HYBI S. Loreto Internet-Draft Ericsson Intended status: Informational March 8, 2010 Expires: September 9, 2010 HyBi Requirements and Features draft-loreto-hybi-requirements-01 Abstract This document considers the requirements and resulting features needed for the design of the WebSocket Protocol. The goal of the document is to provide a stable base for protocol design and related discussion. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on September 9, 2010. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 1] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. HyBi Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. WebSocket Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1. WebSocket Client Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. WebSocket Server Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3. WebSocket Proxies Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4. WebSocket Security Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 2] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 1. Introduction HTTP [RFC2616] is a client/server protocol, where the HTTP servers store the data and provide it when it is requested by clients. When used to used to retrieve data from an HTTP server, the client sends HTTP requests to the server, and the server returns the requested data in HTTP responses. So the client has to poll continuously the server in order to receive new data. Recently techniques that enable bidirectional communication over HTTP have become more pervasive. Those techniques reduce the need to poll continuously the server thanks to the usage of HTTP hanging requests and multiple connections between the client and the server [I-D.loreto-http-bidirectional]. The goal of HyBi is to provide an efficient and clean two-way communication channel between client and server. The communication channel will: o allow each side to, independently from the other, send data when is willing and ready to do it; o rely on a single TCP connection for traffic in both the directions. o reduce the high overhead produced by HTTP headers in each request/ response. The goal of this work is to provide the set of requirements the WebSocket Protocol MUST meet. In the following sections we list and analyse the requirements from the perspective of clients and servers. 2. Terminology In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [RFC2119] and indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations. 2.1. HyBi Terminology This document uses the following HyBi-related terms: Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 3] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 connection: A transport layer virtual circuit established between a client and a server for the purpose of communication. frame: The basic unit of WebSocket communication, consisting of a structured sequence of octets matching the syntax defined in the actual protocol and transmitted on the established communication channel. message: user message: a block of related data with identified boundaries. origin server: The server on which a given resource resides or is to be created. 3. WebSocket Requirements The following requirements fro WebSocket Protocol have been identified both in the HyBi wg input document [I-D.hixie-thewebsocketprotocol] and in the HyBi mailing list dicussion. REQ. 1: The WebSocket Protocol MUST run directly on top of a transport protocol (e.g. TCP, UDP or SCTP, DCCP). REQ. 2: The WebSocket Protocol MUST be able to handle (send and receive) messages on top of a TCP data stream connection. Reason: transfer data as message prevents the receiver to parse/ handle partial content. REQ. 3: It MUST be possible to sent a message when the total size is either unknown or exceeds a fixed buffer size. Reason: This will allow dynamic messages to be constructed and sent without the need to buffer the entire message. REQ. 4: Textual data MUST be encoded as UTF-8. REQ. 5: The protocol MUST be designed to support different frame types (e.g. binary). REQ. 6: The WebSocket protocol MUST allow HTTP and WebSocket connections to be served from the same port. Consideration MUST be given: Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 4] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 * to provide WebSocket services via modules that plug in to existing web infrastructure. * to making it possible and practical to implement standalone implementations of the protocol without requiring a fully conforming HTTP implementation. Reason: Some server developers would like to integrate WebSocket support into existing HTTP servers. In addition, the default HTTP and HTTPS ports are ofter favoured for traffic that has to go through a firewall, so service providers will likely want to be able to use WebSocket over ports 80 and 443, even when running a We server on the same host. However there could be scenarios where it is not opportune or possible to setup a proxy on the same HTTP server. REQ. 7: When sharing host and "well known" port with HTTP, the WebSocket protocol MUST be HTTP compatible until both ends have established the WebSocket protocol. Reason: when operating on the standard HTTP ports, existing web infrastructure may handle according to existing standards prior to the establishment of the new protocol. REQ. 8: The protocol SHOULD make it possible and practical to reuse existing HTTP components where appropriate. Reason: the re-usage of existing well-debugged software decreases the number of implementation errors as well as the possibility to introduce security holes especially and at the same time speed up the development especially when the Web Socket server is implemented as modules that plug in to existing popular Web servers. 3.1. WebSocket Client Requirements REQ. 9: The WebSocket Client MUST be able to set up a communication channel sending to a WebSocket Server a well defined handshake. REQ. 10: WebSocket Protocol MUST provide for graceful close of an active WebSocket connection on request from the user Application. Reason: a clean shutdown signals that the other endpoint has definitely received all the messages sent prior the the close, so there is no protocol uncertainty about what has been processed / what can be retried on another connection. Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 5] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 OPEN ISSUE: WebSocket Protocol MUST also allow ungraceful close, either on request from the user application or as a result of a detected error condition. REQ. 11: The WebSocket Client MUST be able to request the server, during the handshake, to use a specific WebSocket sub-protocol. REQ. 12: The WebSocket Client MUST have the ability to send arbitrary text content to the server on the established communication channel, in the form of ordered discrete blocks. REQ. 13: The WebSocket Client MUST have the ability to send arbitrary binary content to the server on the established communication channel, in the form of ordered discrete blocks. 3.2. WebSocket Server Requirements REQ. 14: The WebSocket Server that accept to set up, with a WebSocket Client, a communication channel MUST send back to the WebSocket Client a well defined handshake. REQ. 15: The WebSocket Server MUST have the ability to send arbitrary text content to the client on the established communication channel, in the form of ordered discrete blocks. REQ. 16: The WebSocket Server MUST have the ability to send arbitrary binary content to the client on the established communication channel, in the form of ordered discrete blocks. 3.3. WebSocket Proxies Requirements Todo 3.4. WebSocket Security Requirements REQ. 17: The WebSocket Protocol MUST use the Origin-based security model commonly used by Web browsers to restrict which Web pages can contact a WebSocket sever when the WebSocket protocol is used from a Web page. REQ. 18: When used directly (not from a Web page), the WebSocket Protocol MUST use an equivalent security model. Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 6] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 REQ. 19: WebSocket should be designed to be robust against cross- protocol attacks. The protocol design should consider and mitigate the risk presented by WebSocket clients to existing servers (including HTTP servers). It should also consider and mitigate the risk to WebSocket servers presented by clients for other protocols (including HTTP). Reason: As the Web Socket protocol is expected to be mainly used in browsers, a careful design is necessary to mitigate the chances for hostile JavaScript to use WebSocket for a cross-protocol attack against vanilla HTTP resources or non-HTTP servers. More the design should prevent the possibility for cross-site XMLHttpRequest (using CORS or XDomainRequest) to be used for a cross-protocol attack against WebSocket resources, potentially violating integrity (though not confidentiality). 4. Security Considerations 5. IANA Considerations This requirements document does not mandate any immediate IANA actions. However, such IANA considerations may arise from future HyBi specification documents which try to meet the requirements given here. 6. Acknowledgments 7. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2616] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999. [I-D.loreto-http-bidirectional] Loreto, S., Saint-Andre, P., Salsano, S., and G. Wilkins, "Best Practices for the Use of Long Polling and Streaming in Bidirectional HTTP", draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-02 (work in progress), February 2010. [I-D.hixie-thewebsocketprotocol] Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 7] Internet-Draft HyBi Requirements March 2010 Hickson, I., "The Web Socket protocol", draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-75 (work in progress), February 2010. Author's Address Salvatore Loreto Ericsson Hirsalantie 11 Jorvas 02420 Finland Email: salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com Loreto Expires September 9, 2010 [Page 8]