<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../xml2rfc-1.34pre2/rfc2629.xslt' ?>
    <?rfc toc="yes" ?>
    <?rfc symrefs="yes" ?>
    <?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
    <?rfc iprnotified="no" ?>
    <?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "../xml2rfc-1.34pre2/rfc2629.dtd" [
    <!ENTITY rfc2004 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2004.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc2119 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc5226 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5226.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc2460 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2460.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc2710 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2710.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc2784 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2784.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc2983 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2983.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3024 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3024.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3168 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3168.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3344 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3344.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3519 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3519.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3588 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3588.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3633 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3633.xml'> 
    <!ENTITY rfc3775 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3775.xml'>   
    <!ENTITY rfc3810 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3810.xml'>     
    <!ENTITY rfc3963 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3963.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc4213 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4213.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc5265 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5265.xml'>    
    <!ENTITY rfc5266 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5266.xml'>
    <!ENTITY rfc3978 PUBLIC '' 
      'http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3978.xml'>
]>
<rfc category="std" ipr="trust200811" docName="draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-10.txt">
    <front>
        <title>Dual Stack Mobile IPv4</title>
        <author initials="G." surname="Tsirtsis" fullname="George Tsirtsis">
            <organization>Qualcomm</organization>
            <address>
                <email>tsirtsis@googlemail.com</email>
            </address>
        </author>
        <author initials="V." surname="Park" fullname="Vincent Park">
            <organization>Qualcomm</organization>
            <address>
                <phone>+908-947-7084</phone>
                <email>vpark@qualcomm.com</email>
            </address>
        </author>
        <author initials="H." surname="Soliman" fullname="Hesham Soliman">
            <organization>Elevate Technologies</organization>
            <address>
                <phone>+614-111-410-445</phone>
                <email>hesham@elevatemobile.com</email>
            </address>
        </author>
        <date month="January" year="2009"/>
        <abstract>
            <t>This specification provides IPv6 extensions to the Mobile IPv4
                protocol. The extensions allow a dual stack node to use IPv4 and
                IPv6 home addresses as well as to move between IPv4 and dual
                stack network infrastructures. </t>
        </abstract>
    </front>
    <middle>
        <section title="Requirements Notation">
            <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
                NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
                "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described
                in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
        </section>
        <section title="Introduction">
            <t>Mobile IPv4 <xref target="RFC3344"/> allows a mobile node with an
                IPv4 address to maintain communications while moving in an IPv4
                network. </t>
            <t>Extensions defined in this document allow a node that has IPv4
                and IPv6 addresses <xref target="RFC2460"/> to maintain
                communications through any of its addresses while moving in IPv4
                or dual stack networks.</t>
            <t>Essentially, this specification separates the Mobile IPv4
                signaling from the IP version of the traffic it tunnels. Mobile
                IPv4 with the present extensions remains a signaling protocol
                that runs over IPv4, and yet can set-up both IPv4 and IPv6
                tunnels over IPv4.</t>
            <t> The aim is two-fold:</t>
            <t>
                <list>
                    <t>On one hand, Mobile IPv4 with the present extensions
                        becomes a useful transition mechanism, allowing
                        automated but controlled tunneling of IPv6 traffic over
                        IPv4 tunnels. Dual stack nodes in dual stack home
                        networks can now roam to and from legacy IPv4 networks,
                        while IPv4 mobile nodes and networks can migrate to IPv6
                        without changing mobility management, and without
                        upgrading all network nodes to IPv6 at once.</t>
                    <t> On the other hand, and more importantly, it allows dual
                        stack mobile nodes and networks to utilize a single
                        protocol for the movement of both IPv4 and IPv6 stacks
                        in the network topology.</t>
                </list>
            </t>
            <t> Note that features like Mobile IPv6 <xref target="RFC3775"/>
                style route optimization will not be possible with this solution
                as it still relies on Mobile IPv4 signaling, which does not
                provide route optimization. </t>
            <section title="Goals">
                <t>
                    <list style="letters">
                        <t>The solution supports the registration of IPv6 home
                            prefix(s) in addition to regular IPv4 home address
                            registration</t>
                        <t>The solution supports static and dynamic IPv6 prefix
                            delegation</t>
                        <!--            <t>The solution supports the above registrations with
                            and without FA support</t> -->
                    </list>
                </t>
            </section>
            <section title="Non-Goals">
                <t>
                    <list style="letters">
                        <t>The solution does not provide support for IPv6
                            care-of address registration</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
            </section>
            <section anchor="imp-exp" title="Implicit and Explicit Modes">
                <t>As defined in NEMO <xref target="RFC3963"/>, this
                    specification also supports two modes of operation; the
                    implicit mode and the explicit mode.</t>
                <t>In the implicit mode, the mobile node does not include any
                    IPv6 prefix request extensions in the Registration Request.
                    The home agent can use any mechanism (not defined in this
                    document) to determine the IPv6 prefix(es) owned by the
                    mobile node and to set up forwarding for these prefixes. In
                    this mode of operation all traffic to and from the IPv6
                    prefixes MUST be encapsulated over the IPv4 tunnel between
                    the mobile node's IPv4 home address and the IPv4 address of
                    the home agent, and as such it is transparent to any foreign
                    agent in the path. This IPv4 tunnel is established by
                    mechanisms that are out of the scope of this document on
                    both the mobile node and home agent when operating in the
                    implicit mode.</t>
                <t>In the explicit mode, IPv6 bindings are signalled explicitly.
