TOC 
SHIM6 Working GroupM. Komu
Internet-DraftHIIT
Intended status: InformationalM. Bagnulo
Expires: January 14, 2010UC3M
 K. Slavov
 S. Sugimoto, Ed.
 Ericsson
 July 13, 2009


Socket Application Program Interface (API) for Multihoming Shim
draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-09

Status of this Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on January 14, 2010.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.

Abstract

This document specifies sockets API extensions for the multihoming shim layer. The API aims to enable interactions between applications and the multihoming shim layer for advanced locator management, and access to information about failure detection and path exploration.

This document is based on an assumption that a multihomed host is equipped with a conceptual sub-layer (hereafter "shim") inside the IP layer that maintains mappings between identifiers and locators. Examples of the shim are SHIM6 and HIP.



Table of Contents

1.  Introduction
2.  Terminology
3.  System Overview
4.  Requirements
5.  Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer
    5.1.  SHIM_ASSOCIATED
    5.2.  SHIM_DONTSHIM
    5.3.  SHIM_HOT_STANDBY
    5.4.  SHIM_PATHEXPLORE
    5.5.  SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF
    5.6.  SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF
    5.7.  SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV
    5.8.  SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV
    5.9.  SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND
    5.10.  SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND
    5.11.  SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL
    5.12.  SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER
    5.13.  SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT
    5.14.  SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP
    5.15.  Error Handling
6.  Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim
    6.1.  Get Locator Information from Incoming Packet
    6.2.  Specify Locator Information for Outgoing Packet
    6.3.  Notification from Application to Multihoming Shim
7.  Data Structures
    7.1.  Placeholder for Locator Information
        7.1.1.  Handling Locator behind NAT
    7.2.  Path Exploration Parameter
    7.3.  Feedback Information
8.  Implications for Existing Socket API Extensions
9.  Resolving Conflicts with Preference Values
    9.1.  Implicit Forking
10.  Discussion
    10.1.  Naming at Socket Layer
    10.2.  Additional Requirements from Applications
    10.3.  Issues of Header Conversion among Different Address Family
    10.4.  Handling of Unknown Locator Provided by Application
11.  Changes
    11.1.  Changes from version 00 to version 01
    11.2.  Changes from version 01 to version 02
    11.3.  Changes from version 02 to version 03
    11.4.  Changes from version 03 to version 04
    11.5.  Changes from version 04 to version 05
    11.6.  Changes from version 05 to version 06
    11.7.  Changes from version 06 to version 07
    11.8.  Changes from version 07 to version 08
    11.9.  Changes from version 08 to version 09
12.  IANA Considerations
13.  Security Considerations
14.  Conclusion
15.  Acknowledgments
16.  References
    16.1.  Normative References
    16.2.  Informative References
Appendix A.  Context Forking
§  Authors' Addresses




 TOC 

1.  Introduction

HIP and SHIM6 have a commonality in their protocol design in the sense that the semantic roles of an IP address, i.e., an identifier and a locator, are distinguished. Separation of identifier and locator is done by introducing a "shim" inside the IP layer which maintains mapping of the identifier and associated locators. This design principle is called "identifier/locator separation" and the shim is referred to as a "shim sub-layer" in this document.

The shim sub-layer provides a nice property to present a stable communication endpoints (i.e., identifiers) to the upper layer protocols. An on-going session can be maintained even when the locator associated with the identifier is changed, for instance, upon a re-homing event under a multihomed environment. Therefore, upper layer protocols, especially connection-oriented applications are no more annoyed by the locator change thanks to the identifier/locator separation mechanism.

While the identifier/locator separation removes negative impact of locator change, it does not necessarily mean that applications are always ignorant about locators. We rather think that applications may want to have a control of locators in some cases. For instance, an application may want to use a specific locator to send IP packets. Such a control of locators is referred to as "locator management" in this document. Besides, applications may want to turn on or off the identifier/locator separation mechanism. This document defines API that provides locator management and additional control of shim sub-layer for applications.

This document recommends that the switching of identifier and locator is done only once inside the TCP/IP stack of an endhost. That is, if multiple shim sub-layers exist at the IP layer, any one of them should be applied exclusively for a given flow.

As this document specifies sockets API extensions, it is written so that the syntax and semantics are in line with the Posix standard [POSIX] (, “IEEE Std. 1003.1-2001 Standard for Information Technology -- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX). Open group Technical Standard: Base Specifications, Issue 6, http://www.opengroup.org/austin,” December 2001.) as much as possible. The API specified in this document defines how to use ancillary data (aka cmsg) to access the locator information with recvmsg() and/or sendmsg() I/O calls. The definition of API is presented in C language and data types follow the Posix format; intN_t means a singed integer of exactly N bits (e.g. int16_t) and uintN_t means an unsigned integer of exactly N bits (e.g. uint32_t).

The target readers of this document are application programmers who develop application software which may benefit greatly from multihomed environments. In addition, this document aims to provide necessary information for developers of multihoming shim protocols to implement API for enabling advanced locator management.



 TOC 

2.  Terminology

This section provides terminology used in this document. Basically most of the terms used in this document are taken from the following documents:



In this document, the term "IP" refers to both IPv4 and IPv6, unless the protocol version is specifically mentioned. The following are definitions of terms frequently used in this document:



 TOC 

3.  System Overview

Figure 1 (System overview) illustrates the system overview. The shim sub-layer and REAP component exist inside the IP layer. Applications use the sockets API defined in this document to interface with the shim sub-layer and the transport layer for locator management, failure detection, and path exploration.

It may also be possible that the shim sub-layer interacts with the transport layer, however, such an interaction is outside the scope of this document.




