- End boiler plate from RFC5592 -->

	<section title="TLS Transport Model Cached Information">
	  
	  <!-- BEGIN text matching RFC5592 -->
	  <t>
	    The TLS Transport Model has specific responsibilities
	    regarding the cached information.  See the Elements of
	    Procedure in <xref target="eop" /> for detailed processing
	    instructions on the use of the tmStateReference fields by
	    the TLS Transport Model.
	  </t>
	  
	  <section title="tmSecurityName">
	    <t>
	      The tmSecurityName MUST be a human-readable name (in
	      snmpAdminString format) representing the identity that
	      has been set according to the procedures in <xref
	      target="eop" />.  The tmSecurityName MUST be constant
	      for all traffic passing through an TLSTM session.
	      Messages MUST NOT be sent through an existing (D)TLS
	      connection that was established using a different
	      tmSecurityName.
	    </t>
	    
	    <t>
	      On the (D)TLS server side of a connection the
	      tmSecurityName is derived using the procedures described
	      in <xref target="establishserver" /> and the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB's
	      snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable DESCRIPTION clause.
	    </t>
	    
	    <t>
	      On the (D)TLS client side of a connection the
	      tmSecurityName is presented to the TLS Transport Model
	      by the application (possibly because of configuration
	      specified in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB).
	    </t>
	    
	    <t>
	      The securityName MAY be derived from the tmSecurityName
	      by a Security Model and MAY be used to configure
	      notifications and access controls in MIB modules.
	      Transport Models SHOULD generate a predictable
	      tmSecurityName so operators will know what to use when
	      configuring MIB modules that use securityNames derived
	      from tmSecurityNames.  The TLSTM generates predictable
	      tmSecurityNames based on the configuration found in the
	      SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB's snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable and relies on the
	      network operators to have configured this table
	      appropriately.
	    </t>
	  </section>
	  <section title="tmSessionID">
	    <t>
	      The tmSessionID MUST be recorded per message at the time
	      of receipt.  When tmSameSecurity is set, the recorded
	      tmSessionID can be used to determine whether the (D)TLS
	      connection available for sending a corresponding
	      outgoing message is the same (D)TLS connection as was
	      used when receiving the incoming message (e.g., a
	      response to a request).
	    </t>
	  </section>
	  <section title="Session State">
	    <t>
	      The per-session state that is referenced by
	      tmStateReference may be saved across multiple messages
	      in a Local Configuration Datastore.  Additional
	      session/connection state information might also be
	      stored in a Local Configuration Datastore.
	    </t>
	  </section>
	  <!-- END text matching RFC5592 -->
	</section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="Elements of Procedure" anchor="eop">
      <t>
	<!-- BEGIN text copied from RFC5592 -->

	Abstract service interfaces have been defined by <xref
	target="RFC3411" /> and further augmented by <xref
	target="RFC5590" /> to describe the conceptual data flows
	between the various subsystems within an SNMP entity.  The
	TLSTM uses some of these conceptual data flows when
	communicating between subsystems.
      </t>
      <t>
	To simplify the elements of procedure, the release of state
	information is not always explicitly specified.  As a general rule, if
	state information is available when a message gets discarded, the
	message-state information should also be released.  If state
	information is available when a session is closed, the session state
	information should also be released.

	<!-- BEGIN added beyond what RFC5592 had in it: -->
	Sensitive information, like cryptographic keys, should be
	overwritten appropriately prior to being released.
	<!-- END added beyond what RFC5592 had in it: -->
      </t>
      <t>
	An error indication in statusInformation will typically
	include the Object Identifier (OID) and value for an
	incremented error counter.  This may be accompanied by the
	requested securityLevel and the tmStateReference.  Per-message
	context information is not accessible to Transport Models, so
	for the returned counter OID and value, contextEngine would be
	set to the local value of snmpEngineID and contextName to the
	default context for error counters.
      </t>
      <!-- END text copied from RFC5592 -->
      <section title="Procedures for an Incoming Message">
	<t>
	  This section describes the procedures followed by the (D)TLS
	  Transport Model when it receives a (D)TLS protected packet.  The
	  required functionality is broken into two different sections.
	</t>
	<t>
	  <xref target="dtlsprocessing" /> describes the processing
	  required for de-multiplexing multiple DTLS connections,
	  which is specifically needed for DTLS over UDP sessions.  It
	  is assumed that TLS protocol implementations already provide
	  appropriate message demultiplexing.
	</t>

	<t>
	  <xref target="snmpinprocessing" /> describes the transport
	  processing required once the (D)TLS processing has been
	  completed.  This will be needed for all (D)TLS-based
	  connections.
	</t>
	<section title="DTLS over UDP Processing for Incoming Messages"
	  anchor="dtlsprocessing">
	  <t>
	    For connection-oriented transport protocols, such as TCP,
	    the transport protocol takes care of demultiplexing
	    incoming packets to the right connection. Depending on the
	    DTLS implementation, for DTLS over UDP, this
	    demultiplexing may need to be done by the TLSTM
	    implementation.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    Like TCP, DTLS over UDP uses the four-tuple &lt;source IP,
	    destination IP, source port, destination port&gt; for
	    identifying the connection (and relevant DTLS connection
	    state). This means that when establishing a new session,
	    implementations MUST use a different UDP source port
	    number for each active connection to a remote destination
	    IP-address/port-number combination to ensure the remote
	    entity can disambiguate between multiple connections.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    If demultiplexing received UDP datagrams to DTLS
	    connection state is done by the TLSTM implementation
	    (instead of the DTLS implementation), the steps below
	    describe one possible method to accomplish this.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The important output results from the steps in this
	    process are the remote transport address, incomingMessage,
	    incomingMessageLength, and the tlstmSessionID.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    <list style="format %d)">
	      <t>
		The TLS Transport Model examines the raw UDP message,
		in an implementation-dependent manner.
	      </t>
	      <t>
		The TLS Transport Model queries the LCD using the
		transport parameters (source and destination IP
		addresses and ports) to determine if a session already
		exists.
		<list style="format 2%c)">
		  <t>
		    If a matching entry in the LCD does not exist,
		    then the UDP packet is passed to the DTLS
		    implementation for processing.  If the DTLS
		    implementation decides to continue with the
		    connection and allocate state for it, it returns a
		    new DTLS connection handle (an implementation
		    dependent detail). In this case, TLSTM selects a
		    new tlstmSessionId, and caches this and the DTLS
		    connection handle as a new entry in the LCD
		    (indexed by the transport parameters).  If the
		    DTLS implementation returns an error or does not
		    allocate connection state (which can happen with
		    the stateless cookie exchange), processing stops.
		  </t>
		  <t>
		    If a session does exist in the LCD then its DTLS
		    connection handle (an implementation dependent
		    detail) and its tlstmSessionId is extracted from
		    the LCD.  The UDP packet and the connection handle
		    is passed to the DTLS implementation.  If the DTLS
		    implementation returns success but does not return
		    an incomingMessage and an incomingMessageLength
		    then processing stops (this is the case when the
		    UDP datagram contained DTLS handshake messages,
		    for example).  If the DTLS implementation returns
		    an error then processing stops.
		  </t>
		</list>
	      </t>
	      <t>
		Retrieve the incomingMessage and an
		incomingMessageLength from DTLS.  These results and
		the tlstmSessionID are used below in <xref
		target="snmpinprocessing" /> to complete the
		processing of the incoming message.
	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	</section>
	<section title="Transport Processing for Incoming SNMP Messages"
	  anchor="snmpinprocessing">
	  <t>
	    The procedures in this section describe how the TLS
	    Transport Model should process messages that have already
	    been properly extracted from the (D)TLS stream.  Note that
	    care must be taken when processing messages originating
	    from either TLS or DTLS to ensure they're complete and
	    single.  For example, multiple SNMP messages can be passed
	    through a single DTLS message and partial SNMP messages
	    may be received from a TLS stream.  These steps describe
	    the processing of a singular SNMP message after it has
	    been delivered from the (D)TLS stream.
	    <list style="format %d)">
	      <t>
		Determine the tlstmSessionID for the incoming message.
		The tlstmSessionID MUST be a unique session identifier
		for this (D)TLS connection.  The contents and format
		of this identifier are implementation-dependent as
		long as it is unique to the session.  A session
		identifier MUST NOT be reused until all references to
		it are no longer in use.  The tmSessionID is equal to
		the tlstmSessionID discussed in <xref
		target="dtlsprocessing" />.  tmSessionID refers to the
		session identifier when stored in the tmStateReference
		and tlstmSessionID refers to the session identifier
		when stored in the LCD.  They MUST always be equal
		when processing a given session's traffic.

