NETCONF Working Group K. Watsen Internet-Draft Watsen Networks Intended status: Standards Track M. Scharf Expires: 14 August 2021 Hochschule Esslingen 10 February 2021 YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09 Abstract This document defines three YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] modules to support the configuration of TCP clients and TCP servers, either as standalone or in conjunction with a stack protocol layer specific configurations. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) This draft contains placeholder values that need to be replaced with finalized values at the time of publication. This note summarizes all of the substitutions that are needed. No other RFC Editor instructions are specified elsewhere in this document. Artwork in this document contains shorthand references to drafts in progress. Please apply the following replacements: * "DDDD" --> the assigned RFC value for this draft Artwork in this document contains placeholder values for the date of publication of this draft. Please apply the following replacement: * "2021-02-10" --> the publication date of this draft The following Appendix section is to be removed prior to publication: * Appendix A. Change Log Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 August 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Relation to other RFCs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Specification Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.3. Adherence to the NMDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. The "ietf-tcp-common" Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. Data Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. Example Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3. The "ietf-tcp-client" Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.1. Data Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2. Example Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.3. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4. The "ietf-tcp-server" Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1. Data Model Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.2. Example Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.3. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.1. The "ietf-tcp-common" YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.2. The "ietf-tcp-client" YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.3. The "ietf-tcp-server" YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.1. The "IETF XML" Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.2. The "YANG Module Names" Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 A.1. 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 A.2. 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.3. 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.4. 03 to 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.5. 04 to 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.6. 05 to 06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.7. 06 to 07 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.8. 07 to 08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A.9. 08 to 09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 1. Introduction This document defines three YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] modules to support the configuration of TCP clients and TCP servers, either as standalone or in conjunction with a stack protocol layer specific configurations. 1.1. Relation to other RFCs This document presents one or more YANG modules [RFC7950] that are part of a collection of RFCs that work together to, ultimately, enable the configuration of the clients and servers of both the NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040] protocols. The modules have been defined in a modular fashion to enable their use by other efforts, some of which are known to be in progress at the time of this writing, with many more expected to be defined in time. The normative dependency relationship between the various RFCs in the collection is presented in the below diagram. The labels in the diagram represent the primary purpose provided by each RFC. Hyperlinks to each RFC are provided below the diagram. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 crypto-types ^ ^ / \ / \ truststore keystore ^ ^ ^ ^ | +---------+ | | | | | | | +------------+ | tcp-client-server | / | | ^ ^ ssh-client-server | | | | ^ tls-client-server | | | ^ ^ http-client-server | | | | | ^ | | | +-----+ +---------+ | | | | | | | | +-----------|--------|--------------+ | | | | | | | | +-----------+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | netconf-client-server restconf-client-server +=======================+===========================================+ |Label in Diagram | Originating RFC | +=======================+===========================================+ |crypto-types | [I-D.ietf-netconf-crypto-types] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |truststore | [I-D.ietf-netconf-trust-anchors] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |keystore | [I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |tcp-client-server | [I-D.ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |ssh-client-server | [I-D.ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |tls-client-server | [I-D.ietf-netconf-tls-client-server] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |http-client-server | [I-D.ietf-netconf-http-client-server] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |netconf-client-server | [I-D.ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ |restconf-client-server | [I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server] | +-----------------------+-------------------------------------------+ Table 1: Label to RFC Mapping Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 1.2. Specification Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 1.3. Adherence to the NMDA This document in compliant with the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. It does not define any protocol accessible nodes that are "config false". 2. The "ietf-tcp-common" Module This section defines a YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] module called "ietf-tcp- common". A high-level overview of the module is provided in Section 2.1. Examples illustatrating the module's use are provided in Examples (Section 2.2). The YANG module itself is defined in Section 2.3. 2.1. Data Model Overview This section provides an overview of the "ietf-tcp-common" module in terms of its features and groupings. 2.1.1. Model Scope This document defines a common "grouping" statement for basic TCP connection parameters that matter to applications. In some TCP stacks, such parameters can also directly be set by an application using system calls, such as the socket API. The base YANG model in this document focuses on modeling TCP keep-alives. This base model can be extended as needed. 2.1.2. Features The following diagram lists all the "feature" statements defined in the "ietf-tcp-common" module: Features: +-- keepalives-supported | The diagram above uses syntax that is similar to but not | defined in [RFC8340]. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 2.1.3. Groupings The "ietf-tcp-common" module defines the following "grouping" statements: * tcp-common-grouping * tcp-connection-grouping These groupings are presented in the following subsections. 2.1.3.1. The "tcp-common-grouping" Grouping The following tree diagram [RFC8340] illustrates the "tcp-common- grouping" grouping: grouping tcp-common-grouping +-- keepalives! {keepalives-supported}? +-- idle-time uint16 +-- max-probes uint16 +-- probe-interval uint16 Comments: * The "keepalives" node is a "presence" node so that the decendent nodes' "mandatory true" doesn't imply that keepalives must be configured. * The "idle-time", "max-probes", and "probe-interval" nodes have the common meanings. Please see the YANG module in Section 2.3 for details. 2.1.3.2. The "tcp-connection-grouping" Grouping The following tree diagram [RFC8340] illustrates the "tcp-connection- grouping" grouping: grouping tcp-connection-grouping +---u tcp-common-grouping Comments: * This grouping uses the "tcp-common-grouping" grouping discussed in Section 2.1.3.1. 2.1.4. Protocol-accessible Nodes The "ietf-tcp-common" module does not contain any protocol-accessible nodes. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 2.1.5. Guidelines for Configuring TCP Keep-Alives Network stacks may include "keep-alives" in their TCP implementations, although this practice is not universally accepted. If keep-alives are included, [RFC1122] [RFC793bis] mandates that the application MUST be able to turn them on or off for each TCP connection, and that they MUST default to off. Keep-alive mechanisms exist in many protocols. Depending on the protocol stack, TCP keep-alives may only be one out of several alternatives. Which mechanism(s) to use depends on the use case and application requirements. If keep-alives are needed by an application, it is RECOMMENDED that the aliveness check happens only at the protocol layers that are meaningful to the application. A TCP keep-alive mechanism SHOULD only be invoked in server applications that might otherwise hang indefinitely and consume resources unnecessarily if a client crashes or aborts a connection during a network failure [RFC1122]. TCP keep-alives may consume significant resources both in the network and in endpoints (e.g., battery power). In addition, frequent keep-alives risk network congestion. The higher the frequency of keep-alives, the higher the overhead. Given the cost of keep-alives, parameters have to be configured carefully: * The default idle interval (leaf "idle-time") MUST default to no less than two hours, i.e., 7200 seconds [RFC1122]. A lower value MAY be configured, but keep-alive messages SHOULD NOT be transmitted more frequently than once every 15 seconds. Longer intervals SHOULD be used when possible. * The maximum number of sequential keep-alive probes that can fail (leaf "max-probes") trades off responsiveness and robustness against packet loss. ACK segments that contain no data are not reliably transmitted by TCP. Consequently, if a keep-alive mechanism is implemented it MUST NOT interpret failure to respond to any specific probe as a dead connection [RFC1122]. Typically a single-digit number should suffice. * TCP implementations may include a parameter for the number of seconds between TCP keep-alive probes (leaf "probe-interval"). In order to avoid congestion, the time interval between probes MUST NOT be smaller than one second. Significantly longer intervals SHOULD be used. It is important to note that keep-alive probes (or replies) can get dropped due to network congestion. Sending further probe messages into a congested path after a short Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 interval, without backing off timers, could cause harm and result in a congestion collapse. Therefore it is essential to pick a large, conservative value for this interval. 