Spring M. Jethanandani, Ed. Internet-Draft T. Murakami Intended status: Standards Track Arrcus, Inc Expires: 21 September 2022 20 March 2022 A YANG Model for SRv6 Mobile User Plane draft-mahesh-bess-srv6-mup-yang-00 Abstract This document defines a YANG data model for configuration and management of SRv6 for the Mobile User Plane (MUP). Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 September 2022. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 1] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Note to RFC Editors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Appendix A. Appendix 1 Complete Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . 21 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 1. Introduction In mobile networks, mobility systems provide connectivity over a wireless link to stationary and non-stationary nodes. The user-plane establishes a tunnel between the mobile node and its anchor node over IP-based backhaul and core networks. When SRv6 is applied to mobile networks, it enables a source routing architecture, where operators get to explicitly specify a route for the packets to traverse both to and from a mobile node. The SRv6 Endpoint nodes serve as mobile user-plane anchors. For example, in an Enhanced mode topology, the intermediate waypoints, SIDs, can be used for Traffic Engineering. For more details, see Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane [I-D.ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane], Section 5.2. The gNB and UPF are SR-aware, and there are two service segments, one for traffic engineering to support a low latency path, and the other for service programming. In such a topology the operator routes the traffic through these SRv6 nodes, so they can perform their Endpoint functionality and forward the packet. Further, in the uplink direction, when the gNB receives a packet from a UE, it adds the segments of the SR policy to route the traffic through those two segments, while doing something similar in the downlink direction. This document describes a YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] data model for the Segment Routing IPv6 (SRv6) user plane of mobile networks. The model conforms to the NMDA [RFC8342] architecture. Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 2] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 1.2. Note to RFC Editors This document uses several placeholder values throughout the document. Please replace them as follows and remove this note before publication. RFC XXXX, where XXXX is the number assigned to this document at the time of publication. 2022-03-08 with the actual date of the publication of this document. 2. Terminology This document references terms defined in other documents. In particular, it imports definitions for the following terms from Segment Routing Architecture [RFC8402], and IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH) [RFC8754]. * Active Segment * BGP-Prefix Segment * Prefix SID * Segment * SID * SRH * SRv6 * SRv6 Endpoint nodes * SRv6 SID * Segment Routing domain (SR domain) * SR Global Block (SRGB) Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 3] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 * SR Local Block (SRLB) 2.1. Acronyms This document uses a few acronyms. Some of them are defined here for reference. +=========+======================================================+ | Acronym | Definition | +=========+======================================================+ | gNB | gNodeB, a 5G Base Station using New Radio technology | +---------+------------------------------------------------------+ | MUP | Mobile User Plane | +---------+------------------------------------------------------+ | SR | Segment Routing | +---------+------------------------------------------------------+ | SRv6 | Segment Routing over v6 | +---------+------------------------------------------------------+ | UE | User Equipment | +---------+------------------------------------------------------+ | UPF | User Plane Function | +---------+------------------------------------------------------+ Table 1: Acronyms 3. Tree Diagram An abridged version of the tree diagram is shown here. Annotations used in the diagram are defined in YANG Tree Diagrams [RFC8340]. Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 4] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 module: ietf-srv6-mobile augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global: +--rw route-distinguisher? rt-types:route-distinguisher +--rw label-allocation-mode? identityref +--rw sid-allocation-mode? identityref +--rw srv6 +--rw locator? leafref +--ro sid-manager-connected? boolean +--ro locator-registered? boolean +--ro micro-segment-enabled? boolean +--rw mobile +--rw encapsulation | ... +--rw decapsulations | ... +--rw decapsulation-source-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global /bgp:route-selection-options: +--rw selection-deferral-time? uint16 +--rw med-missing-as-worst? boolean +--rw multipath-as-path-relax? boolean +--rw multipath-nexthop-relax? boolean augment /rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:defined-sets /bp:bgp-defined-sets: +--rw n4-interface-sets +--rw interface-set* [name] +--rw name string +--rw member* identityref augment /rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions /rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:statements /rt-pol:statement/rt-pol:conditions/bp:bgp-conditions: +--rw match-n4-network-interface-set +--rw n4-network-instance-set? leafref +--rw match-set-options? match-set-options-type augment /rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions /rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:statements /rt-pol:statement/rt-pol:actions/bp:bgp-actions: +--rw set-network-interface +--rw apply-policy +--rw import-policy* leafref +--rw default-import-policy? default-policy-type +--rw export-policy* leafref +--rw default-export-policy? default-policy-type Figure 1: Tree Diagram for SRv6 YANG Model Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 5] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 4. YANG Model The YANG model is divided into two parts. The first part of the model augments the BGP