HIP R. Moskowitz
Internet-Draft HTT Consulting
Intended status: Standards Track S. Card
Expires: March 18, 2020 A. Wiethuechter
AX Enterprize
September 15, 2019
New Cryptographic Algorithms for HIP
draft-moskowitz-hip-new-crypto-00
Abstract
This document provides new cryptographic algorithms to be used with
HIP. The Edwards Elliptic Curve and the Keccak sponge functions are
the main focus. The HIP parameters and processing instructions
impacted by these algorithms are defined.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 18, 2020.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terms and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Requirements Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. HIP Parameter values for new Crytpo . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Elliptic Curves for Diffie-Hellman . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1.1. DIFFIE_HELLMAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Edward Digital Signature Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2.1. HOST_ID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2.2. HIT_SUITE_LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Hashing with the Keccak Function . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3.1. The Keccak Permutation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3.2. RHASH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.3. HIP_MAC and HIP_MAC2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.4. HIP Cipher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.4.1. HIP_CIPHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Generating a HIT from an HI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. HIP KEYMAT Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Using Keccak for a Pseudorandom Function . . . . . . . . . . 8
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8.1. Keymat vulnerabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction
This document adds new cryptographic algorithms for HIPv2 [RFC7401].
This includes:
o New elliptic curves for ECDH.
o The Edwards Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)
used in Host Identities (HI) and for Base Exchange (BEX)
signatures.
o Hashes used in Host Identity Tag (HIT) generation, and wherever
else hashes are needed.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
o Keyed hashes used for KEYMAT generation and packet MACing
operations.
o AEAD and stream ciphers to use in HIP and HIP enabled secure
communication protocols.
The hashes and encryption are all built on the Keccak [Keccak] sponge
function.
These additions reflect selection of advances in the field of
cryptography that would best benefit HIP, particularly in constrained
devices and communications.
2. Terms and Definitions
2.1. Requirements Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here. `
2.2. Definitions
Keccak (KECCAK Message Authentication Code): The family of all
sponge functions with a KECCAK-f permutation as the underlying
function and multi-rate padding as the padding rule.
KMAC (KECCAK Message Authentication Code): A PRF and keyed hash
function based on KECCAK.
cSHAKE (The customizable SHAKE function): Extends the SHAKE scheme
to allow users to customize their use of the function.
SHAKE (Secure Hash Algorithm KECCAK): A secure hash that allows for
an arbitrary output length.
PRF (Pseudorandom Function): A function that can be used to generate
output from a random seed such that the output is computationally
indistinguishable from truly random output.
capacity: In the sponge construction, the width of the underlying
function minus the rate.
rate: In the sponge construction, the number of input bits processed
per invocation of the underlying function.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
XOF (eXtendable-Output Function): A function on bit strings (also
called messages) in which the output can be extended to any
desired length.
3. HIP Parameter values for new Crytpo
HIP parameters carry information that is necessary for establishing
and maintaining a HIP association. For example, the device's public
keys as well as the signaling for negotiating ciphers and payload
handling are encapsulated in HIP parameters. Additional information,
meaningful for end hosts or middleboxes, may also be included in HIP
parameters. The specification of the HIP parameters and their
mapping to HIP packets and packet types is flexible to allow HIP
extensions to define new parameters and new protocol behavior.
3.1. Elliptic Curves for Diffie-Hellman
Elliptic curves Curve25519 and Curve448 RFC 7748 [RFC7748]) are
specified here for use in the HIP Diffie-Hellman exchange.
Curve25519 and Curve448 are already defined in Section 5.2.1 of
[I-D.ietf-hip-dex], using the HIP-DEX CKDF. Here they are defined
for using the new KMAC NIST SP 800-185 [NIST.SP.800-185] derived KDF
in Section 5.
3.1.1. DIFFIE_HELLMAN
The DIFFIE_HELLMAN parameter may be included in selected HIP packets
based on the DH Group ID selected. The DIFFIE_HELLMAN parameter is
defined in Section 5.2.7 of [RFC7401].
The following Elliptic Curves are defined here:
Group KDF Value
Curve25519 [RFC7748] KKDF 13
Curve448 [RFC7748] KKDF 14
A new KDF for KEYMAT, Section 6.5 of [RFC7401] and Section 6.3 of
[I-D.ietf-hip-dex] using Keccak is defined in Section 5.
3.2. Edward Digital Signature Algorithm
Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) (RFC 8032
[RFC8032]) are specified here for use as Host Identities (HIs).
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
3.2.1. HOST_ID
The HOST_ID parameter specifies the public key algorithm, and for
elliptic curves, a name. The HOST_ID parameter is defined in
Section 5.2.19 of [RFC7401].