                    The mobile node includes one or more IPv6 prefix request
                    extensions in the Registration Request, while the home agent
                    returns corresponding IPv6 prefix reply extensions to
                    accept/reject the IPv6 bindings. </t>
                <t>Additionally, in the explicit mode, the mobile node (when
                    co-located mode of operation is used)
                    <!-- or the foreign agent
                    (when present) -->
                    can indicate whether IPv6 traffic should be tunneled to the
                    care-of address or the home address of the mobile node.</t>
                <t>The rest of this specification is primarily defining the
                    explicit mode.</t>
            </section>
        </section>
        <section title="Extension Formats">
            <t>The following extensions are defined according to this
                specification. </t>
            <section title="IPv6 Prefix Request Extension">
                <t>A new skippable extension to the Mobile IPv4 registration
                    request message in accordance to the short extension format
                    of <xref target="RFC3344"/> is defined here.</t>
                <figure anchor="IPv6Prefix"
                    title=" IPv6 Prefix Request Extension">
                    <preamble>This extension contains a mobile IPv6 network
                        prefix and its prefix length.</preamble>
                    <artwork> 
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |      Type     |   Length      |   Sub-Type    | Prefix Length |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                                                               |
   +                   Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix                  +
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</artwork>
                    <postamble/>
                </figure>
                <t>Type</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>TBD (DSMIPv4 Extension)(skippable type to be assigned
                            by IANA)</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Length</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>18</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Sub-Type</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>1 (IPv6 Prefix Request)</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Prefix Length</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>A sixteen-byte field containing the Mobile IPv6
                            Network Prefix; all insignificant (low-order) bits
                            (beyond the Prefix Length) MUST be set to 0 by the
                            originator of the option and ignored by the
                        receiver</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>A sixteen-byte field containing the Mobile IPv6
                            Network Prefix</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
            </section>
            <section title="IPv6 Prefix Reply Extension">
                <t>A new skippable extension to the Mobile IPv4 registration
                    reply message in accordance to the short extension format of
                        <xref target="RFC3344"/> is defined here.</t>
                <figure anchor="Code" title="IPv6 Prefix Reply Extension">
                    <preamble>This extension defines a mobile IPv6 network
                        prefix and its prefix length, as well as a code. </preamble>
                    <artwork>
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |   Length      |   Sub-Type    |     Code      |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   | Prefix Length |    Reserved   |                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+                               +
   |                                                               |
   +                                                               +
   |                                                               |
   +                   Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix                  +
   |                                                               |
   +                               +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+      
   |                               |                               
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   </artwork>
                </figure>
                <t>Type</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>TBD (DSMIPv4 Extension)(skippable type to be assigned
                            by IANA)</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Length</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>20</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Sub-Type</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>2 (IPv6 Prefix Reply)</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Code</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>A value indicating the result of the registration
                            request with respect to the IPv6 home prefix
                            registration. See below for currently defined
                        Codes.</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Prefix Length</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>Indicates the prefix length of the prefix included in
                            the Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix field. A value of 255
                            indicates that a link local address is included in
                            the Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix field.</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Reserved</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t> Set to 0 by the sender, ignored by the receiver</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>A sixteen-byte field containing the Mobile IPv6
                            Network Prefix; all insignificant (low-order) bits
                            (beyond the Prefix Length) MUST be set to 0 by the
                            originator of the option and ignored by the
                        receiver</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>The following values are defined for use as a Code value in
                    the above extension</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>0 registration accepted, IPv6 to be tunneled to HoA</t>
                        <t>1 registration accepted, IPv6 to be tunneled to CoA</t>
                        <t>8 registration rejected, reason unspecified</t>
                        <t>9 registration rejected, administratively prohibited</t>
                        <!--    <t>10 registration rejected, not home subnet</t> 
                        <t>11 registration rejected, Duplicate Address Detection
                            failed</t>  -->
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t> Note that a registration reply that does not include an IPv6
                    prefix reply extension, when received in response to a
                    registration request carrying at least one instance of the
                    IPv6 prefix request extension, indicates that the home agent
                    does not support IPv6 extensions and thus has ignored such
                    extensions in the registration request.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="IPv6 Tunneling Mode Extension">
                <t>A new skippable extension to the Mobile IPv4 registration
                    request message in accordance to the short extension format
                    of <xref target="RFC3344"/> is defined here.</t>
                <figure anchor="Mode" title="IPv6 Tunneling Mode Extension">
                    <preamble>By including this extension in a registration
                        request the sender indicates that IPv6 traffic can be
                        tunneled to the mobile node's CoA.</preamble>
                    <artwork>
0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|     Type      |   Length      |    Sub-Type   |   Reserved    |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 </artwork>
                </figure>
                <t>Type</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>TBD (DSMIPv4 Extension) (skippable type to be
