Google LLC

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California 94043 United States of America dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com

Internet-Draft The QUIC DATAGRAM extension provides application protocols running over QUIC with a mechanism to send unreliable data while leveraging the security and congestion-control properties of QUIC. However, QUIC DATAGRAM frames do not provide a means to demultiplex application contexts. This document defines how to use QUIC DATAGRAM frames when the application protocol running over QUIC is HTTP/3 by adding an identifier at the start of the frame payload. This allows HTTP messages to convey related information using unreliable DATAGRAM frames, ensuring those frames are properly associated with an HTTP message. Discussion of this work is encouraged to happen on the MASQUE IETF mailing list (masque@ietf.org) or on the GitHub repository which contains the draft: .

Introduction The QUIC DATAGRAM extension provides application protocols running over QUIC with a mechanism to send unreliable data while leveraging the security and congestion-control properties of QUIC. However, QUIC DATAGRAM frames do not provide a means to demultiplex application contexts. This document defines how to use QUIC DATAGRAM frames when the application protocol running over QUIC is HTTP/3 by adding an identifier at the start of the frame payload. This allows HTTP messages to convey related information using unreliable DATAGRAM frames, ensuring those frames are properly associated with an HTTP message. This design mimics the use of Stream Types in HTTP/3, which provide a demultiplexing identifier at the start of each unidirectional stream. Discussion of this work is encouraged to happen on the MASQUE IETF mailing list (masque@ietf.org) or on the GitHub repository which contains the draft: .

Conventions and Definitions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Flow Identifiers Flow identifiers represent bidirectional flows of datagrams within a single QUIC connection. These are conceptually similar to streams in the sense that they allow multiplexing of application data. Flows lack any of the ordering or reliability guarantees of streams. Beyond this, a sender SHOULD ensure that DATAGRAM frames within a single flow are transmitted in order relative to one another. If multiple DATAGRAM frames can be packed into a single QUIC packet, the sender SHOULD group them by flow identifier to promote fate-sharing within a specific flow and improve the ability to process batches of datagram messages efficiently on the receiver.

Flow Identifier Allocation Implementations of HTTP/3 that support the DATAGRAM extension MUST provide a flow identifier allocation service. That service will allow applications co-located with HTTP/3 to request a unique flow identifier that they can subsequently use for their own purposes. The HTTP/3 implementation will then parse the flow identifier of incoming DATAGRAM frames and use it to deliver the frame to the appropriate application. Even flow identifiers are client-initiated, while odd flow identifiers are server-initiated. This means that an HTTP/3 client implementation of the flow identifier allocation service MUST only provide even identifiers, while a server implementation MUST only provide odd identifiers. Note that, once allocated, any flow identifier can be used by both client and server - only allocation carries separate namespaces to avoid requiring synchronization.

HTTP/3 DATAGRAM Frame Format When used with HTTP/3, the Datagram Data field of QUIC DATAGRAM frames uses the following format (using the notation from the "Notational Conventions" section of ):

HTTP/3 DATAGRAM Frame Format

Flow Identifier:

A variable-length integer indicating the Flow Identifier of the datagram (see ).

HTTP/3 Datagram Payload:

The payload of the datagram, whose semantics are defined by individual applications. Note that this field can be empty.

Endpoints MUST treat receipt of a DATAGRAM frame whose payload is too short to parse the flow identifier as a connection error of type PROTOCOL_VIOLATION.

The H3_DATAGRAM HTTP/3 SETTINGS Parameter Implementations of HTTP/3 that support this mechanism can indicate that to their peer by sending the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with a value of 1. The value of the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter MUST be either 0 or 1. A value of 0 indicates that this mechanism is not supported. An endpoint that receives the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with a value that is neither 0 or 1 MUST terminate the connection with error H3_SETTINGS_ERROR. And endpoint that sends the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with a value of 1 MUST send the max_datagram_frame_size QUIC Transport Parameter . An endpoint that receives the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with a value of 1 on a QUIC connection that did not also receive the max_datagram_frame_size QUIC Transport Parameter MUST terminate the connection with error H3_SETTINGS_ERROR. When clients use 0-RTT, they MAY store the value of the server's H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter. Doing so allows the client to use HTTP/3 datagrams in 0-RTT packets. When servers decide to accept 0-RTT data, they MUST send a H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter greater or equal to the value they sent to the client in the connection where they sent them the NewSessionTicket message. If a client stores the value of the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with their 0-RTT state, they MUST validate that the new value of the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter sent by the server in the handshake is greater or equal to the stored value; if not, the client MUST terminate the connection with error H3_SETTINGS_ERROR.