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		If this is the first message received through this
		session and the session does not have an assigned
		tlstmSessionID yet then the snmpTlstmSessionAccepts
		counter is incremented and a tlstmSessionID for the
		session is created.  This will only happen on the
		server side of a connection because a client would
		have already assigned a tlstmSessionID during the
		openSession() invocation.  Implementations may have
		performed the procedures described in <xref
		target="establishserver" /> prior to this point or
		they may perform them now, but the procedures
		described in <xref target="establishserver" /> MUST be
		performed before continuing beyond this point.
	      </t>
	      <t>
		Create a tmStateReference cache for the subsequent reference and
		assign the following values within it:
		<list style="hanging">
		  <t hangText="tmTransportDomain">
		    = snmpTLSTCPDomain or snmpDTLSUDPDomain as
		    appropriate.
		  </t>
		  <t hangText="tmTransportAddress">
		    = The address the message originated from.
		  </t>
		  <t hangText="tmSecurityLevel">
		    = The derived tmSecurityLevel for the session, as
		    discussed in <xref target="seclevel" /> and <xref
		    target="establishsession" />.
		  </t>
		  <t hangText="tmSecurityName">
		    = The derived tmSecurityName for the session as
		    discussed in <xref target="establishsession" />.
		    This value MUST be constant during the lifetime of
		    the session.
		  </t>
		  <t hangText="tmSessionID">
		    = The tlstmSessionID described in step 1 above.
		  </t>
		</list>
	      </t>
	      <t>
		The incomingMessage and incomingMessageLength are
		assigned values from the (D)TLS processing.
	      </t>
	      <t>
		The TLS Transport Model passes the transportDomain,
		transportAddress, incomingMessage, and
		incomingMessageLength to the Dispatcher using the
		receiveMessage ASI:
		<figure>
		  <artwork><![CDATA[
    statusInformation =
    receiveMessage(
    IN   transportDomain     -- snmpTLSTCPDomain or snmpDTLSUDPDomain,
    IN   transportAddress    -- address for the received message
    IN   incomingMessage        -- the whole SNMP message from (D)TLS
    IN   incomingMessageLength  -- the length of the SNMP message    
    IN   tmStateReference    -- transport info          
     )
 ]]>
		  </artwork>
		</figure>
	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	</section>
      </section>
      <section title="Procedures for an Outgoing SNMP Message">
	<t>
	  The Dispatcher sends a message to the TLS Transport Model
	  using the following ASI:
	  <figure>
	    <artwork><![CDATA[
    statusInformation =
    sendMessage(
    IN   destTransportDomain           -- transport domain to be used
    IN   destTransportAddress          -- transport address to be used
    IN   outgoingMessage               -- the message to send
    IN   outgoingMessageLength         -- its length    
    IN   tmStateReference              -- transport info           
    )
	      ]]></artwork>
	  </figure>
	</t>
	<t>
	  This section describes the procedure followed by the TLS
	  Transport Model whenever it is requested through this ASI to
	  send a message.
	  <list style="format %d)">
	    <t>
	      If tmStateReference does not refer to a cache containing
	      values for tmTransportDomain, tmTransportAddress,
	      tmSecurityName, tmRequestedSecurityLevel, and
	      tmSameSecurity, then increment the
	      snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches counter, discard the
	      message, and return the error indication in the
	      statusInformation.  Processing of this message stops.
            </t>
	    <t>
	      Extract the tmSessionID, tmTransportDomain,
	      tmTransportAddress, tmSecurityName,
	      tmRequestedSecurityLevel, and tmSameSecurity values from
	      the tmStateReference.  Note: The tmSessionID value may
	      be undefined if no session exists yet over which the
	      message can be sent.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      If tmSameSecurity is true and either tmSessionID is
	      undefined or refers to a session that is no longer open
	      then increment the snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions counter,
	      discard the message and return the error indication in
	      the statusInformation.  Processing of this message
	      stops.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      If tmSameSecurity is false and tmSessionID refers to a
	      session that is no longer available then an
	      implementation SHOULD open a new session using the
	      openSession() ASI (described in greater detail in step
	      5b).  Instead of opening a new session an implementation
	      MAY return a snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions error to the
	      calling module and stop processing of the message.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      If tmSessionID is undefined, then use tmTransportDomain,
	      tmTransportAddress, tmSecurityName and
	      tmRequestedSecurityLevel to see if there is a
	      corresponding entry in the LCD suitable to send the
	      message over.
	      <list style="format 5%c)" counter="step4">
		<t>
		  If there is a corresponding LCD entry, then this
		  session will be used to send the message.
		</t>
		<t>
		  If there is not a corresponding LCD entry, then open
		  a session using the openSession() ASI (discussed
		  further in <xref target="establishclient" />).
		  Implementations MAY wish to offer message buffering
		  to prevent redundant openSession() calls for the
		  same cache entry.  If an error is returned from
		  openSession(), then discard the message, discard the
		  tmStateReference, increment the
		  snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors, return an error
		  indication to the calling module and stop processing
		  of the message.
		</t>
	      </list>
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      Using either the session indicated by the tmSessionID if
	      there was one or the session resulting from a previous
	      step (4 or 5), pass the outgoingMessage to (D)TLS for
	      encapsulation and transmission.
	    </t>
	  </list>
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Establishing or Accepting a Session"
	anchor="establishsession">
	<t>
	  Establishing a (D)TLS connection as either a client or a
	  server requires slightly different processing.  The
	  following two sections describe the necessary processing
	  steps.
	</t>
	<section title="Establishing a Session as a Client"
	  anchor="establishclient">
	  <t>
	    The TLS Transport Model provides the following primitive
	    for use by a client to establish a new (D)TLS connection:
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    <figure>
	      <artwork>
statusInformation =           -- errorIndication or success
openSession(
IN   tmStateReference         -- transport information to be used
OUT  tmStateReference         -- transport information to be used
IN   maxMessageSize           -- of the sending SNMP entity
)
	      </artwork>
	    </figure>
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The following describes the procedure to follow when
	    establishing a SNMP over (D)TLS connection between SNMP
	    engines for exchanging SNMP messages.  This process is
	    followed by any SNMP client's engine when establishing a
	    session for subsequent use.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    This procedure MAY be done automatically for an SNMP
	    application that initiates a transaction, such as a
	    command generator, a notification originator, or a proxy
	    forwarder.
	    <list style="format %d)">
	      <t>
		The snmpTlstmSessionOpens counter is incremented.
	      </t>
	      
	      <t>
		The client selects the appropriate certificate and
		cipher_suites for the key agreement based on the
		tmSecurityName and the tmRequestedSecurityLevel for
		the session.  For sessions being established as a
		result of a SNMP-TARGET-MIB based operation, the
		certificate will potentially have been identified via
		the snmpTlstmParamsTable mapping and the cipher_suites
		will have to be taken from system-wide or
		implementation-specific configuration.  If no row in
		the snmpTlstmParamsTable exists then implementations MAY
		choose to establish the connection using a default
		client certificate available to the application.
		Otherwise, the certificate and appropriate
		cipher_suites will need to be passed to the
		openSession() ASI as supplemental information or
		configured through an implementation-dependent
		mechanism.  It is also implementation-dependent and
		possibly policy-dependent how tmRequestedSecurityLevel
		will be used to influence the security capabilities
		provided by the (D)TLS connection.  However this is
		done, the security capabilities provided by (D)TLS
		MUST be at least as high as the level of security
		indicated by the tmRequestedSecurityLevel parameter.
		The actual security level of the session is reported
		in the tmStateReference cache as tmSecurityLevel.  For
		(D)TLS to provide strong authentication, each
		principal acting as a command generator SHOULD have
		its own certificate.
	      </t>
	      
	      <t>
		Using the destTransportDomain and destTransportAddress
		values, the client will initiate the (D)TLS handshake
		protocol to establish session keys for message
		integrity and encryption.

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		If the attempt to establish a session is unsuccessful,
		then snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors is incremented, an
		error indication is returned, and processing stops.
		If the session failed to open because the presented
		server certificate was unknown or invalid then the
		snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate or
		snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates MUST be
		incremented and a snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown or
		snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate notification SHOULD be
		sent as appropriate.  Reasons for server certificate
		invalidation includes, but is not limited to,
		cryptographic validation failures and an unexpected
		presented certificate identity.
	      </t>
	      <t>
		The (D)TLS client MUST then verify that the (D)TLS
		server's presented certificate is the expected
		certificate.  The (D)TLS client MUST NOT transmit SNMP
		messages until the server certificate has been
		authenticated, the client certificate has been
		transmitted and the TLS connection has been fully
		established.

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		If the connection is being established from
		configuration based on SNMP-TARGET-MIB configuration,
		then the snmpTlstmAddrTable DESCRIPTION clause describes
		how the verification is done (using either a
		certificate fingerprint, or an identity authenticated
		via certification path validation).