                     +------------------------+
                     |       Application      |
                     +------------------------+
                        ^                 ^
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~Socket Interface|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                        |                 v
            +-----------|------------------------------+
            |           |  Transport Layer             |
            +-----------|------------------------------+
                  ^     |
    +-------------|-----|-------------------------------------+
    |             v     v                                     |
    |   +-----------------------------+       +----------+    |  IP
    |   |            Shim             |<----->|   REAP   |    | Layer
    |   +-----------------------------+       +----------+    |
    |                       ^                      ^          |
    +-----------------------|----------------------|----------+
                            v                      v
            +------------------------------------------+
            |                Link Layer                |
            +------------------------------------------+

 Figure 1: System overview 



 TOC 

4.  Requirements

The following is a list of requirements from applications:



 TOC 

5.  Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer

In this section, socket options that are specific to the shim sub-layer are defined.

Table 1 (Socket options for multihoming shim) shows a list of the socket options that are specific to the multihoming shim sub-layer. An application may use these socket options for a given socket either by the getsockopt() system call or by the setsockopt() system call. All of these socket options are defined at level SOL_SHIM.

The first column of Table 1 (Socket options for multihoming shim) gives the name of the option. The second and third columns indicate whether the option can be handled by the getsockopt() system call and/or by the setsockopt() system call. The fourth column provides a brief description of the socket option. The fifth column shows the type of data structure specified along with the socket option. By default, the data structure type is an integer.



optnamegetsetdescriptiondtype
SHIM_ASSOCIATED o   Get the parameter which indicates whether if the socket is associated with any shim context or not. int
SHIM_DONTSHIM o o Get or set the parameter which indicates whether to employ the multihoming support by the shim sub-layer or not. int
SHIM_HOT_STANDBY o o Get or set the parameter to request the shim sub-layer to prepare a hot-standby connection. int
SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF o o Get or set the preferred locator on the local side for the context associated with the socket. *1
SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF o o Get or set the preferred locator on the remote side for the context associated with the socket. *1
SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV o o Get or set the parameter which is used to request the shim sub-layer to store the destination locator of the received IP packet. int
SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV o o Get or set the parameter which is used to request the shim sub-layer to store the source locator of the received IP packet. int
SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND o o Get or set the source locator of outgoing IP packets. *2
SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND o o Get or set the destination locator of outgoing IP packets. *2
SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL o o Get or set the list of locators associated with the local EID. *3
SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER o o Get or set the list of locators associated with the peer's EID. *3
SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT o o Get or set the timeout value for detecting failure. int
SHIM_PATHEXPLORE o o Get or set parameters for path exploration and failure detection. *4
SHIM_CONTEXT_DEFERRED_SETUP o o Get or set the parameter which indicates whether deferred context setup is supported or not. int

 Table 1: Socket options for multihoming shim 

*1: Pointer to a shim_locator which is defined in Section 7 (Data Structures).

*2: Pointer to shim_locator data structure.

*3: Pointer to an array of shim_locator.

*4: Pointer to a shim_pathexplore which is defined in Section 7 (Data Structures).

Figure 2 (System model of sockets API with shim sub-layer) illustrates how the shim specific socket options fit into the system model of socket API. The figure shows that the shim sub-layer and the additional protocol components (IPv4 and IPv6) below the shim sub-layer are new to the system model. As previously mentioned, all the shim specific socket options are defined at the SOL_SHIM level. This design choice brings the following advantages:

  1. The existing sockets API continue to work at the layer above the shim sub-layer. That is, those legacy API handle IP addresses as identifiers.
  2. With newly defined socket options for the shim sub-layer, the application obtains additional control of locator management.
  3. The shim specific socket options can be kept independent from address family (IPPROTO_IP or IPPROTO_IPV6) and transport protocol (IPPROTO_TCP or IPPROTO_UDP).




                         s1 s2      s3 s4
                          |  |       |  |
         +----------------|--|-------|--|----------------+
         |             +-------+   +-------+             |
         | IPPROTO_TCP |  TCP  |   |  UDP  |             |
         |             +-------+   +-------+             |
         |                |   \     /   |                |
         |                |    -----    |                |
         |                |   /     \   |                |
         |              +------+   +------+              |
         |   IPPROTO_IP | IPv4 |   | IPv6 | IPPROTO_IPV6 |
         |              +------+   +------+              |
         |                  \         /             SOL_SOCKET
         |          +--------\-------/--------+          |
         | SOL_SHIM |          shim           |          |
         |          +--------/-------\--------+          |
         |                  /         \                  |
         |              +------+   +------+              |
         |              | IPv4 |   | IPv6 |              |
         |              +------+   +------+              |
         |                  |          |                 |
         +------------------|----------|-----------------+
                            |          |
                          IPv4       IPv6
                        Datagram   Datagram

 Figure 2: System model of sockets API with shim sub-layer 



 TOC 

5.1.  SHIM_ASSOCIATED

The SHIM_ASSOCIATED option is used to check whether the socket is associated with any shim context or not.

This option is meaningful when the locator information of the received IP packet does not tell whether the identifier/locator adaptation is performed or not. Note that the EID pair and the locator pair may be identical in some cases.

This option can be specified by getsockopt(). Thus, the option is read-only and the result (0 or 1) is set in the option value (the fourth argument of getsockopt()).

The data type of the option value is an integer. The option value indicates the presence of shim context. A returned value 1 means that the socket is associated with a shim context at the shim sub-layer. A return value 0 indicates that there is no shim context associated with the socket.

For example, the option can be used by the application as follows:

    int optval;
    int optlen = sizeof(optval);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_ASSOCIATED, &optval, &optlen);


 TOC 

5.2.  SHIM_DONTSHIM

The SHIM_DONTSHIM option is used to request the shim layer not to provide the multihoming support for the communication established over the socket.

The data type of the option value is an integer, and it takes 0 or 1. An option value 0 means that the multihoming shim sub-layer is employed if available. An option value 1 means that the application does not want the multihoming shim sub-layer to provide the multihoming support for the communication established over the socket.

Default value is set as 0, which means that the multihoming shim sub-layer performs identifier/locator adaptation if available.

Any attempt to disable the multihoming shim support MUST be made by the application before the socket is connected. If an application makes such an attempt for a connected-socket, an error code EOPNOTSUPP MUST be returned.