2.2. Example Usage This section presents an example showing the "tcp-common-grouping" populated with some data. 15 3 30 2.3. YANG Module The ietf-tcp-common YANG module references [RFC6991]. file "ietf-tcp-common@2021-02-10.yang" module ietf-tcp-common { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-common"; prefix tcpcmn; organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group and the IETF TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Authors: Kent Watsen Michael Scharf "; description "This module defines reusable groupings for TCP commons that can be used as a basis for specific TCP common instances. Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC DDDD (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcDDDD); see the RFC itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here."; revision 2021-02-10 { description "Initial version"; reference "RFC DDDD: YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers"; } // Features feature keepalives-supported { description "Indicates that keepalives are supported."; } // Groupings grouping tcp-common-grouping { description "A reusable grouping for configuring TCP parameters common to TCP connections as well as the operating system as a whole."; container keepalives { if-feature "keepalives-supported"; presence "Indicates that keepalives are enabled. Present so that the decendant nodes' 'mandatory true' doesn't imply that this node must be configured."; description "Configures the keep-alive policy, to proactively test the aliveness of the TCP peer. An unresponsive TCP peer is dropped after approximately (idle-time + max-probes Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 * probe-interval) seconds."; leaf idle-time { type uint16 { range "1..max"; } units "seconds"; mandatory true; description "Sets the amount of time after which if no data has been received from the TCP peer, a TCP-level probe message will be sent to test the aliveness of the TCP peer. Two hours (7200 seconds) is safe value, per RFC 1122."; reference "RFC 1122: Requirements for Internet Hosts -- Communication Layers"; } leaf max-probes { type uint16 { range "1..max"; } mandatory true; description "Sets the maximum number of sequential keep-alive probes that can fail to obtain a response from the TCP peer before assuming the TCP peer is no longer alive."; } leaf probe-interval { type uint16 { range "1..max"; } units "seconds"; mandatory true; description "Sets the time interval between failed probes. The interval SHOULD be significantly longer than one second in order to avoid harm on a congested link."; } } // container keepalives } // grouping tcp-common-grouping grouping tcp-connection-grouping { description "A reusable grouping for configuring TCP parameters common to TCP connections."; uses tcp-common-grouping; } Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 } 3. The "ietf-tcp-client" Module This section defines a YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] module called "ietf-tcp- client". A high-level overview of the module is provided in Section 3.1. Examples illustatrating the module's use are provided in Examples (Section 3.2). The YANG module itself is defined in Section 3.3. 3.1. Data Model Overview This section provides an overview of the "ietf-tcp-client" module in terms of its features and groupings. 3.1.1. Features The following diagram lists all the "feature" statements defined in the "ietf-tcp-client" module: Features: +-- local-binding-supported +-- tcp-client-keepalives +-- proxy-connect +-- socks5-gss-api +-- socks5-username-password | The diagram above uses syntax that is similar to but not | defined in [RFC8340]. 3.1.2. Groupings The "ietf-tcp-client" module defines the following "grouping" statement: * tcp-client-grouping This grouping is presented in the following subsection. 3.1.2.1. The "tcp-client-grouping" Grouping The following tree diagram [RFC8340] illustrates the "tcp-client- grouping" grouping: Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 grouping tcp-client-grouping +-- remote-address inet:host +-- remote-port? inet:port-number +-- local-address? inet:ip-address | {local-binding-supported}? +-- local-port? inet:port-number | {local-binding-supported}? +-- proxy-server! {proxy-connect}? | +-- (proxy-type) | +--:(socks4) | | +-- socks4-parameters | | +-- remote-address inet:ip-address | | +-- remote-port? inet:port-number | +--:(socks4a) | | +-- socks4a-parameters | | +-- remote-address inet:host | | +-- remote-port? inet:port-number | +--:(socks5) | +-- socks5-parameters | +-- remote-address inet:host | +-- remote-port? inet:port-number | +-- authentication-parameters! | +-- (auth-type) | +--:(gss-api) {socks5-gss-api}? | | +-- gss-api | +--:(username-password) | {socks5-username-password}? | +-- username-password | +-- username string | +---u ct:password-grouping +---u tcpcmn:tcp-connection-grouping Comments: * The "remote-address" node, which is mandatory, may be configured as an IPv4 address, an IPv6 address, a hostname. * The "remote-port" node is not mandatory, but its default value is the invalid value '0', thus forcing the consuming data model to refine it in order to provide it an appropriate default value. * The "local-address" node, which is enabled by the "local-binding- supported" feature (Section 2.1.2), may be configured as an IPv4 address, an IPv6 address, or a wildcard value. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 * The "local-port" node, which is enabled by the "local-binding- supported" feature (Section 2.1.2), is not mandatory. Its default value is '0', indicating that the operating system can pick an arbitrary port number. * The "proxy-server" node is enabled by a "feature" statement and, for servers that enable it, is a "presence" container so that the decendent "mandatory true" choice node doesn't imply that the proxt-server node must be configured. * This grouping uses the "tcp-connection-grouping" grouping discussed in Section 2.1.3.2. 