RTCWeb Working Group R. Jesup Internet-Draft Mozilla Intended status: Standards Track S. Loreto Expires: January 17, 2013 Ericsson M. Tuexen Muenster Univ. of Appl. Sciences July 16, 2012 WebRTC Data Channel Protocol draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol-02.txt Abstract The Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) working group is charged to provide protocols to support for direct interactive rich communication using audio, video, and data between two peers' web- browsers. This document specifies an actual (minor) protocol for how the JS-layer dataChannel objects provide the data channels between the peers. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on January 17, 2013. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 1] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Opening Handshake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Control Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.1. DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST Message . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.2. DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE Message . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.3. DATA_CHANNEL_ACK Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6. Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6.1. Adding a Channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6.2. Closing a Channel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6.3. Sending and Receiving Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. Signaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.1. Startup considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 10. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 11.2. Informational References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 2] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 1. Introduction The Data Channel Protocol is designed to provide, in the WebRTC context [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview], a generic transport service allowing Web Browser to exchange generic data in a bidirectional peer to peer fashion. As discussed in [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-channel] the protocol uses Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) [RFC4960] encapsulated on Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) [RFC6347] as described in [I-D.tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps] to benefit from their already standardized transport and security features. 2. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3. Terminology This document uses the following terms: Association: An SCTP association. Stream: A unidirectional stream of an SCTP association. It is uniquely identified by a stream identifier. Channel: A bidirectional channel consisting of two SCTP streams. 4. Opening Handshake The opening handshake is based on the multimedia session description exchange that happens between the browsers, typically through a Web Server acting as the signaling service. [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp] defines the protocol identifier, 'SCTP/ DTLS', and defines how to establish an SCTP association over DTLS using the Session Description Protocol (SDP). The SCTP association is created with the number of streams specified by the application, and if not specified, then it SHOULD default to 16 streams. It is recommended that additional streams be available dynamically based on [RFC6525]. Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 3] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 5. Control Messages Data Channel Control Messages are sent to manage opening bidirectional channels. A DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST message is sent on the Stream that is intended to be used to send in that direction, and a response (DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE) is sent back on the Stream to be used for the other direction, with a reverse_direction_stream entry holding the Stream number the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST was sent on. This allows association of the Streams that define the bidirectional channel. Finally, a DATA_CHANNEL_ACK is sent on the original Stream to complete the 3-way handshake. Errors are returned by setting the error field of the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE message to a non-0 value. In this case the original sender of DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST shall close the channel. 5.1. DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST Message This message is sent initially on the stream used for user messages using the channel. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Message Type | Channel Type | Flags | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reliability Parameter | Priority | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ \ / | Label | / \ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Message Type: 1 byte (unsigned integer) This field holds the IANA defined message type for the the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST message. The suggested value of this field for IANA is 0x00. Channel Type: 1 byte (unsigned integer) This field specifies the type of the channel to be opened: DATA_CHANNEL_RELIABLE (0x00): The channel provides a reliable bi- directional communication channel. DATA_CHANNEL_RELIABLE_STREAM (0x01): TBD. Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 4] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 DATA_CHANNEL_UNRELIABLE (0x02): TBD. DATA_CHANNEL_PARTIAL_RELIABLE_REXMIT (0x03): The channel provides a partial reliable bi-directional Communication channel. User messages will not be retransmitted more times than specified in the Reliability Parameter. DATA_CHANNEL_PARTIAL_RELIABLE_TIMED (0x04): The channel provides a partial reliable bi-directional Communication channel. User messages might not be transmitted or retransmitted after a specified life-time given in milli-seconds in the Reliability Parameter. This life-time starts when providing the user message to the Javascript engine. Flags: 2 bytes (unsigned integer) This field contains the bitwise OR of the following flags: DATA_CHANNEL_FLAG_OUT_OF_ORDER_ALLOWED (0x0001): If this flag is set, the channel does not need to preserve the message sequencing. Reliability Parameter: 2 bytes (unsigned integer) This field is ignored if a reliable channel is used. If a partial reliable channel with limited number of retransmissions is used, this field specifies the number of retransmissions. If a partial reliable channel with limited lifetime is used, this field specifies the maximum life-time in milli seconds. Priority: 2 bytes (integer) The priority of the channel. Label: Variable Length (sequence of characters) The name of the channel. 5.2. DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE Message This message is sent in response to an DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST message on the stream used for user messages using the channel. Messages with the error field set to non-0 values can be sent on any stream; it is suggested that they be sent (if possible) on an unused stream. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Message Type | Error | Flags | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reverse Stream | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Message Type: 1 byte (unsigned integer) This field holds the IANA defined message type for the the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE message. The suggested value of this field for IANA is 0x01. Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 5] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 Error: 1 byte (unsigned integer) TBD. Flags: 2 bytes (unsigned integer) TBD. Reverse Stream: 2 bytes (unsigned integer) The identifier for the incoming stream of the channel. The corresponding DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST message was received on this stream. 