Softwire S. Jiang Internet-Draft Y. Fu Intended status: Standards Track B. Liu Expires: December 21, 2014 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd P. Deacon IEA Software, Inc. June 19, 2014 RADIUS Attribute for MAP draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02 Abstract Mapping of Address and Port (MAP) is a stateless mechanism for running IPv4 over IPv6-only infrastructure. It provides both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) MAP options has been defined to configure MAP Customer Edge (CE). However, in many networks, the configuration information may be stored in Authentication Authorization and Accounting (AAA) servers while user configuration is mainly from Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) through DHCPv6 protocol. This document defines a Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) attribute that carries MAP configuration information from AAA server to BNG. The MAP RADIUS attribute are designed following the simplify principle. It provides just enough information to form the correspondent DHCPv6 MAP option. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on December 21, 2014. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 1] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. MAP Configuration process with RADIUS . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. MAP-Configuration Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2. MAP Rule Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.3. Sub Options for MAP Rule Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3.1. Rule-IPv6-Prefix Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3.2. Rule-IPv4-Prefix Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.3.3. EA Length Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.3.4. BR-IPv6-Address Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.3.5. PSID Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.3.6. PSID Length Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.3.7. PSID Offset Sub Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.4. Table of attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5. Diameter Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 2] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1. Introduction Recently providers start to deploy IPv6 and consider how to transit to IPv6. Mapping of Address and Port (MAP)[I-D.ietf-softwire-map] is a stateless mechanism for running IPv4 over IPv6-only infrastructure. It provides both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. MAP has adopted Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) [RFC3315] as auto- configuring protocol. The MAP Customer Edge (CE) uses the DHCPv6 extension options [I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp] to discover MAP Border Relay (in tunnel model only) and to configure relevant MAP rules. In many networks, user configuration information may be managed by AAA (Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting) servers. Current AAA servers communicate using the Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) [RFC2865] protocol. In a fixed line broadband network, the Broadband Network Gateways (BNGs) act as the access gateway of users. The BNGs are assumed to embed a DHCPv6 server function that allows them to locally handle any DHCPv6 requests initiated by hosts. Since the MAP configuration information is stored in AAA servers and user configuration is mainly through DHCPv6 protocol between BNGs and hosts/CEs, new RADIUS attributes are needed to propagate the information from AAA servers to BNGs. The MAP RADIUS attributes designed in this document are especially for the MAP encapsulation mode, while providing enough information to form the correspondent DHCPv6 MAP option [I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp]. 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. The terms MAP CE and MAP Border Relay are defined in [I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. 3. MAP Configuration process with RADIUS The below Figure 1 illustrates how the RADIUS protocol and DHCPv6 cooperate to provide MAP CE with MAP configuration information. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 3] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 MAP CE BNG AAA Server | | | |------DHCPv6 Solicit----->| | |(Option Request w/ MAP option) | | |--Access-Request(MAP Attr)-->| | | | | |<--Access-Accept(MAP Attr)---| |<---DHCPv6 Advertisement--| | | | | |------DHCPv6 Request---->| | | (MAP Option) | | |<---- -DHCPv6 Reply-------| | | (MAP option) | | | | | DHCPv6 RADIUS Figure 1: the cooperation between DHCPv6 and RADIUS combining with RADIUS authentication BNGs act as a RADIUS client and as a DHCPv6 server. First, the MAP CE MAY initiate a DHCPv6 Solicit message that includes an Option Request option (6) [RFC3315] with the MAP option [I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp] from the MAP CE. But note that