For example, an application can request the system not to apply the multihoming support as follows:

    int optval;

    optval = 1;

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DONTSHIM, &optval, sizeof(optval));

For example, the application can check the option value as follows:

    int optval;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(optval);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DONTSHIM, &optval, &len);


 TOC 

5.3.  SHIM_HOT_STANDBY

The SHIM_HOT_STANDBY option is used to control the shim sub-layer whether to employ a hot-standby connection for the socket or not. A hot-standby connection is an alternative working locator pair to the current locator pair. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is an integer.

The option value can be set by setsockopt().

The option value can be read by getsockopt().

By default, the value is set to 0, meaning that hot-standby connection is disabled.

For example, an application can request establishment of a hot-standby connection by using the socket option as follows:

    int optval;

    optval = 1;

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_HOT_STANDBY, &optval,
               sizeof(optval));

For example, an application can get the option value by using the socket option as follows:

    int optval;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(optval);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_HOT_STANDBY, &optval, &len);


 TOC 

5.4.  SHIM_PATHEXPLORE

The application may use this socket option to specify parameters concerning path exploration. Path exploration is a procedure to find an alternative locator pair to the current locator pair. As the REAP specification defines, a peer may send Probe messages to find an alternative locator pair.

The option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is a pointer to the buffer where a set of information for path exploration is stored. The data structure is defined in Section 7 (Data Structures).

By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

For example, an application can set parameters for path exploration by using the socket option as follows.

    struct shim6_pathexplore pe;

    pe.pe_probenum = 4;        /* times */
    pe.pe_keepaliveto = 10;    /* seconds */
    pe.pe_initprobeto = 500;   /* milliseconds */
    pe.pe_reserved = 0;

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_PATHEXPLORE, &pe, sizeof(pe));

For example, an application can get parameters for path exploration by using the socket option as follows.

    struct shim6_pathexplore pe;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(pe);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_PATHEXPLORE, &pe, &len);


 TOC 

5.5.  SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF

The SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF option is used to get or set preferred locator on local side within a given context. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is a pointer to a locator information data structure which is defined in Section 7 (Data Structures).

By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled.

The preferred locator can be set by setsockopt(). The shim sub-layer shall verify requested locator before it updating the preferred locator.

An application can get the preferred locator by getsockopt().

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR will be returned when the validation of the specified locator failed.

For example, an application can set the preferred locator by using the socket option as follows. Note that some members of the shim_locator (lc_ifidx and lc_flags) are ignored in the set operation.

    struct shim_locator lc;
    struct in6_addr ip6;

    /* ...set the locator (ip6)... */

    memset(&lc, 0, sizeof(shim_locator));
    lc.lc_family = AF_INET6;  /* IPv6 */
    lc.lc_ifidx = 0;
    lc.lc_flags = 0;
    lc.lc_preference = 255;
    memcpy(lc.lc_addr, &ip6, sizeof(in6_addr));

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF, &lc,
               sizeof(optval));

For example, an application can get the preferred locator by using the socket option as follows.

    struct shim_locator lc;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(lc);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF, &lc, &len);


 TOC 

5.6.  SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF

The SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF option is used to get or set preferred locator on peer side within a given context. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is a pointer to the locator information data structure which is defined in Section 7 (Data Structures).

By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled.

The preferred locator can be set by setsockopt(). The shim sub-layer shall verify requested locator before it updating the preferred locator.

An application can get the preferred locator by getsockopt().

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR will be returned when the validation of the requested locator fails.

The usage of the option is same as that of SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF. Note that some members of the shim_locator (lc_ifidx and lc_flags) are ignored in the set operation.



 TOC 

5.7.  SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV

The SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV option can be used to request the shim sub-layer to store the destination locator of the received IP packet in an ancillary data object which can be accessed by recvmsg(). Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is integer. The option value should be binary (0 or 1). By default, the option value is set to 0, meaning that the option is disabled.

An application can set the option value by setsockopt().

An application can get the option value by getsockopt().

See Section 6 (Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim) for the procedure to access locator information stored in the ancillary data objects.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

For example, an application can request the shim sub-layer to store destination locator by using the socket option as follows.

    int optval;

    optval = 1;

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV, &optval,
               sizeof(optval));

For example, an application can get the option value as follows.

    int optval;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(optval);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV, &optval, &len);


 TOC 

5.8.  SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV

The SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV option is used to request the shim sub-layer to store the source locator of the received IP packet in an ancillary data object which can be accessed by recvmsg(). Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is integer. The option value should be binary (0 or 1). By default, the option value is set to 0, meaning that the option is disabled.

The option value can be set by setsockopt().

The option value can be read by getsockopt().

See Section 6 (Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim) for the procedure to access locator information stored in the ancillary data objects.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

The usage of the option is same as that of SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV option.



 TOC 

5.9.  SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND

The SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND option is used to request the shim sub-layer to use a specific locator as the source locator for the IP packets to be sent from the socket. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of option value is pointer to shim_locator data structure.

An application can set the local locator by setsockopt() providing a valid locator which is stored in a shim_locator data structure. When a zero-filled locator is specified, pre-existing setting of local locator is inactivated.

An application can get the local locator by getsockopt().

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR will be returned when invalid locator is specified.

For example, an application can request the shim sub-layer to use a specific local locator by using the socket option as follows.

    struct shim_locator locator;
    struct in6_addr ia6;

    /* an IPv6 address preferred for the source locator is copied
       to the parameter ia6 */

    memset(&locator, 0, sizeof(locator));

    /* fill shim_locator data structure */
    locator.lc_family = AF_INET6;
    locator.lc_ifidx = 1;
    locator.lc_flags = 0;
    locator.lc_preference = 0;
    memcpy(&locator.lc_addr, &ia6, sizeof(ia6));

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND, &locator,
               sizeof(locator));

For example, an application can get the preferred local locator by using the socket option as follows.

    struct shim_locator locator;

    memset(&locator, 0, sizeof(locator));

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND, &locator,
               sizeof(locator));

    /* check locator */


 TOC 

5.10.  SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND

The SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND option is used to request the shim sub-layer to use a specific locator for the destination locator of IP packets to be sent from the socket. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is a pointer to shim_locator data structure.