                            assigned by IANA)</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Length</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>2</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Sub-Type</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>3 (IPv6 Tunneling Mode)</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>Reserved</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t> Set to 0 by the sender, ignored by the receiver</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
            </section>
        </section>
        <section title="Mobile IP Registrations">
            <section title="Registration Request">
                <t>A mobile node MAY include in a registration request one or
                    more IPv6 prefix request extensions defined in this
                    specification.</t>
                <t> A mobile node MAY also include exactly one IPv6 tunneling
                    mode extension when it uses the co-located care-of address
                    mode of <xref target="RFC3344"/>.</t>
                <t> When IPv6 prefix and/or IPv6 tunneling mode extensions are
                    used by the mobile IP client, they MUST be placed after the
                    registration request header and before the mobile – home
                    authentication extension so they MUST be included in the
                    computation of any authentication extension.</t>
                <!--   <t> A foreign agent MAY include exactly one IPv6 tunneling mode
                    extension, defined in this specification, in a registration
                    request when a mobile node registers using the care-of
                    address mode via the foreign agent.</t>
                <t> When the IPv6 tunneling mode extension is used by a foreign
                    agent it MUST be placed after the mobile – home
                    authentication extensions and before the foreign – home
                    authentication extension so they MUST be included in the
                    computation of the foreign – home authentication extension
                    when one exists.</t> -->
            </section>
            <section title="Registration Reply">
                <t> The mechanism described in this specification depends on
                    skippable extensions. For that reason, a registration reply
                    that does not include an IPv6 prefix reply extension, in
                    response to a registration request including an IPv6 prefix
                    request extension, indicates that the home agent does not
                    support IPv6 extensions and has ignored the request.</t>
                <t> If an IPv6 prefix reply extension is included in a
                    registration reply, then the extension indicates the success
                    or failure of the IPv6 prefix registration. The IPv6 prefix
                    reply extension does not affect in any way the code value in
                    the registration reply header but it is superseded by it. In
                    other words if the code field in the registration reply
                    header is set to a reject code, then all IPv6 prefix request
                    extensions are also rejected. If the code field in the
                    registration reply header, however, is set to an accept
                    code, then an IPv6 prefix reply extension with a code field
                    set to a reject code only rejects the binding for the
                    specific IPv6 prefix indicated in the same extension.</t>
                <t> Note that a rejecting IPv6 prefix reply extension has the
                    same effect as not including such an extension at all, in
                    the sense that in both cases the mobile node
                    <!--and foreign
                    agent --> must act as if
                    the corresponding IPv6 prefix request extension included in
                    the registration request was rejected. Of course, the
                    inclusion of the IPv6 prefix reply extension allows the home
                    agent to indicate why a given IPv6 prefix request extension
                    was rejected.
                    <!--Consequently, home agent
                    implementations of this specification SHOULD include, in the
                    registration reply messages, an IPv6 prefix reply extension
                    for each IPv6 prefix request extension included in the
                    corresponding registration request message.-->
                    A detailed description of how the mobile node handles
                    different IPv6 prefix reply extension code values and the
                    absence of IPv6 prefix reply extensions is given in <xref
                        target="MN"/>.</t>
            </section>
            <section anchor="ha" title="Home Agent Considerations">
                <t>The dual stack home agent defined in this specification is a
                    Mobile IPv4 home agent in that, it MUST operate as defined
                    in MIPv4 <xref target="RFC3344"/>. In addition to that, the
                    following mechanisms are defined in this specification.
                    <!--It MUST also, however, perform the following
                    Mobile IPv6 <xref target="RFC3775"/> and NEMO <xref target="RFC3963"/> Home
                    Agent functions to serve the IPv6 address(es)/prefixe(s) for mobile nodes.-->
                </t>
                <t> For each IPv6 prefix request extension included in a valid
                    registration request, a home agent that supports this
                    specification SHOULD include a corresponding IPv6 prefix
                    reply extension in the registration reply message. The home
                    agent MUST NOT include more than one IPv6 prefix reply
                    extension for the same prefix. For each accepted IPv6 prefix
                    the home agent MUST decide the tunneling mode it is going to
                    use and set the code field of the IPv6 prefix reply
                    extension to the appropriate value. The IPv6 prefix field of
                    each of the IPv6 prefix reply extensions included in the
                    registration reply MUST match the IPv6 prefix field of an
                    IPv6 prefix request extension included in the corresponding
                    registration request message.</t>
                <!--      <t>If the IPv6 home address included in an IPv6 prefix request
                    extension is not an on-link IPv6 address with respect to the
                    home agent's current Prefix List or a prefix it is
                    configured to serve, the home agent MUST reject the IPv6
                    prefix request extension and SHOULD return an IPv6 Prefix
                    Reply extension with rejection code "registration rejected,
                    not home subnet" in the registration reply to the mobile
                    node.</t> 
                <t> When the IPv6 prefix request extension contains a /128 IPv6
                    address and unless this home agent already has a binding for
                    the given IPv6 address indicated, the home agent MUST
                    perform Duplicate Address Detection <xref target="RFC4862"/>
                    on the mobile node's home IPv6 link before returning a
                    registration reply. This ensures that no other node on the
                    home link is using the IPv6 home address. Duplicate address
                    detection is not required when the IPv6 prefix request
                    extension contains a prefix. If this Duplicate Address
                    Detection fails for the given IPv6 home address or an
                    associated link local address, then the home agent MUST
                    reject the IPv6 prefix request extension and SHOULD return a
                    registration reply to the mobile node, in which the code
                    field of the corresponding IPv6 prefix reply extension is
                    set to "registration rejected, Duplicate Address Detection
                    failed". </t> -->
                <t>When the home agent sends a successful registration reply to
                    the mobile node, with the code field of a corresponding IPv6
                    prefix reply extension set to one of the "registration
                    accepted" values, the home agent indicates that the IPv6
                    prefix is registered for the lifetime granted for the
                    binding. It also indicates the tunneling mode used i.e.,
