From nobody Mon May 9 05:38:40 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BB312B077; Mon, 9 May 2016 05:38:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.698 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-39p_oURuOR; Mon, 9 May 2016 05:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out4133-18.mail.aliyun.com (out4133-18.mail.aliyun.com [42.120.133.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3EC12D181; Mon, 9 May 2016 05:38:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1462797505; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Mime-version:Content-type; bh=dCMpT5UTfYmGIkvVFy+J5RS0W1mnTTCjS0d59row+KQ=; b=NjaDaCVy2xDuyYi8gQ+fDOGwxCPuRsKGwMdYknTz+7CUEDQXUYhSjxsmaFgcBbzD3uWMQyPHx6rWI8ejdxbIKsN9WrDszRxWNxVpw9LtdpEVb3rlATm3tY/fTWbLW8eWmfEXs8GdfKRGQz6ABNaGCi09mbb3VFUESreDio31wAQ= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R101e4; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03292; MF=kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=7; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_----4nE16x5_1462797491; Received: from 30.30.150.30(mailfrom:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com ip:182.92.253.7) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 09 May 2016 20:38:20 +0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 20:38:11 +0800 From: "Kepeng Li" To: "Kepeng Li" , "ace@ietf.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3545671101_2500699" Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Hannes Tschofenig , cose@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 12:38:32 -0000 > 此邮件使用 MIME 格式。由于邮件阅读程序不能识别 此格式,因此,可能无法识别该邮件的分部或部分内容。 --B_3545671101_2500699 Content-type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable We got several supports and no objections, so it is concluded that the draf= t is adopted as an ACE WG item, with the change that we remove the "web=A1=B0 fro= m the name. Authors: please resubmit the current draft as draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; we will start processing further changes in the WG process.(If you already know about technical issues, please use the WG tracker for now; editorial issues might be tracked easier on github.= ) We will also add this item in our ACE charter. Kind Regards Kepeng (ACE co-chair) =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Li Kepeng =C8=D5=C6=DA: Thursday, 7 April, 2016 9:34 am =D6=C1: "ace@ietf.org" =B3=AD=CB=CD: Kathleen Moriarty , Hannes Tschofenig , , , Stephen Farrell =D6=F7=CC=E2: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 To: ACE WG Cc: OAuth and COSE WG Hello all, This note begins a Call For Adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 [1] to be adopted as an ACE working group item, and added in the charter. The call ends on April 22, 2016. Keep in mind that adoption of a document does not mean the document as-is is ready for publication. It is merely acceptance of the document as a starting point for what will be the final product of the ACE working group. The working group is free to make changes to the document according to the normal consensus process. Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition, preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item. Note that this email was also copied to OAuth and COSE WG, in order to get input from wider audience. Thanks, Kind Regards Kepeng (ACE co-chair) [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token/ _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace --B_3545671101_2500699 Content-type: text/html; charset="GB2312" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
We got several supports = and no objections, so it is concluded that the draft is adopted as an ACE WG= item, with the change that we remove the "web“ from the name.<= /div>

Authors: please resubmit the= current draft as draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; we will start processing= further changes in the WG process.(If you already know about technical issues, please use t= he WG tracker for now; editorial issues might be tracked easier on github.)<= /span>
<= br>
We will a= lso add this item in our ACE charter.

Kind Regards
Kepeng (ACE co-chair)

=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Li Kep= eng <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.c= om>
=C8=D5=C6=DA: Thursday, 7 April= , 2016 9:34 am
=D6=C1: "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf= .org>
=B3=AD=CB=CD: Kathleen Moriar= ty <kathleen.moriarty.i= etf@gmail.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, <cose@ietf.org>, <oauth@ietf.= org>, Stephen Farrell <= stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00
=

To: ACE WG
Cc: OAuth and COSE WG
<= font face=3D"Courier">

Hello= all,

This note begins a Call For Adoption for draft-wa=
hlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 [1]
to be adopted as an ACE working grou= p item, and added in the charter.
The call = ends on April 22, 2016.

Keep in mind that adoption of a=
 document does not mean the document
as-is is ready for publication. It is merely acceptance of the
document as a starting point for what will be the final product
of the ACE working group. The working group is free to make changes to
the document according to the normal consensus process.

Please reply on this thread with expressions of support or opposition,
preferably with comments, regarding accepting this as a work item.

Note that this email was also copied to OAuth an= d COSE WG, in order to 
get input from wider audience.

Thanks,

Kind Regards
Kepeng (ACE co-chair)


_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/ma= ilman/listinfo/ace
--B_3545671101_2500699-- From nobody Mon May 9 07:31:51 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF6312B05A; Mon, 9 May 2016 07:31:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JbUVoDqJKGbt; Mon, 9 May 2016 07:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (slow1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACC912B00A; Mon, 9 May 2016 07:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8176A47E163; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 134.102.17.95 Received: from eduroam-0351.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-0351.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.17.95]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B528DA80E6; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 16:31:34 +0200 From: Carsten Bormann User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kepeng Li References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Hannes Tschofenig , cose@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org, "ace@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 14:31:49 -0000 > draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a problem. ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) Gr眉脽e, Carsten From nobody Mon May 9 17:49:45 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FB912D547; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:49:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.197 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bb7RmqT8QjNS; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30F912D0BD; Mon, 9 May 2016 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074425-c7fff70000005f72-41-573130224aa3 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 23.49.24434.22031375; Mon, 9 May 2016 20:49:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u4A0nbAF013683; Mon, 9 May 2016 20:49:37 -0400 Received: from [10.20.11.38] ([65.115.200.131]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u4A0nUEW015036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 May 2016 20:49:33 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Justin Richer In-Reply-To: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 19:49:29 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> To: Carsten Bormann X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprHKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6noqtkYBhusHyDnMX3bz3MFkem3GW1 mLZ1KqvF0p33WC0aduZbXJ5fZHHy7Ss2B3aPiW8/snjsnHWX3WPxpv1sHkuW/GTymLYoM4A1 issmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj9K9LbAX9bBW31t5lb2D8xtLFyMkhIWAi8X3ZZCCbi0NIoI1J4lP/ HlYIZwOjxLp5jVCZ1UwSZ6ZcBGthFlCX+DPvEjOIzSugJ7Fp/VsmEFtYIEzix76vrCA2m4Cq xPQ1LWBxTqD6OXPOgPWyCKhI7Pw1mxlkKLPAX0aJ2xOfsEMM1ZZYtvA11FAriUNHVwI1cwBt DpJom2sGEhYRUJK4cHENG8TZshJPTi5imcAoMAvJSbOQnDQLydQFjMyrGGVTcqt0cxMzc4pT k3WLkxPz8lKLdC30cjNL9FJTSjcxgoPeRXUH45y/XocYBTgYlXh4d3AZhguxJpYVV+YeYpTk YFIS5XVl1AsX4kvKT6nMSCzOiC8qzUktPsQowcGsJMJ7Tw+onDclsbIqtSgfJiXNwaIkzsvI wMAgJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk5Xh4FCS4H0A0ihYlJqeWpGWmVOCkGbi4AQZzgM0vBdseHFBYm5x ZjpE/hSjLseCH7fXMgmx5OXnpUqJ8/KBFAmAFGWU5sHNASUrx+ITza8YxYHeEuZl0weq4gEm OrhJr4CWMAEtkWPTB1lSkoiQkmpg5Gk1VtLRu84sejRua9lC4RduyrFLT7PXFZs9lDKUOV/A nRO/7kHC3fMH1HK9nZPi/s/n/cZ/8sbtDONGiadbj7mtN37829fribwIy5rvS50+zdt+fcsh 0Yn7fjx6Oqf3Hkd5l4ybvWvv8aUCzGvaZ9+rNjMv1Jm0Z/GKNB0W9VwdyYuvG29fVGIpzkg0 1GIuKk4EADn0NyMxAwAA Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose@ietf.org Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 00:49:44 -0000 We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the = COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding. =E2=80=94 Justin > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >=20 >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt;=20 >=20 > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to = a > problem. >=20 > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) >=20 > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten >=20 > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Tue May 10 01:44:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5042B12D1E0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:43:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wahlstromstekniska-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NbMZ7I_LUDmf for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450D112D53E for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u64so6730021lff.3 for ; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:43:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wahlstromstekniska-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=tSby/1R0Lu9eXQstX/YJ8XL0DFyOGbnRpVwShspzJqQ=; b=bPn/lEO5kS4Z++5m6QFNKEByjjHK3+PrBS3KwJF4F9RCPcxHGXrC7qiP4WyqvWN+xf Azla7jnU189E87xVsV8HZLfktl+MgPT7OlFha5k3HVGmlYbJpM3m08zgJqWtXxIfTDgj UZJxCGyCOstbRyQUM64xvs9o873H3c9e1vjacV185/20phKH8Psy7xljbdxGx0YBnO8X ePh/uSubc0Yxqmy75jQZY1XSEZMpElGQIRQovERTXvDWrrKU4SmK/LSx4JXabbjudqho 6BdE4vK2SCyQZKMcIRnL75XUXlvoF5R/EmeGbd1Wf0Y8LXqolvt5cCVUuTN1wh8W1HGL qmVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=tSby/1R0Lu9eXQstX/YJ8XL0DFyOGbnRpVwShspzJqQ=; b=U0zxaRf7iv+qSpvOzoZMoOcDl0ol+yekUBI0AzzW1Ys4DxopG8dak88popp4QD2Eh2 3l2qpHsHX6dXI/4G34d4pXNNzSoEoz/bbGgH864i2exav6Fv/QhtwN4gE4volVL+QJ0F 7wY1TISUttX09uUPa6Mab2m72bznjttb+6MzH0LDJTYZdbv29GkOQO9JOkAoqRKrddsq BwK4AktDnvcLcJJQ+1R/8xRZiZKHBYYEqi5bfjjaNIrFAc1+bSNMi4FofSxdY0tyVe6X ZQuvGyicQXRyh8okB2F7+wRC8yp9/7E/i69fcRoInAgUJMRUyGBsJ77WAMPc+OArgG0y t59g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWK+eQZ9p4NB/0M87/QyziJj0ol0YnftQTRVKp30hiYnq6BfpotAqhLyrRuuCiDHInGlla8ANXyJXqaSQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.22.19 with SMTP id m19mr17054764lfi.118.1462869830177; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.136.5 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:43:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [37.247.26.197] In-Reply-To: <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:43:50 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Erik_Wahlstr=C3=B6m?= To: Justin Richer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11406a9c94ae0a053278ec62 Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Carsten Bormann , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:43:57 -0000 --001a11406a9c94ae0a053278ec62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons: - To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on JWT and it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE instead of JSON/JOSE. - I would not say that JWT is the only format that works for the web, and it's even used in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means I don't have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the only web protocol? Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact that it can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a "jot" and I figured that our "cozy chairs" would very much like that fact because then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :) / Erik On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer wrote: > We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the C= OSE working > group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding. > > =E2=80=94 Justin > > > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > > > >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; > > > > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR > > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many > > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a > > problem. > > > > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. > > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) > > > > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > COSE mailing list > > COSE@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > --001a11406a9c94ae0a053278ec62 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons:- To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on JWT an= d it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE instead = of JSON/JOSE.
- I would not say that JWT is the only format that = works for the web, and it's even used in other, non-traditional, web pr= otocols. That means I don't have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Wh= y would JSON be the only web protocol?

Then we als= o have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact that it can be= called "cot" just like JWT is called a "jot" and I fig= ured that our "cozy chairs" would very much like that fact becaus= e then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :)

<= div>/ Erik


On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@= mit.edu> wrote:
We can also= call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the COSE working g= roup, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding.

=C2=A0=E2=80=94 Justin

> On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
>> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt;
>
> For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "= CBOR
> Token".=C2=A0 While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there= are many
> tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to = a
> problem.
>
> ACE CBOR Token is fine, though.
> (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.)
>
> Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> COSE mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