model in BGP Model for Service Provider Network [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model] for the BGP configuration, while the second part augments the BGP Routing Policy model in BGP Model for Service Provider Network [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model]. This model defines a new SAFI called 'srv6-mup'. The BGP model is augmented both at a global level to add SRv6 configuration, and at the route selection option. The BGP policy model is augemented to add a defined set, a set of match options, and a set of actions. The model imports Common YANG Data Types [RFC6991], A YANG Data Model for Routing Management(NMDA Version) [RFC8349], A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy [RFC9067], YANG Data Model for Segment Routing [RFC9020], YANG Data Model for SRv6 Base and Static [I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-yang], and BGP Model for Service Provider Network [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model]. file "ietf-srv6-mobile@2022-03-08.yang" module ietf-srv6-mobile { yang-version "1.1"; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-srv6-mobile"; prefix "srv6-mob"; import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types."; } import ietf-routing { prefix rt; reference "RFC 8349, A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)."; } import ietf-routing-types { prefix rt-types; reference "RFC 8294: Common YANG Types for the Routing Area."; } import ietf-routing-policy { prefix rt-pol; reference "RFC 9067: A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy."; } import ietf-bgp { Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 6] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 prefix bgp; reference "I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model: BGP Model for Service Provider Network."; } import ietf-bgp-policy { prefix bp; reference "I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model: BGP Model for Service Provider Network."; } import ietf-bgp-types { prefix bt; reference "I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model: BGP Model for Service Provider Network."; } import ietf-segment-routing { prefix sr; reference "RFC 9020: YANG Data Model for Segment Routing."; } import ietf-srv6-base { prefix srv6; reference "I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-yang: YANG Data Model for SRv6 Base and Static."; } import ietf-srv6-types { prefix srv6-types; reference "RFC 9020: YANG Data Model for Segment Routing."; } organization "IETF SPRING Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Editor: Mahesh Jethanandani (mjethanandani at gmail dot com) Author: Tetsuya Murakami (tetsuya at arrcus dot com)"; description "This module augments the BGP YANG model to add support for configuration in mobile networks. Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 7] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here."; revision "2022-03-08" { description "Initial Version."; reference "RFC XXXX, A YANG Model for BGP configuration in mobile networks."; } /* * Features */ /* * Typedefs */ typedef srv6-mobile-function-type { type union { type identityref { base "srv6-types:srv6-endpoint-type"; } type uint16; } description "Type definition for SRV6 mobile function. Unknown values are represented as the numeric value."; reference "draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane"; } Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 8] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 /* * Identities */ identity srv6-mup { base bt:afi-safi-type; description "Segment Routing for Mobile User Plane (AFI,SAFI = ?,?)"; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG Model for BGP configuration in mobile networks."; } identity label-allocation-mode { description "Base identity to be used to express types of label allocation strategies to be used within a network instance"; } identity label-per-prefix { base label-allocation-mode; description "A label is to be allocated per prefix entry in the RIB for the network instance"; } identity label-per-nexthop { base label-allocation-mode; description "A label is to be allocated per nexthop entry in the RIB for the network instance"; } identity label-instance { base label-allocation-mode; description "A single label is to be used for the instance"; } identity sid-allocation-mode { description "Base identity to be used to express types of SRv6 segment ID allocation strategies to be used within a network instance."; } identity sid-per-nexthop { base sid-allocation-mode; description "A segment ID is to be allocated per nexthop entry in the RIB Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 9] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 for the network instance"; } identity sid-instance { base sid-allocation-mode; description "A single segment ID is to be used for the instance"; } identity sid-per-nexthop-no-transportation { base sid-allocation-mode; description "A segment ID is to be allocated per nexthop entry in the RIB for the network instance"; } identity sid-instance-no-transportation { base sid-allocation-mode; description "A single segment ID is to be used for the instance"; } identity mobile-interface-type { description "Base identity for different mobile interfaces."; } identity n4 { base mobile-interface-type; description "N4 interface."; } /* * Groupings */ /* * BGP configuration */ augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global" { description "Augmentation of the BGP global configuration to add srv6 mobile configuration."; leaf route-distinguisher { Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 10] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 type rt-types:route-distinguisher; description "The route distinguisher that should be used for the local VRF or VSI instance when it is signalled via BGP."; } leaf label-allocation-mode { type identityref { base label-allocation-mode; } must "not(../sid-allocation-mode)" { error-message "label-allocation-mode and sid-allocation-mode" + "cannot co-exist"; } must "not(/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol" + "/bgp:bgp/bgp:global/srv6/mobile/encapsulation/config" + "/locator | " + "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global" + "/srv6/locator)" { error-message "SRv6 configurations must be removed first"; } description "The label allocation mode to be used for L3 entries in the network instance"; } leaf sid-allocation-mode { type identityref { base sid-allocation-mode; } must "not(../label-allocation-mode)" { error-message "label-allocation-mode and sid-allocation-mode " + "cannot co-exist"; } must "boolean(/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol" + "/bgp:bgp/bgp:global/srv6/mobile/encapsulation/locator |" + "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global/srv6" + "/mobile/decapsulations/decapsulation/locator |" + "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global/srv6" + "/locator)" { error-message "SRv6 locator name must be configured"; } description Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 11] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 "The segment ID allocation mode to be used for L3 entries in the network instance"; } container srv6 { description "SRv6 mobile container."; leaf locator { type leafref { path "/rt:routing/sr:segment-routing/" + "srv6:srv6/srv6:locators/srv6:locator/srv6:name"; } description "Locator configuration."; } leaf sid-manager-connected { type boolean; config false; description "Connection with segment ID manager is active"; } leaf locator-registered { type boolean; config false; description "Locator name is registered"; } leaf micro-segment-enabled { type boolean; config false; description "Locator has enabled micro-segment behavior"; } container mobile { when "derived-from-or-self(/rt:routing" + "/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global" + "/bgp:afi-safis/bgp:afi-safi/bgp:name, 'srv6-mup')" { description "This augmentation is valid only for a MUP SAFI."; } description Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 12] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 "Mobile configuration of SRv6."; container encapsulation { description "Encapsulation configuration."; leaf locator { type leafref { path "/rt:routing/sr:segment-routing/" + "srv6:srv6/srv6:locators/srv6:locator/srv6:name"; } description "Reference to SRv6 locater key"; } leaf function { type srv6-mobile-function-type; must "boolean(current()/../locator)" { error-message "SRv6 Mobile Locator name must be configured"; } description "One of the SRv6 function types."; } leaf source-adress { type inet:ipv4-address; description "GTP source IP address"; } leaf source-position { type uint8; description "Bit position of GTP source IP address"; } container n4-network-instance { description "Definitions for the N4 interface."; leaf routing-policy { type leafref { path "/rt-pol:routing-policy/" + "rt-pol:policy-definitions/" + "rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:name"; } must "boolean(current()/../access)" { Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 13] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 error-message "SRv6 Mobile access instance name must be " + "configured"; } description "Reference to routing-policy"; } leaf access { type string; description "Mobile access instance."; } } } container decapsulations { description "SRv6 mobile decapsulation configuration."; list decapsulation { key "id"; description "SRv6 mobile Decapsulation config"; leaf id { type uint16; description "SRv6 mobile decapsulation entry id"; } leaf locator { type leafref { path "/rt:routing/sr:segment-routing/" + "srv6:srv6/srv6:locators/srv6:locator/srv6:name"; } description "Reference to SRv6 locater key"; } leaf function { type srv6-mobile-function-type; must "boolean(current()/../locator)" { error-message "SRv6 Mobile Locator name must be configured"; } description "One of SRv6 function types."; Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 14] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 } container n4-network-instance { description "Definitions for the N4 interface."; leaf core { type string; description "Core instance"; } } } } leaf decapsulation-source-prefix { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "IPv6 prefix for GTP source address"; } } } } augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" + "/rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global" + "/bgp:route-selection-options" { description "Augmentation of the BGP global configuration for route selection options to add srv6 mobile configuration."; leaf selection-deferral-time { type uint16 { range 1..3600; } default 300; description "An upper-bound on the time (in seconds) that the best-path selection is deferred"; } leaf med-missing-as-worst { type boolean; description "A route without MED is treated as with highest MED value"; } leaf multipath-as-path-relax { Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 15] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 type boolean; default true; description "Paths with different AS-Path but of same length can form ECMP"; } leaf multipath-nexthop-relax { type boolean; default false; description "Enable BGP multi-path for paths with same next-hop"; } } augment "/rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:defined-sets" + "/bp:bgp-defined-sets" { description "Augmentation of the Routing Policy module to add mobile interface defined sets."; container n4-interface-sets { description "Enclosing container for list of n4 interface sets."; list interface-set { key "name"; description "List of defined interface sets."; leaf name { type string; description "Name of interface set. This is used to reference the set in match conditions."; } leaf-list member { type identityref { base "mobile-interface-type"; } description "Members of interface set."; } } } } Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 16] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 augment "/rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions" + "/rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:statements" + "/rt-pol:statement/rt-pol:conditions/bp:bgp-conditions" { description "Augmentation of the Routing Policy module to add conditions."; container match-n4-network-interface-set { description "Match a referenced network instance."; leaf n4-network-instance-set { type