An application can set the remote locator by setsockopt() providing a valid locator which is stored in a shim_locator data structure. When a zero-filled locator is specified, pre-existing setting of remote locator is inactivated.

An application can get the specified remote locator by getsockopt().

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR when invalid locator is specified.

The usage of the option is as the same as that of SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND option.



 TOC 

5.11.  SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL

The SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL option is used to get or set the locator list associated with the local EID of the shim context associated with the socket. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is a pointer to the buffer in which a locator list is stored. See Section 7 (Data Structures) for the data structure for storing the locator information. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled.

An application can get the locator list by getsockopt(). Note that the size of the buffer pointed by optval argument should be large enough to store an array of locator information. The number of the locator information is not known beforehand.

The local locator list can be set by setsockopt(). The buffer pointed by optval argument should contain an array of locator list.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR will be returned when the validation of the specified locator failed.

For example, an application can set a list of locators to be associated with the local EID by using the socket option as follows:

    struct shim_locator locators[SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS];
    struct sockaddr_in *sin;
    struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6;

    memset(locators, 0, sizeof(locators));

    ...

    /* obtain local IP addresses from local interfaces */

    ...

    /* first locator (an IPv6 address) */
    locators[0].lc_family = AF_INET6;
    locators[0].lc_ifidx = 0;
    locators[0].lc_flags = 0;
    locators[0].lc_preference = 1;
    memcpy(&locators[0].lc_addr, &sa6->sin6_addr,
           sizeof(sa6->sin6_addr));

    ...

    /* second locator (an IPv4 address) */
    locators[1].lc_family = AF_INET;
    locators[1].lc_ifidx = 0;
    locators[1].lc_flags = 0;
    locators[1].lc_preference = 0;
    memcpy(&locators[1].lc_addr, &sa->sin_addr,
           sizeof(sa->sin_addr));

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL, locators,
               sizeof(locators));

For example, an application can get a list of locators that are associated with the local EID by using the socket option as follows.

    struct shim_locator locators[SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS];

    memset(locators, 0, sizeof(locators));

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV, locators,
               sizeof(locators));

    /* parse locators */
    ...



 TOC 

5.12.  SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER

The SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER option is used to get or set the locator list associated with the peer EID of the shim context associated with the socket. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is a pointer to the buffer where a locator list is stored. See Section 7 (Data Structures) for the data structure for storing the locator information. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled.

An application can get the locator list by getsockopt(). Note that the size of the buffer pointed by optval argument should be large enough to store an array of locator information. The number of the locator information is not known beforehand.

An application can set the locator list by setsockopt(). The buffer pointed by optval argument should contain an array of locator list.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR will be returned when the validation of the specified locator failed.

The usage of the option is same as that of SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL.



 TOC 

5.13.  SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT

The SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT option is used to get or set the timeout value for application to detect failure. Hence this option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket.

The data type of the option value is an integer. The value indicates the period of timeout in seconds to send a REAP Keepalive message since the last outbound traffic. By default, the option value is set to 0, meaning that the option is disabled. When the option is disabled, the REAP mechanism follows its default value of Send Timeout value as specified in [I‑D.ietf‑shim6‑failure‑detection] (Arkko, J. and I. Beijnum, “Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming,” June 2008.)

If the timeout value specified is longer than the Send Timeout configured in the REAP component, the REAP Keepalive message should be suppressed.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

For example, an application can set the timeout value by using the socket option as follows.

    int optval;

    optval = 15; /* 15 seconds */

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT, &optval,
               sizeof(optval));

For example, an application can get the timeout value by using the socket option as follows.

    int optval;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(optval);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT, &optval, &len);


 TOC 

5.14.  SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP

The SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP option is used to specify whether to enable deferred context setup or not. Deferred context setup means that the context is established in parallel with the data communication. Note that SHIM6 supports deferred context setup and HIP does not because EIDs in HIP (i.e., Host Identifiers) are non-routable.

The data type for the option value is an integer. The option value should be binary (0 or 1). By default, the value is set to 1, meaning that the context setup is deferred. In order to disable the option, the application should call setsockopt() with option value set to 0.

For example, an application can disable the deferred context setup by using the socket option as follows:

    int optval;

    optval = 0;

    setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP,
               &optval, sizeof(optval));

For example, an application can get the option value as follows.

    int optval;
    int len;

    len = sizeof(optval);

    getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP,
               &optval, &len);


 TOC 

5.15.  Error Handling

If successful, getsockopt() and setsockopt() return 0; otherwise, the functions return -1 and set errno to indicate an error.

The following are new error values defined for some shim specific socket options indicating that the getsockopt() or setsockopt() finished incompletely:

EINVALIDLOCATOR
This indicates that at least one of the necessary validations inside the shim sub-layer for the specified locator has failed. In case of SHIM6, there are two kinds of verifications required for security reasons prior to sending an IP packet to the peer's new locator; one is the return routability (check if the peer is actually willing to receive data with the specified locator) and the other one is the verification based on crypto identifier mechanisms [RFC3972] (Aura, T., “Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA),” March 2005.), [I‑D.ietf‑shim6‑hba] (Bagnulo, M., “Hash Based Addresses (HBA),” December 2007.).



 TOC 

6.  Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim

In this section, the definition and the usage of the ancillary data specific to multihoming shim are provided.

As defined in the Posix standard, sendmsg() and recvmsg() input a msghdr structure as their arguments. These system calls can handle control information along with data. Figure 3 (msghdr structure) shows the msghdr structure which is defined in <sys/socket.h>. The member msg_control holds a pointer to the buffer where the shim specific ancillary data objects can be stored in addition to other ancillary data objects.



     struct msghdr {
             caddr_t msg_name;       /* optional address */
             u_int   msg_namelen;    /* size of address */
             struct  iovec *msg_iov; /* scatter/gather array */
             u_int   msg_iovlen;     /* # elements in msg_iov */
             caddr_t msg_control;    /* ancillary data, see below */
             u_int   msg_controllen; /* ancillary data buffer len */
             int     msg_flags;      /* flags on received message */
     };
 Figure 3: msghdr structure 

The buffer pointed by the member msg_control of the msghdr structure may contain locator information which is a single locator and it should be possible to process them with the existing macros defined in Posix and [RFC3542] (Stevens, W., Thomas, M., Nordmark, E., and T. Jinmei, “Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6,” May 2003.). Each cmsghdr{} should be followed by data which stores a single locator.