--001a11406a9c94ae0a053278ec62-- From nobody Tue May 10 01:50:50 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546B412D56E; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.792 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=microsoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWD2aS42PBcY; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0129.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160EB12D0EC; Tue, 10 May 2016 01:50:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=2Pb2uuHwa6Jnqn40nZjHM/K60YjU2Fe2jk5X6obVYwc=; b=ZIXCgRcSRcQcIyBxcqyCc8nvXjHA/ZnWQvQFA1W1EHWnRPyN4YInFOi1R8GMKyhY+SpGQqpJx1p8vcntvjOJ6ImCQ7YO0z5oR97LUeythsu7gplRJaWMySvd+eUUrA/sf4nXmMo4TXu2MXm7e7fzKTHkfEy/N3AZmOS5CaXvgNM= Received: from SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.130.139) by SN1PR0301MB1648.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.130.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.485.9; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:50:38 +0000 Received: from SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.130.139]) by SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.130.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0492.016; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:50:38 +0000 From: Mike Jones To: =?utf-8?B?RXJpayBXYWhsc3Ryw7Zt?= , "Justin Richer" Thread-Topic: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 Thread-Index: AQHRqpgaOC6RkJUk/U2IOlAZ6LFfqJ+x20iA Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:50:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: wahlstromstekniska.se; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; wahlstromstekniska.se; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [86.110.65.6] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 739799e7-b7da-4bfd-ed62-08d378b028c5 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0301MB1648; 5:K7Id0ATTLRgZvJbTnnlc06Wik3fklcDLwhFjrTXVUhOs7ZLB9rZ9vKoF32KEKZ3GmyTNyWBT2j/Qq0UqMyAidTJkY8BBX9sex2PfjxUfPh/FchNhiqIQz0/IoKdB6zwjr0kv47w0r3JLWO+p59/Www==; 24:GkraLZES7gpCh9GvOcxpnAtodVePBbUYq4KQqVONY5cwnIP/opCoMnaTqZ47uH1VH+1gGCZPn8ao2XOr/WnyiZsS7rB54UxFip5kbMzjqo0=; 7:I7HvaxNOca1PiuxDXJTZrycBzcztCmtk7kwVbcEox6ebrphSf+KJJLW0ebLIuJlABwAq6hPGM0io1oHQaiBzxCLBUN3k1v+sRlkxarMkL0Awrz05v3p+QO1emjbCz+Jz5gVBJQNj1GcrZhrbZqMvj7wi7mW6d66S1WwswgNjyqbA7S5fT0L6QmlH9FWpXpO6YDeZdOM0Z+3j+686i35n7Q== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; x-forefront-prvs: 0938781D02 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(24454002)(74316001)(76576001)(92566002)(11100500001)(5003600100002)(8936002)(3280700002)(19609705001)(81166005)(19580395003)(3660700001)(9686002)(19580405001)(19617315012)(10090500001)(5002640100001)(10290500002)(10400500002)(5005710100001)(2950100001)(50986999)(87936001)(2171001)(2906002)(5008740100001)(66066001)(1220700001)(33656002)(230783001)(5001770100001)(54356999)(76176999)(16236675004)(99286002)(86362001)(122556002)(4326007)(77096005)(106116001)(19300405004)(790700001)(586003)(102836003)(6116002)(15975445007)(189998001)(19625215002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; H:SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN1PR0301MB1645A1F955468253B8EF4782F5710SN1PR0301MB1645_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 May 2016 08:50:38.1134 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0301MB1648 Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Carsten Bormann , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:50:43 -0000 --_000_SN1PR0301MB1645A1F955468253B8EF4782F5710SN1PR0301MB1645_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBhbHNvIGZlZWwgc3Ryb25nbHkgdGhhdCB0aGUgbmFtZSBzaG91bGQgcmVtYWluIENCT1IgV2Vi IFRva2VuLiAgQ1dUIGlzIGEgYmVuZWZpY2lhcnkgb2YgdGhlIGludGVsbGVjdHVhbCBhbmQgZGVw bG95bWVudCBoZXJpdGFnZSBmcm9tIHRoZSBTaW1wbGUgV2ViIFRva2VuIChTV1QpIGFuZCBKU09O IFdlYiBUb2tlbiAoSldUKS4gIENXVCBpcyBpbnRlbnRpb25hbGx5IHBhcmFsbGVsIHRvIEpXVC4g IFRoZSBuYW1lIHNob3VsZCBzdGF5IHBhcmFsbGVsIGFzIHdlbGwuDQoNClRoZSDigJxXZWLigJ0g cGFydCBvZiB0aGUg4oCcQ0JPUiBXZWIgVG9rZW7igJ0gbmFtZSBjYW4gYmUgdGFrZW4gYXMgYSBy ZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gdGhlIFdlYiBvZiBUaGluZ3MgKHNlZSBodHRwczovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5v cmcvd2lraS9XZWJfb2ZfVGhpbmdzKS4gIEFzIEVyaWsgY29ycmVjdGx5IHBvaW50cyBvdXQgSlNP TiBpcyBub3QgdGhlIG9ubHkgZGF0YSByZXByZXNlbnRhdGlvbiB0aGF0IG1ha2VzIHRoaW5ncyBp biB0aGUgV2ViIGFuZCB0aGUgV2ViIG9mIFRoaW5ncy4NCg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0tIE1pa2UNCg0KRnJvbTogQWNl IFttYWlsdG86YWNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBFcmlrIFdhaGxzdHLD tm0NClNlbnQ6IFR1ZXNkYXksIE1heSAxMCwgMjAxNiAxOjQ0IEFNDQpUbzogSnVzdGluIFJpY2hl ciA8anJpY2hlckBtaXQuZWR1Pg0KQ2M6IEthdGhsZWVuIE1vcmlhcnR5IDxrYXRobGVlbi5tb3Jp YXJ0eS5pZXRmQGdtYWlsLmNvbT47IEtlcGVuZyBMaSA8a2VwZW5nLmxrcEBhbGliYWJhLWluYy5j b20+OyBhY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IENhcnN0ZW4gQm9ybWFubiA8Y2Fib0B0emkub3JnPjsgSGFubmVz IFRzY2hvZmVuaWcgPGhhbm5lcy50c2Nob2ZlbmlnQGdteC5uZXQ+OyA8b2F1dGhAaWV0Zi5vcmc+ IDxvYXV0aEBpZXRmLm9yZz47IGNvc2UgPGNvc2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW0Fj ZV0gW0NPU0VdIENhbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW9uIGZvciBkcmFmdC13YWhsc3Ryb2VtLWFjZS1jYm9y LXdlYi10b2tlbi0wMA0KDQpPciBrZWVwIHRoZSBDQk9SIFdlYiBUb2tlbiAoQ1dUKSBmb3IgdHdv IG1ham9yIHJlYXNvbnM6DQotIFRvIHNob3cgdGhlIHZlcnkgY2xvc2UgcmVsYXRpb25zaGlwIHRv IEpXVC4gSXQgcmVsaWVzIGhlYXZpbHkgb24gSldUIGFuZCBpdCdzIGlhbmEgcmVnaXN0cnkuIEl0 IGlzIGVzc2VudGlhbGx5IGEgSldUIGJ1dCBpbiBDQk9SL0NPU0UgaW5zdGVhZCBvZiBKU09OL0pP U0UuDQotIEkgd291bGQgbm90IHNheSB0aGF0IEpXVCBpcyB0aGUgb25seSBmb3JtYXQgdGhhdCB3 b3JrcyBmb3IgdGhlIHdlYiwgYW5kIGl0J3MgZXZlbiB1c2VkIGluIG90aGVyLCBub24tdHJhZGl0 aW9uYWwsIHdlYiBwcm90b2NvbHMuIFRoYXQgbWVhbnMgSSBkb24ndCBoYXZlIGEgcHJvYmxlbSB3 aXRoIHRoZSBXIGluIENXVCBhdCBhbGwuIFdoeSB3b3VsZCBKU09OIGJlIHRoZSBvbmx5IHdlYiBw cm90b2NvbD8NCg0KVGhlbiB3ZSBhbHNvIGhhdmUgb25lIHNtYWxsZXIgKGEgbG90IHNtYWxsZXIp IHJlYXNvbiwgaXQncyB0aGUgZmFjdCB0aGF0IGl0IGNhbiBiZSBjYWxsZWQgImNvdCIganVzdCBs aWtlIEpXVCBpcyBjYWxsZWQgYSAiam90IiBhbmQgSSBmaWd1cmVkIHRoYXQgb3VyICJjb3p5IGNo YWlycyIgd291bGQgdmVyeSBtdWNoIGxpa2UgdGhhdCBmYWN0IGJlY2F1c2UgdGhlbiBpdCdzIGVz c2VudGlhbGx5IGEgImNvenkgY290IiA6KQ0KDQovIEVyaWsNCg0KDQpPbiBUdWUsIE1heSAxMCwg MjAxNiBhdCAyOjQ5IEFNLCBKdXN0aW4gUmljaGVyIDxqcmljaGVyQG1pdC5lZHU8bWFpbHRvOmpy aWNoZXJAbWl0LmVkdT4+IHdyb3RlOg0KV2UgY2FuIGFsc28gY2FsbCBpdCB0aGUg4oCcQ09TRSBU b2tlbuKAnS4gQXMgYSBjaGFpciBvZiB0aGUgQ09TRSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLCBJ4oCZbSBmaW5l IHdpdGggdGhhdCBhbW91bnQgb2YgY28tYnJhbmRpbmcuDQoNCiDigJQgSnVzdGluDQoNCj4gT24g TWF5IDksIDIwMTYsIGF0IDk6MzEgQU0sIENhcnN0ZW4gQm9ybWFubiA8Y2Fib0B0emkub3JnPG1h aWx0bzpjYWJvQHR6aS5vcmc+PiB3cm90ZToNCj4NCj4+IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtYWNlLWNib3ItdG9r ZW4tMDAudHh0Ow0KPg0KPiBGb3IgdGhlIHJlY29yZCwgSSBkbyBub3QgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCBBQ0Ug aGFzIGEgY2xhaW0gb24gdGhlIHRlcm0gIkNCT1INCj4gVG9rZW4iLiAgV2hpbGUgdGhlIHRlcm0g dG9rZW4gaXMgbm90IHVzZWQgaW4gUkZDIDcwNDksIHRoZXJlIGFyZSBtYW55DQo+IHRva2VucyB0 aGF0IGNvdWxkIGJlIGV4cHJlc3NlZCBpbiBDQk9SIG9yIGJlIHVzZWQgaW4gYXBwbHlpbmcgQ0JP UiB0byBhDQo+IHByb2JsZW0uDQo+DQo+IEFDRSBDQk9SIFRva2VuIGlzIGZpbmUsIHRob3VnaC4N Cj4gKE9yLCBiZXR0ZXIsIENCT1IgQUNFIFRva2VuLCBDQVQuKQ0KPg0KPiBHcsO8w59lLCBDYXJz dGVuDQo+DQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f DQo+IENPU0UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IENPU0VAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOkNPU0VAaWV0Zi5v cmc+DQo+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY29zZQ0KDQpfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KQWNlIG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdA0KQWNlQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzpBY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2FjZQ0KDQo= --_000_SN1PR0301MB1645A1F955468253B8EF4782F5710SN1PR0301MB1645_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1m YWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAy IDQ7fQ0KLyogU3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWws IGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJ Zm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIixzZXJpZjt9 DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCglj b2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFu Lk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpw dXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQpwLm1zb25vcm1hbDAsIGxpLm1z b25vcm1hbDAsIGRpdi5tc29ub3JtYWwwDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOm1zb25vcm1hbDsNCglt c28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGluOw0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1sZWZ0OjBpbjsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLHNlcmlmO30NCnNwYW4uRW1haWxTdHlsZTE4 DQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOnBlcnNvbmFsLXJlcGx5Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJp IixzYW5zLXNlcmlmOw0KCWNvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjA7fQ0KLk1zb0NocERlZmF1bHQNCgl7bXNvLXN0 eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7 fQ0KQHBhZ2UgV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3NpemU6OC41aW4gMTEuMGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbjoxLjBp biAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbiAxLjBpbjt9DQpkaXYuV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3BhZ2U6V29yZFNlY3Rp b24xO30NCi0tPjwvc3R5bGU+PCEtLVtpZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFwZWRlZmF1 bHRzIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBzcGlkbWF4PSIxMDI2IiAvPg0KPC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+PCEt LVtpZiBndGUgbXNvIDldPjx4bWw+DQo8bzpzaGFwZWxheW91dCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCI+DQo8bzpp ZG1hcCB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgZGF0YT0iMSIgLz4NCjwvbzpzaGFwZWxheW91dD48L3htbD48IVtl bmRpZl0tLT4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5IGxhbmc9IkVOLVVTIiBsaW5rPSJibHVlIiB2bGluaz0i cHVycGxlIj4NCjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9IldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMSI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFs Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJp JnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Y29sb3I6IzAwMjA2MCI+SSBhbHNvIGZlZWwgc3Ryb25nbHkgdGhh dCB0aGUgbmFtZSBzaG91bGQgcmVtYWluIENCT1IgV2ViIFRva2VuLiZuYnNwOyBDV1QgaXMgYSBi ZW5lZmljaWFyeSBvZiB0aGUgaW50ZWxsZWN0dWFsIGFuZCBkZXBsb3ltZW50IGhlcml0YWdlIGZy b20gdGhlIFNpbXBsZSBXZWIgVG9rZW4gKFNXVCkNCiBhbmQgSlNPTiBXZWIgVG9rZW4gKEpXVCku Jm5ic3A7IENXVCBpcyBpbnRlbnRpb25hbGx5IHBhcmFsbGVsIHRvIEpXVC4mbmJzcDsgVGhlIG5h bWUgc2hvdWxkIHN0YXkgcGFyYWxsZWwgYXMgd2VsbC48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZh bWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Y29sb3I6IzAwMjA2MCI+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9 ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNl cmlmO2NvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjAiPlRoZSDigJxXZWLigJ0gcGFydCBvZiB0aGUg4oCcQ0JPUiBXZWIg VG9rZW7igJ0gbmFtZSBjYW4gYmUgdGFrZW4gYXMgYSByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gdGhlIFdlYiBvZiBU aGluZ3MgKHNlZQ0KPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvV2ViX29m X1RoaW5ncyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvV2ViX29mX1RoaW5nczwvYT4p LiZuYnNwOyBBcyBFcmlrIGNvcnJlY3RseSBwb2ludHMgb3V0IEpTT04gaXMgbm90IHRoZSBvbmx5 IGRhdGEgcmVwcmVzZW50YXRpb24gdGhhdCBtYWtlcyB0aGluZ3MgaW4gdGhlIFdlYiBhbmQgdGhl IFdlYiBvZiBUaGluZ3MuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1h bCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJy aSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2NvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjAiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFu PjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0 O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjojMDAyMDYw Ij4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsgLS0gTWlrZTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxh IG5hbWU9Il9NYWlsRW5kQ29tcG9zZSI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2NvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjAiPjxv OnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvYT48L3A+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0ibXNvLWJvb2ttYXJr Ol9NYWlsRW5kQ29tcG9zZSI+PC9zcGFuPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90Oyxz YW5zLXNlcmlmIj5Gcm9tOjwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7 Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4gQWNlIFttYWlsdG86 YWNlLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddDQo8Yj5PbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgPC9iPkVyaWsgV2FobHN0csO2 bTxicj4NCjxiPlNlbnQ6PC9iPiBUdWVzZGF5LCBNYXkgMTAsIDIwMTYgMTo0NCBBTTxicj4NCjxi PlRvOjwvYj4gSnVzdGluIFJpY2hlciAmbHQ7anJpY2hlckBtaXQuZWR1Jmd0Ozxicj4NCjxiPkNj OjwvYj4gS2F0aGxlZW4gTW9yaWFydHkgJmx0O2thdGhsZWVuLm1vcmlhcnR5LmlldGZAZ21haWwu Y29tJmd0OzsgS2VwZW5nIExpICZsdDtrZXBlbmcubGtwQGFsaWJhYmEtaW5jLmNvbSZndDs7IGFj ZUBpZXRmLm9yZzsgQ2Fyc3RlbiBCb3JtYW5uICZsdDtjYWJvQHR6aS5vcmcmZ3Q7OyBIYW5uZXMg VHNjaG9mZW5pZyAmbHQ7aGFubmVzLnRzY2hvZmVuaWdAZ214Lm5ldCZndDs7ICZsdDtvYXV0aEBp ZXRmLm9yZyZndDsgJmx0O29hdXRoQGlldGYub3JnJmd0OzsgY29zZSAmbHQ7Y29zZUBpZXRmLm9y ZyZndDs8YnI+DQo8Yj5TdWJqZWN0OjwvYj4gUmU6IFtBY2VdIFtDT1NFXSBDYWxsIGZvciBhZG9w dGlvbiBmb3IgZHJhZnQtd2FobHN0cm9lbS1hY2UtY2Jvci13ZWItdG9rZW4tMDA8bzpwPjwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4N CjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5PciBrZWVwIHRoZSBDQk9SIFdlYiBUb2tlbiAo Q1dUKSBmb3IgdHdvIG1ham9yIHJlYXNvbnM6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+LSBUbyBzaG93IHRoZSB2ZXJ5IGNsb3NlIHJlbGF0aW9uc2hpcCB0byBK V1QuIEl0IHJlbGllcyBoZWF2aWx5IG9uIEpXVCBhbmQgaXQncyBpYW5hIHJlZ2lzdHJ5LiBJdCBp cyBlc3NlbnRpYWxseSBhIEpXVCBidXQgaW4gQ0JPUi9DT1NFIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgSlNPTi9KT1NF LjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+LSBJ IHdvdWxkIG5vdCBzYXkgdGhhdCBKV1QgaXMgdGhlIG9ubHkgZm9ybWF0IHRoYXQgd29ya3MgZm9y IHRoZSB3ZWIsIGFuZCBpdCdzIGV2ZW4gdXNlZCBpbiBvdGhlciwgbm9uLXRyYWRpdGlvbmFsLCB3 ZWIgcHJvdG9jb2xzLiBUaGF0IG1lYW5zIEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBhIHByb2JsZW0gd2l0aCB0aGUg VyBpbiBDV1QgYXQgYWxsLiBXaHkgd291bGQgSlNPTiBiZSB0aGUgb25seSB3ZWIgcHJvdG9jb2w/ PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpw PiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPlRo ZW4gd2UgYWxzbyBoYXZlIG9uZSBzbWFsbGVyIChhIGxvdCBzbWFsbGVyKSByZWFzb24sIGl0J3Mg dGhlIGZhY3QgdGhhdCBpdCBjYW4gYmUgY2FsbGVkICZxdW90O2NvdCZxdW90OyBqdXN0IGxpa2Ug SldUIGlzIGNhbGxlZCBhICZxdW90O2pvdCZxdW90OyBhbmQgSSBmaWd1cmVkIHRoYXQgb3VyICZx dW90O2NvenkgY2hhaXJzJnF1b3Q7IHdvdWxkIHZlcnkgbXVjaCBsaWtlIHRoYXQgZmFjdCBiZWNh dXNlIHRoZW4gaXQncyBlc3NlbnRpYWxseSBhICZxdW90O2NvenkgY290JnF1b3Q7DQogOik8bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+LyBFcmlr PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpw PiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05v cm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+ T24gVHVlLCBNYXkgMTAsIDIwMTYgYXQgMjo0OSBBTSwgSnVzdGluIFJpY2hlciAmbHQ7PGEgaHJl Zj0ibWFpbHRvOmpyaWNoZXJAbWl0LmVkdSIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmpyaWNoZXJAbWl0LmVk dTwvYT4mZ3Q7IHdyb3RlOjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRl cjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0OnNvbGlkICNDQ0NDQ0MgMS4wcHQ7cGFkZGluZzowaW4gMGluIDBp biA2LjBwdDttYXJnaW4tbGVmdDo0LjhwdDttYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGluIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJN c29Ob3JtYWwiPldlIGNhbiBhbHNvIGNhbGwgaXQgdGhlIOKAnENPU0UgVG9rZW7igJ0uIEFzIGEg Y2hhaXIgb2YgdGhlIENPU0Ugd29ya2luZyBncm91cCwgSeKAmW0gZmluZSB3aXRoIHRoYXQgYW1v dW50IG9mIGNvLWJyYW5kaW5nLjxicj4NCjxicj4NCiZuYnNwO+KAlCBKdXN0aW48YnI+DQo8YnI+ DQomZ3Q7IE9uIE1heSA5LCAyMDE2LCBhdCA5OjMxIEFNLCBDYXJzdGVuIEJvcm1hbm4gJmx0Ozxh IGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpjYWJvQHR6aS5vcmciPmNhYm9AdHppLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7IHdyb3RlOjxi cj4NCiZndDs8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWFjZS1jYm9yLXRva2VuLTAwLnR4dDs8 YnI+DQomZ3Q7PGJyPg0KJmd0OyBGb3IgdGhlIHJlY29yZCwgSSBkbyBub3QgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCBB Q0UgaGFzIGEgY2xhaW0gb24gdGhlIHRlcm0gJnF1b3Q7Q0JPUjxicj4NCiZndDsgVG9rZW4mcXVv dDsuJm5ic3A7IFdoaWxlIHRoZSB0ZXJtIHRva2VuIGlzIG5vdCB1c2VkIGluIFJGQyA3MDQ5LCB0 aGVyZSBhcmUgbWFueTxicj4NCiZndDsgdG9rZW5zIHRoYXQgY291bGQgYmUgZXhwcmVzc2VkIGlu IENCT1Igb3IgYmUgdXNlZCBpbiBhcHBseWluZyBDQk9SIHRvIGE8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IHByb2JsZW0u PGJyPg0KJmd0Ozxicj4NCiZndDsgQUNFIENCT1IgVG9rZW4gaXMgZmluZSwgdGhvdWdoLjxicj4N CiZndDsgKE9yLCBiZXR0ZXIsIENCT1IgQUNFIFRva2VuLCBDQVQuKTxicj4NCiZndDs8YnI+DQom Z3Q7IEdyw7zDn2UsIENhcnN0ZW48YnI+DQomZ3Q7PGJyPg0KJmd0OyBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzxicj4NCiZndDsgQ09TRSBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3Q8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpDT1NFQGlldGYub3JnIj5DT1NFQGlldGYub3Jn PC9hPjxicj4NCiZndDsgPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0 aW5mby9jb3NlIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9jb3NlPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0i TXNvTm9ybWFsIj48YnI+DQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXzxicj4NCkFjZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q8YnI+DQo8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86QWNlQGll dGYub3JnIj5BY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5v cmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9hY2UiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRm Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2FjZTwvYT48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_SN1PR0301MB1645A1F955468253B8EF4782F5710SN1PR0301MB1645_-- From nobody Tue May 10 05:57:43 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EF012D5B9; Tue, 10 May 2016 05:57:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.196 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zl7N8RBuMPgl; Tue, 10 May 2016 05:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu [18.7.68.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF8912B03D; Tue, 10 May 2016 05:57:36 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074423-58fff7000000258f-cc-5731dabf32f1 Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E5.63.09615.FBAD1375; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u4ACvYaS010547; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:57:34 -0400 Received: from [10.20.11.38] ([65.115.200.131]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u4ACvRlP031382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 May 2016 08:57:30 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EF532274-2CD8-4C78-BC6B-DE6F810A1E2D" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Justin Richer In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 07:57:27 -0500 Message-Id: <5E85AFAC-07D3-4499-A5B2-5FEC69409913@mit.edu> References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> To: Mike Jones X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrAKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nrrv/lmG4wbN5ahbfv/UwWxyZcpfV YtrWqawWXyc0sVos3XmP1aJhZ77F5flFFnunfWKxOPn2FZsDp8fEtx9ZPHbOusvusXjTfjaP JUt+Mnm07vjL7jFtUabHmmkzWALYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyuh9dYCo408pYce9+A1sD48Li LkZODgkBE4kDf48xdzFycQgJtDFJvLz5nhHC2cgocW/JZVYIZw2TxJHj51hAWpgFEiRuv1oI ZvMK6ElsWv+WCcQWFgiTaPx9E8xmE1CVmL6mBczmFEiUOHr8OzuIzQIUv/pzL9hQZoEvTBKz p/0EcjiABllJzNwlCLFsNpPEvgWTWUEaRAR0JB5f/MYGcausxJOTi1gmMPLPQnLHLCR3QMS1 JZYtfM0MYWtK7O9ezoIpriHR+W0i6wJGtlWMsim5Vbq5iZk5xanJusXJiXl5qUW6Znq5mSV6 qSmlmxjBEeWivIPxZZ/3IUYBDkYlHt4dXIbhQqyJZcWVuYcYJTmYlER5BacAhfiS8lMqMxKL M+KLSnNSiw8xSnAwK4nwRl4GyvGmJFZWpRblw6SkOViUxHkZGRgYhATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLIy HBxKEryzbgI1ChalpqdWpGXmlCCkmTg4QYbzAA2fC1LDW1yQmFucmQ6RP8WoKCXOWwWSEABJ ZJTmwfWCEp5j8YnmV4ziQK8I874AqeIBJku47ldAg5mABsux6YMMLklESEk1MHbKrGzb2PNJ U1ksaobdPsN/eyumVbuazbrUrBL/+lRpdVS32ovXc5Jm55idehif/WTithVvopkNPGWOrDLM lGy89ezlhMzrGpXrcj+9bms5FbmgVPfeway3gs9f3dp7ntNYaof+tXBDx8jXdzMvHr8x92b3 73gRcc8s+8QGI72lxyRPWtx7+02JpTgj0VCLuag4EQCP/Uo5UwMAAA== Archived-At: Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Erik_Wahlstr=C3=B6m?= , Kathleen Moriarty , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Carsten Bormann , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 12:57:41 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_EF532274-2CD8-4C78-BC6B-DE6F810A1E2D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 You=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: Until this token can be = directly encoded into web technologies, like HTTP headers and HTML = pages, then it has no business being called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D = anything. As it is, it=E2=80=99s a binary encoding that would need an = additional wrapper, like base64url perhaps, to be placed into web = spaces. It can be used in CoAP and native CBOR structures as-is, which = is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do.=20 The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT is very important. A JWT can be = used, as-is, in any part of an HTTP message: headers, query, form, etc. = It can also be encoded as a string in other data structures in just = about any language without any additional transformation, including = HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, = and this is a feature set that this new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. = Ergo, it has no business being called a =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token = regardless of its heritage.=20 Both CBOR Token and COSE Token are fine with me.=20 =E2=80=94 Justin > On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones = wrote: >=20 > I also feel strongly that the name should remain CBOR Web Token. CWT = is a beneficiary of the intellectual and deployment heritage from the = Simple Web Token (SWT) and JSON Web Token (JWT). CWT is intentionally = parallel to JWT. The name should stay parallel as well. > =20 > The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D = name can be taken as a reference to the Web of Things (see = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things = ). As Erik correctly = points out JSON is not the only data representation that makes things in = the Web and the Web of Things. > =20 > -- Mike > =C2=A0 <> > From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Wahlstr=C3=B6m= > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 AM > To: Justin Richer > Cc: Kathleen Moriarty ; Kepeng Li = ; ace@ietf.org; Carsten Bormann = ; Hannes Tschofenig ; = ; cose > Subject: Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption for = draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 > =20 > Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons: > - To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on JWT = and it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE instead = of JSON/JOSE. > - I would not say that JWT is the only format that works for the web, = and it's even used in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means = I don't have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the = only web protocol? > =20 > Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact = that it can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a "jot" and I = figured that our "cozy chairs" would very much like that fact because = then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :) > =20 > / Erik > =20 > =20 > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer > wrote: > We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of = the COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of = co-branding. >=20 > =E2=80=94 Justin >=20 > > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann > wrote: > > > >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; > > > > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term = "CBOR > > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are = many > > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR = to a > > problem. > > > > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. > > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) > > > > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > COSE mailing list > > COSE@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose = >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace = --Apple-Mail=_EF532274-2CD8-4C78-BC6B-DE6F810A1E2D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 You=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: Until this = token can be directly encoded into web technologies, like HTTP headers = and HTML pages, then it has no business being called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D= anything. As it is, it=E2=80=99s a binary encoding that would need an = additional wrapper, like base64url perhaps, to be placed into web = spaces. It can be used in CoAP and native CBOR structures as-is, which = is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do. 