                    tunneling to home address or care-of address, based on the
                    value of the code field used in the IPv6 prefix reply
                    extension. </t>
                <!--            <t> The specific addresses, which are to be tested before accepting the Registration
                    Request and later to be defended by performing Duplicate Address Detection,
                    depend on the setting of the Link-Local Address Compatibility (L) bit, as
                    follows:</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>L=0: Defend only the given address. Do not derive a link-local address.</t>
                        <t>L=1: Defend both the given non link-local unicast (home) address and the
                            derived link-local. The link-local address is derived by replacing the
                            subnet prefix in the mobile node's home address with the link-local
                            prefix.</t>
                    </list>
                </t> -->
                <t>Note that since only IPv6 prefixes (and not addresses) are
                    supported by this specification, there is no need for
                    Duplicate Address Detection. The home agent, however, MUST
                    check that registered prefixes are not overlapping so that
                    all addresses under each registered prefix belong to a
                    single mobile node at any one time. These prefixes MUST NOT
                    appear as on-link to any other node (e.g., via Router
                    Advertisements).</t>
                <section title="IPv6 Reachability">
                    <!--   <t>Dual stack home agents MUST use Proxy Neighbor Discovery
                            <xref target="RFC4861"/> on behalf of the nodes they
                        serve. This allows the home agent to receive IPv6
                        packets addressed to the mobile node's registered IPv6
                        address(es).</t>
                    <t>In this respect, the dual stack home agent MUST act as
                        defined in MIPv6 <xref target="RFC3775"/>, Section
                        10.4.1. in order to intercept IPv6 packets for the
                        mobile nodes it serves.</t> -->
                    <t> For each registered IPv6 prefix, the home agent MUST
                        advertise its reachability as defined in NEMO <xref
                            target="RFC3963"/>, section 6.3.</t>
                </section>
                <section anchor="tun"
                    title="Processing intercepted IPv6 Packets">
                    <t>A dual stack home agent that supports the IPv6 extensions
                        defined in this specification, MUST keep track of the
                        following IPv6 related state for the mobile nodes it
                        supports, in addition to the state defined in <xref
                            target="RFC3344"/>.</t>
                    <t>- Registered IPv6 prefix(es) and prefix length(s)</t>
                    <t>- Tunneling mode for IPv6 traffic:</t>
                    <t>
                        <list>
                            <t>- Tunnel to IPv4 HoA and accept IPv6 tunneled
                                from IPv4 HoA.</t>
                            <t>- Tunnel to CoA and accept IPv6 tunneled from
                                CoA.</t>
                        </list>
                    </t>
                    <t> When IPv6 traffic is encapsulated over the tunnel
                        between the HA and the mobile node's care-off address,
                        the tunneling mechanism used should be the same as the
                        mechanism negotiated by the Mobile IP header as defined
                        in MIPv4 <xref target="RFC3344"/>. In that case, when
                        IPinIP encapsulation is negotiated, IPv6 is tunneled
                        over IPv4 according to <xref target="RFC4213"/>. GRE
                        also allow tunneling of IPv6 packets by setting the
                        Protocol Type <xref target="RFC2784"/> field, to the
                        appropriate payload type defined for IPv6 by IANA.
                        Minimal Encapsulation <xref target="RFC2004"/> cannot be
                        used, since the second (inner) IP header is IPv6, which
                        is not supported by <xref target="RFC2004"/>. </t>
                    <t>When IPv6 traffic is encapsulated over the tunnel between
                        the HA and the mobile node's home address, IPv6 is
                        always tunneled over IPv4 according to <xref
                            target="RFC4213"/>.The resulting IPv4 packet is then
                        delivered just like any other IPv4 packet addressed to
                        the IPv4 HoA (using the tunneling for normal IPv4
                        traffic, possibly going via FA). </t>
                    <!-- <t> A home agent that supports this specification MUST be
                        able to defend IPv4 and IPv6 addresses registered by
                        mobile nodes according to mechanisms described in MIPv4
                            <xref target="RFC3344"/> and MIPv6 <xref
                            target="RFC3775"/> specifications. </t> -->
                    <t> Tunneling mode selection for IPv6 traffic depends on the
                        following parameters in a successful registration
                        request:</t>
                    <t>1) A registration request is received with one or more
                        IPv6 prefix request extensions. An IPv6 tunneling mode
                        extension is not included.</t>
                    <t>
                        <list>
                            <t>All IPv6 packets destined to the registered IPv6
                                prefix(es) MUST be tunneled by the home agent to
                                the registered IPv4 home address of the mobile
                                node. The home agent first encapsulates the IPv6
                                packet, addressing it to the mobile node's IPv4
                                home address, and then tunnels this encapsulated
                                packet to the foreign agent. This extra level of
                                encapsulation is required so that IPv6 routing
                                remains transparent to a foreign agent that does
                                not support IPv6. When received by the foreign
                                agent, the unicast encapsulated packet is
                                detunneled and delivered to the mobile node in
                                the same way as any other packet. The mobile
                                node must decapsulate the received IPv4 packet
                                in order to recover the original IPv6 packet.</t>
                            <t> Additionally, the home agent MUST be prepared to
                                accept reverse tunneled packets from the IPv4
                                home address of the mobile node encapsulating
                                IPv6 packets sent by that mobile node. </t>
                        </list>
                    </t>
                    <t>2) A registration request is received with one or more
                        IPv6 prefix request extensions. An IPv6 tunneling mode
                        extension is included.</t>
                    <t>
                        <list>
                            <t>All IPv6 packets destined to the registered IPv6
                                prefix(es) SHOULD be tunneled by the home agent
                                to the registered care-of address of the mobile
                                node. Additionally, the home agent SHOULD be
                                prepared to accept reverse tunneled packets from
                                the care-of address of the mobile node
                                encapsulating IPv6 packets sent by that mobile
                                node. The home agent MAY ignore the presence of
                                the IPv6 tunneling mode extension and act as in
                                case (1) above. </t>
                        </list>
                    </t>
                    <!--<t>Packets addressed to the mobile node's IPv6 link-local
                        address MUST NOT be tunneled to the mobile node.