In case of non-connected socket, msg_name member stores the socket address of the peer which should be considered as an identifier rather than a locator. The locator of the peer node should be retrieved by SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV as specified below.

Table 2 (Shim specific ancillary data) is a list of the shim specific ancillary data which can be used for recvmsg() or sendmsg(). In any case, SOL_SHIM must be set as cmsg_level.



cmsg_typesendmsg()recvmsg()cmsg_data[]
SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV   o *1
SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV   o *1
SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND o   *1
SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND o   *1
SHIM_FEEDBACK o   shim_feedback{}

 Table 2: Shim specific ancillary data 

*1: cmsg_data[] should include padding (if necessary) and a single sockaddr_in{}/sockaddr_in6{}.

It should be noted that the above ancillary data can only be handled by a UDP or a raw socket and not by a TCP socket. This is because there is no one-to-one mapping between a single send/receive operation and a TCP segment being transmitted/received.



 TOC 

6.1.  Get Locator Information from Incoming Packet

An application can get locator information from the received IP packet by specifying the shim specific socket options for the socket. When SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV and/or SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV socket options are set, the application can retrieve local and/or remote locator from the ancillary data.



 TOC 

6.2.  Specify Locator Information for Outgoing Packet

An application can specify the locators to be used for transmitting an IP packet by sendmsg(). When the ancillary data of cmsg_type SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND and/or SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND are specified, the application can explicitly specify the source and/or the destination locators to be used for the communication over the socket.

In addition, the application can specify the outgoing interface by SHIM_IF_SEND ancillary data. The ancillary data should contain the interface identifier of the physical interface over which the application expects the packet to be transmitted.

Note that the effect is limited to the datagram transmitted by the sendmsg().

If the specified locator pair is verified, the shim sub-layer overrides the locators of the IP packet.

An error EINVALIDLOCATOR will be returned when validation of the specified locator failed.



 TOC 

6.3.  Notification from Application to Multihoming Shim

An application may provide feedbacks to the shim sub-layer about the communication status. Such feedbacks are particularly useful for the shim sub-layer in the absence of REAP mechanism to monitor the reachability status of the currently used locator pair in a given shim context.

The notification can be made by sendmsg() specifying a new ancillary data called SHIM_FEEDBACK. The ancillary data can be handled by specifying SHIM_FEEDBACK option in cmsg_type.

An error ENOENT will be returned when there is no context associated with the socket.

See Section 7.3 (Feedback Information) for details of the data structure to be used. Note that this specification does not specify the exact behavior of the shim sub-layer when a feedback is given by an application.



 TOC 

7.  Data Structures

In this section, data structures specifically defined for the multihoming shim sub-layer are introduced. These data structures are either used as a parameter for setsockopt()/getsockopt() (as mentioned in Section 5 (Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer)) or as a parameter for ancillary data to be processed by sendmsg()/recvmsg() (as mentioned in Section 6 (Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim)).



 TOC 

7.1.  Placeholder for Locator Information

As defined in Section 5 (Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer), the SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF, SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF, SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL, and SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER socket options need to handle one or more locator information. Locator information includes not only the locator itself but also additional information about the locator which is useful for locator management. A new data structure is defined to serve as a placeholder for the locator information.

Figure 4 (shim locator structure) illustrates the data structure called shim_locator which stores a locator information.


     struct shim_locator {
             uint8_t    lc_family;       /* address family */
             uint8_t    lc_proto;        /* protocol */
             uint16_t   lc_port;         /* port number */
             uint16_t   lc_flags;        /* flags */
             uint16_t   lc_pref;         /* preference value */
             uint32_t   lc_ifidx;        /* interface index */
             struct in6_addr lc_addr;    /* address */
     };

 Figure 4: shim locator structure 

lc_family
Address family of the locator (e.g. AF_INET, AF_INET6). It is required that the parameter contains non-zero value indicating the exact address family of the locator.
lc_proto
Internet Protocol number for the protocol which is used to handle locator behind NAT. Typically, this value is set as UDP (17) when the locator is a UDP encapsulation interface.
lc_port
Port number which is used for handling locator behind NAT.
lc_flags
Each bit of the flags represents a specific characteristics of the locator. Hash Based Address (HBA) is defined as 0x01. Cryptographically Generated Address (CGA) is defined as 0x02.
lc_pref
Preference of the locator. The preference is represented by an integer.
lc_ifidx
Interface index of the network interface to which the locator is assigned. This field should be valid only in a read (getsockopt()) operation.
lc_addr
Contains the locator. In the case where a locator whose size is smaller than 16 bytes, an encoding rule should be provided for each locator of a given address family. For instance, in case of AF_INET (IPv4), the locator should be in the format of an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address as defined in [RFC4291] (Hinden, R. and S. Deering, “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture,” February 2006.).