Algorithm
profiles Values
EdDSA 13 [8032] (RECOMMENDED)
For hosts that implement EdDSA as the algorithm, the following ECC
curves are available:
Algorithm Curve Values
EdDSA RESERVED 0
EdDSA EdDSA25519 1 [RFC8032]
EdDSA EdDSA25519ph 2 [RFC8032]
EdDSA EdDSA448 3 [RFC8032]
EdDSA EdDSA448ph 4 [RFC8032]
3.2.2. HIT_SUITE_LIST
The HIT_SUITE_LIST parameter contains a list of the supported HIT
suite IDs of the Responder. Based on the HIT_SUITE_LIST, the
Initiator can determine which source HIT Suite IDs are supported by
the Responder. The HIT_SUITE_LIST parameter is defined in
Section 5.2.10 of [RFC7401].
The following HIT Suite ID is defined, and the relationship between
the four-bit ID value used in the OGA ID field and the eight-bit
encoding within the HIT_SUITE_LIST ID field is clarified:
HIT Suite Four-bit ID Eight-bit encoding
RESERVED 0 0x00
EdDSA/SHAKE128 5 0x50 (RECOMMENDED)
The following table provides more detail on the above HIT Suite
combinations. The input for each generation algorithm is the
encoding of the HI as defined in Section 4. The output is 96 bits
long and is directly used in the ORCHID.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
+-------+----------+---------+---------------+----------------------+
| Index | Hash | HMAC | Signature | Description |
| | function | | algorithm | |
| | | | family | |
+-------+----------+---------+---------------+----------------------+
| 5 | SHAKE128 | KMAC128 | EdDSA | EdDSA HI hashed with |
| | | | | cSHAKE128, output is |
| | | | | 96 bits |
+-------+----------+---------+---------------+----------------------+
Table 1: HIT Suites
3.3. Hashing with the Keccak Function
The Keccak [Keccak] sponge function is the basis for the new SHA-3,
standard NIST FIPS 202 [NIST.FIPS.202], and the customized XOF
functions in NIST SP 800-185 [NIST.SP.800-185]. These are used here
as an alternative to all the hashing functions in HIP.
Hardware implementation of Keccak in VHDL is available from Keccak
[Keccak].
3.3.1. The Keccak Permutation
Keccak is described as a sponge function. The analogy to a sponge is
that an arbitrary number of input bits are "absorbed" into the state
of the function, after which an arbitrary number of output bits are
"squeezed" out of its state.
The Keccak function is defined to have a width of b bits. Where b
is the capacity (c) + rate (r).
The rate is the number of bits "fed" into the sponge at a time.
The capacity is twice the desired hash "strength" and part of the
sponge width.
b is one of the set {25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600}. In FIPS 202,
b=1600. Thus a hash strength of 128 bits can be delivered with c=256
and r=1344, or 168 byte segment input to the sponge.
Keccak can also provide a hash strength of 128 bit with b=800 (r=544
or 68 bytes) and b=400 (r=144 or 18 bytes). 256 bit strength can
only be provided with b=1600 or 800.
FIPS 202 does not specify use of these smaller values for b which may
be preferred in memory constrained devices, processing relatively
short input strings. Future work will determine if the smaller
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
values for b result in a significant performance/memory improvement
to warrant their use.
3.3.2. RHASH
The RHASH is the general term used throughout [RFC7401] to refer to
the hash used for a specific HIT suite. For this addendum SHAKE128
is used, even for HIs of EdDSA448.
Unless otherwise specified, L of SHAKE128 is 256, resulting in a
similar output to SHA256. Any truncation used for, older, fixed
output hashes is still used. This is to simplify code integration.
One exception to this is in Section 4.
3.3.3. HIP_MAC and HIP_MAC2
The HIP_MAC and HIP_MAC2 parameters in [RFC7401] use HMAC [RFC2104].
This performs two hashes on a string with a key for a keyed hash the
length of the underlying hash.
Here, KMAC from NIST SP 800-185 [NIST.SP.800-185] is used. This is a
single pass using the underlying cSHAKE function. The function call
is:
KMAC128(Key, Input String, 256, "")
3.4. HIP Cipher
HIP encrypted parameters use the HIP_CIPHER, Section 5.2.8 of
[RFC7401]. The Keccak Keyak cipher, ref, is recommended. Keyak is a
candidate in the NIST Lightweight Cryptography competition and is
consistent with the overall approach in this addendum to use Keccak
functions for simplicity in design and implementation.
3.4.1. HIP_CIPHER
The HIP_CIPHER parameter values for Keyak are:
hip_cipher
Suite ID Value
RIVER KEYAK 6 (Keyak)
LAKE KEYAK 7 (Keyak)
For use as the HIP Cipher, the TAG generated in Keyak is discarded.
The Keyak SUV is the key plus IV specified for the encrypted
parameter. River Keyak MAY be used for [I-D.ietf-hip-dex], in place
of AES-CTR.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
Lake Keyak can provide 256 bits of security by following the
recommendations for the Keyak cipher.
4. Generating a HIT from an HI
The EdDSA/cSHAKE based HITs vary slightly the ORCHID generation
method described in section 3.2 of [RFC7401]. The XOF functionality
of cSHAKE produces an output of L bits. This replaces the Encode_96
function in the ORCHID generation.