                        Instead, these packets MUST be discarded and the home
                        agent SHOULD return an ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable,
                        code 3, message to the packet's Source Address (unless
                        this Source Address is a multicast address).</t> -->
                    <!-- Packets addressed to
   the mobile node's site-local address SHOULD NOT be tunneled to the
   mobile node by default. -->
                    <t> The home agent MUST check that all inner IPv6 packets
                        received from the mobile node over a tunnel with the
                        mobile node's home address or the care-of address as the
                        outer source address, include a source address that
                        falls under the registered IPv6 prefix(es) for that
                        mobile node. If the source address of the outer header
                        of a tunneled packet is not the registered IPv4 care-of
                        address or the registered IPv4 home addresses, the
                        packet SHOULD be dropped. If the source address of the
                        inner header of an tunneled packet does not match any of
                        the registered prefixes the packet SHOULD be dropped.</t>
                    <!--   <t> Interception and tunneling IPv6 multicast addressed
                        packets on the home network is only done if the home
                        agent supports multicast group membership control
                        messages from the mobile node as described in the next
                        section. Multicast IPv6 packets addressed to a multicast
                        address with link-local scope <xref target="RFC4291"/>,
                        to which the mobile node is subscribed, MUST NOT be
                        tunneled to the mobile node. These packets SHOULD be
                        silently discarded (after delivering to other local
                        multicast recipients). Multicast packets addressed to a
                        multicast address with a scope larger than link-local,
                        but smaller than global (e.g., site- local and
                        organization-local <xref target="RFC4291"/>, to which
                        the mobile node is subscribed, SHOULD NOT be tunneled to
                        the mobile node. -->
                    <t>Multicast packets addressed to a group to which the
                        mobile node has successfully subscribed, MUST be
                        tunneled to the mobile node.</t>
                </section>
                <section title="IPv6 Multicast Membership Control">
                    <t>IPv6 multicast membership control is provided as defined
                        in MIPv6 <xref target="RFC3775"/>, Section 10.4.3. The
                        only clarification required for the purpose of this
                        specification is that all MLD <xref target="RFC2710"/>
                        or MLDv2 <xref target="RFC3810"/> messages between the
                        mobile node and the home agent MUST be tunneled over an
                        IPv4 tunnel between the mobile node's IPv4 home address
                        and the home agent's IPv4 address, bypassing the foreign
                        agent. Note that if tunneling to the care-of address has
                        been negotiated for other traffic, then the rest of the
                        traffic continues using this tunnel.</t>
                </section>
                <!--               <section title="Sending IPv6 Prefix Information to the Mobile Node">
                    <t>Mobile IPv6 arranges to propagate relevant prefix information to the mobile
                        node when it is away from home, so that it may be used in mobile node home
                        address configuration and in network renumbering.</t>
                    <t>editor's note: SHOULD WE SUPPORT SUCH A MECHANISM HERE?</t>
                </section>-->
                <!--

   o  A Home Address destination option MUST be present in the message.
      It MUST be validated as described in Section 9.3.1 with the
      following additional rule.  The Binding Cache entry existence test
      MUST NOT be done for IPsec packets when the Home Address option
      contains an address for which the receiving node could act as a
      home agent.

   If home agent accepts the Binding Update, it MUST then create a new
   entry in its Binding Cache for this mobile node or update its
   existing Binding Cache entry, if such an entry already exists.  The
   Home Address field as received in the Home Address option provides
   the home address of the mobile node.

   The home agent MUST mark this Binding Cache entry as a home
   registration to indicate that the node is serving as a home agent for
   this binding.  Binding Cache entries marked as a home registration
   MUST be excluded from the normal cache replacement policy used for
   the Binding Cache (Section 9.6) and MUST NOT be removed from the
   Binding Cache until the expiration of the Lifetime period.



                   
    -->
            </section>
            <section title="Foreign Agent Considerations">
                <t>This specification does not afect the operation of the
                    foreign agent.</t>
                <!--        <t>A dual stack foreign agent that supports the IPv6 extensions
                    defined in this specification MUST keep track of the
                    following IPv6 related state for the mobile IP clients it
                    supports in addition to the state defined in <xref
                        target="RFC3344"/>.</t>
                <t>- IPv6 Prefix(es) and Prefix Length(s)</t>
                <t>- Tunneling mode for IPv6 traffic:</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>- accept IPv6 encapsulated in IPv4 and reverse tunnel
                            IPv6</t>
                        <t>- IPv6 is tunneled directly to the IPv4 HoA so the
                            foreign agent will not provide
                            encapsulation/decapsulation services for IPv6
                            traffic for this mobile node.</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>When a foreign agent receives a registration request with
                    IPv6 prefix request extension(s) it has the following
                    choices:</t>
                <t>1) Ignore the extension(s). The registration request is
                    forwarded as is to the home agent. </t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>The foreign agent SHOULD operate according to MIPv4
                                <xref target="RFC3344"/>. </t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>2) Attach an IPv6 tunneling mode extension to the
                    registration request sent to the home agent.</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>The foreign agent MUST be prepared to decapsulate and
                            deliver IPv6 packets, in addition to the IPv4
                            packets, sent to it in the home agent to foreign
                            agent tunnel for that mobile node. The foreign agent
                            MUST be prepared to receive IPv6 packets from the
                            mobile node, in addition to IPv4 packets. All IPv6
                            traffic MUST be reverse tunneled to the home agent
                            by the foreign agent irrespectively from the reverse
                            tunneling setting negotiated for IPv4 packets by
                            mechanisms in <xref target="RFC3024"/>. </t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>If the foreign agent sets the R flag included in the mobility
                    agent advertisement <xref target="RFC3344"/> and a mobile
                    node uses the co-located address mode of operation, the
                    foreign agent MUST NOT include an IPv6 tunneling mode
                    extension in the registration request messages sent from
                    that mobile node.</t> -->
            </section>
            <section anchor="MN" title="Mobile Node Considerations">
                <t>A dual stack mobile node that supports the extensions
                    described in this document MAY use these extensions to
                    register its IPv6 prefix(es) while moving between access
                    routers.</t>
                <t>The mobile node MAY include one or more IPv6 prefix request
                    extension(s) in the registration request. </t>
                <t> In this case the mobile MUST take the following action
                    depending on the extensions included in the registration
                    reply it receives in response to the registration request:</t>
                <t>1) The registration reply does not include any IPv6 prefix
                    reply extensions.</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t> The mobile node MUST assume that the home agent does
                            not support the extensions defined in this
                            specification. The mobile node SHOULD continue to
                            operate according to MIPv4 <xref target="RFC3344"/>.