		<vspace blankLines='1' />

		If the connection is being established for reasons
		other than configuration found in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB
		then configuration and procedures outside the scope of
		this document should be followed.  Configuration
		mechanisms SHOULD be similar in nature to those
		defined in the snmpTlstmAddrTable to ensure consistency
		across management configuration systems.  For example,
		a command-line tool for generating SNMP GETs might
		support specifying either the server's certificate
		fingerprint or the expected host name as a command
		line argument.
	      </t>

	      <t>
		(D)TLS provides assurance that the authenticated
		identity has been signed by a trusted configured
		certification authority.  If verification of the
		server's certificate fails in any way (for example
		because of failures in cryptographic verification or
		the presented identity did not match the expected
		named entity) then the session establishment MUST
		fail, the snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates
		object is incremented.  If the session can not be
		opened for any reason at all, including cryptographic
		verification failures, then the
		snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors counter is incremented and
		processing stops.
	      </t>
	      <t>
		The TLSTM-specific session identifier (tlstmSessionID)
		is set in the tmSessionID of the tmStateReference
		passed to the TLS Transport Model to indicate that the
		session has been established successfully and to point
		to a specific (D)TLS connection for future use.  The
		tlstmSessionID is also stored in the LCD for later
		lookup during processing of incoming messages (<xref
		target="snmpinprocessing" />).

	      </t>
	    </list>
	  </t>
	</section>
	<section title="Accepting a Session as a Server"
	  anchor="establishserver">
	  <t>
	    A (D)TLS server should accept new session connections from
	    any client that it is able to verify the client's
	    credentials for.  This is done by authenticating the
	    client's presented certificate through a certificate path
	    validation process (e.g. <xref target="RFC5280" />) or
	    through certificate fingerprint verification using
	    fingerprints configured in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable.
	    Afterward the server will determine the identity of the
	    remote entity using the following procedures.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    The (D)TLS server identifies the authenticated identity
	    from the (D)TLS client's principal certificate using
	    configuration information from the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable
	    mapping table.  The (D)TLS server MUST request and expect
	    a certificate from the client and MUST NOT accept SNMP
	    messages over the (D)TLS connection until the client has
	    sent a certificate and it has been authenticated.  The
	    resulting derived tmSecurityName is recorded in the
	    tmStateReference cache as tmSecurityName.  The details of
	    the lookup process are fully described in the DESCRIPTION
	    clause of the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable MIB object.  If any
	    verification fails in any way (for example because of
	    failures in cryptographic verification or because of the
	    lack of an appropriate row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable)
	    then the session establishment MUST fail, and the
	    snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates object is
	    incremented.  If the session can not be opened for any
	    reason at all, including cryptographic verification
	    failures, then the snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors counter is
	    incremented and processing stops.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    Servers that wish to support multiple principals at a
	    particular port SHOULD make use of a (D)TLS extension that
	    allows server-side principal selection like the Server
	    Name Indication extension defined in Section 3.1 of <xref
	    target="RFC4366" />.  Supporting this will allow, for
	    example, sending notifications to a specific principal at
	    a given TCP or UDP port.
	  </t>
	</section>
      </section>
      <section title="Closing a Session">
	<t>
	  The TLS Transport Model provides the following primitive to
	  close a session:
	</t>
	<t>
	  <figure>
	    <artwork>
statusInformation =
closeSession(
IN  tmSessionID        -- session ID of the session to be closed
)
	    </artwork>
	  </figure>
	</t>
	<t>
	  The following describes the procedure to follow to close a
	  session between a client and server.  This process is
	  followed by any SNMP engine closing the corresponding SNMP
	  session.
	  <list style="format %d)">
	    <t>
	      Increment either the snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses or the
	      snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses counter as appropriate.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      Look up the session using the tmSessionID.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      If there is no open session associated with the
	      tmSessionID, then closeSession processing is completed.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      Have (D)TLS close the specified connection.  This SHOULD
	      include sending a close_notify TLS Alert to inform the
	      other side that session cleanup may be performed.
	    </t>
	  </list>
	</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="MIB Module Overview">
      <t>
	This MIB module provides management of the TLS Transport
	Model.  It defines needed textual conventions, statistical
	counters, notifications and configuration infrastructure
	necessary for session establishment.  Example usage of the
	configuration tables can be found in <xref target="examples"
	/>.
      </t>
      <section title="Structure of the MIB Module">
	<t>
	  Objects in this MIB module are arranged into subtrees.  Each
	  subtree is organized as a set of related objects.  The
	  overall structure and assignment of objects to their
	  subtrees, and the intended purpose of each subtree, is shown
	  below.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Textual Conventions">
	<t>
	  Generic and Common Textual Conventions used in this module
	  can be found summarized at
	  http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-common-tcs.html
	</t>
	<t>
	  This module defines the following new Textual Conventions:
	  <list style="symbols">
	    <t>
	      A new TransportAddress format for describing (D)TLS
	      connection addressing requirements.
	    </t>
	    <t>
	      A certificate fingerprint allowing MIB module objects to
	      generically refer to a stored X.509 certificate using a
	      cryptographic hash as a reference pointer.
	    </t>
	  </list>
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Statistical Counters">
	<t>
	  The SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB defines some counters that can provide network
	  management stations with information about session usage and
	  potential errors that a MIB-instrumented device may be
	  experiencing.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Configuration Tables">
	<t>
	  The SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB defines configuration tables that an
	  administrator can use for configuring a MIB-instrumented
	  device for sending and receiving SNMP messages over (D)TLS.
	  In particular, there are MIB tables that extend the
	  SNMP-TARGET-MIB for configuring (D)TLS certificate usage and
	  a MIB table for mapping incoming (D)TLS client certificates
	  to SNMPv3 securityNames.
	</t>
	<section title="Notifications">
	  <t>
	    The SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB defines notifications to alert management
	    stations when a (D)TLS connection fails because a server's
	    presented certificate did not meet an expected value
	    (snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown) or because cryptographic
	    validation failed (snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate).
	  </t>
	</section>
      </section>
      <section title="Relationship to Other MIB Modules">
	<t>
	  Some management objects defined in other MIB modules are
	  applicable to an entity implementing the TLS Transport
	  Model.  In particular, it is assumed that an entity
	  implementing the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB will implement the SNMPv2-MIB
	  <xref target="RFC3418" />, the SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB <xref
	    target="RFC3411" />, the SNMP-TARGET-MIB <xref target="RFC3413" />,
	  the SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB <xref target="RFC3413" /> and the
	  SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB <xref target="RFC3415" />.
	</t>
	<t>
	  The SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB module contained in this document is for
	  managing TLS Transport Model information.
	</t>
	<section title="MIB Modules Required for IMPORTS">
	  <t>
	    The SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB module imports items from SNMPv2-SMI <xref
	    target="RFC2578" />, SNMPv2-TC <xref target="RFC2579" />,
	    SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB <xref target="RFC3411" />,
	    SNMP-TARGET-MIB <xref target="RFC3413" /> and SNMPv2-CONF
	    <xref target="RFC2580" />.
	  </t>
	</section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="MIB Module Definition" anchor="mib">
      <t>
	<figure>
	  <artwork>
SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS
    MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
    OBJECT-IDENTITY, mib-2, snmpDomains,
    Counter32, Unsigned32, Gauge32, NOTIFICATION-TYPE
      FROM SNMPv2-SMI
    TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, TimeStamp, RowStatus, StorageType,
    AutonomousType
      FROM SNMPv2-TC
    MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
      FROM SNMPv2-CONF
    SnmpAdminString
      FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB
    snmpTargetParamsName, snmpTargetAddrName
      FROM SNMP-TARGET-MIB
    ;

snmpTlstmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
    LAST-UPDATED "MIBDATE0000Z"
    ORGANIZATION "ISMS Working Group"
    CONTACT-INFO "WG-EMail:   isms@lists.ietf.org
                  Subscribe:  isms-request@lists.ietf.org

                  Chairs:
                     Juergen Schoenwaelder
                     Jacobs University Bremen
                     Campus Ring 1
                     28725 Bremen
                     Germany
                     +49 421 200-3587
                     j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de

                     Russ Mundy
                     SPARTA, Inc.
                     7110 Samuel Morse Drive
                     Columbia, MD  21046
                     USA

                  Editor:
                     Wes Hardaker
                     Sparta, Inc.
                     P.O. Box 382
                     Davis, CA  95617
                     USA
                     ietf@hardakers.net
                  "

    DESCRIPTION  "
        The TLS Transport Model MIB

        Copyright (c) FILLYEAR IETF Trust and the persons identified as
        the document authors.  All rights reserved.

        Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
        without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
        to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
        set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
        Relating to IETF Documents
        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)."

       REVISION     "MIBDATE0000Z"
       DESCRIPTION  "This version of this MIB module is part of
                     RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal
                     notices."

-- NOTE to RFC editor: replace XXXX with actual RFC number 
--                     for this document and change the date to the
--                     current date and remove this note

    ::= { mib-2 www }
-- RFC Ed.: replace www with IANA-assigned number under the mib-2
--          SNMP OID tree and remove this note

-- ************************************************
-- subtrees of the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB
-- ************************************************

snmpTlstmNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 0 }
snmpTlstmIdentities    OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 1 }
snmpTlstmObjects       OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 2 }
snmpTlstmConformance   OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 3 }

-- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmObjects - Objects
-- ************************************************

snmpTLSTCPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The SNMP over TLS transport domain.  The corresponding 
        transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress.