The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT = is very important. A JWT can be used, as-is, in any part of an HTTP = message: headers, query, form, etc. It can also be encoded as a string = in other data structures in just about any language without any = additional transformation, including HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the = JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, and this is a feature set that this = new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. Ergo, it has no business being called a = =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token regardless of its heritage. 

Both CBOR Token and COSE = Token are fine with me. 

 =E2=80=94 Justin

On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:

I also feel strongly that the name should = remain CBOR Web Token.  CWT is a beneficiary of the intellectual = and deployment heritage from the Simple Web Token (SWT) and JSON Web = Token (JWT).  CWT is intentionally parallel to JWT.  The name = should stay parallel as well.
 
The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D = part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D name can be taken as a = reference to the Web of Things (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things).  As = Erik correctly points out JSON is not the only data representation that = makes things in the Web and the Web of Things.
 
          &nb= sp;            = ;            &= nbsp;           &nb= sp;          -- Mike
From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of Erik = Wahlstr=C3=B6m
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 = AM
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>; ace@ietf.org; Carsten = Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; <oauth@ietf.org> <oauth@ietf.org>; cose = <cose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for = adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00
 
Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons:
- To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies = heavily on JWT and it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in = CBOR/COSE instead of JSON/JOSE.
- I would not say = that JWT is the only format that works for the web, and it's even used = in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means I don't have a = problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the only web = protocol?
 
Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, = it's the fact that it can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a = "jot" and I figured that our "cozy chairs" would very much like that = fact because then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :)
 
/ Erik
 
 
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> = wrote:
We = can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the = COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding.

 =E2=80=94 Justin

> On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
>> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt;
>
> For the record, I do not think that = ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR
> Token".  While = the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many
> = tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to = a
> problem.
>
> ACE = CBOR Token is fine, though.
> (Or, better, CBOR ACE = Token, CAT.)
>
> Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, = Carsten
>
> = _______________________________________________
> COSE = mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
=

= --Apple-Mail=_EF532274-2CD8-4C78-BC6B-DE6F810A1E2D-- From nobody Tue May 10 08:16:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEC212D704; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:14:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.215 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Afx2e5YWakx4; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF31012D6FC; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u4AFES5h017962 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 May 2016 15:14:28 GMT Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4AFER06014933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 May 2016 15:14:28 GMT Received: from abhmp0009.oracle.com (abhmp0009.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4AFEQIq027188; Tue, 10 May 2016 15:14:26 GMT Received: from [10.0.1.3] (/24.86.216.17) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 10 May 2016 08:14:25 -0700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-12FBE324-A738-4D06-97CC-03AF56B063ED Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: "Phil Hunt (IDM)" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238) In-Reply-To: <5E85AFAC-07D3-4499-A5B2-5FEC69409913@mit.edu> Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:14:22 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7C5768D4-8293-49E4-B8A6-49910E9C4372@oracle.com> References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> <5E85AFAC-07D3-4499-A5B2-5FEC69409913@mit.edu> To: Justin Richer X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:16:27 -0700 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Erik_Wahlstr=C3=B6m?= , Kathleen Moriarty , Mike Jones , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Carsten Bormann , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:14:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail-12FBE324-A738-4D06-97CC-03AF56B063ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't have this issue. I see your point, but I think the constrained brand= ing makes it clear.=20 IOW. When the specs say "constrained web" the use means to me that the token= s for the constrained set of binary protocols which all tend to be in parall= el architecture with web apis anyway. =20 Phil > On May 10, 2016, at 05:57, Justin Richer wrote: >=20 > You=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: Until this token can be dire= ctly encoded into web technologies, like HTTP headers and HTML pages, then i= t has no business being called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D anything. As it is, i= t=E2=80=99s a binary encoding that would need an additional wrapper, like ba= se64url perhaps, to be placed into web spaces. It can be used in CoAP and na= tive CBOR structures as-is, which is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do.=20 >=20 > The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT is very important. A JWT can be used= , as-is, in any part of an HTTP message: headers, query, form, etc. It can a= lso be encoded as a string in other data structures in just about any langua= ge without any additional transformation, including HTML, XML, and JSON. Thi= s makes the JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, and this is a feature set that= this new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. Ergo, it has no business being called= a =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token regardless of its heritage.=20 >=20 > Both CBOR Token and COSE Token are fine with me.=20 >=20 > =E2=80=94 Justin >=20 >> On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones wro= te: >>=20 >> I also feel strongly that the name should remain CBOR Web Token. CWT is a= beneficiary of the intellectual and deployment heritage from the Simple Web= Token (SWT) and JSON Web Token (JWT). CWT is intentionally parallel to JWT= . The name should stay parallel as well. >> =20 >> The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D na= me can be taken as a reference to the Web of Things (see https://en.wikipedi= a.org/wiki/Web_of_Things). As Erik correctly points out JSON is not the onl= y data representation that makes things in the Web and the Web of Things. >> =20 >> -- Mike >> =20 >> From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Wahlstr=C3=B6m >> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 AM >> To: Justin Richer >> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty ; Kepeng Li ; ace@ietf.org; Carsten Bormann ; Hanne= s Tschofenig ; ;= cose >> Subject: Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor= -web-token-00 >> =20 >> Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons: >> - To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on JWT an= d it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE instead of JS= ON/JOSE. >> - I would not say that JWT is the only format that works for the web, and= it's even used in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means I don't= have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the only web pro= tocol? >> =20 >> Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact that i= t can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a "jot" and I figured that our= "cozy chairs" would very much like that fact because then it's essentially a= "cozy cot" :) >> =20 >> / Erik >> =20 >> =20 >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer wrote: >> We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the C= OSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding. >>=20 >> =E2=80=94 Justin >>=20 >> > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> > >> >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; >> > >> > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR >> > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many >> > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a= >> > problem. >> > >> > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. >> > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) >> > >> > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > COSE mailing list >> > COSE@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Ace mailing list >> Ace@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace >=20 > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose --Apple-Mail-12FBE324-A738-4D06-97CC-03AF56B063ED Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't have this issue. I see your po= int, but I think the constrained branding makes it clear. 

IOW. When t= he specs say "constrained web" the use means to me that the tokens for the c= onstrained set of binary protocols which all tend to be in parallel architec= ture with web apis anyway.  