                        </t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>2) The registration reply includes one or more IPv6 prefix
                    reply extensions.</t>
                <t>
                    <list>
                        <t>The mobile node MUST match each IPv6 prefix reply
                            extension with one of the IPv6 prefix request
                            extensions earlier included in the corresponding
                            registration request message.</t>
                        <t> If a matching IPv6 prefix reply extension is not
                            included for one or more of corresponding IPv6
                            prefix request extensions included in the
                            registration request message, the mobile node MUST
                            assume that these IPv6 prefixes are rejected.</t>
                        <t> For each matching IPv6 prefix reply extension the
                            mobile node MUST inspect the code field. If the
                            field is set to a rejection code then the
                            corresponding IPv6 prefix registration has been
                            rejected. If the code field is set to an acceptance
                            code then the corresponding IPv6 prefix registration
                            has been accepted.</t>
                        <t> If the code field is set to “0” then the mobile node
                            MUST be prepared to send/receive IPv6 packets
                            encapsulated in the bidirectional tunnel between the
                            home agent address and the registered IPv4 home
                            address of the mobile node.</t>
                        <t>If the code field is set to “1” then the mobile node
                            MUST act as follows:</t>
                        <!--    <t>- If the foreign agent care-of address mode of
                            operation is used, the mobile node MUST be prepared
                            to send/receive IPv6 traffic on its interface
                            natively (i.e., without any Mobile IP related tunnel
                            headers). If reverse tunneling is negotiated, then
                            IPv6 traffic sent by the mobile node may be reverse
                            tunneled via the foreign agent using either the
                            direct delivery style or the encapsulating delivery
                            style as defined in <xref target="RFC3024"/> for
                            IPv4 traffic.</t> -->
                        <t>- Assuming the co-located care-of address mode is
                            used, the mobile node MUST be prepared to
                            send/receive IPv6 packets over the bidirectional
                            tunnel between the home agent address and its
                            co-located care-of address. Otherwise the mobile
                            node SHOULD act as in the case where the code field
                            is set to "0".</t>
                    </list>
                </t>
                <t>The mobile node SHOULD include exactly one IPv6 tunneling
                    mode extension if it uses the co-located care-of address
                    model and it wants to request that IPv6 packets are tunneled
                    to its co-located care-of address. If the mobile node uses
                    the co-located care-of address model but it does not include
                    the IPv6 tunneling mode extension, the home agent will
                    tunnel IPv6 traffic to the mobile node’s IPv4 home address.
                    The mobile node MUST NOT include an IPv6 tunneling mode
                    extension if it uses the foreign agent care-of address mode
                    of operation. Note that if the mobile node includes an IPv6
                    tunneling mode extension in this case, IPv6 packets could be
                    tunneled to the FA by the HA. The FA is then likely to drop
                    them since it will not have appropriate state to process
                    them.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="Tunneling Impacts">
                <t>When IPv6 runs over an IPv4 tunnel, the IPv6 tunnel end
                    points can treat the IPv4 tunnel as a single hop link as
                    defined in <xref target="RFC4213"/>. The two tunnel end
                    points, e.g., mobile node and home agent, MUST configure
                    link local IPv6 addresses as defined in <xref
                        target="RFC4213"/>, section 3.7, while they MUST also
                    adhear to the neighbor discovery requirements of the same
                    specification, section 3.8 and the hop limit requirements of
                    section 3.3. </t>
                <t>With respect to the Tunnel MTU an implementation MUST support
                    the Static Tunnel MTU approach as defined in <xref
                        target="RFC4213"/>, section 3.2. Implementation and use
                    of the Dynamic Tunnel MTU method defined in the same section
                    of <xref target="RFC4213"/> is OPTIONAL.</t>
                <t> To accommodate traffic that uses Explicit Congestion
                    Notification (ECN), it is RECOMMENDED that the ECN and DSCP
                    information is copied between the inner and outer header as
                    defined in <xref target="RFC3168"/> and <xref
                        target="RFC2983"/>. It is RECOMMENDED that the
                    full-functionality option defined in section 9.1.1 of <xref
                        target="RFC3168"/> is used to deal with ECN</t>
            </section>
            <section title="IPv6 Prefixes">
                <t>
                    <!-->The dynamic IPv6 prefix allocation described in the following
                    section reuses the Mobile IPv4 mechanisms defined for IPv4
                    address allocation. -->
                    An implementation can use any number of mechanisms to
                    allocate IPv6 prefixes to a mobile node. Once one or more
                    IPv6 prefixes are allocated, they can be registered using
                    the extensions and mechanism already described in this
                    specification.</t>
                <t>How a home agent decides to accept an IPv6 prefix for a given
                    mobile node is out of scope of this specification. Local
                    configuration or external authorization via an authorization
                    system e.g., Diameter <xref target="RFC3588"/>, or other
                    mechanisms may be used to make such determination.</t>
                <!--       <section title="Mobile IP Style Address Allocation">
                    <t>A mobile node may include one or more IPv6 prefix request
                        extensions with the IPv6 prefix field set to zero. The
                        mobile node MAY set the prefix length field of such
                        extensions to zero or to a length of its choice as a
                        hint to the home agent. Such IPv6 prefix request
                        extensions indicate that the mobile node requests IPv6
                        address(es) and prefix(es) to be assigned to it by the
                        home agent. </t>
                    <t>A home agent receiving an IPv6 prefix request extension
                        with the IPv6 prefix field set to zero MAY return an
                        IPv6 prefix reply extension with the IPv6 prefix field
                        set to the IPv6 prefix allocated to the mobile node. The
                        length of that prefix is at the discretion of the home
                        agent. The home agent may take into account the prefix
                        length hint if one is included in the IPv6 Prefix
                        Request extension.</t>