For identities that are EdDSA public keys, the ORCHID input consists
of the public key encoding as specified for the Host Identity field
of the HOST_ID parameter (see Section 3.2.1). Since L is less than
128, cSHAKE128 is used for all EdDSA curve sizes:
cSHAKE128(EdDSA public key, 96, "", Context ID)
5. HIP KEYMAT Generation
The KMAC function provides a new, more efficient, key derivation
function over HKDF [RFC5869]. This will be referred to as KKDF.
The choice of KMAC128 or KMAC256 is based on the strength of the
output key material. For 256 bits of strength equivalent to HMAC-
SHA256, use KMAC256. Per NIST SP 800-56Cr1 [NIST.SP.800-56Cr1],
Section 4.1, Option 3:
KMAC[128|256](salt, IKM, L, S)
L is the derived key bit length. Since 4 HIP keys are "drawn" from
this output, the length is 4 * HIP_key_size.
S is the byte string 01001011 || 01000100 || 01000110, which
represents the sequence of characters "K", "D", and "F" in 8-bit
ASCII.
Salt is derived as defined in [RFC7401] or [I-D.ietf-hip-dex]. There
are special security considerations for IKM per [RFC7748]. The two
HIs MUST be used in constructing IKM as follows:
IKM = HI-I | Diffie-Hellman secret | HI-R
6. Using Keccak for a Pseudorandom Function
Appendix B of NIST SP 800-185 [NIST.SP.800-185] defines how to use
SHAKE, cSHAKE, or KMAC as a PRF.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
7. IANA Considerations
IANA will need to make the following changes to the "Host Identity
Protocol (HIP) Parameters" registries:
Diffie Hellman: This document defines the new Curve25519 and
Curve448 for the Diffie-Hellman exchange (see Section 3.1.1).
Host ID: This document defines the new EdDSA Host ID (see
Section 3.2.1).
HIT Suite ID: This document defines the new HIT Suite of EdDSA/
cSHAKE (see Section 3.2.2).
HIP Cipher: This document defines the new Keyak ciphers for HIP
encrypted parameters (see Section 3.4.1).
8. Security Considerations
8.1. Keymat vulnerabilities
[RFC7748] warns about using Curve25519 and Curve448 in Diffie-Hellman
for key derivation:
Designers using these curves should be aware that for each public
key, there are several publicly computable public keys that are
equivalent to it, i.e., they produce the same shared secrets. Thus
using a public key as an identifier and knowledge of a shared secret
as proof of ownership (without including the public keys in the key
derivation) might lead to subtle vulnerabilities.
This applies to [I-D.ietf-hip-dex], but may have broader
consequences. Thus the two Host IDs are included with the Diffie-
Hellman secret.
9. Acknowledgments
TBD
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[NIST.FIPS.202]
Dworkin, M., "SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and
Extendable-Output Functions", National Institute of
Standards and Technology report,
DOI 10.6028/nist.fips.202, July 2015.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
[NIST.SP.800-185]
Kelsey, J., Change, S., and R. Perlner, "SHA-3 derived
functions: cSHAKE, KMAC, TupleHash and ParallelHash",
National Institute of Standards and Technology report,
DOI 10.6028/nist.sp.800-185, December 2016.
[NIST.SP.800-56Cr1]
Barker, E., Chen, L., and R. Davis, "Recommendation for
key-derivation methods in key-establishment schemes",
National Institute of Standards and Technology report,
DOI 10.6028/nist.sp.800-56cr1, April 2018.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, .
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-hip-dex]
Moskowitz, R., Hummen, R., and M. Komu, "HIP Diet EXchange
(DEX)", draft-ietf-hip-dex-08 (work in progress), June
2019.
[Keccak] Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G., and
R. Van Keer, "The Keccak",
.
[RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed-
Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2104, February 1997,
.
[RFC5869] Krawczyk, H. and P. Eronen, "HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand
Key Derivation Function (HKDF)", RFC 5869,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5869, May 2010,
.
[RFC7401] Moskowitz, R., Ed., Heer, T., Jokela, P., and T.
Henderson, "Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)",
RFC 7401, DOI 10.17487/RFC7401, April 2015,
.
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft HIP New Crypto September 2019
[RFC7748] Langley, A., Hamburg, M., and S. Turner, "Elliptic Curves
for Security", RFC 7748, DOI 10.17487/RFC7748, January
2016, .
[RFC8032] Josefsson, S. and I. Liusvaara, "Edwards-Curve Digital
Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)", RFC 8032,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8032, January 2017,
.
Authors' Addresses
Robert Moskowitz
HTT Consulting
Oak Park, MI 48237
USA
Email: rgm@labs.htt-consult.com
Stuart W. Card
AX Enterprize
4947 Commercial Drive
Yorkville, NY 13495
USA
Email: stu.card@axenterprize.com
Adam Wiethuechter
AX Enterprize
4947 Commercial Drive
Yorkville, NY 13495
USA
Email: adam.wiethuechter@axenterprize.com
Moskowitz, et al. Expires March 18, 2020 [Page 11]