<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY RFC2119 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC3279 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3279.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC2560 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2560.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4732 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4732.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5019 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5019.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5912 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5912.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC6960 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6960.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5280 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5280.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4086 SYSTEM "https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4086.xml">
]>
<rfc submissionType="IETF" docName="draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-05" category="std" ipr="trust200902" updates="6960">
	<!-- Generated by id2xml 1.5.0 on 2020-03-02T06:24:23Z -->
	<?rfc compact="yes"?>
	<?rfc text-list-symbols="*o+-"?>
	<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
	<?rfc sortrefs="no"?>
	<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
	<?rfc strict="yes"?>
	<?rfc toc="yes"?>
	<front>
	<title>OCSP Nonce Extension</title>
	    <author initials="M." surname="Sahni" fullname="Mohit Sahni" role="editor">
      <organization>Palo Alto Networks</organization>
      <address>
	<postal>
	<street>3000 Tannery Way</street>
	<city>Santa Clara</city>
	<region>CA</region>
	<code>95054</code>
	<country>US</country>
	</postal>
        <email>msahni@paloaltonetworks.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>

	<date day="10" month="September" year="2020"/>
	<workgroup>LAMPS</workgroup>
	<abstract><t>
   This document specifies the updated format of the Nonce extension in the
   Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) request and response
   messages. OCSP is used to check the status of a certificate and
   the Nonce extension is used to cryptographically bind an OCSP 
   response message to a particular OCSP request message. This document updates RFC 6960.</t>
	</abstract>
	</front>

	<middle>
	<section title="Introduction" anchor="sect-1"><t>
   This document updates the usage and format of the Nonce extension
   used in OCSP request and response messages. This extension was
   previously defined in section 4.4.1 of <xref target="RFC6960"/>. <xref target="RFC6960"/>
   does not mention any minimum and maximum length of nonce in the Nonce
   extension. Lacking limits on the length of nonce in the Nonce extension, an OCSP responders that follow <xref target="RFC6960"/> may be
   vulnerable to various attacks like Denial of Service attacks <xref target="RFC4732"/>, chosen
   prefix attacks to get a desired signature, and
   possible evasions using the Nonce extension data. This
   document specifies a lower limit of 1 and an upper limit of 32 to the
   length of nonce in the Nonce extension. This document updates <xref target="RFC6960"/>.</t>

	<section title="Terminology" anchor="sect-1.1"><t>
   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>

	</section>

	</section>

	<section title="OCSP Extensions" anchor="sect-2"><t>
   The message format for OCSP request and response is defined in
   <xref target="RFC6960"/>. <xref target="RFC6960"/> also defines the standard extensions for OCSP
   messages based on the extension model employed in X.509 version 3
   certificates (see <xref target="RFC5280"/>). This document only specifies the new format for Nonce extension and
   does not change specification of any of the other standard extensions defined in <xref target="RFC6960"/>.</t>

    <section title="Nonce Extension" anchor="sect-2.1"> <t>
   This section replaces the entirety of the Section 4.4.1 of <xref target="RFC6960"/> which describes the OCSP Nonce extension. 
   </t><t>
   The nonce cryptographically binds a request and a response to
   prevent replay attacks. The nonce is included as one of the
   requestExtensions in requests, while in responses it would be
   included as one of the responseExtensions. In both the request and
   the response, the nonce will be identified by the object identifier
   id-pkix-ocsp-nonce, while the extnValue is the value of the nonce.
   If Nonce extension is present then the length of nonce MUST be at
   least 1 octet and can be up to 32 octets.
   </t> 
   <t> 
   A server MUST reject any OCSP request having a nonce in the Nonce extension with
   length of 0 octets or more than 32 octets with the malformedRequest
   OCSPResponseStatus as described in section 4.2.1 of <xref target="RFC6960"/>.
   </t>
   <t>
   The value of the nonce MUST be generated using a cryptographically
   strong pseudorandom number generator (see <xref target="RFC4086"/>).
   The minimum nonce length of 1 octet is defined to provide
   backward compatibility with older clients that follow [RFC6960].
   Newer OCSP clients that support this document MUST use a
   length of 32 octets for the nonce in Nonce extension. OCSP responders
   MUST accept lengths of at least 16 octets, and  MAY choose to
   ignore the Nonce extension for requests where the length of the nonce is less than 16 octets
   </t>