        The securityName prefix to be associated with the
        snmpTLSTCPDomain is 'tls'.  This prefix may be used by
        security models or other components to identify which secure
        transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName."

    ::= { snmpDomains xx }


-- RFC Ed.: replace xx with IANA-assigned number and
--          remove this note

-- RFC Ed.: replace 'tls' with the actual IANA assigned prefix string
--          if 'tls' is not assigned to this document.

snmpDTLSUDPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The SNMP over DTLS/UDP transport domain.  The corresponding 
        transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress.

        The securityName prefix to be associated with the
        snmpDTLSUDPDomain is 'dtls'.  This prefix may be used by
        security models or other components to identify which secure
        transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName."

    ::= { snmpDomains yy }


-- RFC Ed.: replace yy with IANA-assigned number and
--          remove this note

-- RFC Ed.: replace 'dtls' with the actual IANA assigned prefix string
--          if 'dtls' is not assigned to this document.

SnmpTLSAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    DISPLAY-HINT "1a"
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Represents a IPv4 address, an IPv6 address or an US-ASCII
        encoded hostname and port number.

        An IPv4 address must be in dotted decimal format followed by a
        colon ':' (US-ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal port number
        in US-ASCII.

        An IPv6 address must be a colon separated format, surrounded
        by square brackets ('[', US-ASCII character 0x5B, and ']',
        US-ASCII character 0x5D), followed by a colon ':' (US-ASCII
        character 0x3A) and a decimal port number in US-ASCII.

        A hostname is always in US-ASCII (as per RFC1033);
        internationalized hostnames are encoded in US-ASCII as
        specified in RFC 3490.  The hostname is followed by a colon
        ':' (US-ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal port number in
        US-ASCII.  The name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever
        possible.

        Values of this textual convention may not be directly usable
        as transport-layer addressing information, and may require
        run-time resolution.  As such, applications that write them
        must be prepared for handling errors if such values are not
        supported, or cannot be resolved (if resolution occurs at the
        time of the management operation).

        The DESCRIPTION clause of TransportAddress objects that may
        have SnmpTLSAddress values must fully describe how (and
        when) such names are to be resolved to IP addresses and vice
        versa.

        This textual convention SHOULD NOT be used directly in object
        definitions since it restricts addresses to a specific
        format.  However, if it is used, it MAY be used either on its
        own or in conjunction with TransportAddressType or
        TransportDomain as a pair.

        When this textual convention is used as a syntax of an index
        object, there may be issues with the limit of 128
        sub-identifiers specified in SMIv2 (STD 58).  It is RECOMMENDED
        that all MIB documents using this textual convention make
        explicit any limitations on index component lengths that
        management software must observe.  This may be done either by
        including SIZE constraints on the index components or by
        specifying applicable constraints in the conceptual row
        DESCRIPTION clause or in the surrounding documentation."
    REFERENCE
      "RFC 1033: DOMAIN ADMINISTRATORS OPERATIONS GUIDE
       RFC 3490: Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications
       RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax
       RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2
      "
    SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..255))    

Fingerprint ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
    DISPLAY-HINT "1x:254x"
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
       "A Fingerprint value that can be used to uniquely reference
       other data of potentially arbitrary length.

       A Fingerprint value is composed of a 1-octet hashing algorithm
       identifier followed by the fingerprint value.  The octet value
       encoded is taken from the IANA TLS HashAlgorithm Registry
       (RFC5246).  The remaining octets are filled using the results
       of the hashing algorithm.

       This TEXTUAL-CONVENTION allows for a zero-length (blank)
       Fingerprint value for use in tables where the fingerprint value
       may be optional.  MIB definitions or implementations may refuse
       to accept a zero-length value as appropriate."
    REFERENCE
      "RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2
       http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/
      "
    SYNTAX       OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))

-- Identities for use in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable

snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER
    ::= { snmpTlstmIdentities 1 }

snmpTlstmCertSpecified OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS        current
    DESCRIPTION  "Directly specifies the tmSecurityName to be used for
                  this certificate.  The value of the tmSecurityName
                  to use is specified in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNData
                  column.  The snmpTlstmCertToTSNData column must
                  contain a non-zero length SnmpAdminString compliant
                  value or the mapping described in this row must be
                  considered a failure."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 1 }

snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS        current
    DESCRIPTION  "Maps a subjectAltName's rfc822Name to a 
                  tmSecurityName.  The local part of the rfc822Name is
                  passed unaltered but the host-part of the name must
                  be passed in lower case.

                  Example rfc822Name Field:  FooBar@Example.COM
                  is mapped to tmSecurityName: FooBar@example.com"
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 2 }

snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS        current
    DESCRIPTION  "Maps a subjectAltName's dNSName to a 
                  tmSecurityName after first converting it to all
                  lower case."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 3 }

snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS        current
    DESCRIPTION  "Maps a subjectAltName's iPAddress to a 
                  tmSecurityName by transforming the binary encoded
                  address as follows:


                  1) for IPv4 the value is converted into a decimal
                     dotted quad address (e.g. '192.0.2.1')

                  2) for IPv6 addresses the value is converted into a
                     32-character all lowercase hexadecimal string
                     without any colon separators.

                     Note that the resulting length is the maximum
                     length supported by the View-Based Access Control
                     Model (VACM).  Note that using both the Transport
                     Security Model's support for transport prefixes
                     (see the SNMP-TSM-MIB's
                     snmpTsmConfigurationUsePrefix object for details)
                     will result in securityName lengths that exceed
                     what VACM can handle."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 4 }

snmpTlstmCertSANAny OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS        current
    DESCRIPTION  "Maps any of the following fields using the
                  corresponding mapping algorithms:

                  |------------+------------------------|
                  | Type       | Algorithm              |
                  |------------+------------------------|
                  | rfc822Name | snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name |
                  | dNSName    | snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName    |
                  | iPAddress  | snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress  |
                  |------------+------------------------|

                  The first matching subjectAltName value found in the
                  certificate of the above types MUST be used when
                  deriving the tmSecurityName."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 5 }

snmpTlstmCertCommonName OBJECT-IDENTITY
    STATUS        current

    DESCRIPTION  "Maps a certificate's CommonName to a tmSecurityName
                  after converting it to a UTF-8 encoding."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 6 }

-- The snmpTlstmSession Group

snmpTlstmSession           OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 1 }

snmpTlstmSessionOpens  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
       "The number of times an openSession() request has been executed
       as an (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it succeeded or
       failed."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 1 }

snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times a closeSession() request has been
        executed as an (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it
        succeeded or failed."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 2 }

snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times an openSession() request failed to open a
        session as a (D)TLS client, for any reason."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 3 }

snmpTlstmSessionAccepts  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
       "The number of times a (D)TLS server has accepted a new
       connection from a client and has received at least one SNMP
       message through it."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 4 }

snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times a closeSession() request has been
        executed as an (D)TLS server, regardless of whether it
        succeeded or failed."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 5 }

snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions  OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times an outgoing message was dropped because
        the session associated with the passed tmStateReference was no
        longer (or was never) available."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 6 }

snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times an incoming session was not established
        on an (D)TLS server because the presented client certificate
        was invalid.  Reasons for invalidation include, but are not
        limited to, cryptographic validation failures or lack of a
        suitable mapping row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 7 }

snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times an outgoing session was not established
         on an (D)TLS client because the server certificate presented
         by a SNMP over (D)TLS server was invalid because no
         configured fingerprint or CA was acceptable to validate it.
         This may result because there was no entry in the
         snmpTlstmAddrTable or because no path could be found to a
         known certification authority."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 8 }

snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of times an outgoing session was not established
         on an (D)TLS client because the server certificate presented
         by an SNMP over (D)TLS server could not be validated even if
         the fingerprint or expected validation path was known.  I.E.,
         a cryptographic validation error occurred during certificate
         validation processing.

        Reasons for invalidation include, but are not
        limited to, cryptographic validation failures."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 9 }

snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS   read-only
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The number of outgoing messages dropped because the
        tmStateReference referred to an invalid cache."
    ::= { snmpTlstmSession 10 }

-- Configuration Objects

snmpTlstmConfig             OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 2 }

-- Certificate mapping

snmpTlstmCertificateMapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConfig 1 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Gauge32
    MAX-ACCESS  read-only
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A count of the number of entries in the
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable"
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 1 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      TimeStamp
    MAX-ACCESS  read-only
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable was
        last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not been
        modified since the command responder was started."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 2 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "This table is used by a (D)TLS server to map the (D)TLS
        client's presented X.509 certificate to a tmSecurityName.

        On an incoming (D)TLS/SNMP connection the client's presented
        certificate must either be validated based on an established
        trust anchor, or it must directly match a fingerprint in this
        table. This table does not provide any mechanisms for
        configuring the trust anchors; the transfer of any needed
        trusted certificates for path validation is expected to occur
        through an out-of-band transfer.