                    <t>A mobile node MAY include one or more IPv6 prefix request
                        extensions with the IPv6 Prefix field set to
                        ::interface_identifier, where interface_identifier is
                        the unique layer 2 address of the client. The
                        interface_identifier MUST be less than or equal to 64
                        bits in length. In this case the prefix length field
                        MUST be set to 128.</t>
                    <t>The home agent MAY in this case return an IPv6 Prefix
                        Reply extension with:</t>
                    <t>
                        <list>
                            <t>- the IPv6 prefix field set to PREFIX:: and the
                                prefix length field set to the desired prefix
                                length value. In this case the PREFIX:: subnet
                                is allocated to the mobile node, which should
                                proceed in constructing IPv6 addresses as
                                defined in <xref target="RFC4862"/>
                            </t>
                            <t>- the IPv6 prefix field set to
                                PREFIX::interface_identifier and the prefix
                                length field set to 128. In this case an
                                individual IPv6 address is allocated to the
                                mobile node.</t>
                        </list>
                    </t>
                </section>-->
                <section title="Dynamic IPv6 Prefix Delegation">
                    <t>A dual stack mobile node MAY use prefix delegation as
                        defined in DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation <xref
                            target="RFC3633"/> to get access to IPv6 prefixes.
                        In that case, if the mobile node is not directly
                        attached to its home agent, the mobile node MUST first
                        register its IPv4 home address as per MIPv4 <xref
                            target="RFC3344"/>. When that is done the mobile
                        node can generate a link local IPv6 address as per <xref
                            target="RFC4213"/>, section 3.7. The mobile node
                        then sends registration request to its home agent,
                        including an IPv6 prefix request extension with prefix
                        length field set to 255 and by setting the mobile IPv6
                        network prefix field to the localy generated link local
                        address. If the registration reply message includes an
                        IPv6 prefix reply extension with the code field set to a
                        success code the mobile node can use the tunnel to send
                        and receive IPv6 link local packets. The mobile node can
                        now send DHCPv6 messages according to <xref
                            target="RFC3633"/>. All IPv6 messages at this stage
                        MUST be tunneled over the IPv4 tunnel between the mobile
                        node's IPv4 home address and the home agent's IPv4
                        address.</t>
                    <t>Once prefixes are delegated, and assuming explicit mode
                        is used, the mobile node SHOULD send a registration
                        request with appropriate IPv6 prefix request extensions
                        to the home agent to register the delegated
                    prefixes.</t>
                </section>
            </section>
            <section title="Deregistration of IPv6 Prefix">
                <t>The mobile IP registration lifetime included in the
                    registration request header is valid for all the bindings
                    created by the registration request, which may include
                    bindings for IPv6 prefix(es).</t>
                <t>A registration request with a zero lifetime can be used to
                    remove all bindings from the home agent.</t>
                <t>A re-registration request with non-zero lifetime can be used
                    to deregister some of the registered IPv6 prefixes by not
                    including corresponding IPv6 prefix request extensions in
                    the registration request message.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="Registration with a private CoA">
                <t>If the care-of address is a private address then Mobile IP
                    NAT Traversal as <xref target="RFC3519"/> MAY be used in
                    combination with the extensions described in this
                    specification. In that case, to transport IPv6 packets, the
                    next header field of the Mobile Tunnel Data message header
                        <xref target="RFC3519"/> MUST be set to the value for
                    IPv6. Note that in that case the encapsulation field of the
                    UDP Tunnel Request Extension defined in <xref
                        target="RFC3519"/> MUST be set to zero.</t>
            </section>
        </section>
        <!--       <section title="IPv6 Support for Dynamic Routing Protocols">
            <t>In the solution described so far, forwarding for traffic to mobile node's prefixes is
                set up when the home agent receives a registration request including IPv6 prefix request
                extensions for the mobile node. An alternative to this is for the home agent and an
                IPv6 enabled Mobile Router to run an intra-domain routing protocol. The mechanism is
                fully defined in NEMO <xref target="RFC3963"/> Section 8, and it fully applies to
                this specification.</t>
        </section> -->
        <section title="Security Considerations">
            <t>This specification operates in the security constraints and
                requirements of <xref target="RFC3344"/>. It extends the
                operations defined in <xref target="RFC3344"/> for IPv4 home
                addresses to cover home IPv6 prefixes and provides the same
                level of security for both IP address versions.</t>
            <!-- <t>As defined in the security considerations section of RFC3344,
                ingress filtering in the data path may prevent mobiles from
                using triangular routing for their IPv6 communications even if
                the foreign agent used supports the dual stack extensions
                defined in this specification. In such cases reverse tunneling
                can be used to allow for effective ingress filtering in
                intermediate routers without blocking IPv6 traffic to reach its
                destination.</t> -->
            <t>Home agents MUST perform appropriate checks for reverse tunneled
                IPv6 packets similar to what is defined in <xref
                    target="RFC3024"/> for IPv4 packets. The check defined in
                    <xref target="RFC3024"/> requires that the outer header's
                source address is set to a registered care-of address for the
                mobile node and as such the same check protects from attacks
                whether the encapsulated (inner) header is IPv4 or IPv6.</t>
            <t>In addition to that, the home agent MUST check that the source
                address of the inner header is a registered IPv4 home address or
                IPv6 prefix for this mobile node. If that is not the case, the
                home agent SHOULD silently discard the packet and log the event
                as a security exception.</t>
            <t>Security devices should look for IPv6 packets encapsulated over
                IPv4 either directly to the mobile node's care-of address or via
                double encpasulation first to the mobile node's IPv4 home
                address and then to the mobile node's care-of addres.