leafref { path "/rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:defined-sets/" + "bp:bgp-defined-sets/n4-interface-sets/" + "interface-set/name"; } description "References a defined community set."; } uses rt-pol:match-set-options-group; } } augment "/rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions" + "/rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:statements" + "/rt-pol:statement/rt-pol:actions/bp:bgp-actions" { description "Augmentation of the Routing Policy module to add actions."; container set-network-interface { description "Set a referenced network instance."; uses rt-pol:apply-policy-group; } } } Figure 2: SRv6 YANG Model for Mobile User Plane 5. IANA Considerations This memo registers the following namespace URIs in the IETF XML in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-srv6-mobile Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 17] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 This document registers the following YANG modules in the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC6020]: Name: ietf-srv6-mobile Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-srv6-mobile Prefix: srv6-mob Reference: RFC XXXX 6. Security Considerations The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability: Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability: Some of the RPC operations in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control access to these operations. These are the operations and their sensitivity/vulnerability: 7. References 7.1. Normative References Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 18] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, . [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, . Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 19] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 [RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018, . [RFC8349] Lhotka, L., Lindem, A., and Y. Qu, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349, DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018, . [RFC8402] Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing Architecture", RFC 8402, DOI 10.17487/RFC8402, July 2018, . [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, . [RFC8754] Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J., Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, March 2020, . [RFC9020] Litkowski, S., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Sarkar, P., and J. Tantsura, "YANG Data Model for Segment Routing", RFC 9020, DOI 10.17487/RFC9020, May 2021, . [RFC9067] Qu, Y., Tantsura, J., Lindem, A., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy", RFC 9067, DOI 10.17487/RFC9067, October 2021, . [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model] Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., Hares, S., and J. Haas, "BGP YANG Model for Service Provider Networks", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model-13, 6 March 2022, . [I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-yang] Raza, K., Agarwal, S., Liu, X., Hu, Z., Hussain, I., Shah, H., Voyer, D., Matsushima, S., Horiba, K., Rajamanickam, J., and A. AbdelSalam, "YANG Data Model for SRv6 Base and Static", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- spring-srv6-yang-01, 14 January 2022, . Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 20] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 7.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane] Matsushima, S., Filsfils, C., Kohno, M., Garvia, P. C., Voyer, D., and C. E. Perkins, "Segment Routing IPv6 for Mobile User Plane", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-18, 18 February 2022, . Appendix A. Appendix 1 Complete Tree Diagram Here is a complete tree diagram for the configuration and operational part of the model. module: ietf-srv6-mobile augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global: +--rw route-distinguisher? rt-types:route-distinguisher +--rw label-allocation-mode? identityref +--rw sid-allocation-mode? identityref +--rw srv6 +--rw locator? leafref +--ro sid-manager-connected? boolean +--ro locator-registered? boolean +--ro micro-segment-enabled? boolean +--rw mobile +--rw encapsulation | +--rw locator? leafref | +--rw function? srv6-mobile-function-type | +--rw source-adress? inet:ipv4-address | +--rw source-position? uint8 | +--rw n4-network-instance | +--rw routing-policy? leafref | +--rw access? string +--rw decapsulations | +--rw decapsulation* [id] | +--rw id uint16 | +--rw locator? leafref | +--rw function? | | srv6-mobile-function-type | +--rw n4-network-instance | +--rw core? string +--rw decapsulation-source-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols /rt:control-plane-protocol/bgp:bgp/bgp:global /bgp:route-selection-options: Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 21] Internet-Draft SRv6 MUP YANG Model March 2022 +--rw selection-deferral-time? uint16 +--rw med-missing-as-worst? boolean +--rw multipath-as-path-relax? boolean +--rw multipath-nexthop-relax? boolean augment /rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:defined-sets /bp:bgp-defined-sets: +--rw n4-interface-sets +--rw interface-set* [name] +--rw name string +--rw member* identityref augment /rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions /rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:statements /rt-pol:statement/rt-pol:conditions/bp:bgp-conditions: +--rw match-n4-network-interface-set +--rw n4-network-instance-set? leafref +--rw match-set-options? match-set-options-type augment /rt-pol:routing-policy/rt-pol:policy-definitions /rt-pol:policy-definition/rt-pol:statements /rt-pol:statement/rt-pol:actions/bp:bgp-actions: +--rw set-network-interface +--rw apply-policy +--rw import-policy* leafref +--rw default-import-policy? default-policy-type +--rw export-policy* leafref +--rw default-export-policy? default-policy-type Figure 3: Complete tree diagram Acknowledgements TBA Contributors Thanks to all of the contributors. Authors' Addresses Mahesh Jethanandani (editor) Arrcus, Inc Email: mjethanandani@gmail.com Tetsuya Murakami Arrcus, Inc Email: tetsuya@arrcus.com Jethanandani & Murakami Expires 21 September 2022 [Page 22]