the ORO (Option Request option) with the MAP option could be optional if the network was planned as MAP-enabled as default. When BNG receives the SOLICIT, it SHOULD initiates radius Access-Request message, in which the User-Name attribute (1) SHOULD be filled by the MAP CE MAC address, to the RADIUS server and the User-password attribute (2) SHOULD be filled by the shared MAP password that has been preconfigured on the DHCPv6 server, requesting authentication as defined in [RFC2865] with MAP-Configuration attribute, defined in the next Section. If the authentication request is approved by the AAA server, an Access-Accept message MUST be acknowledged with the IPv6- MAP-Configuration Attribute. After receiving the Access-Accept message with MAP-Configuration Attribute, the BNG SHOULD respond the user an Advertisement message. Then the user can requests for a MAP Option, the BNG SHOULD reply the user with the message containing the MAP option. The recommended format of the MAC address is as defined in Calling-Station-Id (Section 3.20 in [RFC3580] without the SSID (Service Set Identifier) portion. Figure 2 describes another scenario, in which the authorization operation is not coupled with authentication. Authorization relevant to MAP is done independently after the authentication process. As similar to above scenario, the ORO with the MAP option in the initial DHCPv6 request could be optional if the network was planned as MAP- enabled as default. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 4] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 MAP CE BNG AAA Server | | | |------DHCPv6 Request---->| | |(Option Request w/ MAP option) | | |--Access-Request(MAP Attr)-->| | | | | |<--Access-Accept(MAP Attr)---| | | | |<-----DHCPv6 Reply--------| | | (MAP option) | | | | | DHCPv6 RADIUS Figure 2: the cooperation between DHCPv6 and RADIUS decoupled with RADIUS authentication In the abovementioned scenario, the Access-Request packet SHOULD contain a Service-Type attribute (6) with the value Authorize Only (17); thus, according to [RFC5080], the Access-Request packet MUST contain a State attribute that obtained from the previous authentication process. In both above-mentioned scenarios, Message-authenticator (type 80) [RFC2869] SHOULD be used to protect both Access-Request and Access- Accept messages. After receiving the MAP-Configuration Attribute in the initial Access-Accept, the BNG SHOULD store the received MAP configuration parameters locally. When the MAP CE sends a DHCPv6 Request message to request an extension of the lifetimes for the assigned address, the BNG does not have to initiate a new Access-Request towards the AAA server to request the MAP configuration parameters. The BNG could retrieve the previously stored MAP configuration parameters and use them in its reply. If the BNG does not receive the MAP-Configuration Attribute in the Access-Accept it MAY fallback to a pre-configured default MAP configuration, if any. If the BNG does not have any pre-configured default MAP configuration or if the BNG receives an Access-Reject, the tunnel cannot be established. As specified in [RFC3315], section 18.1.4, "Creation and Transmission of Rebind Messages ", if the DHCPv6 server to which the DHCPv6 Renew message was sent at time T1 has not responded by time T2, the MAP CE (DHCPv6 client) SHOULD enters the Rebind state and attempt to contact any available server. In this situation, the secondary BNG receiving the DHCPv6 message MUST initiate a new Access-Request towards the AAA Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 5] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 server. The secondary BNG MAY include the MAP-Configuration Attribute in its Access-Request. 4. Attributes This section defines MAP-Rule Attribute which is used in the MAP scenario. The attribute design follows [RFC6158] and referring to[RFC6929]. The MAP RADIUS attribute are designed following the simplify principle. The sub options are organized into two categories: the necessary and the optional. 4.1. MAP-Configuration Attribute The MAP-Configuration Attribute is structured as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | | + MAP Rule Option(s) + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Type TBD Length 2 + the length of the Rule option(s) MAP Rule Option (s) A variable field that may contains one or more Rule option(s), defined in Section 4.2. 4.2. MAP Rule Options Depending on deployment scenario, one Default Mapping rule and zero or more other type Mapping Rules MUST be included in one MAP- Configuration Attribute. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 6] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | | + Sub Options + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Type 1 Basic Mapping Rule (Not Forwarding Mapping Rule) 2 Forwarding Mapping Rule (Not Basic Mapping Rule) 3 Default Mapping Rule 4 Basic & Forwarding Mapping Rule Length 2 + the length of the sub options Sub Option A variable field that contains necessary sub options defined in Section 4.3 and zero or several optional sub options, defined in Section 4.4. 