Datagram-Flow-Id Header Definition "Datagram-Flow-Id" is a Item Structured Header . Its value MUST be an Integer. Its ABNF is: The "Datagram-Flow-Id" header is used to associate a datagram flow identifier with an HTTP message. For example, the definition of an HTTP method could instruct the client to use its flow identifier allocation service to allocate a new flow identifier, and then the client will add the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header to its request to communicate that value to the server. For example, the resulting header could look like: Definitions of HTTP features that use the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header MAY define their own parameters (parameters are defined in Section 3.1.2 of ). For example, an HTTP method that wishes to use two datagram flow identifiers for the lifetime of its request stream could encode the second flow identifier as a parameter, which could look like this: The "Datagram-Flow-Id" header MUST NOT be present more than once on a given HTTP message; any HTTP message containing more than one "Datagram-Flow-Id" header is malformed. Since the QUIC STREAM frame that contains the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header could be lost or reordered, it is possible that an endpoint will receive an HTTP/3 datagram with a flow identifier that it does not know as it has not yet received the corresponding "Datagram-Flow-Id" header. Endpoints MUST NOT treat that as an error; they MUST either silently discard the datagram or buffer it until they receive the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header. Note that integer structured fields can only encode values up to 10^15-1, therefore the maximum possible value of the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header is lower then the theoretical maximum value of a flow identifier which is 2^62-1 due to the QUIC variable length integer encoding. If the flow identifier allocation service of an endpoint runs out of values lower than 10^15-1, the endpoint MUST treat is as a connection error of type H3_ID_ERROR.

HTTP Intermediaries HTTP/3 DATAGRAM flow identifiers are specific to a given HTTP/3 connection. However, in some cases, an HTTP request may travel across multiple HTTP connections if there are HTTP intermediaries involved; see Section 2.3 of . If an intermediary has sent the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with a value of 1 on its client-facing connection, it MUST inspect all HTTP requests from that connection and check for the presence of the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header. If the HTTP method of the request is not supported by the intermediary, it MUST remove the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header before forwarding the request. If the intermediary supports the method, it MUST either remove the header or adhere to the requirements leveraged by that method on intermediaries. If an intermediary has sent the H3_DATAGRAM SETTINGS parameter with a value of 1 on its server-facing connection, it MUST inspect all HTTP responses from that connection and check for the presence of the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header. If the HTTP method of the request is not supported by the intermediary, it MUST remove the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header before forwarding the response. If the intermediary supports the method, it MUST either remove the header or adhere to the requirements leveraged by that method on intermediaries.

Security Considerations This document does not have additional security considerations beyond those defined in and .

IANA Considerations

HTTP SETTINGS Parameter This document will request IANA to register the following entry in the "HTTP/3 Settings" registry:

HTTP Header This document will request IANA to register the "Datagram-Flow-Id" header in the "Permanent Message Header Field Names" registry maintained at <>.

Normative References This document defines an extension to the QUIC transport protocol to add support for sending and receiving unreliable datagrams over a QUIC connection. Discussion of this work is encouraged to happen on the QUIC IETF mailing list quic@ietf.org (mailto:quic@ietf.org) or on the GitHub repository which contains the draft: https://github.com/quicwg/ datagram (https://github.com/quicwg/datagram). This document defines the core of the QUIC transport protocol. Accompanying documents describe QUIC's loss detection and congestion control and the use of TLS for key negotiation. Note to Readers Discussion of this draft takes place on the QUIC working group mailing list (quic@ietf.org (mailto:quic@ietf.org)), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=quic Working Group information can be found at https://github.com/quicwg; source code and issues list for this draft can be found at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/labels/-transport. The QUIC transport protocol has several features that are desirable in a transport for HTTP, such as stream multiplexing, per-stream flow control, and low-latency connection establishment. This document describes a mapping of HTTP semantics over QUIC. This document also identifies HTTP/2 features that are subsumed by QUIC, and describes how HTTP/2 extensions can be ported to HTTP/3. In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings. This document describes a set of data types and associated algorithms that are intended to make it easier and safer to define and handle HTTP header and trailer fields, known as "Structured Fields", "Structured Headers", or "Structured Trailers". It is intended for use by specifications of new HTTP fields that wish to use a common syntax that is more restrictive than traditional HTTP field values. The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a stateless application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypertext information systems. This document provides an overview of HTTP architecture and its associated terminology, defines the "http" and "https" Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes, defines the HTTP/1.1 message syntax and parsing requirements, and describes related security concerns for implementations.

Acknowledgments The DATAGRAM flow identifier was previously part of the DATAGRAM frame definition itself, the author would like to acknowledge the authors of that document and the members of the IETF QUIC working group for their suggestions. Additionally, the author would like to thank Martin Thomson for suggesting the use of an HTTP/3 SETTINGS parameter. Thanks to Lucas Pardue for their inputs on this document.