Phil

On May 10, 2016,= at 05:57, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.= edu> wrote:

You=E2=80=99re mi= ssing my original complaint: Until this token can be directly encoded into w= eb technologies, like HTTP headers and HTML pages, then it has no business b= eing called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D anything. As it is, it=E2=80=99s a binar= y encoding that would need an additional wrapper, like base64url perhaps, to= be placed into web spaces. It can be used in CoAP and native CBOR structure= s as-is, which is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do. 
The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT is v= ery important. A JWT can be used, as-is, in any part of an HTTP message: hea= ders, query, form, etc. It can also be encoded as a string in other data str= uctures in just about any language without any additional transformation, in= cluding HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D= , and this is a feature set that this new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. Ergo,= it has no business being called a =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token regardless of= its heritage. 

Both CBOR Token and COSE Token are fine with me. 

 =E2=80=94 Justin

On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> w= rote:

I also feel strongly that the name should remain CBOR Web T= oken.  CWT is a beneficiary of the intellectual and deployment heritage= from the Simple Web Token (SWT) and JSON Web Token (JWT).  CWT is inte= ntionally parallel to JWT.  The name should stay parallel as well.
 
The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D part of the =E2=80= =9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D name can be taken as a reference to the Web of Th= ings (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things)= .  As Erik correctly points out JSON is not the only data representatio= n that makes things in the Web and the Web of Things.<= /span>
 
          &n= bsp;            =             &nbs= p;            &n= bsp;         -- Mike=
From: Ace [= mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.o= rg] On B= ehalf Of Erik Wahlstr=C3= =B6m
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 AM
T= o: Justin Richer <<= a href=3D"mailto:jricher@mit.edu" class=3D"">jricher@mit.edu>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>; ace@ietf.org; Carsten B= ormann <cabo@tzi.org>; H= annes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; <oauth@ietf.org> <oauth@ietf.org>; cose <cose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption f= or draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00
=
 
Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for tw= o major reasons:
- To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heav= ily on JWT and it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE i= nstead of JSON/JOSE.
- I would not say that JWT is the only format that= works for the web, and it's even used in other, non-traditional, web protoc= ols. That means I don't have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would J= SON be the only web protocol?
 
<= div class=3D"">
Then we also have one smaller= (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact that it can be called "cot" just like= JWT is called a "jot" and I figured that our "cozy chairs" would very much l= ike that fact because then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :)<= /o:p>
 
/= Erik
 
 
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Ri= cher <jricher@mit.edu> wr= ote:
=
We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2= =80=9D. As a chair of the COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amo= unt of co-branding.

 =E2=80=94 Justin

> On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann &l= t;cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
>> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt;
>
> For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "= CBOR
> Token".  While the term token is not used in RFC= 7049, there are many
> tokens that could be expressed in C= BOR or be used in applying CBOR to a
> problem.
>
> ACE CBOR Token is fine, though.
>= ; (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.)
>
> G= r=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten
>
> ______________= _________________________________
> COSE mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing= list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/m= ailman/listinfo/ace

_______________________________________________<= /span>
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
= --Apple-Mail-12FBE324-A738-4D06-97CC-03AF56B063ED-- From nobody Tue May 10 13:38:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9581D12D520; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:37:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.196 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id msxFJJ_Vumsj; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B62812D5FD; Tue, 10 May 2016 13:37:11 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1209190f-ca3ff70000004b9e-a5-573246761158 Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 86.A7.19358.67642375; Tue, 10 May 2016 16:37:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u4AKb9XR007849; Tue, 10 May 2016 16:37:09 -0400 Received: from [172.25.194.232] ([199.244.219.64]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u4AKb0ai008166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 May 2016 16:37:02 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_15349204-7853-440C-A5EB-97A087AE6A22" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Justin Richer In-Reply-To: <7C5768D4-8293-49E4-B8A6-49910E9C4372@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:36:57 -0500 Message-Id: <59DC8E68-F1F4-435C-AEF8-07D896B1A49A@mit.edu> References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> <5E85AFAC-07D3-4499-A5B2-5FEC69409913@mit.edu> <7C5768D4-8293-49E4-B8A6-49910E9C4372@oracle.com> To: Phil Hunt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrDKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrFvmZhRu8Pm7ocX3bz3MFkem3GW1 mLZ1KqvF1wlNrBZLd95jtWjYmW9xeX6Rxd5pn1gsTr59xWaxYH4juwOXx8S3H1k8ds66y+6x eNN+No8lS34yebTu+Mvu8fHpLRaPaYsyPdZMm8ESwBHFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlfHq5HS2gutz GStW/fjL2sB4poOxi5GTQ0LARGL1geMsXYxcHEICbUwSt76cZYdwNjJKrDy5iRHCWc8ksbq1 nw2khVkgQaJt+VZ2EJtXQE9i0/q3TCC2sECYxI99X1lBbDYBVYnpa1rA4pwCdhLXDj9nAbFZ gOKzf71iAxnKLLCcWeLlt69MEIOsJN4tXMYMse0Pk8TeT7+ZQRIiAioS365ehzpWVuLJyUUs Exj5ZyE5ZBaSQyDi2hLLFr5mhrA1JfZ3L2fBFNeQ6Pw2kXUBI9sqRtmU3Crd3MTMnOLUZN3i 5MS8vNQiXRO93MwSvdSU0k2M4EiT5N/BOKfB+xCjAAejEg/vDi7DcCHWxLLiytxDjJIcTEqi vN8MjMKF+JLyUyozEosz4otKc1KLDzFKcDArifD6ugDleFMSK6tSi/JhUtIcLErivIwMDAxC AumJJanZqakFqUUwWRkODiUJXklXoEbBotT01Iq0zJwShDQTByfIcB6g4XUgNbzFBYm5xZnp EPlTjIpS4rytIFsFQBIZpXlwvaBEePzLbYdXjOJArwjzOoG08wCTKFz3K6DBTECD5dj0QQaX JCKkpBoYix/tObLRSmeyQVegi/X3aUdTnnBEc+x6nteUGMvw7HDO0n3LRKQU1fmtDe6vEXas PBYxJyuwJfvi1mU7sjc+fPRir8QPkQ1zBGP/H9kS+Y89ffHqgwt3BrZ9+bHwwkyzjZuDX6x+ wLDo4r+Fpf3X2H//7BWuC0hucFOaF/Ke7wXz6jk2Cg8cvyuxFGckGmoxFxUnAgA9RCtsXwMA AA== Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:38:30 -0700 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Erik_Wahlstr=C3=B6m?= , Kathleen Moriarty , Mike Jones , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Carsten Bormann , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 20:37:16 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_15349204-7853-440C-A5EB-97A087AE6A22 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Then how about the ACE Constrained Token (ACT)? =E2=80=94 Justin > On May 10, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Phil Hunt (IDM) = wrote: >=20 > I don't have this issue. I see your point, but I think the constrained = branding makes it clear.=20 >=20 > IOW. When the specs say "constrained web" the use means to me that the = tokens for the constrained set of binary protocols which all tend to be = in parallel architecture with web apis anyway. =20 >=20 > Phil >=20 > On May 10, 2016, at 05:57, Justin Richer > wrote: >=20 >> You=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: Until this token can be = directly encoded into web technologies, like HTTP headers and HTML = pages, then it has no business being called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D = anything. As it is, it=E2=80=99s a binary encoding that would need an = additional wrapper, like base64url perhaps, to be placed into web = spaces. It can be used in CoAP and native CBOR structures as-is, which = is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do.=20 >>=20 >> The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT is very important. A JWT can be = used, as-is, in any part of an HTTP message: headers, query, form, etc. = It can also be encoded as a string in other data structures in just = about any language without any additional transformation, including = HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, = and this is a feature set that this new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. = Ergo, it has no business being called a =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token = regardless of its heritage.=20 >>=20 >> Both CBOR Token and COSE Token are fine with me.=20 >>=20 >> =E2=80=94 Justin >>=20 >>> On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones > wrote: >>>=20 >>> I also feel strongly that the name should remain CBOR Web Token. = CWT is a beneficiary of the intellectual and deployment heritage from = the Simple Web Token (SWT) and JSON Web Token (JWT). CWT is = intentionally parallel to JWT. The name should stay parallel as well. >>> =20 >>> The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D= name can be taken as a reference to the Web of Things (see = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things = ). As Erik correctly = points out JSON is not the only data representation that makes things in = the Web and the Web of Things. >>> =20 >>> -- Mike >>> =C2=A0 <> >>> From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org = ] On Behalf Of Erik Wahlstr=C3=B6m >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 AM >>> To: Justin Richer > >>> Cc: Kathleen Moriarty >; Kepeng Li = >; = ace@ietf.org ; Carsten Bormann >; Hannes Tschofenig >; > >; cose = > >>> Subject: Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption for = draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 >>> =20 >>> Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons: >>> - To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on = JWT and it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE = instead of JSON/JOSE. >>> - I would not say that JWT is the only format that works for the = web, and it's even used in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That = means I don't have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be = the only web protocol? >>> =20 >>> Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact = that it can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a "jot" and I = figured that our "cozy chairs" would very much like that fact because = then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :) >>> =20 >>> / Erik >>> =20 >>> =20 >>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer > wrote: >>> We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of = the COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of = co-branding. >>>=20 >>> =E2=80=94 Justin >>>=20 >>> > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann > wrote: >>> > >>> >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; >>> > >>> > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term = "CBOR >>> > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are = many >>> > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR = to a >>> > problem. >>> > >>> > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. >>> > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) >>> > >>> > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > COSE mailing list >>> > COSE@ietf.org >>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose = >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ace mailing list >>> Ace@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace = >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> COSE@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose = --Apple-Mail=_15349204-7853-440C-A5EB-97A087AE6A22 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Then how about the ACE Constrained Token (ACT)?

 =E2=80=94 = Justin

On May 10, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Phil Hunt (IDM) = <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote:

I don't have = this issue. I see your point, but I think the constrained branding makes = it clear. 

IOW. When the specs say "constrained web" the use means to me = that the tokens for the constrained set of binary protocols which all = tend to be in parallel architecture with web apis anyway.  

Phil

On = May 10, 2016, at 05:57, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> = wrote:

You=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: = Until this token can be directly encoded into web technologies, like = HTTP headers and HTML pages, then it has no business being called a = =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D anything. As it is, it=E2=80=99s a binary encoding = that would need an additional wrapper, like base64url perhaps, to be = placed into web spaces. It can be used in CoAP and native CBOR = structures as-is, which is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do. 

The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D = part of JWT is very important. A JWT can be used, as-is, in any part of = an HTTP message: headers, query, form, etc. It can also be encoded as a = string in other data structures in just about any language without any = additional transformation, including HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the = JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, and this is a feature set that this = new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. Ergo, it has no business being called a = =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token regardless of its heritage. 

Both CBOR Token and COSE = Token are fine with me. 

 =E2=80=94 Justin

On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones = <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:

I also feel strongly that the name should = remain CBOR Web Token.  CWT is a beneficiary of the intellectual = and deployment heritage from the Simple Web Token (SWT) and JSON Web = Token (JWT).  CWT is intentionally parallel to JWT.  The name = should stay parallel as well.
 
The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D = part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D name can be taken as a = reference to the Web of Things (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things).  As = Erik correctly points out JSON is not the only data representation that = makes things in the Web and the Web of Things.
 
          &nb= sp;            = ;            &= nbsp;           &nb= sp;          -- Mike
From: Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of Erik = Wahlstr=C3=B6m
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 = AM
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>; ace@ietf.org; Carsten = Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; <oauth@ietf.org> <oauth@ietf.org>; cose = <cose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for = adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00
 
Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons:
- To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies = heavily on JWT and it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in = CBOR/COSE instead of JSON/JOSE.
- I would not say = that JWT is the only format that works for the web, and it's even used = in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means I don't have a = problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the only web = protocol?
 
Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, = it's the fact that it can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a = "jot" and I figured that our "cozy chairs" would very much like that = fact because then it's essentially a "cozy cot" :)
 
/ Erik
 
 
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> = wrote:
We = can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the = COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding.

 =E2=80=94 Justin

> On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
>> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt;
>
> For the record, I do not think that = ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR
> Token".  While = the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many
> = tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to = a
> problem.
>
> ACE = CBOR Token is fine, though.
> (Or, better, CBOR ACE = Token, CAT.)
>
> Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, = Carsten
>
> = _______________________________________________
> COSE = mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
=