        Once the certificate has been found acceptable (either by path
        validation or directly matching a fingerprint in this table),
        this table is consulted to determine the appropriate
        tmSecurityName to identify with the remote connection.  This
        is done by considering each active row from this table in
        prioritized order according to its snmpTlstmCertToTSNID value.
        Each row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value determines
        whether the row is a match for the incoming connection:

            1) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value
               identifies the presented certificate then consider the
               row as a successful match.

            2) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value
               identifies a locally held copy of a trusted CA
               certificate and that CA certificate was used to
               validate the path to the presented certificate then
               consider the row as a successful match.

        Once a matching row has been found, the
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType value can be used to determine how
        the tmSecurityName to associate with the session should be
        determined.  See the snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType column's
        DESCRIPTION for details on determining the tmSecurityName
        value.  If it is impossible to determine a tmSecurityName from
        the row's data combined with the data presented in the
        certificate then additional rows MUST be searched looking for
        another potential match.  If a resulting tmSecurityName mapped
        from a given row is not compatible with the needed
        requirements of a tmSecurityName (e.g., VACM imposes a
        32-octet-maximum length and the certificate derived
        securityName could be longer) then it must be considered an
        invalid match and additional rows MUST be searched looking for
        another potential match.

        Missing values of snmpTlstmCertToTSNID are acceptable and
        implementations should continue to the next highest numbered
        row.  E.G., the table may legally contain only two rows with
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNID values of 10 and 20.

        Users are encouraged to make use of certificates with
        subjectAltName fields that can be used as tmSecurityNames so
        that a single root CA certificate can allow all child
        certificate's subjectAltName to map directly to a
        tmSecurityName via a 1:1 transformation.  However, this table
        is flexible to allow for situations where existing deployed
        certificate infrastructures do not provide adequate
        subjectAltName values for use as tmSecurityNames.
        Certificates may also be mapped to tmSecurityNames using the
        CommonName portion of the Subject field.  However, the usage
        of the CommonName field is deprecated and thus this usage is
        NOT RECOMMENDED.  Direct mapping from each individual
        certificate fingerprint to a tmSecurityName is also possible
        but requires one entry in the table per tmSecurityName and
        requires more management operations to completely configure a
        device."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 3 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable that specifies a mapping
        for an incoming (D)TLS certificate to a tmSecurityName to use
        for a connection."
    INDEX   { snmpTlstmCertToTSNID }
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable 1 }

SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
    snmpTlstmCertToTSNID           Unsigned32,
    snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint  Fingerprint,
    snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType      AutonomousType,
    snmpTlstmCertToTSNData         OCTET STRING,
    snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType  StorageType,
    snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus    RowStatus
}

snmpTlstmCertToTSNID OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A unique, prioritized index for the given entry.  Lower
        numbers indicate a higher priority."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 1 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Fingerprint (SIZE(1..255))
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A cryptographic hash of a X.509 certificate.  The results of
        a successful matching fingerprint to either the trusted CA in
        the certificate validation path or to the certificate itself
        is dictated by the snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType column."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 2 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      AutonomousType
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Specifies the mapping type for deriving a tmSecurityName from
        a certificate.  Details for mapping of a particular type SHALL
        be specified in the DESCRIPTION clause of the OBJECT-IDENTITY
        that describes the mapping.  If a mapping succeeds it will
        return a tmSecurityName for use by the TLSTM model and
        processing stops.

        If the resulting mapped value is not compatible with the
        needed requirements of a tmSecurityName (e.g., VACM imposes a
        32-octet-maximum length and the certificate derived
        securityName could be longer) then future rows MUST be
        searched for additional snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint matches
        to look for a mapping that succeeds."
    DEFVAL { snmpTlstmCertSpecified }
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 3 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..1024))
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Auxiliary data used as optional configuration information for
        a given mapping specified by the snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType
        column.  Only some mapping systems will make use of this
        column.  The value in this column MUST be ignored for any
        mapping type that does not require data present in this
        column."
    DEFVAL { "" }
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 4 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       StorageType
    MAX-ACCESS   read-create
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The storage type for this conceptual row.  Conceptual rows
        having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access to
        any columnar objects in the row."
    DEFVAL      { nonVolatile }
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 5 }

snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      RowStatus
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The status of this conceptual row.  This object may be used
        to create or remove rows from this table.

        To create a row in this table, an administrator must set this
        object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

        Until instances of all corresponding columns are appropriately
        configured, the value of the corresponding instance of the
        snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus column is 'notReady'.

        In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active until
        the corresponding snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType, and snmpTlstmCertToTSNData columns
        have been set.

        The following objects may not be modified while the
        value of this object is active(1):
            - snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint
            - snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType
            - snmpTlstmCertToTSNData
        An attempt to set these objects while the value of
        snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in
        an inconsistentValue error."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 6 }

-- Maps tmSecurityNames to certificates for use by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB

snmpTlstmParamsCount OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Gauge32
    MAX-ACCESS  read-only
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A count of the number of entries in the snmpTlstmParamsTable"
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 4 }

snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      TimeStamp
    MAX-ACCESS  read-only
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmParamsTable
        was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not been
        modified since the command responder was started."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 5 }

snmpTlstmParamsTable OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmParamsEntry
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS
        connection is being set up using an entry in the
        SNMP-TARGET-MIB.  It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's
        snmpTargetParamsTable with a fingerprint of a certificate to
        use when establishing such a (D)TLS connection."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 6 }

snmpTlstmParamsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SnmpTlstmParamsEntry
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A conceptual row containing a fingerprint hash of a locally
        held certificate for a given snmpTargetParamsEntry.  The
        values in this row should be ignored if the connection that
        needs to be established, as indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB
        infrastructure, is not a certificate and (D)TLS based
        connection.  The connection SHOULD NOT be established if the
        certificate fingerprint stored in this entry does not point to
        a valid locally held certificate or if it points to an
        unusable certificate (such as might happen when the
        certificate's expiration date has been reached)."
    INDEX    { IMPLIED snmpTargetParamsName }
    ::= { snmpTlstmParamsTable 1 }

SnmpTlstmParamsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
    snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint Fingerprint,
    snmpTlstmParamsStorageType       StorageType,
    snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus         RowStatus
}

snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Fingerprint
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A cryptographic hash of a X.509 certificate.  This object
        should store the hash of a locally held X.509 certificate that
        should be used (along with the corresponding private key) when
        initiating a (D)TLS connection as a (D)TLS client."
    ::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 1 }

snmpTlstmParamsStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       StorageType
    MAX-ACCESS   read-create
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The storage type for this conceptual row.  Conceptual rows
        having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access to
        any columnar objects in the row."
    DEFVAL      { nonVolatile }
    ::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 2 }


snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      RowStatus
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The status of this conceptual row.  This object may be used
        to create or remove rows from this table.

        To create a row in this table, an administrator must set this
        object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

        Until instances of all corresponding columns are appropriately
        configured, the value of the corresponding instance of the
        snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus column is 'notReady'.

        In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active until
        the corresponding snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint column has
        been set.

        The snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint object may not be modified
        while the value of this object is active(1).

        An attempt to set these objects while the value of
        snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in
        an inconsistentValue error."
    ::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 3 }

snmpTlstmAddrCount OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Gauge32
    MAX-ACCESS  read-only
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A count of the number of entries in the snmpTlstmAddrTable"
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 7 }

snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      TimeStamp
    MAX-ACCESS  read-only
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmAddrTable
        was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not been
        modified since the command responder was started."
    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 8 }

snmpTlstmAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmAddrEntry
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS
          connection is being set up using an entry in the
          SNMP-TARGET-MIB.  It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's
          snmpTargetAddrTable so that the client can verify that the
          correct server has been reached.  This verification can use
          either a certificate fingerprint, or an identity
          authenticated via certification path validation.

          If there is an active row in this table corresponding to the
          entry in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB that was used to establish the
          connection, and the row's snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint
          column has non-empty value, then the server's presented
          certificate is compared with the
          snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value (and the
          snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity column is ignored).  If the
          fingerprint matches, the verification has succeeded.  If the
          fingerprint does not match then the connection MUST be
          closed.

          If the server's presented certificate has passed
          certification path validation [RFC5280] to a configured
          trust anchor, and an active row exists with a zero-length
          snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value, then the
          snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity column contains the expected
          host name.  This expected host name is then compared against
          the server's certificate as follows:

            - Implementations MUST support matching the expected host
            name against a dNSName in the subjectAltName extension
            field and SHOULD support checking the name against the
            common name portion of the subject distinguished name.

            - The '*' (ASCII 0x2a) wildcard character is allowed in the
            dNSName of the subjectAltName extension (and in common
            name, if used to store the host name), but only as the
            left-most (least significant) DNS label in that value.
            This wildcard matches any left-most DNS label in the
            server name.  That is, the subject *.example.com matches
            the server names a.example.com and b.example.com, but does
            not match example.com or a.b.example.com.  Implementations
            MUST support wildcards in certificates as specified above,
            but MAY provide a configuration option to disable them.
            