 TOC 

7.1.1.  Handling Locator behind NAT

Note that the locator information MAY contain a locator behind a Network Address Translator (NAT). Such a situation may arise when the host is behind the NAT and uses a local address as a source locator to communicate with the peer. Note that a NAT traversal mechanism for HIP is defined, which allows HIP host to tunnel control and data traffic over UDP[I‑D.ietf‑hip‑nat‑traversal] (Komu, M., Henderson, T., Tschofenig, H., Melen, J., and A. Keranen, “Basic HIP Extensions for Traversal of Network Address Translators,” June 2009.). Note also that the locator behind NAT is not necessarily an IPv4 address but it can be an IPv6 address. Below is an example where the application sets a UDP encapsulation interface as a source locator when sending IP packets.



       struct shim_locator locator;
       struct in6_addr ia6;

       /* copy the private IPv4 address to the ia6 as an IPv4-mapped
          IPv6 address */

       memset(&locator, 0, sizeof(locator));

       /* fill shim_locator data structure */
       locator.lc_family = AF_INET;
       locator.lc_proto = IPPROTO_UDP;
       locator.lc_port = 50500;
       locator.lc_flags = 0;
       locator.lc_pref = 0;
       locator.lc_ifidx = 3;

       memcpy(&locator.lc_addr, &ia6, sizeof(ia6));

       setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND, &locator,
                  sizeof(locator));

 Figure 5: Handling locator behind NAT 



 TOC 

7.2.  Path Exploration Parameter

As defined in Section 5 (Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer), SHIM_PATHEXPLORE allows application to set or read the parameters for path exploration and failure detection. A new data structure called shim_pathexplore is defined to store the necessary parameters. Figure 6 (path explore structure) illustrates the data structure. The data structure can be passed to getsockopt() or setsockopt() as an argument.


     struct shim_pathexplore {
             uint8_t   pe_probenum;      /* # of initial probe */
             uint8_t   pe_keepaliveto;   /* Keepalive Timeout */
             uint16_t  pe_initprobeto;   /* Initial Probe Timeout */
             uint32_t  pe_reserved;      /* reserved */
     };

 Figure 6: path explore structure 

pe_probenum
Indicates the number of initial probe messages to be sent. Default value of this parameter should follow what is specified in [I‑D.ietf‑shim6‑failure‑detection] (Arkko, J. and I. Beijnum, “Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming,” June 2008.).
pe_keepaliveto
Indicates timeout value for detecting a failure when the host does not receive any packets for a certain period of time while there is outbound traffic. When the timer expires, path exploration procedure will be carried out by sending a REAP Probe message. Default value of this parameter should follow what is specified in [I‑D.ietf‑shim6‑failure‑detection] (Arkko, J. and I. Beijnum, “Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming,” June 2008.).
pe_initprobeto
Indicates retransmission timer of REAP Probe message in milliseconds. Note that this timer is applied before exponential back-off is started. A REAP Probe message for the same locator pair may be retransmitted. Default value of this parameter should follow what is specified in [I‑D.ietf‑shim6‑failure‑detection] (Arkko, J. and I. Beijnum, “Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming,” June 2008.).
pe_reserved
A reserved field for future extension. By default, the field should be initialized to zero.



 TOC 

7.3.  Feedback Information

As mentioned in Section 6.3 (Notification from Application to Multihoming Shim), applications can inform the shim sub-layer about the status of unicast reachability of the locator pair currently in use. The feedback information can be handled by using ancillary data called SHIM_FEEDBACK. A new data structure named shim_feedback is illustrated in Figure 7 (feedback information structure).


     struct shim_feedback {
             uint8_t   fb_direction;    /* direction of traffic */
             uint8_t   fb_indicator;    /* indicator (1-3) */
             uint16_t  fb_reserved;     /* reserved */
     };

 Figure 7: feedback information structure 

direction
Indicates direction of reachability between a locator pair in question. A value 0 indicates outbound and a value 1 indicates inbound direction.
indicator
A value indicating the degree of satisfaction of a unidirectional reachability for a given locator pair.
  • 0: Default value. Whenever this value is specified the feedback information must not be processed by the shim sub-layer.
  • 1: Unable to connect. There is no unidirectional reachability between the locator pair in question.
  • 2: Unsatisfactory. The application is not satisfied with the unidirectional reachability between the locator pair in question.
  • 3: Satisfactory. There is satisfactory unidirectional reachability between the locator pair in question.
reserved
Reserved field. Must be ignored by the receiver.



 TOC 

8.  Implications for Existing Socket API Extensions

Some of the socket options defined in this document are overlapping with existing sockets API and care should be taken for the usage not to confuse with the overlapping features.

The socket options for requesting specific locators to be used for a given transaction (SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF and SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF) are semantically similar to the existing sockets API (IPV6_PKTINFO). The socket options for obtaining the locator information from the received IP packet (SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV and SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV) are semantically similar to the existing sockets API (IP_RECVDSTADDR and IPV6_PKTINFO).

In IPv4, application can obtain the destination IP address of the received IP packet (IP_RECVDSTADDR). If the shim sub-layer performs identifier/locator adaptation for the received packet, the destination EID should be stored in the ancillary data (IP_RECVDSTADDR).

In IPv6, [RFC3542] (Stevens, W., Thomas, M., Nordmark, E., and T. Jinmei, “Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6,” May 2003.) defines that IPV6_PKTINFO can be used to specify source IPv6 address and the outgoing interface for outgoing packets, and retrieve destination IPv6 address and receiving interface for incoming packets. This information is stored in ancillary data being IPV6_PKTINFO specified as cmsg_type. Existing sockets API should continue to work above the shim sub-layer, that is, the IP addresses handled in IPV6_PKTINFO should be EIDs, not the locators.

Baseline is that the above existing sockets API (IP_RECVDSTADDR and IPV6_PKTINFO) is assumed to work above the multihoming shim sub-layer. In other words, the IP addresses those socket options deal with are EIDs rather than locators.



 TOC 

9.  Resolving Conflicts with Preference Values

Since the multihoming shim API allows application to specify preference value for the context which is associated with the socket instance, there may be a conflict with preference values specified by different applications. For instance, application A and B may establish communication with the same EID pair while both applications have different preference in their choice of local locator.

SHIM6 supports a notion of context forking in which a context is split when there is a conflict with preference values specified by multiple applications. Thus, context forking can simply resolve the conflicting situation which may be caused by the use of socket options for multihoming shim sub-layer.



