<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='./rfc2629.xslt' ?>

<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="no"?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<?rfc linkmailto="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" >
    

<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='./rfc2629.xslt' ?>

<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="yes" ?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<rfc ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-nir-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-02" category="std">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="ChaCha20 & Poly1305 for IPsec">ChaCha20 and Poly1305 and their use in IPsec</title>
    <author initials="Y." surname="Nir" fullname="Yoav Nir">
      <organization abbrev="Check Point">Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>5 Hasolelim st.</street>
          <city>Tel Aviv</city>
          <code>6789735</code>
          <country>Israel</country>
        </postal>
        <email>ynir.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2014"/>
    <area>Security Area</area>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <t> This document describes the use of the ChaCha20 stream cipher along with the Poly1305 authenticator, combined into an AEAD algorithm for IPsec.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <!-- ====================================================================== -->
    <section anchor="introduction" title="Introduction">
      <t> The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES - <xref target="FIPS-197"/>) has become the gold standard in encryption. Its efficient design, wide implementation, and hardware support allow for high performance in many areas, including IPsec VPNs. On most modern platforms, AES is anywhere from 4x to 10x as fast as the previous most-used cipher, 3-key Data Encryption Standard (3DES - <xref target="FIPS-46"/>), which makes it not only the best choice, but the only choice.</t>
      <t> The problem is that if future advances in cryptanalysis reveal a weakness in AES, VPN users will be in an unenviable position. With the only other widely supported cipher being the much slower 3DES, it is not feasible to re-configure IPsec installations to use 3DES. <xref target="standby-cipher"/> describes this issue and the need for a standby cipher in greater detail.</t>
      <t> This document proposes the ChaCha20 stream cipher as such a standby cipher in an AEAD construction with the Poly1305 authenticator for use with the Encapsulated Security Protocol (ESP - <xref target="RFC4303"/>). We call this ESP_ChaCha20-Poly1305. These algorithms are described in a separate document (<xref target="chacha_poly"/>). This document only describes the IPsec-specific things.</t> 
      <section anchor="mustshouldmay" title="Conventions Used in This Document">
        <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT",
          "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described
          in <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="esp_chacha_poly" title="ESP_ChaCha20-Poly1305 for ESP">
      <t> ESP_ChaCha20-Poly1305 is a combined mode algorithm, or AEAD. The construction follows the AEAD construction in section 2.7 of <xref target="chacha_poly"/>:<list style="symbols"> 
        <t> The IV is 64-bit, and is used as part of the nonce. </t>
        <t> A 32-bit sender ID is prepended to the 64-bit IV to form the 96-bit nonce. For regular IPsec, this is set to all zeros. IPsec extensions that allow multiple senders, such as GDOI (<xref target="RFC6407"/>) or <xref target="RFC6054"/> may set this to different values.</t>
        <t> The encryption key is 256-bit.</t>
        <t> The Internet Key Exchange protocol (IKE - <xref target="RFC5996"/>) generates a bitstring called KEYMAT that is generated from a PRF. That KEYMAT is divided into keys for encryption, message authentication and whatever else is needed. For the ChaCha20 algorithm, 256 bits are used for the key. TBD: do we want an extra 32 bits as salt for the nonce like in GCM?</t>
        <t> The ChaCha20 encryption algorithm requires the following parameters: a 256-bit key, a 96-bit nonce, and a 32-bit initial block counter. For ESP we set these as follows: <list style="symbols">
          <t> The key is set to the key mentioned above.</t>
          <t> The 96-bit nonce is formed from a concatenation of the 32-bit sender ID and the 64-bit IV, as described above.</t>
          <t> The Initial Block Counter is set to one (1). The reason that one is used for the initial counter rather than zero is that zero is reserved for generating the one-time Poly1305 key (see below)</t></list></t>
        <t> As ChaCha20 is not a block cipher, no padding should be necessary. However, in keeping with the specification in RFC 4303, the ESP does have padding, so as to align the buffer to an integral multiple of 4 octets.</t>
        <t> The same key and nonce, along with a block counter of zero are passed to the ChaCha20 block function, and the top 256 bits of the result are used as the Poly1305 key. The nonce passed to the block function here is the same nonce that is used in ChaCha20, including the 32-bit Sender ID bits, and the key passed is the same as the encryption key.</t>