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

= --Apple-Mail=_15349204-7853-440C-A5EB-97A087AE6A22-- From nobody Wed May 11 04:43:37 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649E412DA43 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:43:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wahlstromstekniska-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGamuqR5fTJM for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9018B12DA6C for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id y84so46442924lfc.0 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:42:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wahlstromstekniska-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=V/5uyXhRz57b+dBXJLXV0qEIfOO5q3B90mczNrMKxG0=; b=IFM6MRSohXEzsjmZ9jDvspEpLR469KdmsGi6y016y3FiAMmqhJPUcUmuWz0+X0KAZg Wu29Q7/yOhFTb9+UcW1ADORrdX4uUmqW3l89psHiVmLPYkEDcjmMm7puPBITpjMjqpM5 BhOxsgPFWjIyLjvjMPaDRRRz2R0Wt5unM8GvXjKLkG9DS7bs3CrlJMOvgUCN9MHwTuyt ur6aFGuipfgQ2aj4ggJvIGZFnzb3YSzN9dkflao4E2IWcSMMtaGzxXwCOaaSJCdgalZN LmHoMwL7yrShNoXTHDwBm7zrYaxhrf5fTJtn5kssGm1caNpz0oupt9UcQBfth4QKTsNX Yv8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=V/5uyXhRz57b+dBXJLXV0qEIfOO5q3B90mczNrMKxG0=; b=lXRRCHYzhEZUwFlJ1DJx9LJMNTaqkBabD3P2ODw2r0mjdJ6Cmxse+aODXGcS+Qxug2 8/piAsCwloTx2zp58T1Udd6N3nohJFxoPDQcM1eAlnx0ay1eLhV00kDB/O5FFdT1xec7 lUbG+DY0KSLeHfsoi0ZzYR8WxG5NsFjnbbIj1REoS3kXuu8/lOupW5//+/m5RBEQqnvM HkOCYKL/lOav72AHm4uhQ7poBABE9vEV1FNpKs7+Y5dYn/lsUfR9160G2cj6VQOMJZD8 ute9xn9gzhgCw3KK78OupHdFvkkQfH06UlePgiZWsodCjkrUHQoHjmWvw1H+W18uGWaS sCvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU/2kwdemo5+iBtH69pxKXRAFEhW9eWm6TcDmVhy7fAHHKcBCkS4/aM0qjD2P32y8mImiLOLn0lWlGfsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.61.39 with SMTP id m7mr1311562lbr.72.1462966937603; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.136.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:42:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [95.192.127.168] In-Reply-To: <5E85AFAC-07D3-4499-A5B2-5FEC69409913@mit.edu> References: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org> <89B6F196-D08F-4FBD-9F0D-5B250284048F@mit.edu> <5E85AFAC-07D3-4499-A5B2-5FEC69409913@mit.edu> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Erik_Wahlstr=C3=B6m?= To: Justin Richer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f503798a2668c05328f88c1 Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Mike Jones , Kepeng Li , "ace@ietf.org" , Carsten Bormann , Hannes Tschofenig , "" , cose Subject: Re: [COSE] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:43:35 -0000 --e89a8f503798a2668c05328f88c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's a very value scenario actually. Even so that it should actually be handled in the draft. Scenario: In the continuum of large and small devices an unconstrained client and AS goes through the hoops of issuing a token using standard (HTTP/JSON). The Resource Server however is constrained and would very much like a CWT when it communicates with the Client. That means that in the AS to Client response from the token endpoint the binary token should actually be wrapped by base64url. I can definitely see that being added to the draft. / Erik On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Justin Richer wrote: > You=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: Until this token can be dir= ectly > encoded into web technologies, like HTTP headers and HTML pages, then it > has no business being called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D anything. As it is, = it=E2=80=99s a binary > encoding that would need an additional wrapper, like base64url perhaps, t= o > be placed into web spaces. It can be used in CoAP and native CBOR > structures as-is, which is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do. > > The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT is very important. A JWT can be use= d, as-is, in any > part of an HTTP message: headers, query, form, etc. It can also be encode= d > as a string in other data structures in just about any language without a= ny > additional transformation, including HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the > JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, and this is a feature set that this new= token doesn=E2=80=99t > share. Ergo, it has no business being called a =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D toke= n regardless of > its heritage. > > Both CBOR Token and COSE Token are fine with me. > > =E2=80=94 Justin > > On May 10, 2016, at 3:50 AM, Mike Jones > wrote: > > I also feel strongly that the name should remain CBOR Web Token. CWT is = a > beneficiary of the intellectual and deployment heritage from the Simple W= eb > Token (SWT) and JSON Web Token (JWT). CWT is intentionally parallel to > JWT. The name should stay parallel as well. > > The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR Web Token=E2=80=9D na= me can be taken as a reference to > the Web of Things (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things). As > Erik correctly points out JSON is not the only data representation that > makes things in the Web and the Web of Things. > > -- Mike > > *From:* Ace [mailto:ace-bounces@ietf.org ] *On > Behalf Of *Erik Wahlstr=C3=B6m > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2016 1:44 AM > *To:* Justin Richer > *Cc:* Kathleen Moriarty ; Kepeng Li < > kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>; ace@ietf.org; Carsten Bormann = ; > Hannes Tschofenig ; < > oauth@ietf.org>; cose > *Subject:* Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption for > draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00 > > Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) for two major reasons: > - To show the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on JWT an= d > it's iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE instead of > JSON/JOSE. > - I would not say that JWT is the only format that works for the web, and > it's even used in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means I don= 't > have a problem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the only web > protocol? > > Then we also have one smaller (a lot smaller) reason, it's the fact that > it can be called "cot" just like JWT is called a "jot" and I figured that > our "cozy chairs" would very much like that fact because then it's > essentially a "cozy cot" :) > > / Erik > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer wrote: > > We can also call it the =E2=80=9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the C= OSE working > group, I=E2=80=99m fine with that amount of co-branding. > > =E2=80=94 Justin > > > On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > > > >> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; > > > > For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR > > Token". While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many > > tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a > > problem. > > > > ACE CBOR Token is fine, though. > > (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.) > > > > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > COSE mailing list > > COSE@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > Ace@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > > --e89a8f503798a2668c05328f88c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That's a very value scenario actually. Even so that it= should actually be handled in the draft.
Scenario: In the continuum of= large and small devices an unconstrained client and AS goes through the ho= ops of issuing a token using standard (HTTP/JSON). The Resource Server howe= ver is constrained and would very much like a CWT when it communicates with= the Client. That means that in the AS to Client response from the token en= dpoint the binary token should actually be wrapped by base64url.=C2=A0
I can definitely see that being added to the draft.
/ Erik<= /div>

On Tue= , May 10, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wro= te:
Y= ou=E2=80=99re missing my original complaint: Until this token can be direct= ly encoded into web technologies, like HTTP headers and HTML pages, then it= has no business being called a =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D anything. As it is, i= t=E2=80=99s a binary encoding that would need an additional wrapper, like b= ase64url perhaps, to be placed into web spaces. It can be used in CoAP and = native CBOR structures as-is, which is what it=E2=80=99s designed to do.=C2= =A0

The =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D part of JWT is very import= ant. A JWT can be used, as-is, in any part of an HTTP message: headers, que= ry, form, etc. It can also be encoded as a string in other data structures = in just about any language without any additional transformation, including= HTML, XML, and JSON. This makes the JWT very =E2=80=9Cwebby=E2=80=9D, and = this is a feature set that this new token doesn=E2=80=99t share. Ergo, it h= as no business being called a =E2=80=9Cweb=E2=80=9D token regardless of its= heritage.=C2=A0

Both CBOR Token and COSE Token ar= e fine with me.=C2=A0

=C2=A0=E2=80=94 Justin

On May 10, 2016, at 3:= 50 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:

I = also feel strongly that the name should remain CBOR Web Token.=C2=A0 CWT is= a beneficiary of the intellectual and deployment heritage from the Simple = Web Token (SWT) and JSON Web Token (JWT).=C2=A0 CWT is intentionally parall= el to JWT.=C2=A0 The name should stay parallel as well.
=C2=A0
The =E2=80=9CWeb=E2=80=9D part of the =E2=80=9CCBOR = Web Token=E2=80=9D name can be taken as a reference to the Web of Things (s= ee=C2=A0https:= //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Things).=C2=A0 As Erik correctly points = out JSON is not the only data representation that makes things in the Web a= nd the Web of Things.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 -- Mike
From:=C2=A0= Ace [mailt= o:ace-bounces@ietf.org]=C2=A0On Behalf Of=C2=A0Erik Wahlstr=C3=B6m
Sent:=C2=A0Tuesday, May= 10, 2016 1:44 AM
To:=C2=A0Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Cc:
=C2=A0Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.co= m>; Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>; ace@ietf.org; Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Hannes Tschofen= ig <hanne= s.tschofenig@gmx.net>; <oauth@ietf.org> <oauth@ietf.org>; cose <cose@ietf.org>
Subject:=C2= =A0Re: [Ace] [COSE] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-= web-token-00
=C2=A0=
Or keep the CBOR Web Token (CWT) f= or two major reasons:
- To s= how the very close relationship to JWT. It relies heavily on JWT and it'= ;s iana registry. It is essentially a JWT but in CBOR/COSE instead of JSON/= JOSE.
- I would not sa= y that JWT is the only format that works for the web, and it's even use= d in other, non-traditional, web protocols. That means I don't have a p= roblem with the W in CWT at all. Why would JSON be the only web protocol?
=C2=A0
Then we also have one smaller (a lot s= maller) reason, it's the fact that it can be called "cot" jus= t like JWT is called a "jot" and I figured that our "cozy ch= airs" would very much like that fact because then it's essentially= a "cozy cot" :)
=C2=A0
/ Erik<= /u>
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:
We can also call it the =E2=80= =9CCOSE Token=E2=80=9D. As a chair of the COSE working group, I=E2=80=99m f= ine with that amount of co-branding.

=C2=A0=E2=80=94 Justin

&= gt; On May 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
>> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-= 00.txt;
>
> For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim= on the term "CBOR
> Token".=C2=A0 While the term token is = not used in RFC 7049, there are many
> tokens that could be expressed= in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a
> problem.
>
> = ACE CBOR Token is fine, though.
> (Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.)<= br>>
> Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten
>
> __________________= _____________________________
> COSE mailing list
>=C2=A0= COSE@ietf.org
>=C2=A0https://www.ietf.org/mailma= n/listinfo/cose
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
=


--e89a8f503798a2668c05328f88c1-- From nobody Thu May 12 17:19:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietf.org Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4F712D0C4; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:19:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.20.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 17:19:47 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: cose@ietf.org Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 00:19:47 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption of the IETF. Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax Author : Jim Schaad Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt Pages : 112 Date : 2016-05-12 Abstract: Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format designed for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the ability to have the basic security services defined for this data format. This document specifies processing for signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This document also specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu May 12 17:23:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85C012D0C4 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:23:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.942 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.942 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egftV_-NLZ3j for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext2.iad.github.net [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A69112B01B for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 17:22:58 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1463098978; bh=Oqq0S60L3NHSQN7TNHtKvHH30DBdHftlaOUNA/mIQnw=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=PnA4YsQrBtUj4u/OEYVtDUnROmzVHgefjKmPSuL7y41vkJITyrhZjKweRtSExAwnb 8P3T723GLhcPB5KrKe3hG7Ts7iDnCPGiOK1CAMcukDcVGQeA3Q+UsEAmYM6ZhD1jR4 0Ai1OQna+YeTsORCBAVzP4PM6LSxwO3YB9jXHGBs= From: Jim Schaad To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57351e62208c1_224a3fa01cf092bc21384f8"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jimsch X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-wg/cose-issues] CFRG document for Curve25519 and Goldilocks has odd shared secret issue (#9) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 00:23:01 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57351e62208c1_224a3fa01cf092bc21384f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Given that we are not being an online protocol, This has not been done. This is the same decision as was made for the JOSE version of the same algorithm --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/9#issuecomment-218922149 ----==_mimepart_57351e62208c1_224a3fa01cf092bc21384f8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Given that we are not being an online protocol, This has not been done. This is the same decision as was made for the JOSE version of the same algorithm


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

----==_mimepart_57351e62208c1_224a3fa01cf092bc21384f8-- From nobody Thu May 12 17:41:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF6A12B009; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:41:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3CeavGh7J0n; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1844712B00F; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hebrews (c-24-21-96-37.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.21.96.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 759A42CA6C; Thu, 12 May 2016 17:41:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 17:41:41 -0700 Message-ID: <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQFv/JeYi+kl86wFCwHOAHo/0sSXmaB5ZwBQ Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: cose@ietf.org Subject: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 00:41:45 -0000 I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that were taken at BA. I have been through the draft a couple of times to look for problems and I believe that it is now ready for a working group last call. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: cose@ietf.org > Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption of the IETF. > > Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax > Author : Jim Schaad > Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > Pages : 112 > Date : 2016-05-12 > > Abstract: > Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format designed > for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the > ability to have the basic security services defined for this data > format. This document specifies processing for signatures, message > authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This document also > specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Fri May 13 15:46:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2A112D171 for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:46:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.196 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGn3sYNV7MTW for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C52CD12D6BA for ; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:46:24 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074425-c7fff70000005f72-04-5736593fdcc3 Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id D5.C6.24434.F3956375; Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u4DMkMT8029786; Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:23 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.80] (104-13-170-63.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [104.13.170.63]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u4DMkKAl032260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 May 2016 18:46:22 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_10C598B4-7ED7-4065-B196-28A41B28D73A" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Justin Richer In-Reply-To: <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:46:19 -0500 Message-Id: <659C8D5C-72B9-42E7-B6EA-B886FADC0D98@mit.edu> References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> To: Jim Schaad X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpileLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IR4hTV1rWPNAs3uLlb1WLa1qmsFqunf2dz YPLYOGc6m8eSJT+ZApiiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDJOXf3BVrDRqWLj3k9MDYx7LLsYOTgkBEwk WpoFuxi5OIQE2pgk1l1tYINwNjJK3H1zhBXCucUkcfHoAkaQDmaBBIkb6+K7GDk5eAX0JDat f8sEYgsLWEn827eSGcRmE1CVmL6mBSzOKeAgsWrBRzCbBSjeseINK4jNLCAh0fziOTvEHCuJ SxdWgcWFBEokmvZcBasXEVCX2Lr6JpgtISAr8eTkIpYJjPyzEK6YheSKWWBTtSWWLXzNDGFr SuzvXs6CKa4h0fltIusCRrZVjLIpuVW6uYmZOcWpybrFyYl5ealFuhZ6uZkleqkppZsYQUHN 7qK6g3HOX69DjAIcjEo8vAlKpuFCrIllxZW5hxglOZiURHnTTczChfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNS iw8xSnAwK4nwtkUA5XhTEiurUovyYVLSHCxK4ryMDAwMQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkZDg4lCd4a kEbBotT01Iq0zJwShDQTByfIcB6g4WZgw4sLEnOLM9Mh8qcYFaXEed+GAyUEQBIZpXlwvaCk k8G7yv4VozjQK8K8W0DaeYAJC677FdBgJqDB1deNQAaXJCKkpBoY+4SaeVhWnFQ4ImqbaGeu ytIt/O+88TvO709ZWAqTmG/zcAmkbplkN7+LtzPP97jC1yPhkc620tUOP6aGJPxt8dwneZ5b ZrLZnDuOt76oP1Y/c6rwmNP7U8JBXOden1iwNm/35c+td+PPdPPfWPij7X3YlaVbNbwWKx30 nVCyfZqge/E2oYuMSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAPMqf5xUDAAA= Archived-At: Cc: cose Subject: Re: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:46:28 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_10C598B4-7ED7-4065-B196-28A41B28D73A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Thanks, Jim. Everyone, please look over the current draft as well as the issues list = (most of which have been marked =E2=80=9CComplete=E2=80=9D, or otherwise = refer to separate documents).=20 https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues = We=E2=80=99ll give people two weeks starting today to look things over = and bring up any showstoppers, then we=E2=80=99ll start the WGLC in = earnest. =E2=80=94 Justin, your COSE chair > On May 12, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Jim Schaad = wrote: >=20 > I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that were = taken at > BA. I have been through the draft a couple of times to look for = problems > and I believe that it is now ready for a working group last call. >=20 > Jim >=20 >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- >> drafts@ietf.org >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >> Cc: cose@ietf.org >> Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt >>=20 >>=20 >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. >> This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption = of the > IETF. >>=20 >> Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax >> Author : Jim Schaad >> Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt >> Pages : 112 >> Date : 2016-05-12 >>=20 >> Abstract: >> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format designed >> for small code size and small message size. There is a need for = the >> ability to have the basic security services defined for this data >> format. This document specifies processing for signatures, message >> authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This document = also >> specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. >>=20 >>=20 >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ >>=20 >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 >>=20 >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-cose-msg-12 >>=20 >>=20 >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>=20 >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> COSE@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >=20 --Apple-Mail=_10C598B4-7ED7-4065-B196-28A41B28D73A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Thanks, Jim.

Everyone, please look over the current draft as well as the = issues list (most of which have been marked =E2=80=9CComplete=E2=80=9D, = or otherwise refer to separate documents). 


We=E2=80=99ll give = people two weeks starting today to look things over and bring up any = showstoppers, then we=E2=80=99ll start the WGLC in earnest.

 =E2=80=94 Justin, = your COSE chair

On May 12, 2016, at 7:41 PM, = Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

I = believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that were taken = at
BA.  I have been through the draft a couple of = times to look for problems
and I believe that it is now = ready for a working group last call.

Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 12, = 2016 5:20 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: = cose@ietf.org
Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: = draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt


A = New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object = Signing and Encryption of the
IETF.