5.3. DATA_CHANNEL_ACK Message This message is sent in response to an DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE message on the stream used for user messages using the channel. Reception of this message tells the opener that the channel setup handshake is complete. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Message Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Message Type: 1 byte (unsigned integer) This field holds the IANA defined message type for the the DATA_CHANNEL_ACK message. The suggested value of this field for IANA is 0x02. 6. Procedures 6.1. Adding a Channel When one side wants to add a channel, it picks an unused outgoing stream; if no unused streams are available a negotiation to increase the number is done. It then sends a DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST control message on the outgoing stream. When an DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST is received on an incoming stream, an unused outgoing stream is picked; if no unused streams are available a negotiation to increase the number is done. A DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE message is sent on the outgoing stream, with the Reverse Stream field set to the incoming stream the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST message came in on. When a DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE is received, the Reverse Stream value is matched against all pending DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST messages. If no match can be found, the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_RESPONSE message SHOULD be ignored. If a match is found, then if the error Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 6] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 value is 0 a DATA_CHANNEL_ACK message is sent on the originator's outgoing Stream for the channel. If the error value is non-zero, the open failed, and the originator SHOULD close down the originally- selected outgoing stream and notify the application. The channel_type and reliability_parameters fields of the DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN_REQUEST message MUST be used to set up the reverse side of the Data Channel so that both directions use the same options. So both directions are either reliable or use the PR-SCTP extension defined in [RFC3758] using the same policy and parameter. 6.2. Closing a Channel Data Channels shall be closed by resetting the outgoing stream If an incoming stream is reset by the peer, an corresponding outgoing stream reset SHOULD be issued. If both streams of a channel are reset, the channel is closed and the streams are available for reuse for new channel opens. 6.3. Sending and Receiving Data Data shall be sent using PPID's other than the Data Channel Control PPID. These PPID's should be registered with IANA via (TBD). The meaning of these data PPIDs and the format of the data shall be specific to the usage of this protocol, and typically shall be provided to the higher layers to allow proper decoding of the data. For WebRTC, data PPID's for DOMStrings and binary data blobs shall be created. All data sent on a Data Channel in both directions MUST be sent over the underlying Stream using the reliability defined when the Data Channel was opened. Data may be sent before the 3-way handshake is complete; if so it must be sent with in-order delivery set in order to avoid race conditions cause by a handshake message being lost. This is an exception to the requirement to send all data using the channel reliability settings. It is recommended that message size be kept within certain bounds (TBD). 7. Signaling This is an application protocol that will normally run on top of SCTP. In the case of rtcweb, it will run over SCTP/DTLS (SCTP on top Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 7] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 of DTLS). This protocol should be specified in the section of the m=application SDP line (Figure 1), details TBD. The section should include the virtual port over the rtcweb DataChannel's SCTP association runs on. (This would allow for more than one association to be used on a DTLS connection; it's an open question if this flexibility is needed.) m=application SCTP/DTLS Figure 1: Data Channel SDP media line 7.1. Startup considerations It has been suggested that in order to speed up channel creation that an initial set of channels be allowed to be specified in the SDP, as a very common case for applications will be a fixed set of data channels. This SDP format would support that: m=application SCTP/DTLS a=fmtp:0 channel=1;stream=0;type=reliable;name="foo" a=fmtp:1 channel=2;stream=1;type=unreliable;inorder;name="bar" Figure 2: Data Channel SDP media plus channels The answer would echo the channel definitions from the offer, with the associated stream numbers to associated with the channel. This would mean that the data channels would be available to use as soon as the association has been negotiated. This may need to be specified via MMUSIC. 8. Security Considerations To be done. 9. IANA Considerations This document also defines three new SCTP Payload Protocol Identifiers (PPIDs). RFC 4960 [RFC4960] creates the registry from which these identifiers have been assigned. The following values have been reserved: WebRTC Control - #To Be Assigned Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 8] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 DOMString - #To Be Assigned Binary Data - #To Be Assigned 10. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Cullen Jennings, Adam Berquist, Justin Uberti, Randall Stewart, ... for there invaluable comments. 11. References 11.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3758] Stewart, R., Ramalho, M., Xie, Q., Tuexen, M., and P. Conrad, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Partial Reliability Extension", RFC 3758, May 2004. [RFC4960] Stewart, R., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 4960, September 2007. [RFC6347] Rescorla, E. and N. Modadugu, "Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2", RFC 6347, January 2012. [RFC6525] Stewart, R., Tuexen, M., and P. Lei, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration", RFC 6525, February 2012. [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp] Loreto, S. and G. Camarillo, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)-Based Media Transport in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-01 (work in progress), March 2012. [I-D.tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps] Jesup, R., Loreto, S., Stewart, R., and M. Tuexen, "DTLS Encapsulation of SCTP Packets for RTCWEB", draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-01 (work in progress), July 2012. 11.2. Informational References [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview] Alvestrand, H., "Overview: Real Time Protocols for Brower- based Applications", draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-04 (work Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 9] Internet-Draft WebRTC Data Channel Protocol July 2012 in progress), June 2012. [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-channel] Jesup, R., Loreto, S., and M. Tuexen, "RTCWeb Datagram Connection", draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-00 (work in progress), March 2012. Authors' Addresses Randell Jesup Mozilla US Email: randell-ietf@jesup.org Salvatore Loreto Ericsson Hirsalantie 11 Jorvas 02420 FI Email: salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com Michael Tuexen Muenster University of Applied Sciences Stegerwaldstrasse 39 Steinfurt 48565 DE Email: tuexen@fh-muenster.de Jesup, et al. Expires January 17, 2013 [Page 10]