 TOC 

9.1.  Implicit Forking

Socket options defined in Section 5 (Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer) may cause conflicting situation when the target context is shared by multiple applications. In such case, socket handler should inform the shim sub-layer that context forking is required. In SHIM6, when a context is forked, an unique identifier called Forked Instance Identifier (FII) is assigned to the newly forked context. The forked context is then exclusively associated with the socket through which non-default preference value was specified. The forked context is maintained by the multihoming shim sub-layer during the lifetime of associated socket instance. When the socket is closed, the multihoming shim sub-layer SHOULD delete associated context. In this way, garbage collection can be carried out to cleanup unused forked contexts. Upon garbage collection, every forked context SHOULD be checked if there is no socket (process) associated with the context. If there is none, the forked context should be deleted. When a forked context is torn down, SHIM6 should notify the peer about the deletion of forked context.

As opposed to socket options, context forking MUST NOT be triggered by any use of ancillary data that is specific to multihoming shim as defined in Section 6 (Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim).



 TOC 

10.  Discussion

In this section, open issues are introduced.



 TOC 

10.1.  Naming at Socket Layer

The getsockname() and getpeername() system calls are used to obtain the 'name' of an endpoint which is actually a pair of IP address and port number assigned to a given socket. getsockname() is used when an application wants to obtain the local IP address and port number assigned for a given socket instance. getpeername() is used when an application obtains the remote IP address and port number.

The above is based on a traditional system model of the sockets API where an IP address is expected to play both the role of identifier and the role of locator.

In a system model where a shim sub-layer exists inside the IP layer, both getsockname() and getpeername() deal with identifiers, namely EIDs. In this sense, the shim sub-layer serves to (1) hide locators and (2) provide access to the identifier for the application over the legacy socket APIs.



 TOC 

10.2.  Additional Requirements from Applications

At the moment, it is not certain if following requirements are common in all the multihomed environments (SHIM6 and HIP). These are mainly identified during discussions made on SHIM6 WG mailing list.



 TOC 

10.3.  Issues of Header Conversion among Different Address Family

The shim sub-layer performs identifier/locator adaptation. Therefore, in some cases, the whole IP header can be replaced with new IP header of a different address family (e.g. conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 or vice versa). Hence, there is an issue how to make the conversion with minimum impact. Note that this issue is common in other protocol conversion such as SIIT[RFC2765] (Nordmark, E., “Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT),” February 2000.).

As addressed in SIIT specification, some of the features (IPv6 routing headers, hop-by-hop extension headers, or destination headers) from IPv6 are not convertible to IPv4. In addition, notion of source routing is not exactly the same in IPv4 and IPv6. Hence, there is a certain limitation in protocol conversion between IPv4 and IPv6.

The question is how should the shim sub-layer behave when it faces with limitation problem of protocol conversion. Should we introduce new error something like ENOSUITABLELOCATOR ?



 TOC 

10.4.  Handling of Unknown Locator Provided by Application

There might be a case where application provides the shim layer new locator with the SHIM_LOC_*_PREF socket options or SHIM_LOC_*_SEND ancillary data. Then there is a question how should the shim sub-layer treat the new locator informed by the application.

In principle, locator information are exchanged by the shim protocol. However, there might be a case where application acquires information about the locator and prefers to use it for its communication.



 TOC 

11.  Changes



 TOC 

11.1.  Changes from version 00 to version 01

The followings are changes from version 00 to version 01:



 TOC 

11.2.  Changes from version 01 to version 02

The followings are changes from version 01 to version 02:



 TOC 

11.3.  Changes from version 02 to version 03

The followings are changes from version 02 to version 03:



 TOC 

11.4.  Changes from version 03 to version 04

The followings are changes from version 03 to version 04:



 TOC 

11.5.  Changes from version 04 to version 05

The followings are changes from version 04 to version 05:



 TOC 

11.6.  Changes from version 05 to version 06

The followings are changes from version 04 to version 05:



 TOC 

11.7.  Changes from version 06 to version 07

The followings are changes from version 06 to version 07:



 TOC 

11.8.  Changes from version 07 to version 08

No changes are made except for updates of the references.



 TOC 

11.9.  Changes from version 08 to version 09

The followings are changes from version 08 to version 09:



 TOC 

12.  IANA Considerations

This document contains no IANA consideration.



 TOC 

13.  Security Considerations

This document does not specify any security mechanism for the shim sub-layer. Fundamentally, the shim sub-layer has a potential to impose security threats, as it changes the source and/or destination IP addresses of the IP packet being sent or received. Therefore, the basic assumption is that the security mechanism defined in each protocol of the shim sub-layer is strictly applied.



 TOC 

14.  Conclusion

In this document, the Application Program Interface (API) for multihoming shim sub-layer is specified. The sockets API allows applications to have additional control of the locator management and interface to the REAP mechanism inside the multihoming shim sub-layer.

Socket options for multihoming shim sub-layer can be used by getsockopt() and/or setsockopt() system calls. Besides, applications can use some ancillary data that are specific to multihoming shim sub-layer to get locator from received packet or to set locator for outgoing packet.

From an architectural point of view, the sockets API provides extends the existing sockets API framework in the face of ID/Locator separation. With regard to API that relate to IP address management, it is assured that existing sockets API continue to work above the shim sub-layer dealing with identifiers, while multihoming shim API deals with locators.



 TOC 

15.  Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Jari Arkko who participated in the discussion that lead to the first version of this document, and Tatuya Jinmei who thoroughly reviewed the early version of this draft and provided detailed comments on sockets API related issues. Thomas Henderson provided valuable comments especially from HIP perspectives.

Authors sincerely thank to the following people for their help to improve this document: Samu Varjonen and Dmitriy Kuptsov.



 TOC 

16.  References



 TOC 

16.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-shim6-failure-detection] Arkko, J. and I. Beijnum, “Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming,” draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-13 (work in progress), June 2008 (TXT, PDF).
[I-D.ietf-shim6-proto] Bagnulo, M. and E. Nordmark, “Level 3 multihoming shim protocol,” draft-ietf-shim6-proto-12 (work in progress), February 2009 (TXT).
[POSIX] IEEE Std. 1003.1-2001 Standard for Information Technology -- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX). Open group Technical Standard: Base Specifications, Issue 6, http://www.opengroup.org/austin,” December 2001.
[RFC3542] Stevens, W., Thomas, M., Nordmark, E., and T. Jinmei, “Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6,” RFC 3542, May 2003 (TXT).
[RFC4423] Moskowitz, R. and P. Nikander, “Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Architecture,” RFC 4423, May 2006 (TXT).