=        Title =           : CBOR = Encoded Message Syntax
=        Author =          : Jim Schaad
= Filename        : = draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt
Pages =           : 112
= Date =            : = 2016-05-12

Abstract:
=   Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format = designed
  for small code size and small = message size.  There is a need for the
=   ability to have the basic security services defined for this = data
  format.  This document specifies = processing for signatures, message
=   authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR.  This = document also
  specifies a representation for = cryptographic keys using CBOR.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/

There's also a htmlized version available = at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12

A diff from the previous version is available = at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-cose-msg-12


Please note that it may take a = couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by = anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose


= --Apple-Mail=_10C598B4-7ED7-4065-B196-28A41B28D73A-- From nobody Thu May 19 06:52:24 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3969612D144; Thu, 19 May 2016 06:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.221 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eo4b_CHASLjG; Thu, 19 May 2016 06:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2357D12D150; Thu, 19 May 2016 06:52:05 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79f26d00000327e-d5-573dc50447c3 Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.60]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 51.16.12926.405CD375; Thu, 19 May 2016 15:52:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB303.ericsson.se ([169.254.3.153]) by ESESSHC014.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.60]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 19 May 2016 15:51:42 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?R8O2cmFuIFNlbGFuZGVy?= To: Jim Schaad Thread-Topic: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt Thread-Index: AQHRrLA8zxOtG4N5eEGcMOBLfY7fkJ/AUcIA Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 13:51:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> In-Reply-To: <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329 x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <8AA30772DBB21143BF5BD1B15FDBAE6C@ericsson.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7jS7LUdtwg6ULFC3ebd3HaDFt61RW i9XTv7M5MHtsnDOdzWPJkp9MAUxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBkPtuxiLTigX3F7xja2BsYlel2M nBwSAiYSX7dtY4awxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcIRR4smrF2wgCSGBJYwS639qgNhsAi4SDxoeMYHY IgLqEltX3wSyOTiYBUIkzv/zBAkLC9hLfDnznR2ixEFix9NvbBC2kcTK28fAbBYBVYldfXcY QWxeAQuJ7n17mEHGCAmUSdy/DnYOJ1DrqgUfwTYxAp32/dQaMJtZQFzi1pP5TBAnC0gs2XMe 6nxRiZeP/7GC2KICehL7XpxnBBkpIaAkMW1rGsSRmhLrd+lDmNYSL2c5QAxUlJjS/ZAd4hZB iZMzn7BMYJSYhWTXLITmWQjNs5A0z0LSvICRdRWjaHFqcVJuupGxXmpRZnJxcX6eXl5qySZG YAwe3PJbdQfj5TeOhxgFOBiVeHgV5GzDhVgTy4orcw8xSnAwK4nwrjoMFOJNSaysSi3Kjy8q zUktPsQozcGiJM7r/1IxXEggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cAY3f226GGSQ1jugwP8b3bNXWYf 9rwl9pj5kjcXBVXN014uLyhgW/Fr1oTN6aUufe997Q0Tc+8u758xRSj4R4FAgpdWx6s0rmVN 1nuvBHwL6a4saV2w6sfPrXUdC3n6nD6KfxD8e/TVp4KYS+eE/nz8ynz10ow1b7v1XdVm7uv6 FBgfvDjCkmGaEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAuC0xG70CAAA= Archived-At: Cc: "cose-chairs@ietf.org" , "cose@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 13:52:14 -0000 SGkgSmltDQoNCkEgY291cGxlIG9mIHF1ZXN0aW9ucyByZWxhdGVkIHRvIGFwcGx5aW5nIENPU0Ug cmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gaXNzdWVzIHdpdGggdGhlDQpkcmFmdCBpdHNlbGYuIA0KDQoxLiBBcyB5b3Ug a25vdyB3ZSBhcmUgbG9va2luZyBhdCBidWlsZGluZyBzZWN1cml0eSBwcm90b2NvbHMgdXNpbmcg Q09TRS4NCkZvciBFREhPQyB3ZSBuZWVkIHRvIHN1cHBvcnQgWC41MDkgY2VydGlmaWNhdGUgYmFz ZWQgYXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gb2YgdGhlDQpESCBleGNoYW5nZS4gV2l0aCBQU0sgYW5kIFJQSywg d2hpY2ggaXMgY3VycmVudGx5IGRlc2NyaWJlZCwgRURIT0MgaXMgYW4NCmV4Y2hhbmdlIG9mIENP U0UgbWVzc2FnZXMuIFdoYXQgd291bGQgYmUgYSBuYXR1cmFsIHdheSB0byBpbmNsdWRlIGEgcHVi bGljDQprZXkgY2VydGlmaWNhdGUgaW4gYSBDT1NFX1NpZ24xIG9iamVjdCwgdGhlIHB1YmxpYyBr ZXkgb2YgdGhlIGNlcnRpZmljYXRlDQppbnRlbmRlZCB0byBiZSB1c2VkIGJ5IHRoZSByZWNpcGll bnQgdG8gdmVyaWZ5IHRoZSBzaWduYXR1cmUgb2YgdGhlIENPU0UNCm9iamVjdD8gDQoNCg0KMi4g QW5vdGhlciB0aGluZyB3ZSBkaXNjdXNzZWQgcHJldmlvdXNseSB3YXMgdGhlIGRldGFpbGVkIHNw ZWNpZmljYXRpb24NCmZvciBkZXJpdmluZyB0aGUgc2hhcmVkIHNlY3JldCB3aXRoIEVDREgsIGFu YWxvZ291c2x5IHRvIHNlY3Rpb24gNy4zLjMgb2YNCmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRt bC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLXRscy10bHMxMy0xMg0KDQpJIG5vdGUgaW4gc2VjdGlvbiAxMi40LjENCg0K IiBUaGUgbWF0aGVtYXRpY3MgZm9yIEVsbGlwdGljIEN1cnZlIERpZmZpZS1IZWxsbWFuIGNhbiBi ZSBmb3VuZCBpbg0KICAgW1JGQzYwOTBdLiAgSW4gdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB0aGUgYWxnb3JpdGht IGlzIGV4dGVuZGVkIHRvIGJlIHVzZWQNCiAgIHdpdGggdGhlIHR3byBjdXJ2ZXMgZGVmaW5lZCBp biBbUkZDNzc0OF0uDQoNCiAgIEVDREggaXMgcGFyYW1ldGVyaXplZCBieSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5n Og0KDQogICBvICBDdXJ2ZSBUeXBlL0N1cnZlOiBUaGUgY3VydmUgc2VsZWN0ZWQgY29udHJvbHMg bm90IG9ubHkgdGhlIHNpemUgb2YNCiAgICAgIHRoZSBzaGFyZWQgc2VjcmV0LCBidXQgdGhlIG1h dGhlbWF0aWNzIGZvciBjb21wdXRpbmcgdGhlIHNoYXJlZA0KICAgICAgc2VjcmV0LiDigJwNCg0K DQpUaGVyZSBhcmUgYXQgbGVhc3QgdHdvIGtpbmRzIG9mIHNoYXJlZCBzZWNyZXQsIG9uZSBpcyBh IHBvaW50IG9uIGEgY3VydmUsDQpkZW5vdGVkIGdeKGoqaykgaW4gUkZDNjA5MCwgb3IgYWx0ZXJu YXRpdmVseSBhIGNvb3JkaW5hdGUuIEFub3RoZXIgaXMgdGhlDQpieXRlIHN0cmluZyBkZXJpdmVk IGZyb20gZ14oaiprKSBvciBpdHMgY29vcmRpbmF0ZSwgdXNlZCBmb3Igc3Vic2VxdWVudA0Ka2V5 IGRlcml2YXRpb24uICBUaGUgZm9ybWVyIGlzIGRlZmluZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgY3VydmUsIGJ1dCBu b3QgbmVjZXNzYXJpbHkNCnRoZSBsYXR0ZXIuDQoNCkZvciBleGFtcGxlIGluIHRoZSBjYXNlIG9m IFJGQzc3NDgsIHNlY3Rpb24gNi4xLCAiQWxpY2UgYW5kIEJvYiBjYW4gdGhlbg0KdXNlIGEga2V5 LWRlcml2YXRpb24NCiAgIGZ1bmN0aW9uIHRoYXQgaW5jbHVkZXMgSywgS19BLCBhbmQgS19CIHRv IGRlcml2ZSBhIHN5bW1ldHJpYyBrZXku4oCdDQoNCg0KU2VjdGlvbiAxMSBpbiBkcmFmdC1pZXRm LWNvc2UtbXNnIG5pY2VseSBkZXNjcmliZXMgdGhlIGtleSBkZXJpdmF0aW9uDQpnaXZlbiB0aGUg c2hhcmVkIHNlY3JldCwgYnV0IEkgY2Fu4oCZdCBmaW5kIHRoZSByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gdGhlIGV4 YWN0DQpwcm9jZWR1cmUgZm9yIG9idGFpbmluZyB0aGUgc2hhcmVkIHNlY3JldCBzdGFydGluZyBm cm9tIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQoNCk5vdCBpbnNpc3Rpbmcgb24gaXQgYmUgaW5jbHVkZWQgaW4gdGhp cyBkcmFmdC4gRm9yIG5vdyBJIGp1c3Qgd2FudCBhDQpjb25maXJtYXRpb24gdGhhdCBJIGhhdmVu 4oCZdCBtaXNzZWQgc29tZXRoaW5nLg0KDQoNCkfDtnJhbg0KDQoNCg0KDQpPbiAyMDE2LTA1LTEz IDAyOjQxLCAiQ09TRSBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgSmltIFNjaGFhZCIgPGNvc2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0Kb24gYmVoYWxmIG9mIGlldGZAYXVndXN0Y2VsbGFycy5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+SSBi ZWxpZXZlIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCByZXByZXNlbnRzIGFsbCBvZiB0aGUgZGVjaXNpb25zIHRo YXQgd2VyZSB0YWtlbg0KPmF0DQo+QkEuICBJIGhhdmUgYmVlbiB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBh IGNvdXBsZSBvZiB0aW1lcyB0byBsb29rIGZvciBwcm9ibGVtcw0KPmFuZCBJIGJlbGlldmUgdGhh dCBpdCBpcyBub3cgcmVhZHkgZm9yIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBsYXN0IGNhbGwuDQo+DQo+Smlt DQo+DQo+DQo+PiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPj4gRnJvbTogQ09TRSBbbWFp bHRvOmNvc2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIGludGVybmV0LQ0KPj4gZHJh ZnRzQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiBTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgTWF5IDEyLCAyMDE2IDU6MjAgUE0NCj4+ IFRvOiBpLWQtYW5ub3VuY2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+IENjOiBjb3NlQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiBTdWJq ZWN0OiBbQ09TRV0gSS1EIEFjdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy0xMi50eHQNCj4+IA0K Pj4gDQo+PiBBIE5ldyBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdCBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZnJvbSB0aGUgb24tbGlu ZSBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdHMNCj5kaXJlY3Rvcmllcy4NCj4+IFRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgYSB3b3Jr IGl0ZW0gb2YgdGhlIENCT1IgT2JqZWN0IFNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIEVuY3J5cHRpb24gb2YNCj4+dGhl DQo+SUVURi4NCj4+IA0KPj4gICAgICAgICBUaXRsZSAgICAgICAgICAgOiBDQk9SIEVuY29kZWQg TWVzc2FnZSBTeW50YXgNCj4+ICAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9yICAgICAgICAgIDogSmltIFNjaGFhZA0K Pj4gCUZpbGVuYW1lICAgICAgICA6IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29zZS1tc2ctMTIudHh0DQo+PiAJUGFn ZXMgICAgICAgICAgIDogMTEyDQo+PiAJRGF0ZSAgICAgICAgICAgIDogMjAxNi0wNS0xMg0KPj4g DQo+PiBBYnN0cmFjdDoNCj4+ICAgIENvbmNpc2UgQmluYXJ5IE9iamVjdCBSZXByZXNlbnRhdGlv biAoQ0JPUikgaXMgZGF0YSBmb3JtYXQgZGVzaWduZWQNCj4+ICAgIGZvciBzbWFsbCBjb2RlIHNp emUgYW5kIHNtYWxsIG1lc3NhZ2Ugc2l6ZS4gIFRoZXJlIGlzIGEgbmVlZCBmb3IgdGhlDQo+PiAg ICBhYmlsaXR5IHRvIGhhdmUgdGhlIGJhc2ljIHNlY3VyaXR5IHNlcnZpY2VzIGRlZmluZWQgZm9y IHRoaXMgZGF0YQ0KPj4gICAgZm9ybWF0LiAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgcHJvY2Vz c2luZyBmb3Igc2lnbmF0dXJlcywgbWVzc2FnZQ0KPj4gICAgYXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gY29kZXMs IGFuZCBlbmNyeXB0aW9uIHVzaW5nIENCT1IuICBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFsc28NCj4+ICAgIHNw ZWNpZmllcyBhIHJlcHJlc2VudGF0aW9uIGZvciBjcnlwdG9ncmFwaGljIGtleXMgdXNpbmcgQ0JP Ui4NCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiBUaGUgSUVURiBkYXRhdHJhY2tlciBzdGF0dXMgcGFnZSBmb3IgdGhp cyBkcmFmdCBpczoNCj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWll dGYtY29zZS1tc2cvDQo+PiANCj4+IFRoZXJlJ3MgYWxzbyBhIGh0bWxpemVkIHZlcnNpb24gYXZh aWxhYmxlIGF0Og0KPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29z ZS1tc2ctMTINCj4+IA0KPj4gQSBkaWZmIGZyb20gdGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIHZlcnNpb24gaXMgYXZh aWxhYmxlIGF0Og0KPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvcmZjZGlmZj91cmwyPWRyYWZ0LWll dGYtY29zZS1tc2ctMTINCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiBQbGVhc2Ugbm90ZSB0aGF0IGl0IG1heSB0YWtl IGEgY291cGxlIG9mIG1pbnV0ZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgdGltZSBvZg0KPnN1Ym1pc3Npb24NCj4+IHVu dGlsIHRoZSBodG1saXplZCB2ZXJzaW9uIGFuZCBkaWZmIGFyZSBhdmFpbGFibGUgYXQgdG9vbHMu aWV0Zi5vcmcuDQo+PiANCj4+IEludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0cyBhcmUgYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgYnkg YW5vbnltb3VzIEZUUCBhdDoNCj4+IGZ0cDovL2Z0cC5pZXRmLm9yZy9pbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHMv DQo+PiANCj4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f DQo+PiBDT1NFIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPj4gQ09TRUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cu aWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9jb3NlDQo+DQo+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj5DT1NFIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPkNPU0VAaWV0 Zi5vcmcNCj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Nvc2UNCg0K From nobody Sat May 21 10:35:09 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D459812D521; Sat, 21 May 2016 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ta7a1-Z9GBl3; Sat, 21 May 2016 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFAF12D520; Sat, 21 May 2016 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hebrews (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED4D12CA30; Sat, 21 May 2016 10:35:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: =?utf-8?Q?'G=C3=B6ran_Selander'?= References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 10:35:04 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01d1b387$1c83c690$558b53b0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQFv/JeYi+kl86wFCwHOAHo/0sSXmQKWYCE2AYrVDYKgZgisAA== Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 17:35:08 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G=C3=B6ran = Selander > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:52 AM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org; cose@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt >=20 > Hi Jim >=20 > A couple of questions related to applying COSE rather than issues with = the draft > itself. >=20 > 1. As you know we are looking at building security protocols using = COSE. > For EDHOC we need to support X.509 certificate based authentication of = the DH > exchange. With PSK and RPK, which is currently described, EDHOC is an > exchange of COSE messages. What would be a natural way to include a = public > key certificate in a COSE_Sign1 object, the public key of the = certificate intended > to be used by the recipient to verify the signature of the COSE = object? >=20 We do not have a current method of carrying certificates in a COSE = message at this time. When we were discussing things, it was presumed = and confirmed that while certificates may be used, they were going to be = pre-provisioned in some manner. The additional overhead associated with = carrying certificates was not considered to be part of the target = environment. That said, for pre-provisioned certificates one would place the SPKI = field into the KID field of a message.=20 If one really wants to carry certificates, then one would need to define = a new header field that allowed for one or more certificates to be = carried as part of the message. One might also wish to provide for OCSP = responses to be carried as well for long term messages and good time = capabilities in order to ease revocation checking. I do recognize that = many of the situations you are looking at would probably not do = revocation checking but it might be reasonable to allow for the ability = in the future. >=20 > 2. Another thing we discussed previously was the detailed = specification for > deriving the shared secret with ECDH, analogously to section 7.3.3 of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-12 >=20 > I note in section 12.4.1 >=20 > " The mathematics for Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman can be found in > [RFC6090]. In this document the algorithm is extended to be used > with the two curves defined in [RFC7748]. >=20 > ECDH is parameterized by the following: >=20 > o Curve Type/Curve: The curve selected controls not only the size = of > the shared secret, but the mathematics for computing the shared > secret. =E2=80=9C >=20 >=20 > There are at least two kinds of shared secret, one is a point on a = curve, denoted > g^(j*k) in RFC6090, or alternatively a coordinate. Another is the byte = string > derived from g^(j*k) or its coordinate, used for subsequent key = derivation. The > former is defined with the curve, but not necessarily the latter. >=20 > For example in the case of RFC7748, section 6.1, "Alice and Bob can = then use a > key-derivation > function that includes K, K_A, and K_B to derive a symmetric = key.=E2=80=9D >=20 >=20 > Section 11 in draft-ietf-cose-msg nicely describes the key derivation = given the > shared secret, but I can=E2=80=99t find the reference to the exact = procedure for obtaining > the shared secret starting from this draft. >=20 > Not insisting on it be included in this draft. For now I just want a = confirmation > that I haven=E2=80=99t missed something. I remember that you told me about this and I did intend to deal with the = first case, but I forgot to write it down and missed it. =20 I thought that I had dealt with the second case, but I cannot seem to = find the text at the moment so it might have been lost. I will look for = it and see if I am just missing it or if the text got lost and needs to = be re-added. Jim >=20 >=20 > G=C3=B6ran >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 2016-05-13 02:41, "COSE on behalf of Jim Schaad" = on behalf of ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: >=20 > >I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that were > >taken at BA. I have been through the draft a couple of times to look > >for problems and I believe that it is now ready for a working group > >last call. > > > >Jim > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > >> drafts@ietf.org > >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM > >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >> Cc: cose@ietf.org > >> Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption > >>of the > >IETF. > >> > >> Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax > >> Author : Jim Schaad > >> Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> Pages : 112 > >> Date : 2016-05-12 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format = designed > >> for small code size and small message size. There is a need for = the > >> ability to have the basic security services defined for this = data > >> format. This document specifies processing for signatures, = message > >> authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This document = also > >> specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >submission > >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at = tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> COSE mailing list > >> COSE@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > > >_______________________________________________ > >COSE mailing list > >COSE@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >=20 > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Mon May 23 21:28:25 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BE012D5DB; Mon, 23 May 2016 21:28:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wF7m9LLqRZUR; Mon, 23 May 2016 21:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8146D12D12D; Mon, 23 May 2016 21:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hebrews (c-24-21-96-37.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.21.96.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC63B2CA6A; Mon, 23 May 2016 21:28:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: =?utf-8?Q?'G=C3=B6ran_Selander'?= References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:28:21 -0700 Message-ID: <01f201d1b574$b491e8b0$1db5ba10$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQFv/JeYi+kl86wFCwHOAHo/0sSXmQKWYCE2AYrVDYKgaeZKoA== Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 04:28:24 -0000 Please look at this and see if you think it covers the required changes. https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-spec/pull/150 jim > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G=C3=B6ran = Selander > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:52 AM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org; cose@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt >=20 > Hi Jim >=20 > A couple of questions related to applying COSE rather than issues with = the draft > itself. >=20 > 1. As you know we are looking at building security protocols using = COSE. > For EDHOC we need to support X.509 certificate based authentication of = the DH > exchange. With PSK and RPK, which is currently described, EDHOC is an > exchange of COSE messages. What would be a natural way to include a = public > key certificate in a COSE_Sign1 object, the public key of the = certificate intended > to be used by the recipient to verify the signature of the COSE = object? >=20 >=20 > 2. Another thing we discussed previously was the detailed = specification for > deriving the shared secret with ECDH, analogously to section 7.3.3 of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-12 >=20 > I note in section 12.4.1 >=20 > " The mathematics for Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman can be found in > [RFC6090]. In this document the algorithm is extended to be used > with the two curves defined in [RFC7748]. >=20 > ECDH is parameterized by the following: >=20 > o Curve Type/Curve: The curve selected controls not only the size = of > the shared secret, but the mathematics for computing the shared > secret. =E2=80=9C >=20 >=20 > There are at least two kinds of shared secret, one is a point on a = curve, denoted > g^(j*k) in RFC6090, or alternatively a coordinate. Another is the byte = string > derived from g^(j*k) or its coordinate, used for subsequent key = derivation. The > former is defined with the curve, but not necessarily the latter. >=20 > For example in the case of RFC7748, section 6.1, "Alice and Bob can = then use a > key-derivation > function that includes K, K_A, and K_B to derive a symmetric = key.=E2=80=9D >=20 >=20 > Section 11 in draft-ietf-cose-msg nicely describes the key derivation = given the > shared secret, but I can=E2=80=99t find the reference to the exact = procedure for obtaining > the shared secret starting from this draft. >=20 > Not insisting on it be included in this draft. For now I just want a = confirmation > that I haven=E2=80=99t missed something. >=20 >=20 > G=C3=B6ran >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 2016-05-13 02:41, "COSE on behalf of Jim Schaad" = on behalf of ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: >=20 > >I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that were > >taken at BA. I have been through the draft a couple of times to look > >for problems and I believe that it is now ready for a working group > >last call. > > > >Jim > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > >> drafts@ietf.org > >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM > >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >> Cc: cose@ietf.org > >> Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption > >>of the > >IETF. > >> > >> Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax > >> Author : Jim Schaad > >> Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> Pages : 112 > >> Date : 2016-05-12 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format = designed > >> for small code size and small message size. There is a need for = the > >> ability to have the basic security services defined for this = data > >> format. This document specifies processing for signatures, = message > >> authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This document = also > >> specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >submission > >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at = tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> COSE mailing list > >> COSE@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > > >_______________________________________________ > >COSE mailing list > >COSE@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >=20 > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Thu May 26 10:50:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03B212D7CD for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:50:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWScIz8UsZVN for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net (smtp3.pacifier.net [64.255.237.