3.1.3. Protocol-accessible Nodes The "ietf-tcp-client" module does not contain any protocol-accessible nodes. 3.2. Example Usage This section presents two examples showing the "tcp-client-grouping" populated with some data. This example shows a TCP-client configured to not connect via a proxy: www.example.com 443 0.0.0.0 0 15 3 30 This example shows a TCP-client configured to connect via a proxy: Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 www.example.com 443 0.0.0.0 0 proxy.my-domain.com 1080 foobar secret 15 3 30 3.3. YANG Module The ietf-tcp-client YANG module references [RFC6991]. file "ietf-tcp-client@2021-02-10.yang" module ietf-tcp-client { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-client"; prefix tcpc; import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; } import ietf-crypto-types { prefix ct; reference "RFC AAAA: YANG Data Types and Groupings for Cryptography"; } import ietf-tcp-common { Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 prefix tcpcmn; reference "RFC DDDD: YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers"; } organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group and the IETF TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Authors: Kent Watsen Michael Scharf "; description "This module defines reusable groupings for TCP clients that can be used as a basis for specific TCP client instances. Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC DDDD (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcDDDD); see the RFC itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here."; revision 2021-02-10 { description "Initial version"; reference "RFC DDDD: YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers"; Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 } // Features feature local-binding-supported { description "Indicates that the server supports configuring local bindings (i.e., the local address and local port) for TCP clients."; } feature tcp-client-keepalives { description "Per socket TCP keepalive parameters are configurable for TCP clients on the server implementing this feature."; } feature proxy-connect { description "Proxy connection configuration is configurable for TCP clients on the server implementing this feature."; } feature socks5-gss-api { description "Indicates that the server supports authenticating using GSSAPI when initiating TCP connections via and SOCKS Version 5 proxy server."; reference "RFC 1928: SOCKS Protocol Version 5"; } feature socks5-username-password { description "Indicates that the server supports authenticating using username/password when initiating TCP connections via and SOCKS Version 5 proxy server."; reference "RFC 1928: SOCKS Protocol Version 5"; } // Groupings grouping tcp-client-grouping { description "A reusable grouping for configuring a TCP client. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 Note that this grouping uses fairly typical descendent node names such that a stack of 'uses' statements will have name conflicts. It is intended that the consuming data model will resolve the issue (e.g., by wrapping the 'uses' statement in a container called 'tcp-client-parameters'). This model purposely does not do this itself so as to provide maximum flexibility to consuming models."; leaf remote-address { type inet:host; mandatory true; description "The IP address or hostname of the remote peer to establish a connection with. If a domain name is configured, then the DNS resolution should happen on each connection attempt. If the DNS resolution results in multiple IP addresses, the IP addresses are tried according to local preference order until a connection has been established or until all IP addresses have failed."; } leaf remote-port { type inet:port-number; default "0"; description "The IP port number for the remote peer to establish a connection with. An invalid default value (0) is used (instead of 'mandatory true') so that as application level data model may 'refine' it with an application specific default port number value."; } leaf local-address { if-feature "local-binding-supported"; type inet:ip-address; description "The local IP address/interface (VRF?) to bind to for when connecting to the remote peer. INADDR_ANY ('0.0.0.0') or INADDR6_ANY ('0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0' a.k.a. '::') MAY be used to explicitly indicate the implicit default, that the server can bind to any IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, respectively."; } leaf local-port { if-feature "local-binding-supported"; type inet:port-number; default "0"; description "The local IP port number to bind to for when connecting Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 to the remote peer. The port number '0', which is the default value, indicates that any available local port number may be used."; } container proxy-server { if-feature "proxy-connect"; presence "Indicates that a proxy connection is configured. Present so that the 'proxy-type' node's 'mandatory true' doesn't imply that the proxy connection must be configured."; choice proxy-type { mandatory true; description "Selects a proxy connection protocol."; case socks4 { container socks4-parameters { leaf remote-address { type inet:ip-address; mandatory true; description "The IP address of the proxy server."; } leaf remote-port { type