                Interactions with Mobile IPv4 and IPsec have been covered
                elsewhere, for instance in <xref target="RFC5265"/> and <xref
                    target="RFC5266"/>. </t>
        </section>
        <section title="IANA Considerations">
            <t> This specification requires the allocation of a new type number
                for DSMIPv4 extensions, from the space of numbers for skippable
                mobility extensions (i.e., 128-255), defined for Mobile IPv4
                    <xref target="RFC3344"/> at
                http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobileip-numbers, under
                extensions appearing in Mobile IP control messages.. </t>
            <t> This specification also creates a new subtype space for the type
                number of this extension. The subtype values 1, 2 and 3 are
                defined in this specification, while the rest of the sub-types
                are reserved and available for allocation based on expert
                review. </t>
            <t>Finally, this specification creates a new space for the code
                field of the IPv6 prefix reply extension. Values 0, 1, 8, and 9
                are defined in this specification. Values 2-7 are reserved for
                accept codes and values 10-255 are reserved for reject codes. </t>
            <t>Similar to the procedures specified for Mobile IPv4 <xref
                    target="RFC3344"/> number spaces, future allocations from
                the two number spaces require expert review <xref
                    target="RFC5226"/>.</t>
        </section>
        <!--     <section anchor="tbr" title="Change history">
            <t>NOTE TO RFC EDITOR: Remove <xref target="tbr"/> before
                publication.</t>
            <section title="Changes from v04 to v05">
                <t>Corrected nits.</t>
                <t> Added IANA considerations section.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="Changes from v03 to v04">
                <t>Clarified that DAD is only needed on IPv6 addresses and not
                    prefixes, in <xref target="ha"/>.</t>
                <t>Clarified of tunneling process in <xref target="tun"/>
                </t>
                <t>Numerous editorial and clarification changes.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="Changes from v02 to v03">
                <t>Clarified high level description of implicit mode in <xref
                        target="imp-exp"/> (thanks to Kent for suggesting
                    appropriate text).</t>
                <t>Clarified how IPv6 is tunneled over various tunneling modes
                    allowed by MIPv4 in <xref target="tun"/> (thanks to Alex for
                    spotting this).</t>
                <t>Numerous editorial and clarification changes.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="Changes from v01 to v02">
                <t>Expanded high level description of explicit mode in <xref
                        target="imp-exp"/>. </t>
                <t>Fixed alignment of figures.</t>
                <t>Fixed length fields in extensions to reflect short extension
                    format correctly (thanks to Jun Awano for catching this one)</t>
                <t>Removed section on Prefix Delegation and replaced it with
                    more generic text that allows any other address allocation
                    mechanism to be used to allocate IPv6 addresses and then
                    extensions and mechanism described in this specification can
                    be used to registered these addresses.</t>
                <t>Numerous editorial and clarification changes.</t>
            </section>
            <section title="Changes from v00 to v01">
                <t>The home agent Considerations section was re-written and
                    expanded with a lot more details by adapting text from MIPv6
                    and NEMO specifications.</t>
                <t>New error codes were added to section 3.2</t>
                <t>Allowed for any length prefix, not just 64 and 128.</t>

                <t>Numerous editorial and clarification changes.</t>
            </section>
        </section>-->
        <section title="Acknowledgements">
            <t>Thanks to Pat Calhoun, Paal Engelstad, Tom Hiller and Pete McCann
                for earlier work on this subject. Thanks also to Alex Petrescu
                for various suggestions. Special thanks also to Sri Gundavelli
                and Kent Leung for their thorough review and suggestions.</t>
        </section>
    </middle>
    <back>
        <references title="Normative References"> &rfc2119; &rfc5226;
            &rfc2460; &rfc3024; &rfc3344; &rfc3519;
            &rfc3633; &rfc3775; &rfc3963; &rfc4213; </references>
        <references title="Informative References">&rfc2004; &rfc2710;
            &rfc2784; &rfc2983; &rfc3168; &rfc3588;
            &rfc3810; &rfc5265; &rfc5266;</references>
    </back>
</rfc>