            - If the locally configured name is an internationalized
            domain name, conforming implementations MUST convert it to
            the ASCII Compatible Encoding (ACE) format for performing
            comparisons, as specified in Section 7 of [RFC5280].
            
          If the expected host name fails these conditions then the
          connection MUST be closed.

          If there is no row in this table corresponding to the entry
          in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB and the server can be authorized by
          another, implementation dependent means, then the connection
          MAY still proceed."

    ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 9 }

snmpTlstmAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SnmpTlstmAddrEntry
    MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A conceptual row containing a copy of a certificate's
        fingerprint for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry.  The values in
        this row should be ignored if the connection that needs to be
        established, as indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB
        infrastructure, is not a (D)TLS based connection.  If an
        snmpTlstmAddrEntry exists for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry then
        the presented server certificate MUST match or the connection
        MUST NOT be established.  If a row in this table does not
        exist to match a snmpTargetAddrEntry row then the connection
        SHOULD still proceed if some other certificate validation path
        algorithm (e.g. RFC5280) can be used."
    INDEX    { IMPLIED snmpTargetAddrName }
    ::= { snmpTlstmAddrTable 1 }

SnmpTlstmAddrEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
    snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint    Fingerprint,
    snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity       SnmpAdminString,
    snmpTlstmAddrStorageType          StorageType,
    snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus            RowStatus
}

snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      Fingerprint
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A cryptographic hash of a public X.509 certificate.  This
        object should store the hash of the public X.509 certificate
        that the remote server should present during the (D)TLS
        connection setup.  The fingerprint of the presented
        certificate and this hash value MUST match exactly or the
        connection MUST NOT be established."
    DEFVAL { "" }
    ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 1 }

snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      SnmpAdminString
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The reference identity to check against the identity
        presented by the remote system."
    DEFVAL { "" }
    ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 2 }

snmpTlstmAddrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX       StorageType
    MAX-ACCESS   read-create
    STATUS       current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The storage type for this conceptual row.  Conceptual rows
        having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access to
        any columnar objects in the row."
    DEFVAL      { nonVolatile }
    ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 3 }


snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX      RowStatus
    MAX-ACCESS  read-create
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The status of this conceptual row.  This object may be used
        to create or remove rows from this table.

        To create a row in this table, an administrator must set this
        object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

        Until instances of all corresponding columns are
        appropriately configured, the value of the
        corresponding instance of the snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus
        column is 'notReady'.

        In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active until
        the corresponding snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint column has been
        set.

        Rows MUST NOT be active if the snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint
        column is blank and the snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity is set to
        '*' since this would insecurely accept any presented
        certificate.

        The snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint object may not be modified
        while the value of this object is active(1).

        An attempt to set these objects while the value of
        snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus is active(1) will result in
        an inconsistentValue error."
    ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 4 }


-- ************************************************
--  snmpTlstmNotifications - Notifications Information
-- ************************************************

snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
    OBJECTS { snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate }
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Notification that the server certificate presented by a SNMP
         over (D)TLS server was invalid because no configured
         fingerprint or CA was acceptable to validate it.  This may be
         because there was no entry in the snmpTlstmAddrTable or
         because no path could be found to known certificate
         authority.

         To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be
         sent to servers that themselves have triggered the
         notification."
    ::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 1 }

snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate NOTIFICATION-TYPE
    OBJECTS { snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint, 
              snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates}
    STATUS  current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Notification that the server certificate presented by an SNMP
         over (D)TLS server could not be validated even if the
         fingerprint or expected validation path was known.  I.E., a
         cryptographic validation occurred during certificate
         validation processing.

         To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be
         sent to servers that themselves have triggered the
         notification."
    ::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 2 }

-- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmCompliances - Conformance Information
-- ************************************************

snmpTlstmCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConformance 1 }

snmpTlstmGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConformance 2 }



-- ************************************************
-- Compliance statements
-- ************************************************

snmpTlstmCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "The compliance statement for SNMP engines that support the
        SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB"
    MODULE
        MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTlstmStatsGroup,
                           snmpTlstmIncomingGroup,
                           snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup,
                           snmpTlstmNotificationGroup }
    ::= { snmpTlstmCompliances 1 }

-- ************************************************
-- Units of conformance
-- ************************************************
snmpTlstmStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
        snmpTlstmSessionOpens,
        snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses,
        snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors,
        snmpTlstmSessionAccepts,
        snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses,
        snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions,
        snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates,
        snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate,
        snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates,
        snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches
    }
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A collection of objects for maintaining
        statistical information of an SNMP engine which
        implements the SNMP TLS Transport Model."
    ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 1 }

snmpTlstmIncomingGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNData,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType,
        snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus
    }
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A collection of objects for maintaining
        incoming connection certificate mappings to
        tmSecurityNames of an SNMP engine which implements the
        SNMP TLS Transport Model."
    ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 2 }

snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup OBJECT-GROUP
    OBJECTS {
        snmpTlstmParamsCount,
        snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged,
        snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint,
        snmpTlstmParamsStorageType,
        snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus,
        snmpTlstmAddrCount,
        snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged,
        snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint,
        snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity,
        snmpTlstmAddrStorageType,
        snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus
    }
    STATUS      current
    DESCRIPTION
        "A collection of objects for maintaining
        outgoing connection certificates to use when opening
        connections as a result of SNMP-TARGET-MIB settings."
    ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 3 }

snmpTlstmNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
    NOTIFICATIONS {
        snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown,
        snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate
    }
    STATUS current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Notifications"
    ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 4 }