        <t> Finally, the Poly1305 function is run on the data to be authenticated, which is, as specified in section 2.7 of <xref target="chacha_poly"/> a concatenation of the following in the below order:<list style="symbols">
          <t> The Authenticated Additional Data (AAD) - see <xref target="aad"/>.</t>
          <t> The AAD length in bytes as a 32-bit network order quantity.</t>
          <t> The ciphertext</t>
          <t> The length of the ciphertext as a 32-bit network order quantity.</t></list></t>
        <t> The 128-bit output of Poly1305 is used as the tag. All 16 bytes are included in the packet.</t></list></t>
      <t> The encryption algorithm transform ID for negotiating this algorithm in IKE is TBA by IANA.</t> 
      <section anchor="aad" title="AAD Construction">
        <t> The construction of the Additional Authenticated Data (AAD) is similar to the one in <xref target="RFC4106"/>. For security associations (SAs) with 32-bit sequence numbers the AAD is 8 bytes: 4-byte SPI followed by 4-byte sequence number ordered exactly as it is in the packet. For SAs with ESN the AAD is 12 bytes: 4-byte SPI followed by an 8-byte sequence number as a 64-bit network order integer.</t>
      </section>
    </section>  
      <section anchor="security" title="Security Considerations">
        <t> The ChaCha20 cipher is designed to provide 256-bit security.</t>
        <t> The Poly1305 authenticator is designed to ensure that forged messages are rejected with a probability of 1-(n/(2^102)) for a 16n-byte message, even after sending 2^64 legitimate messages, so it is SUF-CMA in the terminology of <xref target="AE"/>.</t>
        <t> The most important security consideration in implementing this draft is the uniqueness of the nonce used in ChaCha20. The nonce should be selected uniquely for a particular key, but unpredictability of the nonce is not required. counters and LFSRs are both acceptable ways of generating unique nonces, as is encrypting a counter using a 64-bit cipher such as DES. Note that it is not acceptable to use a truncation of a counter encrypted with a 128-bit or 256-bit cipher, because such a truncation may repeat after a short time.</t>
        <t> Another issue with implementing these algorithms is avoiding side channels. This is trivial for ChaCha20, but requires some care for Poly1305. Considerations for implementations of these algorithms are in the <xref target="chacha_poly"/> document.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="iana" title="IANA Considerations">
        <t> IANA is requested to assign one value from the IKEv2 "Transform Type 1 - Encryption Algorithm Transform IDs" registry, with name ESP_ChaCha20-Poly1305, and this document as reference.</t>
      </section>  
      <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements">
        <t> All of the algorithms in this document were designed by D. J. Bernstein. The AEAD construction was designed by Adam Langley. The author would also like to thank Adam for helpful comments, as well as Yaron Sheffer for telling me to write the algorithms draft.</t>
      </section>    
  </middle>
  <!-- ====================================================================== -->
  <back>
    <references title="Normative References"> 
      <reference anchor='RFC2119'>
        <front>
          <title abbrev='RFC Key Words'>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
          <author initials='S.' surname='Bradner' fullname='Scott Bradner'>
            <organization>Harvard University</organization>
            <address>
              <postal>
                <street>1350 Mass. Ave.</street>
                <street>Cambridge</street>
                <street>MA 02138</street>
              </postal>
              <phone>- +1 617 495 3864</phone>
              <email>sob@harvard.edu</email>
            </address>
          </author>
          <date year='1997' month='March' />
          <area>General</area>
          <keyword>keyword</keyword>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name='BCP' value='14' />
        <seriesInfo name='RFC' value='2119' />
        <format type='TXT' octets='4723' target='ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2119.txt' />
        <format type='HTML' octets='16553' target='http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119' />
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC5996">
        <front>
          <title>Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)</title>
          <author initials="C." surname="Kaufman" fullname="C. Kaufman">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="P." surname="Hoffman" fullname="P. Hoffman">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="Y." surname="Nir" fullname="Y. Nir">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="P." surname="Eronen" fullname="P. Eronen">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2010" month="September"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="5996"/>
        <format type="TXT" octets="346466" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5996.txt"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC4303">