 TOC 

16.2. Informative References

[I-D.ietf-hip-nat-traversal] Komu, M., Henderson, T., Tschofenig, H., Melen, J., and A. Keranen, “Basic HIP Extensions for Traversal of Network Address Translators,” Internet Draft draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal-08, June 2009.
[I-D.ietf-shim6-app-refer] Nordmark, E., “Shim6 Application Referral Issues,” draft-ietf-shim6-app-refer-00 (work in progress), July 2005 (TXT).
[I-D.ietf-shim6-hba] Bagnulo, M., “Hash Based Addresses (HBA),” draft-ietf-shim6-hba-05 (work in progress), December 2007 (TXT).
[RFC2765] Nordmark, E., “Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT),” RFC 2765, February 2000 (TXT).
[RFC3972] Aura, T., “Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA),” RFC 3972, March 2005 (TXT).
[RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture,” RFC 4291, February 2006 (TXT).


 TOC 

Appendix A.  Context Forking

In this section, an issue concerning context forking and its relation to the multihoming shim API are discussed.

SHIM6 supports a notion of context forking. A peer may decide to fork a context for certain reason (e.g. upper layer protocol prefers to use different locator pair than the one defined in available context). The procedure of forking context is done similar to the normal context establishment, performing the 4-way message exchange. A peer who has decided to fork a context initiates the context establishment. Hereafter, we call this peer initiator.

Once the forked context is established between the peers, on the initiator side, it is possible to apply forked context to the packet flow since the system maintains an association between the forked context and the socket owned by the application that has requested the context forking. How this association is maintained is implementation specific issue. However, on the responder side, there is a question on how the outbound packet can be multiplexed by the shim sub-layer. Since there are more than one SHIM6 contexts that match with the ULID pair of the packet flow. There is a need to differentiate packet flows not only by the ULID pairs but some other information and associate a given packet flow with specific context.

Figure 8 (context forking) gives an example of a scenario where two communicating peers fork a context. Initially, there has been a single transaction between the peers, by the application 1 (App1). Accordingly, another transaction is started, by application 2 (App2). Both of the transactions are made based the same ULID pair. The first context pair (Ctx1) is established for the transaction of App1. Given the requests from App2, the shim sub-layer on Peer 1 decides to fork a context. Accordingly, a forked context (Ctx2) is established between the peers, which should be exclusively applied to the transaction of App2. Ideally, multiplexing and demultiplexing of packet flows that relate to App1 and App2 should be done as illustrated in Figure 8 (context forking). However, as mentioned earlier, the responder needs to multiplex outbound flows of App1 and App2 somehow. Note that if a context forking occurs on the initiator side, a context forking needs to occur also on the responder side.


           Peer 1                                 Peer 2
         (initiator)                            (responder)

    +----+         +----+                  +----+         +----+
    |App1|         |App2|                  |App1|         |App2|
    +----+         +----+                  +----+         +----+
      |^             |^                      ^|             ^|
      v|             v|                      |v             |v
 -----S1-------------S2-----            -----S1-------------S2-----
      ||             ||                      ||             ||
      ||             ||                      ||             ||

     Ctx1           Ctx2                    Ctx1           Ctx2
 ULID:<A1,B1>   ULID:<A1,B1>            ULID:<B1,A1>    ULID:<B1,A1>
 Loc: <A1,B2>   Loc: <A1,B3>            Loc: <B2,A1>    Loc: <B3,A1>
 FII: 0         FII: 100                FII: 0          FII: 100

      |^             |^                      ^|             ^|
      ||             ||                      ||             ||
      ||             ||                      ||             ||
      \..............||....................../|             ||
       \.............||......................./             ||
                     ||                                     ||
                     \|...................................../|
                      \....................................../

 Figure 8: context forking 

To overcome the problem mentioned above, there are some solutions.

One viable approach is to let the system implicitly maintain an association between the socket and the associated context by keeping the record of inbound packet processing. That is, the system stores the information about the context on which the inbound packet flow was demultiplexed. The information comprises the ULID pair and FII of the context and is stored in the socket instance. Later, the system can use the information to identify the associated context in outbound packet processing. This approach should be feasible as far as there is bi-directional user traffic.

Another viable approach is to extend SHIM6 protocol by adding capability of exchanging additional information to identify the packet flow from others which needs to be handled by a newly forked context. The information exchange can be done during the context establishment. The initiator appends 5 tuple of the packet flow to be handled by the newly forked context. Note that the additional information provided by the 5 tuple are source and destination port numbers and upper layer protocol. The information is later used by the shim sub-layer to multiplex the outbound packet flow on the responder side.

The socket options for multihoming shim can be used by the application to trigger the context forking in implicit manner. The peer becomes an initiator in the establishment of the forked context. Once the forked context is established between the peers, application on each end can influence the preference on context by utilizing the multihoming shim API.



 TOC 

Authors' Addresses

  Miika Komu
  Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
  Tammasaarenkatu 3
  Helsinki
  Finland
Phone:  +358503841531
Fax:  +35896949768
Email:  miika@iki.fi
URI:  http://www.hiit.fi/
  
  Marcelo Bagnulo
  Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  Av. Universidad 30
  Leganes 28911
  SPAIN
Phone:  +34 91 6248837
Email:  marcelo@it.uc3m.es
URI:  http://it.uc3m.es/marcelo
  
  Kristian Slavov
  Ericsson Research Nomadiclab
  Hirsalantie 11
  Jorvas FI-02420
  Finland
Phone:  +358 9 299 3286
Email:  kristian.slavov@ericsson.com
  
  Shinta Sugimoto (editor)
  Nippon Ericsson K.K.
  Koraku Mori Building
  1-4-14, Koraku, Bunkyo-ku
  Tokyo 112-0004
  Japan
Phone:  +81 3 3830 2241
Email:  shinta.sugimoto@ericsson.com