END
	  </artwork>
	</figure>
      </t>
    </section>
    <section title="Operational Considerations">
      <t>
	This section discusses various operational aspects of
	deploying TLSTM.
      </t>
      <section title="Sessions">
	<t>
	  A session is discussed throughout this document as meaning a
	  security association between two TLSTM instances.  State
	  information for the sessions are maintained in each TLSTM
	  implementation and this information is created and destroyed
	  as sessions are opened and closed.  A "broken" session (one
	  side up and one side down) can result if one side of a
	  session is brought down abruptly (i.e., reboot, power
	  outage, etc.).  Whenever possible, implementations SHOULD
	  provide graceful session termination through the use of
	  disconnect messages.  Implementations SHOULD also have a
	  system in place for detecting "broken" sessions through the
	  use of heartbeats <xref
	  target="I-D.seggelmann-tls-dtls-heartbeat" /> or other
	  detection mechanisms.
	</t>
	<t>
	  Implementations SHOULD limit the lifetime of established
	  sessions depending on the algorithms used for generation of
	  the master session secret, the privacy and integrity
	  algorithms used to protect messages, the environment of the
	  session, the amount of data transferred, and the sensitivity
	  of the data.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Notification Receiver Credential Selection"> 
	<t>
	  When an SNMP engine needs to establish an outgoing session
	  for notifications, the snmpTargetParamsTable includes an
	  entry for the snmpTargetParamsSecurityName of the target.
	  Servers that wish to support multiple principals at a
	  particular port SHOULD make use of the Server Name
	  Indication extension defined in Section 3.1 of <xref
	  target="RFC4366" />.  Without the Server Name Indication the
	  receiving SNMP engine (Server) will not know which (D)TLS
	  certificate to offer to the Client so that the
	  tmSecurityName identity-authentication will be successful.
	  </t>
	<t>
	  Another solution is to maintain a one-to-one mapping between
	  certificates and incoming ports for notification receivers.
	  This can be handled at the notification originator by
	  configuring the snmpTargetAddrTable (snmpTargetAddrTDomain
	  and snmpTargetAddrTAddress) and requiring the receiving SNMP
	  engine to monitor multiple incoming static ports based on
	  which principals are capable of receiving notifications.
	</t>
	<t>
	  Implementations MAY also choose to designate a single
	  Notification Receiver Principal to receive all incoming
	  notifications or select an implementation specific method of
	  selecting a server certificate to present to clients.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="contextEngineID Discovery">
	<t>
	  Most command responders have contextEngineIDs that are
	  identical to the USM securityEngineID.  USM provides a
	  discovery service that allows command generators to
	  determine a securityEngineID and thus a default
	  contextEngineID to use.  Because the TLS Transport Model
	  does not make use of a securityEngineID, it may be difficult
	  for command generators to discover a suitable default
	  contextEngineID.  Implementations should consider offering
	  another engineID discovery mechanism to continue providing
	  Command Generators with a suitable contextEngineID
	  mechanism.  A recommended discovery solution is documented
	  in <xref target="RFC5343" />.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Transport Considerations">
	<t>
	  This document defines how SNMP messages can be transmitted
	  over the TLS and DTLS based protocols.  Each of these
	  protocols are additionally based on other transports (TCP
	  and UDP).  These two base protocols also have operational
	  considerations that must be taken into consideration when
	  selecting a (D)TLS based protocol to use such as its
	  performance in degraded or limited networks.  It is beyond
	  the scope of this document to summarize the characteristics
	  of these transport mechanisms.  Please refer to the base
	  protocol documents for details on messaging considerations
	  with respect to MTU size, fragmentation, performance in
	  lossy-networks, etc.
	</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="Security Considerations"
      anchor="securityconsiderations">
      <t>
	This document describes a transport model that permits SNMP to
	utilize (D)TLS security services.  The security threats and
	how the (D)TLS transport model mitigates these threats are
	covered in detail throughout this document.  Security
	considerations for DTLS are covered in <xref target="RFC4347"
	/> and security considerations for TLS are described in
	Section 11 and Appendices D, E, and F of TLS 1.2 <xref
	target="RFC5246" />.  When run over a connectionless transport
	such as UDP, DTLS is more vulnerable to denial of service
	attacks from spoofed IP addresses; see Section
	4.2 for details how the cookie exchange is used to address this issue.
      </t>
      <section title="Certificates, Authentication, and Authorization">
	<t>
	  Implementations are responsible for providing a security
	  certificate installation and configuration mechanism.
	  Implementations SHOULD support certificate revocation lists.
	</t>
	<t>
	  (D)TLS provides for authentication of the identity of both
	  the (D)TLS server and the (D)TLS client.  Access to MIB
	  objects for the authenticated principal MUST be enforced by
	  an access control subsystem (e.g. the VACM).
	</t>
	<t>
	  Authentication of the command generator principal's identity
	  is important for use with the SNMP access control subsystem
	  to ensure that only authorized principals have access to
	  potentially sensitive data.  The authenticated identity of
	  the command generator principal's certificate is mapped to
	  an SNMP model-independent securityName for use with SNMP
	  access control.
	</t>
	<t>
	  The (D)TLS handshake only provides assurance that the
	  certificate of the authenticated identity has been signed by
	  an configured accepted certification authority.  (D)TLS has
	  no way to further authorize or reject access based on the
	  authenticated identity.  An Access Control Model (such as
	  the VACM) provides access control and authorization of a
	  command generator's requests to a command responder and a
	  notification responder's authorization to receive
	  Notifications from a notification originator.  However to
	  avoid man-in-the-middle attacks both ends of the (D)TLS
	  based connection MUST check the certificate presented by the
	  other side against what was expected.  For example, command
	  generators must check that the command responder presented
	  and authenticated itself with a X.509 certificate that was
	  expected.  Not doing so would allow an impostor, at a
	  minimum, to present false data, receive sensitive
	  information and/or provide a false belief that configuration
	  was actually received and acted upon.  Authenticating and
	  verifying the identity of the (D)TLS server and the (D)TLS
	  client for all operations ensures the authenticity of the
	  SNMP engine that provides MIB data.
	</t>
	<t>
	  The instructions found in the DESCRIPTION clause of the
	  snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable object must be followed exactly.  It is also
	  important that the rows of the table be searched in prioritized order
	  starting with the row containing the lowest numbered snmpTlstmCertToTSNID
	  value.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Use with SNMPv1/SNMPv2c Messages">
	<t>
	  <!-- BEGIN copied from RFC5592 -->
	  The SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c message
	  processing described in <xref target="RFC3584" /> (BCP 74) always
	  selects the SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c Security Models, respectively.  Both of
	  these and the User-based Security Model typically used with SNMPv3
	  derive the securityName and securityLevel from the SNMP message
	  received, even when the message was received over a secure transport.
	  Access control decisions are therefore made based on the contents of
	  the SNMP message, rather than using the authenticated identity and
	  securityLevel provided by the TLS Transport Model.
	  <!-- END copied from RFC5592 -->
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="MIB Module Security">
	<t>
	  <!-- BEGIN modifications of template from mib-doc-template-xml-04.xml -->
	  There are a number of management objects defined in this MIB
	  module with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write and/or
	  read-create.  Such objects may be considered sensitive or
	  vulnerable in some network environments.  The support for
	  SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper
	  protection can have a negative effect on network operations.
	  These are the tables and objects and their
	  sensitivity/vulnerability:
	  <list style="symbols">
	    <t>
	      The snmpTlstmParamsTable can be used to change the outgoing
	      X.509 certificate used to establish a (D)TLS connection.
	      Modification to objects in this table need to be
	      adequately authenticated since modification to values in
	      this table will have profound impacts to the security of
	      outbound connections from the device.  Since knowledge
	      of authorization rules and certificate usage mechanisms
	      may be considered sensitive, protection from disclosure
	      of the SNMP traffic via encryption is also highly
	      recommended.
	    </t>

	    <t>
	      The snmpTlstmAddrTable can be used to change the
	      expectations of the certificates presented by a remote
	      (D)TLS server.  Modification to objects in this table
	      need to be adequately authenticated since modification
	      to values in this table will have profound impacts to
	      the security of outbound connections from the device.
	      Since knowledge of authorization rules and certificate
	      usage mechanisms may be considered sensitive, protection
	      from disclosure of the SNMP traffic via encryption is
	      also highly recommended.
	    </t>

	    <t>
	      The snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable is used to specify the mapping
	      of incoming X.509 certificates to tmSecurityNames which
	      eventually get mapped to a SNMPv3 securityName.
	      Modification to objects in this table need to be
	      adequately authenticated since modification to values in
	      this table will have profound impacts to the security of
	      incoming connections to the device.  Since knowledge of
	      authorization rules and certificate usage mechanisms may
	      be considered sensitive, protection from disclosure of
	      the SNMP traffic via encryption is also highly
	      recommended.
	    </t>
	  </list>
	</t>
	<t>
	  Some of the readable objects in this MIB module (i.e.,
	  objects with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be
	  considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network
	  environments.  It is thus important to control even GET
	  and/or NOTIFY access to these objects and possibly to even
	  encrypt the values of these objects when sending them over
	  the network via SNMP.  These are the tables and objects and
	  their sensitivity/vulnerability:
	  <list style="symbols">
	    <t>
	      This MIB contains a collection of counters that monitor
	      the (D)TLS connections being established with a device.
	      Since knowledge of connection and certificate usage
	      mechanisms may be considered sensitive, protection from
	      disclosure of the SNMP traffic via encryption is also
	      highly recommended.
	    </t>
          </list>
        </t>
	<!-- END modifications of template from mib-doc-template-xml-04.xml -->
	<!-- BEGIN copied text from mib-doc-template-xml-04.xml -->
	<t>
	  SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate
	  security.  Even if the network itself is secure (for example
	  by using IPsec), even then, there is no control as to who on
	  the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET
	  (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB module.
	</t>
	<t>
	  It is RECOMMENDED that implementers consider the security
	  features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see <xref
	  target="RFC3410"/>, section 8), including full support for
	  the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and
	  privacy).
	</t>
	<t>
	  Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
	  RECOMMENDED.  Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3
	  and to enable cryptographic security.  It is then a
	  customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP
	  entity giving access to an instance of this MIB module is
	  properly configured to give access to the objects only to
	  those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to
	  indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.
	</t>
	<!-- END copied text from mib-doc-template-xml-04.xml -->
      </section>
    </section>
    <section title="IANA Considerations">
      <t>
	IANA is requested to assign:
	<list style="numbers">
	  <t>
	    Two TCP/UDP port numbers from the "Registered Ports" range
	    of the Port Numbers registry, with the following keywords
	    (where TBD1 and TBD2 correspond to the assigned port numbers):

	    <figure>
	      <artwork>
  Keyword         Decimal     Description 	References
  -------         -------     ----------- 	----------
  snmptls         TBD1/tcp    SNMPv3-TLS  	[RFC-isms-dtls-tm]
  snmpdtls        TBD1/udp    SNMPv3-DTLS 	[RFC-isms-dtls-tm]
  snmptls-trap    TBD2/tcp    SNMPv3-Trap-TLS   [RFC-isms-dtls-tm]
  snmpdtls-trap   TBD2/udp    SNMPv3-Trap-DTLS  [RFC-isms-dtls-tm]
	      </artwork>
	    </figure>