4.3. Sub Options for MAP Rule Option 4.3.1. Rule-IPv6-Prefix Sub Option The Rule-IPv6-Prefix Sub Option is necessary for every MAP Rule option. It should appear for once and only once. The IPv6 Prefix sub option is followed the framed IPv6 prefix designed in [RFC3162]. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 7] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | Reserved | prefix6-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | rule-ipv6-prefix | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 1 (SubType number, for the Rule-IPv6-Prefix6 sub option) SubLen 20 (the length of the Rule-IPv6-Prefix6 sub option) Reserved Reserved for future usage. It should be set to all zero. prefix6-len length of the IPv6 prefix, specified in the rule-ipv6-prefix field, expressed in bits rule-ipv6-prefix a 128-bits field that specifies an IPv6 prefix that appears in a MAP rule 4.3.2. Rule-IPv4-Prefix Sub Option 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | Reserved | prefix4-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | rule-ipv4-prefix | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 2 (SubType number, for the Rule-IPv4-Prefix6 sub option) SubLen 8 (the length of the Rule-IPv4-Prefix6 sub option) Reserved Reserved for future usage. It should be set to all zero. Prefix4-len length of the IPv6 prefix, specified in the rule-ipv6-prefix field, expressed in bits rule-ipv4-prefix a 32-bits field that specifies an IPv4 prefix that appears in a MAP rule Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 8] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 4.3.3. EA Length Sub Option 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | EA-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 3 (SubType number, for the EA Length sub option) SubLen 4 (the length of the EA Length sub option) EA-len 16 bits long field that specifies the Embedded-Address (EA) bit length. Allowed values range from 0 to 48. 4.3.4. BR-IPv6-Address Sub Option 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | BR-ipv6-address | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 4 (SubType number, for the BR-ipv6-address sub option) SubLen 20 (the length of the BR-ipv6-address sub option) Reserved Reserved for future usage. It should be set to all zero. BR-ipv6-address a 128-bits field that specifies the IPv6 address for the BR. 4.3.5. PSID Sub Option Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 9] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | PSID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 5 (SubType number, for the PSID Sub Option sub option) SubLen 4 (the length of the PSID Sub Option sub option) PSID (Port-set ID) Explicit 16-bit (unsigned word) PSID value. The PSID value algorithmically identifies a set of ports assigned to a CE. The first k-bits on the left of this 2-octets field is the PSID value. The remaining (16-k) bits on the right are padding zeros. 4.3.6. PSID Length Sub Option 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | PSID-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 6 (SubType number, for the PSID Length sub option) SubLen 4 (the length of the PSID Length sub option) PSID-len Bit length value of the number of significant bits in the PSID field. (also known as 'k'). When set to 0, the PSID field is to be ignored. After the first 'a' bits, there are k bits in the port number representing valid of PSID. Subsequently, the address sharing ratio would be 2 ^k. 4.3.7. PSID Offset Sub Option Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 10] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | SubType | SubLen | PSID Offset | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ SubType 7 (SubType number, for the PSID Offset sub option) SubLen 4 (the length of the PSID Offset sub option) PSID Offset 4 bits long field that specifies the numeric value for the MAP algorithm's excluded port range/offset bits (A-bits), as per section 5.1.1 in [I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. Default must be set to 4. 4.4. Table of attributes The following table provides a guide to which attributes may be found in which kinds of packets, and in what quantity. Request Accept Reject Challenge Accounting # Attribute Request 0-1 0-1 0 0 0-1 TBD1 MAP- Configuration 0-1 0-1 0 0 0-1 1 User-Name 0-1 0 0 0 0 2 User-Password 0-1 0-1 0 0 0-1 6 Service-Type 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 80 Message-Authenticator The following table defines the meaning of the above table entries. 0 This attribute MUST NOT be present in packet. 0+ Zero or more instances of this attribute MAY be present in packet. 0-1 Zero or one instance of this attribute MAY be present in packet. 1 Exactly one instance of this attribute MUST be present in packet. 