inet:port-number; default "1080"; description "The IP port number for the proxy server."; } description "Parameters for connecting to a TCP-based proxy server using the SOCKS4 protocol."; reference "SOCKS, Proceedings: 1992 Usenix Security Symposium."; } } case socks4a { container socks4a-parameters { leaf remote-address { type inet:host; mandatory true; description "The IP address or hostname of the proxy server."; } leaf remote-port { type inet:port-number; default "1080"; Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 description "The IP port number for the proxy server."; } description "Parameters for connecting to a TCP-based proxy server using the SOCKS4a protocol."; reference "SOCKS Proceedings: 1992 Usenix Security Symposium. OpenSSH message: SOCKS 4A: A Simple Extension to SOCKS 4 Protocol https://www.openssh.com/txt/socks4a.protocol"; } } case socks5 { container socks5-parameters { leaf remote-address { type inet:host; mandatory true; description "The IP address or hostname of the proxy server."; } leaf remote-port { type inet:port-number; default "1080"; description "The IP port number for the proxy server."; } container authentication-parameters { presence "Indicates that an authentication mechanism has been configured. Present so that the 'auth-type' node's 'mandatory true' doesn't imply that an authentication mechanism must be configured."; description "A container for SOCKS Version 5 authentication mechanisms. A complete list of methods is defined at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/socks-methods /socks-methods.xhtml."; reference "RFC 1928: SOCKS Protocol Version 5"; choice auth-type { mandatory true; description "A choice amongst supported SOCKS Version 5 Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 authentication mechanisms."; case gss-api { if-feature socks5-gss-api; container gss-api { description "Contains GSS-API configuration. Defines as an empty container to enable specific GSS-API configuration to be augmented in by future modules."; reference "RFC 1928: SOCKS Protocol Version 5 RFC 2743: Generic Security Service Application Program Interface Version 2, Update 1"; } } case username-password { if-feature socks5-username-password; container username-password { leaf username { type string; mandatory true; description "The 'username' value to use for client identification."; } uses ct:password-grouping { description "The password to be used for client authentication."; } description "Contains Username/Password configuration."; reference "RFC 1929: Username/Password Authentication for SOCKS V5"; } } } } description "Parameters for connecting to a TCP-based proxy server using the SOCKS5 protocol."; reference "RFC 1928: SOCKS Protocol Version 5"; } } } Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 description "Proxy server settings."; } uses tcpcmn:tcp-connection-grouping { augment "keepalives" { if-feature "tcp-client-keepalives"; description "Add an if-feature statement so that implementations can choose to support TCP client keepalives."; } } } } 4. The "ietf-tcp-server" Module This section defines a YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] module called "ietf-tcp- server". A high-level overview of the module is provided in Section 4.1. Examples illustatrating the module's use are provided in Examples (Section 4.2). The YANG module itself is defined in Section 4.3. 4.1. Data Model Overview This section provides an overview of the "ietf-tcp-server" module in terms of its features and groupings. 4.1.1. Features The following diagram lists all the "feature" statements defined in the "ietf-tcp-server" module: Features: +-- tcp-server-keepalives | The diagram above uses syntax that is similar to but not | defined in [RFC8340]. 4.1.2. Groupings The "ietf-tcp-server" module defines the following "grouping" statement: * tcp-server-grouping Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 This grouping is presented in the following subsection. 4.1.2.1. The "tcp-server-grouping" Grouping The following tree diagram [RFC8340] illustrates the "tcp-server- grouping" grouping: grouping tcp-server-grouping +-- local-address inet:ip-address +-- local-port? inet:port-number +---u tcpcmn:tcp-connection-grouping Comments: * The "local-address" node, which is mandatory, may be configured as an IPv4 address, an IPv6 address, or a wildcard value. * The "local-port" node is not mandatory, but its default value is the invalid value '0', thus forcing the consuming data model to refine it in order to provide it an appropriate default value. * This grouping uses the "tcp-connection-grouping" grouping discussed in Section 2.1.3.2. 4.1.3. Protocol-accessible Nodes The "ietf-tcp-server" module does not contain any protocol-accessible nodes. 4.2. Example Usage This section presents an example showing the "tcp-server-grouping" populated with some data. 10.20.30.40 7777 15 3 30 4.3. YANG Module The ietf-tcp-server YANG module references [RFC6991]. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 file "ietf-tcp-server@2021-02-10.yang" module ietf-tcp-server { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-server"; prefix tcps; import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; } import ietf-tcp-common { prefix tcpcmn; reference "RFC DDDD: YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers"; } organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group and the IETF TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Authors: Kent Watsen Michael Scharf "; description "This module defines reusable groupings for TCP servers that can be used as a basis for specific TCP server instances. Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC DDDD (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcDDDD); see the RFC Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here."; revision 2021-02-10 { description "Initial version"; reference "RFC DDDD: YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers"; } // Features feature tcp-server-keepalives { description "Per socket TCP keepalive parameters are configurable for TCP servers on the server implementing this feature."; } // Groupings grouping tcp-server-grouping { description "A reusable grouping for configuring a TCP server. Note that this grouping uses fairly typical descendent node names such that a stack of 'uses' statements will have name conflicts. It is intended that the consuming data model will resolve the issue (e.g., by wrapping the 'uses' statement in a container called 'tcp-server-parameters'). This model purposely does not do this itself so as to provide maximum flexibility to consuming models."; leaf local-address { type inet:ip-address; mandatory true; description "The local IP address to listen on for incoming TCP client connections. INADDR_ANY (0.0.0.0) or INADDR6_ANY (0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 a.k.a. ::) MUST be used when the server is to listen on all IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, respectively."; Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 } leaf local-port { type inet:port-number; default "0"; description "The local port number to listen on for incoming TCP client connections. An invalid default value (0) is used (instead of 'mandatory true') so that an application level data model may 'refine' it with an application specific default port number value."; } uses tcpcmn:tcp-connection-grouping { augment "keepalives" { if-feature "tcp-server-keepalives"; description "Add an if-feature statement so that implementations can choose to support TCP server keepalives."; } } } } 5. Security Considerations 5.1. The "ietf-tcp-common" YANG Module The "ietf-tcp-common" YANG module defines "grouping" statements that are designed to be accessed via YANG based management protocols, such as NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. Both of these protocols have mandatory-to-implement secure transport layers (e.g., SSH, TLS) with mutual authentication. The NETCONF access control model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular users to a pre-configured subset of all available protocol operations and content. Since the module in this document only define groupings, these considerations are primarily for the designers of other modules that use these groupings. None of the readable data nodes defined in this YANG module are considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. The NACM "default-deny-all" extension has not been set for any data nodes defined in this module. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 None of the writable data nodes defined in this YANG module are considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. The NACM "default-deny-write" extension has not been set for any data nodes defined in this module. This module does not define any RPCs, actions, or notifications, and thus the security consideration for such is not provided here. 5.2. The "ietf-tcp-client" YANG Module The "ietf-tcp-client" YANG module defines "grouping" statements that are designed to be accessed via YANG based management protocols, such as NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. Both of these protocols have mandatory-to-implement secure transport layers (e.g., SSH, TLS) with mutual authentication. The NETCONF access control model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular users to a pre-configured subset of all available protocol operations and content. Since the module in this document only define groupings, these considerations are primarily for the designers of other modules that use these groupings. One readable data node defined in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. This node is as follows: * The "proxy-server/socks5-parameters/authentication-parameters/ username-password/password" node: The cleartext "password" node defined in the "tcp-client- grouping" grouping is additionally sensitive to read operations such that, in normal use cases, it should never be returned to a client. For this reason, the NACM extension "default-deny- all" has been applied to it. None of the writable data nodes defined in this YANG module are considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. The NACM "default-deny-write" extension has not been set for any data nodes defined in this module. This module does not define any RPCs, actions, or notifications, and thus the security consideration for such is not provided here. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 5.3. The "ietf-tcp-server" YANG Module The "ietf-tcp-server" YANG module defines "grouping" statements that are designed to be accessed via YANG based management protocols, such as NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. Both of these protocols have mandatory-to-implement secure transport layers (e.g., SSH, TLS) with mutual authentication. The NETCONF access control model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular users to a pre-configured subset of all available protocol operations and content. Since the module in this document only define groupings, these considerations are primarily for the designers of other modules that use these groupings. None of the readable data nodes defined in this YANG module are considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. The NACM "default-deny-all" extension has not been set for any data nodes defined in this module. None of the writable data nodes defined in this YANG module are considered sensitive or vulnerable in network environments. The NACM "default-deny-write" extension has not been set for any data nodes defined in this module. This module does not define any RPCs, actions, or notifications, and thus the security consideration for such is not provided here. 6. IANA Considerations 6.1. The "IETF XML" Registry This document registers two URIs in the "ns" subregistry of the IETF XML Registry [RFC3688]. Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registrations are requested: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-common Registrant Contact: The IESG XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-client Registrant Contact: The IESG XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-server Registrant Contact: The IESG XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 6.2. The "YANG Module Names" Registry This document registers two YANG modules in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC6020]. Following the format in [RFC6020], the following registrations are requested: name: ietf-tcp-common namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-common prefix: tcpcmn reference: RFC DDDD name: ietf-tcp-client namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-client prefix: tcpc reference: RFC DDDD name: ietf-tcp-server namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcp-server prefix: tcps reference: RFC DDDD 7. References 7.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, . [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, . 7.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-netconf-crypto-types] Watsen, K., "YANG Data Types and Groupings for Cryptography", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-netconf-crypto-types-18, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-http-client-server] Watsen, K., "YANG Groupings for HTTP Clients and HTTP Servers", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- netconf-http-client-server-05, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore] Watsen, K., "A YANG Data Model for a Keystore", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-keystore-20, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server] Watsen, K., "NETCONF Client and Server Models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-netconf- client-server-21, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server] Watsen, K., "RESTCONF Client and Server Models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-restconf- client-server-21, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server] Watsen, K., "YANG Groupings for SSH Clients and SSH Servers", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- netconf-ssh-client-server-22, 20 August 2020, . Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 [I-D.ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server] Watsen, K. and M. Scharf, "YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-08, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-tls-client-server] Watsen, K., "YANG Groupings for TLS Clients and TLS Servers", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- netconf-tls-client-server-22, 20 August 2020, . [I-D.ietf-netconf-trust-anchors] Watsen, K., "A YANG Data Model for a Truststore", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-trust- anchors-13, 20 August 2020, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, . Appendix A. Change Log This section is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. A.1. 00 to 01 Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 * Added 'local-binding-supported' feature to TCP-client model. * Added 'keepalives-supported' feature to TCP-common model. * Added 'external-endpoint-values' container and 'external- endpoints' feature to TCP-server model. A.2. 01 to 02 * Removed the 'external-endpoint-values' container and 'external- endpoints' feature from the TCP-server model. A.3. 02 to 03 * Moved the common model section to be before the client and server specific sections. * Added sections "Model Scope" and "Usage Guidelines for Configuring TCP Keep-Alives" to the common model section. A.4. 03 to 04 * Fixed a few typos. A.5. 04 to 05 * Removed commented out "grouping tcp-system-grouping" statement kept for reviewers. * Added a "Note to Reviewers" note to first page. A.6. 05 to 06 * Added support for TCP proxies. A.7. 06 to 07 * Expanded "Data Model Overview section(s) [remove "wall" of tree diagrams]. * Updated the Security Considerations section. A.8. 07 to 08 * Added missing IANA registration for "ietf-tcp-common" * Added "mandatory true" for the "username" and "password" leafs Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Groupings for TCP Clients and Servers February 2021 * Added an example of a TCP-client configured to connect via a proxy * Fixed issues found by the SecDir review of the "keystore" draft. * Updated the "ietf-tcp-client" module to use the new "password- grouping" grouping from the "crypto-types" module. A.9. 08 to 09 * Addressed comments raised by YANG Doctor in the ct/ts/ks drafts. Authors' Addresses Kent Watsen Watsen Networks Email: kent+ietf@watsen.net Michael Scharf Hochschule Esslingen - University of Applied Sciences Email: michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de Watsen & Scharf Expires 14 August 2021 [Page 32]