	    These are the default ports for receipt of SNMP command
	    messages (snmptls and snmpdtls) and SNMP notification
	    messages (snmptls-trap and snmpdtls-trap) over a TLS
	    Transport Model as defined in this document.
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    An SMI number under snmpDomains for the snmpTLSTCPDomain
	    object identifier,
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    An SMI number under snmpDomains for the snmpDTLSUDPDomain
	    object identifier,
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    A SMI number under mib-2, for the MIB module in this
	    document,
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    "tls" as the corresponding prefix for the snmpTLSTCPDomain
	    in the SNMP Transport Model registry,
	  </t>
	  <t>
	    "dtls" as the corresponding prefix for the
	    snmpDTLSUDPDomain in the SNMP Transport Model registry,
	  </t>
	</list>
      </t>
      <t>
	RFC Editor's note: this section should be replaced with
	appropriate descriptive assignment text after IANA assignments
	are made and prior to publication.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section title="Acknowledgements">
      <t>
	This document closely follows and copies the Secure Shell
	Transport Model for SNMP defined by David Harrington and
	Joseph Salowey in <xref target="RFC5292" />.
      </t>
      <t>
	This document was reviewed by the following people who helped
	provide useful comments (in alphabetical order): Andy Donati,
	Pasi Eronen, David Harrington, Jeffrey Hutzelman, Alan Luchuk,
	Michael Peck, Tom Petch, Randy Presuhn, Ray Purvis, Peter
	Saint-Andre, Joseph Salowey, Jurgen Schonwalder, Dave Shield,
	Robert Story.
      </t>
      <t>
	This work was supported in part by the United States
	Department of Defense.  Large portions of this document are
	based on work by General Dynamics C4 Systems and the following
	individuals: Brian Baril, Kim Bryant, Dana Deluca, Dan Hanson,
	Tim Huemiller, John Holzhauer, Colin Hoogeboom, Dave Kornbau,
	Chris Knaian, Dan Knaul, Charles Limoges, Steve Moccaldi,
	Gerardo Orlando, and Brandon Yip.
      </t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references title="Normative References">
      &rfc2119;
      &rfc2578;
      &rfc2579;
      &rfc2580;
      &rfc3411;
      &rfc3413;
      &rfc3414;
      &rfc3415;
      &rfc3418;
      &rfc3584;
      &rfc4347;
      &rfc5246;
      &rfc5280;
      &rfc5590;
      &rfc5591;
    </references>
    <references title="Informative References">
      &rfc3410;
      &rfc4366;
      &rfc5292;
      &rfc5343;
      <reference anchor="I-D.seggelmann-tls-dtls-heartbeat">
        <front>
          <title>Transport Layer Security and Datagram Transport Layer Security Heartbeat Extension</title>
          <author initials="R.S." surname="Seggelmann"
            fullname="Robin Seggelmann">
            <organization>Muenster Univ. of Applied Sciences</organization>
          </author>
          <author initials="M.T." surname="Tuexen"
            fullname="Michael Tuexen">
            <organization>Muenster Univ. of Applied Sciences</organization>
          </author>
          <author initials="M.W." surname="Williams"
            fullname="Michael Williams">
          </author>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <section title="Target and Notification Configuration Example" anchor="examples">
      <t>
	Configuring the SNMP-TARGET-MIB and NOTIFICATION-MIB along
	with access control settings for the SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB
	can be a daunting task without an example to follow.  The
	following section describes an example of what pieces must be
	in place to accomplish this configuration.
      </t>

      <t>
	The isAccessAllowed() ASI requires configuration to exist in
	the following SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB tables:
	<figure>
	  <artwork>
   vacmSecurityToGroupTable
   vacmAccessTable
   vacmViewTreeFamilyTable
	  </artwork>
	</figure>
      </t>
      <t>
	The only table that needs to be discussed as particularly
	different here is the vacmSecurityToGroupTable.  This table is
	indexed by both the SNMPv3 security model and the security
	name.  The security model, when TLSTM is in use, should be set
	to the value of 4, corresponding to the TSM <xref
	target="RFC5591" />.  An example vacmSecurityToGroupTable row
	might be filled out as follows (using a single SNMP SET
	request):
      </t>
      <t>
	<figure>
	  <artwork>
   vacmSecurityModel              = 4 (TSM)
   vacmSecurityName               = "blueberry"
   vacmGroupName                  = "administrators"
   vacmSecurityToGroupStorageType = 3 (nonVolatile)
   vacmSecurityToGroupStatus      = 4 (createAndGo)
	  </artwork>
	</figure>
      </t>      
      
      <t>
        This example will assume that the "administrators" group has
        been given proper permissions via rows in the vacmAccessTable
        and vacmViewTreeFamilyTable.
      </t>
      
      <t>
        Depending on whether this VACM configuration is for a Command
        Responder or a command generator the security name "blueberry"
        will come from a few different locations.
      </t>

      <section title="Configuring the Notification Originator">
        <t>
	  For notification originators performing authorization
	  checks, the server's certificate must be verified against
	  the expected certificate before proceeding to send the
	  notification.  The expected certificate from the server may
	  be listed in the snmpTlstmAddrTable or may be determined through
	  other X.509 path validation mechanisms.  The securityName to
	  use for VACM authorization checks is set by the
	  SNMP-TARGET-MIB's snmpTargetParamsSecurityName column.
	</t>

        <t>
	  The certificate that the notification originator should
	  present to the server is taken from the
	  snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint column from the appropriate
	  entry in the snmpTlstmParamsTable table.  (Or else a default
	  certificate may be used if available.)
	</t>

	<t>
	  To configure a notification originator to open a TLS over
	  TCP connection to a notification receiver it must be
	  configured so the server's presented certificate can be
	  verified against the expected certificate before proceeding
	  to send the notification.  This is done by configuring the
	  snmpTlstmAddrTable accordingly.  For example, if the
	  verification is done via certification path validation (to a
	  trust anchor configured in implementation dependent manner),
	  then the table entries could look like:
	</t>
	<t>
	  <figure>
	    <artwork>
snmpTargetAddrTable row:
  snmpTargetAddrName              = "toNRAddr"
  snmpTargetAddrTDomain           = snmpTLSTCPDomain
  snmpTargetAddrTAddress          = "192.0.2.1:XXXTLSTCPTRAPPORT"
  snmpTargetAddrTimeout           = 1500
  snmpTargetAddrRetryCount        = 3
  snmpTargetAddrTagList           = "toNRTag"
  snmpTargetAddrParams            = "toNR"     (MUST match below)
  snmpTargetAddrStorageType       = 3          (nonVolatile)
  snmpTargetAddrColumnStatus      = 4          (createAndGo)
                                     
snmpTargetParamsTable row:           
  snmpTargetParamsName            = toNR
  snmpTargetParamsMPModel         = SNMPv3
  snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel   = 4          (TransportSecurityModel)
  snmpTargetParamsSecurityName    = "blueberry"
  snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel   = 3          (authPriv)
  snmpTargetParamsStorageType     = 3          (nonVolatile)
  snmpTargetParamsRowStatus       = 4          (createAndGo0

snmpTlstmAddrTable row:
   snmpTargetAddrName             =  "toNRAddr"
   snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint =  ""
   snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity    =  "server.example.org"
   snmpTlstmAddrStorageType       =  3         (nonVolatile)
   snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus         =  4         (createAndGo)
	    </artwork>
	  </figure>
	</t>
	<t>
	  Editor's note: replace the string "XXXTLSTCPTRAPPORT" above
	  with the appropriately assigned "snmptls-trap" port.
	</t>
      </section>
      <section title="Configuring the Command Responder">
        <t>
	  For command responder applications, the vacmSecurityName
	  "blueberry" value is a value that derived from an incoming
	  (D)TLS connection.  The mapping from a recevied (D)TLS
	  client certificate to a tmSecurityName is done with the
	  snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable.  The certificates must be loaded into
	  the device so that a snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry may refer to it.
	  As an example, consider the following entry which will
	  provide a mapping from a client's public X.509's hash
	  fingerprint directly to the "blueberry" tmSecurityName:
	  <figure>
	    <artwork>
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNID           = 1  (chosen by ordering preference)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint  = HASH (appropriate fingerprint)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType      = snmpTlstmCertSpecified
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNSecurityName = "blueberry"
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType  = 3  (nonVolatile)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus    = 4  (createAndGo)
	    </artwork>
	  </figure>
        </t>

        <t>
          The above is an example of how to map a particular
          certificate to a particular tmSecurityName.  It is
          recommended, however, that users make use of direct
          subjectAltName or CommonName mappings where possible as it
          provides a more scalable approach to certificate management.
          This entry provides an example of using a subjectAltName
          mapping:

          <figure>
            <artwork>
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNID          = 1   (chosen by ordering preference)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint = HASH (appropriate fingerprint)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType     = snmpTlstmCertSANAny
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNData        = ""  (not used)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType = 3   (nonVolatile)
  snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus   = 4   (createAndGo)
            </artwork>
          </figure>
        </t>
        
        <t>
          The above entry indicates the subjectAltName field for
          certificates created by an issuing certificate with a
          corresponding fingerprint will be trusted to always produce
          common names that are directly one-to-one mappable into
          tmSecurityNames.  This type of configuration should only be
          used when the certificate authorities naming conventions are
          carefully controlled.
        </t>

        <t>
	  In the example, if the incoming (D)TLS client provided
	  certificate contained a subjectAltName where the first
	  listed subjectAltName in the extension is the rfc822Name of
	  "blueberry@example.com", the certificate was signed by a
	  certificate matching the snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value and
	  the CA's certificate was properly installed on the device
	  then the string "blueberry@example.com" would be used as the
	  tmSecurityName for the session.
	</t>
      </section>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
<!-- Local Variables: -->
<!-- End: -->