5. Diameter Considerations This attribute is usable within either RADIUS or Diameter [RFC6733]. Since the Attributes defined in this document will be allocated from the standard RADIUS type space, no special handling is required by Diameter entities. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 11] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 6. IANA Considerations This document requires the assignment of two new RADIUS Attributes Types in the "Radius Types" registry (currently located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types for the following attributes: o MAP-Configuration TBD1 IANA should allocate the numbers from the standard RADIUS Attributes space using the "IETF Review" policy [RFC5226]. 7. Security Considerations In MAP scenarios, both CE and BNG are within a provider network, which can be considered as a closed network and a lower security threat environment. A similar consideration can be applied to the RADIUS message exchange between BNG and the AAA server. Known security vulnerabilities of the RADIUS protocol are discussed in [RFC2607], [RFC2865], and[RFC2869]. Use of IPsec [RFC4301] for providing security when RADIUS is carried in IPv6 is discussed in [RFC3162]. A malicious user may use MAC address proofing and/or dictionary attack on the shared MAP password that has been preconfigured on the DHCPv6 server to get unauthorized MAP configuration information. Security considerations for MAP specific between MAP CE and BNG are discussed in [I-D.ietf-softwire-map]. Furthermore, generic DHCPv6 security mechanisms can be applied DHCPv6 intercommunication between MAP CE and BNG. Security considerations for the Diameter protocol are discussed in [RFC6733]. 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the valuable comments made by Peter Lothberg, Wojciech Dec, and Suresh Krishnan for this document. This document was produced using the xml2rfc tool [RFC2629]. 9. References Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 12] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 9.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, June 2000. [RFC3162] Aboba, B., Zorn, G., and D. Mitton, "RADIUS and IPv6", RFC 3162, August 2001. [RFC3315] Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003. [RFC3580] Congdon, P., Aboba, B., Smith, A., Zorn, G., and J. Roese, "IEEE 802.1X Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Usage Guidelines", RFC 3580, September 2003. [RFC5080] Nelson, D. and A. DeKok, "Common Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Implementation Issues and Suggested Fixes", RFC 5080, December 2007. [RFC6158] DeKok, A. and G. Weber, "RADIUS Design Guidelines", BCP 158, RFC 6158, March 2011. [RFC6929] DeKok, A. and A. Lior, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions", RFC 6929, April 2013. 9.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-softwire-map] Troan, O., Dec, W., Li, X., Bao, C., Matsushima, S., Murakami, T., and T. Taylor, "Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP)", draft-ietf-softwire-map-10 (work in progress), January 2014. [I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp] Mrugalski, T., Troan, O., Farrer, I., Perreault, S., Dec, W., Bao, C., leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com, l., and X. Deng, "DHCPv6 Options for configuration of Softwire Address and Port Mapped Clients", draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-07 (work in progress), March 2014. [RFC2607] Aboba, B. and J. Vollbrecht, "Proxy Chaining and Policy Implementation in Roaming", RFC 2607, June 1999. Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 13] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 [RFC2629] Rose, M., "Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML", RFC 2629, June 1999. [RFC2869] Rigney, C., Willats, W., and P. Calhoun, "RADIUS Extensions", RFC 2869, June 2000. [RFC4301] Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005. [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, May 2008. [RFC6733] Fajardo, V., Arkko, J., Loughney, J., and G. Zorn, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 6733, October 2012. Authors' Addresses Sheng Jiang Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Q14, Huawei Campus, No.156 Beiqing Road Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100095 P.R. China Email: jiangsheng@huawei.com Yu Fu Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Q14, Huawei Campus, No.156 Beiqing Road Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100095 P.R. China Email: eleven.fuyu@huawei.com Bing Liu Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Q14, Huawei Campus, No.156 Beiqing Road Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100095 P.R. China Email: leo.liubing@huawei.com Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 14] Internet-Draft MAP RADIUS June 2014 Peter Deacon IEA Software, Inc. P.O. Box 1170 Veradale, WA 99037 USA Email: peterd@iea-software.com Jiang, et al. Expires December 21, 2014 [Page 15]