        <front>
          <title>IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)</title>
          <author initials="S." surname="Kent" fullname="S. Kent">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2005" month="December"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4303"/>
        <format type="TXT" octets="114315" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4303.txt"/>
      </reference> 
      <reference anchor="RFC6054">
        <front>
          <title>Using Counter Modes with Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH) to Protect Group Traffic</title>
          <author initials="D." surname="McGrew" fullname="D. McGrew">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="B." surname="Weis" fullname="B. Weis">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2010" month="November"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6054"/>
        <format type="TXT" octets="22672" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6054.txt"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="chacha_poly">
        <front>
          <title>ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF protocols</title>
          <author initials="A" surname="Langley" fullname="Adam Langley">
            <organization>Google Inc.</organization>
          </author>
          <author initials="Y" surname="Nir" fullname="Yoav Nir">
            <organization>Check Point</organization>
          </author>
          <date month="January" day="31" year="2014"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-01"/>
        <format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-01.html"/>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <references title="Informative References"> 
      <reference anchor="FIPS-197" target="http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/fips-197.pdf">
        <front>
          <title>Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)</title>
          <author>
            <organization>National Institute of Standards and Technology</organization>
          </author>
          <date month="November" year="2001" />
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="FIPS" value="PUB 197" />
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="FIPS-46" target="http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip46-2.htm">
        <front>
          <title>Data Encryption Standard</title>
          <author>
            <organization>National Institute of Standards and Technology</organization>
          </author>
          <date month="December" year="1993" />
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="FIPS" value="PUB 46-2" />
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="standby-cipher">
        <front>
          <title>Selection of Future Cryptographic Standards</title>
          <author initials='D' surname='McGrew' fullname='David McGrew'>
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>  
          <author initials='A' surname='Grieco' fullname='Anthony Grieco'>
            <organization>Cisco Systems, Inc.</organization>
          </author>  
          <author initials='Y' surname='Sheffer' fullname='Yaron Sheffer'>
            <organization>Porticor</organization>
          </author>  
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-mcgrew-standby-cipher" />
        <format type="HTML" target="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcgrew-standby-cipher-00" />
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC4106">
        <front>
          <title>The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)</title>
          <author initials="J." surname="Viega" fullname="J. Viega">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <author initials="D." surname="McGrew" fullname="D. McGrew">
            <organization/>
          </author>
          <date year="2005" month="June"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="4106"/>
        <format type="TXT" octets="23399" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4106.txt"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="RFC6407">
        <front>
          <title>The Group Domain of Interpretation</title>
          <author initials="B." surname="Weis" fullname="B. Weis"><organization/></author>
          <author initials="S." surname="Rowles" fullname="S. Rowles"><organization/></author>
          <author initials="T." surname="Hardjono" fullname="T. Hardjono"><organization/></author>
          <date year="2011" month="October"/>
        </front>
        <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6407"/>
        <format type="TXT" target="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6407.txt"/>
      </reference>
      <reference anchor="AE" target="http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~mihir/papers/oem.html">
        <front>
          <title>Authenticated Encryption: Relations among notions and analysis of the generic composition paradigm</title>
          <author initials="M." surname="Bellare"/>
          <author initials="C." surname="Namprempre"/>
        </front>
      </reference>
    </references>
    <!-- ====================================================================== -->
  </back>
</rfc>