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDB512D562 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hebrews (c-24-21-96-37.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.21.96.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2839538F12 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:50:29 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: References: <57446515.8070900@gmail.com> <5746C234.6010109@gmail.com> <03a201d1b769$acf63240$06e296c0$@augustcellars.com> <574722C8.2000901@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: <574722C8.2000901@tzi.org> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:50:28 -0700 Message-ID: <03d501d1b777$17728f30$4657ad90$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQJ+L04cgDL25s7N3/o7DumPLnoYjgJfZsgtAgXu9nICRlpPmJ49MerQ Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Subject: [COSE] FW: [jose] JOSE implementation Interoperability events X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:50:30 -0000 I am trying to gauge interest in this. Are there people who would like = to participate? Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:cabo@tzi.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 9:23 AM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: 'Sergey Beryozkin' ; jose@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [jose] JOSE implementation Interoperability events >=20 > Jim Schaad wrote: > > Are people interested in doing anything along these lines at the = next > > IETF meeting as part of the hackathon? >=20 > Yes, please. Maybe we can add COSE to the mix. > (Unfortunately, on Saturday most "constrained" people will be at the = RIOT > summit, but there also is Sunday, except for those that are at the 6lo = plugtest. > That weekend is getting a bit crowded.) >=20 > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Fri May 27 00:29:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F013B12DBD1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:29:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sics-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXUTsJQ7eAjj for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:29:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB9812D0E1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id b73so19621766lfb.3 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:25:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sics-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=U5WKxAkw0DmVHM2NO2qI+tfonfY2uR0W0IA0bwm7C4A=; b=QCUz0+aQm82D1NYkKDpEwyRqFuIIHK82lSAdGpata7bTdzrlrNyuC4nY6UhIsNdjwa hafUBS1emSxxyImybvVgwLH+F5nDjCYY+iitEXDa1DdkLOXY1MLqCcNRFIfMG6J2mrYA 5JEJBCcoZXKq0zlM6WIXrGZSEN51GGAfGMyECONtmiEt6sYRoy78bXeVvtMuvdrhQaqW QdCvT8dqXEbSlIw+n/5u/f/rmtzLKdEry3Jc1YlKBAd9KZGsEZCE0mGLyQETCUgiZsbg +h6WS11er22uw9XqgwvuTJaTPCw/b474rdwHBkAzpMg/gcynjRw+QqjZlUdnhxWVbLf2 Dx7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=U5WKxAkw0DmVHM2NO2qI+tfonfY2uR0W0IA0bwm7C4A=; b=bDSwzEaRG138WXXl943KuSsY9MHDRNpT+ULsyfR0hsKN2ErbdJNskQ4inRNIYg3/x/ 1wNmGgOI5y74kIDFsa7Lx7rn1a33Lhv2hONdSp8FKJ8e/4RVMuH3BWtIAztNvub7vxF/ plfRvyDvRLiNVEReN+fnCBawjcvlXzTJ1rQuw8zyAvpUAj9YwLayNW2fhWSEuMJ4l6OV DQpQEig/AsKH1ifbcjdMDdCdywDdKvaNmjMlU0aa1CcJX6eP2kkeydPUdBpFiKzFDhHM 0KFonKHqHvr7qaC8RE9xlTc+85/821aXvmilDTYPqRZ4c4ynHA9hCpb1YcCFv/OqEAiU dH/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIYJC3kKat50/TZnRNfd4L3XiAs/J0cpLM806xK8fmPUqmRFjaUkHKlevzpq3xnhMOZ X-Received: by 10.46.33.13 with SMTP id h13mr1215990ljh.39.1464333905047; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.166] ([85.235.10.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e71sm751186lfg.8.2016.05.27.00.25.03 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 27 May 2016 00:25:04 -0700 (PDT) To: cose@ietf.org References: <57446515.8070900@gmail.com> <5746C234.6010109@gmail.com> <03a201d1b769$acf63240$06e296c0$@augustcellars.com> <574722C8.2000901@tzi.org> <03d501d1b777$17728f30$4657ad90$@augustcellars.com> From: Ludwig Seitz Message-ID: <5747F647.3080500@sics.se> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:24:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <03d501d1b777$17728f30$4657ad90$@augustcellars.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms020603080807040303080309" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: [jose] JOSE implementation Interoperability events X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:29:12 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020603080807040303080309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-05-26 19:50, Jim Schaad wrote: > I am trying to gauge interest in this. Are there people who would like= to participate? > > Jim > I have two students who are in the process of adapting Jim's Cose-C lib=20 to a CC2358 platform. However I doubt that this will be in good enough=20 shape for IETF 96. IETF 97 however looks much more feasible. /Ludwig --=20 Ludwig Seitz, PhD SICS Swedish ICT AB Ideon Science Park Building Beta 2 Scheelev=C3=A4gen 17 SE-223 70 Lund Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51 http://www.sics.se --------------ms020603080807040303080309 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC CtQwggTqMIID0qADAgECAhAU4QcxMULaotNy8Yzm2pESMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMHUxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSkwJwYDVQQLEyBTdGFydENvbSBD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTEjMCEGA1UEAxMaU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBDbGll bnQgQ0EwHhcNMTYwMzE0MDkzNDMyWhcNMTcwMzE0MDkzNDMyWjA4MRcwFQYDVQQDDA5sdWR3 aWdAc2ljcy5zZTEdMBsGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYObHVkd2lnQHNpY3Muc2UwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC9kgmm82Op78D9DXYNJrQW5bUdSxElnOC/CzAK/enHn+uF B/RLo8alI6Ukd35qsAtcje0I3e/RtbkRnkEuhKneH+aDRofy7YaWQO61CjIlcdndTx8FEmXK /swcafYX5PbyzQFGgApwtWFkVXcq3R87CDB3VbkHzTHIBmfwZ4hhDeEyuJoSuWEVWQppfTji /GpVLiDx6s+Zqm3qI5EkjvhQ+jX3tJxXqUf4w1BY6/sBLfvr7TOPGPoAmi6B2UOgyDSfX3c0 +jzlYFLNb6Eqc7uGvaQi7VN39kAJXz9f+qL/wokaNjboK3/JyTG/ikxsWymzO9E0/U9apn2Y z5SVUGSDAgMBAAGjggGxMIIBrTAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBLAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUH AwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwHQYDVR0OBBYEFN37NX1Db3Xp23cbQI1MpYPUMw84 MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFCSBbDlhvkkPj7cbRivJKLUnSG1oMG8GCCsGAQUFBwEBBGMwYTAkBggr BgEFBQcwAYYYaHR0cDovL29jc3Auc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tMDkGCCsGAQUFBzAChi1odHRwOi8v YWlhLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jZXJ0cy9zY2EuY2xpZW50MS5jcnQwOAYDVR0fBDEwLzAtoCug KYYnaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc2NhLWNsaWVudDEuY3JsMBkGA1UdEQQSMBCB Dmx1ZHdpZ0BzaWNzLnNlMCMGA1UdEgQcMBqGGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tLzBG BgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGCysGAQQBgbU3AQIEMCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3Rh cnRzc2wuY29tL3BvbGljeTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAUy78MN+soYHwIz+6m9mMkzPF KfgIq7sLupWnis7K5U66U9zfKOVDReyfUvPmar7P7Tb9uNNrUlkk3lSISplqU30TMnVbtK5D I0mxdpa1hZxIAa8uWQnAh/oYJJYaMziKxpZgsUjel6/ZnD0z/QsuHo763I1boi2ghe4Knj0f qFO79ErRr9aJJBfQlFVwQ4gRoYtMz18/usC3eqGxFz8a/LCeRMWeZJagGJ/St1WW1HUBmMFd vRFweeUdCvDbzK+WjqbxhXyi7b0sH65lWIjINCBVQ0AvqOwm/aXEWcIQlAIJjr2kEC6c0VY6 V1aP16BAKooEgGGOTrmcDGeteXZRyjCCBeIwggPKoAMCAQICEGunin0K14jWUQr5WeTntOEw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4x KzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMT IFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MB4XDTE1MTIxNjAxMDAwNVoXDTMw MTIxNjAxMDAwNVowdTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKTAn BgNVBAsTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MSMwIQYDVQQDExpTdGFy dENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIENsaWVudCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEB AL192vfDon2D9luC/dtbX64eG3XAtRmvmCSsu1d52DXsCR58zJQbCtB2/A5uFqNxWacpXGGt TCRk9dEDBlmixEd8QiLkUfvHpJX/xKnmVkS6Iye8wUbYzMsDzgnpazlPg19dnSqfhM+Cevdf a89VLnUztRr2cgmCfyO9Otrh7LJDPG+4D8ZnAqDtVB8MKYJL6QgKyVhhaBc4y3bGWxKyXEtx 7QIZZGxPwSkzK3WIN+VKNdkiwTubW5PIdopmykwvIjLPqbJK7yPwFZYekKE015OsW6FV+s4D IM8UlVS8pkIsoGGJtMuWjLL4tq2hYQuuN0jhrxK1ljz50hH23gA9cbMCAwEAAaOCAWQwggFg MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAyBgNVHR8EKzApMCegJaAjhiFodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNv bS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwZgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEWjBYMCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5z dGFydHNzbC5jb20wMAYIKwYBBQUHMAKGJGh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRz L2NhLmNydDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUJIFsOWG+SQ+PtxtGK8kotSdIbWgwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvv GqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwPwYDVR0gBDgwNjA0BgRVHSAAMCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHmh0 dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3BvbGljeTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAgEAi+P3h+wB i4StDwECW5zhIycjBL008HACblIf26HY0JdOruKbrWDsXUsiI0j/7Crft9S5oxvPiDtVqspB OB/y5uzSns1lZwh7sG96bYBZpcGzGxpFNjDmQbcM3yl3WFIRS4WhNrsOY14V7y2IrUGsvets D+bjyOngCIVeC/GmsmtbuLOzJ606tEc9uRbhjTu/b0x2Fo+/e7UkQvKzNeo7OMhijixaULyI NBfCBJb+e29bLafgu6JqjOUJ9eXXj20p6q/CW+uVrZiSW57+q5an2P2i7hP85jQJcy5j4HzA 0rSiF3YPhKGAWUxKPMAVGgcYoXzWydOvZ3UDsTDTagXpRDIKQLZo02wrlxY6iMFqvlzsemVf 1odhQJmi7Eh5TbxI40kDGcBOBHhwnaOumZhLP+SWJQnjpLpSlUOj95uf1zo9oz9e0NgIJoz/ tdfrBzez76xtDsK0KfUDHt1/q59BvDI7RX6gVr0fQoCyMczNzCTcRXYHY0tq2J0oT+bsb6sH 2b4WVWAiJKnSYaWDjdA70qHX4mq9MIjO/ZskmSY8wtAk24orAc0vwXgYanqNsBX5Yv4sN4Z9 VyrwMdLcusP7HJgRdAGKpkR2I9U4zEsNJQJewM7S4Jalo1DyPrLpL2nTET8ZrSl5Utp1UeGp /2deoprGevfnxWB+vHNQiu85o6MxggPMMIIDyAIBATCBiTB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQG A1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjEpMCcGA1UECxMgU3RhcnRDb20gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBB dXRob3JpdHkxIzAhBgNVBAMTGlN0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgQ2xpZW50IENBAhAU4QcxMULa otNy8Yzm2pESMA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIICEzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcB MBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNjA1MjcwNzI0NTVaMC8GCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEiBCC48cg+bdkJ ULORkGulUoSt9IsjouJ02uCE/QdUPzaxfTBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQB KjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGaBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgYwwgYkwdTELMAkG A1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKTAnBgNVBAsTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENl cnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MSMwIQYDVQQDExpTdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIENsaWVu dCBDQQIQFOEHMTFC2qLTcvGM5tqREjCBnAYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgYyggYkwdTELMAkGA1UE BhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKTAnBgNVBAsTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRp ZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MSMwIQYDVQQDExpTdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIENsaWVudCBD QQIQFOEHMTFC2qLTcvGM5tqREjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQA0g09bEJwCPGb+3uaRdMK6 0xvpG/tlTrAtLJx7iBCe6vR+wpu2RtL9E5BjR/6vbcRmFevqC6XR6MMOI9i45VjkYFHEI/4g /EjljN5eQoZVce7h4w80MkNSaIrLlQmVUFWYPhHXeqNhRQXCWpr6e4b2zGHvCWhQRV2t+kOn XYZK4qEoz/ZvcbkYCwaY37YtbblSVZukC9AANaNBEYP24jCrSzw9jgV8cIZBHLhqK5BvD8Q8 tkJvCoEUmJ/ySV1tQuD/v5ypaMqObti+XZI9cj8ZZ9mBykCGNuyv4oefWf+9S2kpmdt3I/5t zvbw2Euu8wbBHOtZ74sJ5HpagSKEZorLAAAAAAAA --------------ms020603080807040303080309-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:26:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BC412DA94 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3NRMvaI-vnCx for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext2.iad.github.net [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26F512D975 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:50 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1464355550; bh=Q5Ol6X+FM3bEJE9y3hYyGtjXqfWK3W4uCoBqzEjcjDM=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ZXkNo7Iwv1B9WNrmiEWRQxpfSYIST/NZZ+t1vEAn5V+mdY+DDgtsLkqBxp2/ZASc3 Xs/nTnDPS1hc51ZlsVjyao7yyRpHdcMybDeafFslzKShoaXGDWkSyBNuRCZYAoWzBW NmNCmDPP0wjJRIM5oOtcrkpQLxQ3zujpAsfhh+vw= From: Justin Richer To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57484ade7a7e5_32df3ff8269e92c031399d"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jricher X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-wg/cose-issues] CFRG document for Curve25519 and Goldilocks has odd shared secret issue (#9) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:25:59 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57484ade7a7e5_32df3ff8269e92c031399d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closed #9. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/9#event-674450136 ----==_mimepart_57484ade7a7e5_32df3ff8269e92c031399d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #9.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_57484ade7a7e5_32df3ff8269e92c031399d-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:26:09 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24B412D0D8 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kImB20BnyOqE for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext2.iad.github.net [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBC1412DA93 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1464355551; bh=9/weWjJEZP0PYwJ6O5C5qguCxWwAu6PJU3Sj1zLumzw=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Kds9SnT1/n+HbPsBVvhM9RRnqxmDdfApEYF8R6/8vWFnYgU/maeoNhB3XEhc4aZHY dWEBa/YUi7kqywvhUEkx+yxjiA/YDgrdMI8RoibAkXA68VqafWCK9pSeVJ84Mwm7LK tVQ4xE5wJjw/P4t8l7QohvYBUpOfb1xm34LcSkvM= From: Justin Richer To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57484adf15a47_3be83f970b1dd29c35931e"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jricher X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-wg/cose-issues] Define a key parameter for IV (#61) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:26:01 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57484adf15a47_3be83f970b1dd29c35931e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closed #61. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/61#event-674450147 ----==_mimepart_57484adf15a47_3be83f970b1dd29c35931e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #61.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_57484adf15a47_3be83f970b1dd29c35931e-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:26:11 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3A412DA94 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2J4ldMlpNyjp for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext1.iad.github.net [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C8912DA9A for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:50 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1464355550; bh=YAenuXDi86sR4Ld0Km2a2q8xm5vmJmqgcxox3+3zE0Q=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=u0VpA8bC9+c9gu2iWgqUZJVgEw/TYgVT5FbHdOb9msX8B//lAsNCrz3j9JgQQKZgb Se47jQZwwJgt2TTX4L7dQb/466J0Yl0yCu08G/+twgbhG1NMUXReocGq1VhRVmnClz iAFIoKts5IUUqb9++DTulPguaYy6IhAsBUmwF0Bw= From: Justin Richer To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57484aded3b40_3fd53f970b1dd29c1577e8"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jricher X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-wg/cose-issues] Remove example features not implemented in the specification (#15) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:26:02 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57484aded3b40_3fd53f970b1dd29c1577e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closed #15. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/15#event-674450139 ----==_mimepart_57484aded3b40_3fd53f970b1dd29c1577e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #15.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_57484aded3b40_3fd53f970b1dd29c1577e8-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:26:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5747512DA94 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k87GvY7_gNZY for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext6.iad.github.net [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D1412DA9B for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:50 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1464355550; bh=FZm3hRq1A4L4I8TUT+nxdTV0x7SQe/NhJZZlf22Sj3s=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RX0Aeaz+7EQ+bat7zWSUBcplFBPq3Q7NU2sFOPS1uX7v+A734cauyEDZaHx12nuvJ ynd/1aJD+Ec9vst/7gviiM93IA3kZ60x0wNlR2DSRiqKkDacHDMunu5LElkqoOfeIG AgxthXY4TfiODsti1snz7KiA2SOXnRbsi/P3+bA0= From: Justin Richer To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57484ade9bf38_3dd53fbfc96612a012006d"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jricher X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] =?utf-8?q?=5Bcose-wg/cose-issues=5D_Move_=E2=80=9Ccreation?= =?utf-8?q?_time=E2=80=9D_value_to_the_payload_=28=2313=29?= X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:26:03 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57484ade9bf38_3dd53fbfc96612a012006d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closed #13. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/13#event-674450138 ----==_mimepart_57484ade9bf38_3dd53fbfc96612a012006d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #13.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_57484ade9bf38_3dd53fbfc96612a012006d-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:26:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EAF12D565 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cokwuhBA3utL for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext1.iad.github.net [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D623012DA99 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1464355551; bh=NJ00ByZtdaXpQu7IS1kx5JKlHCqOUGJ/ZwZTqZfUfQs=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=FV8UBR5P5lDi1kfebihNMb1vImOoh564CqBLBMSgxAO1ZgqFXgPUAvMNwSoh2Vc1h T6gYZWYusYAwJsGy+VcPd1cq89tJRTQKI72+9XCjWBBXs+lrqGMfUZtRv3Nup/+wUp B3cyqCVtW2v8hpLyVKHazHeAHMqIeiE92MeRvNWY= From: Justin Richer To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57484adf4374_38f53fca5f59329c2344ae"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jricher X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-wg/cose-issues] Should we support padding for Enveloped/Encrypted Messages (#53) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:26:08 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57484adf4374_38f53fca5f59329c2344ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closed #53. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/53#event-674450145 ----==_mimepart_57484adf4374_38f53fca5f59329c2344ae Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #53.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_57484adf4374_38f53fca5f59329c2344ae-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:26:19 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995712DA9A for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.961 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DH8GHuBLJc9s for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053EE12DA9C for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:25:51 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1464355551; bh=UP2On04VgiLWokm0uS3S4K/GFSj/uWSFFiouoixFm14=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=lPG1A2snDpEewqqNLCEGmfzSo32tlB+C++jQAXTu8JAUVlSR+OCzma3hfswSZvBev Ro6vrWBUYBx91bt0o94cN9cm6H5Raeiuxas1rnlLk2bZv12Y+nCugO78WvxYWzJ2gK xTOwollQqmeR9cvlgcBVf+wAbSEPwAD1P8b1PYAU= From: Justin Richer To: cose-wg/cose-issues Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_57484adf130ad_76423ff5242772bc10679"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: jricher X-GitHub-Recipient: cose-ietf X-GitHub-Reason: comment X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: cose@ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: Comment , cose-ietf Subject: Re: [COSE] [cose-wg/cose-issues] Tag Request Range for CBOR Tags (#54) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: cose-wg/cose-issues List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:26:09 -0000 ----==_mimepart_57484adf130ad_76423ff5242772bc10679 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closed #54. --- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues/54#event-674450146 ----==_mimepart_57484adf130ad_76423ff5242772bc10679 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #54.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