	<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
   id-pkix-ocsp           OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ad-ocsp }
   id-pkix-ocsp-nonce     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pkix-ocsp 2 }

   Nonce ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(1..32))
]]></artwork>
	</figure>
	</section>

	</section>

	<section title="Security Considerations" anchor="sect-3">
      <t>      
      The security considerations of OCSP, in general, are described in
      <xref target="RFC6960"/>. During the interval in which the previous OCSP response for a
      certificate is not expired but the responder has a changed status for
      that certificate, a copy of that OCSP response can be used to indicate that the status of the certificate is still valid. 
      Including client's Nonce value in the OCSP
      response makes sure that the response is the latest response from
      the server and not an old copy.
      </t>

	<section title="Replay Attack" anchor="sect-3-1">
<t>
   The Nonce extension is used to avoid replay attacks. Since the OCSP
   responder may choose to not send the Nonce extension in the OCSP
   response even if the client has sent the Nonce extension in the
   request <xref target="RFC5019"/>, an on-path attacker can intercept the OCSP request
   and respond with an earlier response from the server without the
   Nonce extension. This can be mitigated by configuring the server to
   use a short time interval between the thisUpdate and nextUpdate fields in
   the OCSP response.
</t>
	</section>
	<section title="Nonce Collision" anchor="sect-3-2">
		<t>
   If the value of nonce used by a client in OCSP request is
   predictable, then an attacker may prefetch responses with the
   predicted nonce and can replay them, thus defeating the purpose of
   using nonce. Therefore the value of Nonce extension in the OCSP
   request MUST contain cryptographically strong randomness and MUST be
   freshly generated at the time of creating the OCSP request. Also
   if the length of nonce is too small e.g. 1 octet then
   an on-path attacker can prefetch responses with all the possible
   values of nonce and replay a matching nonce.
		</t>
	</section>
	</section>

	<section title="IANA Considerations" anchor="sect-4">
<t>This document does not call for any IANA actions.</t>
	</section>
	<section title="Changes to Appendix B. of RFC 6960" anchor="sect-5"> 
	<t>
	This section updates the ASN.1 definitions of the OCSP Nonce extension in Appendix B.1 and Appendix B.2 of <xref target="RFC6960"/> 
	The Appendix B.1 defines OCSP using ASN.1 - 1998 Syntax and Appendix B.2 defines OCSP using ASN.1 - 2008 Syntax
	</t>
	<section title="Changes to Appendix B.1. OCSP in ASN.1 - 1998 Syntax" anchor="sect-5-1"> 
	<t>OLD Syntax: </t>
	<t>The definition of OCSP Nonce Extension is not provided in Appendix B.1 of <xref target="RFC6960"/> for the ASN.1 - 1998 Syntax.</t>
	<t>NEW Syntax: </t>
<figure><artwork><![CDATA[
    Nonce ::= OCTET STRING(SIZE(1..32))
]]></artwork>
</figure>
        </section>
        <section title="Changes to Appendix B.2 OCSP in ASN.1 - 2008 Syntax" anchor="sect-5-2"> 
<t>OLD Syntax: </t>
    <figure><artwork><![CDATA[
    re-ocsp-nonce EXTENSION ::= { SYNTAX OCTET STRING IDENTIFIED
        BY id-pkix-ocsp-nonce }

]]></artwork>
</figure>
    <t>NEW Syntax: </t>
    <figure><artwork><![CDATA[
    re-ocsp-nonce EXTENSION ::= { SYNTAX OCTET STRING(SIZE(1..32)) 
        IDENTIFIED BY id-pkix-ocsp-nonce }
]]></artwork>
	</figure>
		</section>				
	</section>
	</middle>

	<back>
	<references title="Normative References">
	<reference anchor="RFC2119" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119"><front>
	<title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
	<author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
	</author>

	<date month="March" year="1997"/>
	</front>

	<seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
	<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
	<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
	</reference>
	<reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
	<front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author initials="B." surname="Leiba" fullname="B. Leiba">
            </author>
            <date year="2017" month="May"/>
	</front>
            <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
            <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
            <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
        </reference>
	&RFC5280;
	&RFC6960;
	</references>
	<references title="Informative References">
	&RFC4086;
	&RFC4732;
	&RFC5019;
	</references>
	</back>

	</rfc>
	