----==_mimepart_57484adf130ad_76423ff5242772bc10679-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:30:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481B812DA9D for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:30:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.747 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DilL4cEb433K for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD2E12DA97 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:30:42 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074422-77bff70000005530-ba-57484c01f72a Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 66.8B.21808.10C48475; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:30:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u4RDUeO7030989; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:30:40 -0400 Received: from [192.168.128.57] (static-96-237-195-53.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [96.237.195.53]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u4RDUcOS002322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 May 2016 09:30:39 -0400 To: "cose@ietf.org" From: Justin Richer Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:30:29 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------FBE746972615D397E4104DEE" X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nosvo4xFucPSdqMW0rVNZLRp25jsw eeycdZfdY8mSn0wBTFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGStffWUqeCFccWbHFPYGxh28XYycHBICJhIX Pr9k62Lk4hASaGOS2Hmgjx3C2cgo8W/BWqjMbSaJq6+usoK0iAgoS0w61gxmMwtYSGxb/p4N xGYTUJWYvqaFCcQWFlCSmHz2IVANBwevgJXE55e5IGEWoJJTP5Ywg9iiAjES27sms4PYvAKC EidnPmGBGBkmsep6C9sERt5ZSFKzkKQgbDOJeZsfMkPY8hLb384BsjmAbDWJZa1KMOHmrbOZ FzCyrWKUTcmt0s1NzMwpTk3WLU5OzMtLLdI11cvNLNFLTSndxAgOUhelHYwT/3kdYhTgYFTi 4WVwdg8XYk0sK67MPcQoycGkJMpb7OkRLsSXlJ9SmZFYnBFfVJqTWnyIUYKDWUmEV8EbKMeb klhZlVqUD5OS5mBREucNijwWJiSQnliSmp2aWpBaBJOV4eBQkuDd6QXUKFiUmp5akZaZU4KQ ZuLgBBnOAzT8NkgNb3FBYm5xZjpE/hSjopQ471GQhABIIqM0D64XlEQS3h42fcUoDvSKMK8F yG08wAQE1/0KaDAT0OAFLGCDSxIRUlINjAHZT7vP5Aeq2zQtvW9+ZFr1o8/LOOY73bX6ZWN2 LDU3afKBNx0WJt9XNPqbMMmde8Bvf8RcrTLokETTFqUvB+eFl3SlXLh2qNjD/MqhtW9nCLyI 3pB0ecEe7WP+269ol6wvO9u1fp17zP/cc5sr7r9QqDQ7VLRpkeWDDBXWJafmR/VXM81p/6vE UpyRaKjFXFScCACXpC18/QIAAA== Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty Subject: [COSE] Messages document in WGLC X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:30:47 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------FBE746972615D397E4104DEE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As announced two weeks ago, since we haven't seen any showstoppers or complaints on recently completed issues, the messages document is now in WGLC. We expect this LC to run for two weeks. Everyone, please review the current document and reply to the list with your reviews. Even if it's "I read it and everything looks good to me", that's helpful information for us to have in order to move things forward. -- Justin & Kepeng, your COSE chairs \. - - . ' _ , -`. ' _,' _,' ' ,-' _/ ' ,-' \ _/ ' ,' \ _' ' ' _\' ' , _,-' \ _________ \,_,--' \ \\_______\ \ \\+=+=+=+\ \ \\=+=+=+=\ \ \\+=+=+=+\ \ \\=+=+=+=\________ \ \\+=+=+=+____----)) \ \`---------.)))\\ \ ||+=+=+=+=+=\\ /\\ \ ||___________\\/ \\ \ ||------------\\ ejm \|| \\ --------------FBE746972615D397E4104DEE Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

As announced two weeks ago, since we haven't seen any showstoppers or complaints on recently completed issues, the messages document is now in WGLC. We expect this LC to run for two weeks.

Everyone, please review the current document and reply to the list with your reviews. Even if it's "I read it and everything looks good to me", that's helpful information for us to have in order to move things forward.

聽-- Justin & Kepeng, your COSE chairs


        \.  -   -  .
       '          _ , -`.
     '        _,'     _,'
    '      ,-'      _/
   '    ,-' \     _/
  '   ,'     \  _'
  '  '       _\'
  ' ,    _,-'  \     _________
  \,_,--'       \    \\_______\
                 \    \\+=+=+=+\
                  \    \\=+=+=+=\
                   \    \\+=+=+=+\
                    \    \\=+=+=+=\________
                     \    \\+=+=+=+____----))
                      \    \`---------.)))\\
                       \   ||+=+=+=+=+=\\ /\\
                        \  ||___________\\/ \\
                         \ ||------------\\
  ejm                     \||             \\

--------------FBE746972615D397E4104DEE-- From nobody Fri May 27 06:55:15 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7CD12D09B; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:55:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.221 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAU_V39OvT5z; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5D512B03C; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:55:11 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79486d0000069d0-d3-574851bd0b63 Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.54]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id C8.75.27088.DB158475; Fri, 27 May 2016 15:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB303.ericsson.se ([169.254.3.153]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Fri, 27 May 2016 15:55:09 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?R8O2cmFuIFNlbGFuZGVy?= To: Jim Schaad Thread-Topic: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt Thread-Index: AQHRrLA8zxOtG4N5eEGcMOBLfY7fkJ/AUcIAgAccvoCABXbggA== Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:55:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> <01f201d1b574$b491e8b0$1db5ba10$@augustcellars.com> In-Reply-To: <01f201d1b574$b491e8b0$1db5ba10$@augustcellars.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422 x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <278BCF617EDA434D9CA1A042E397094B@ericsson.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7me7eQI9wg48vZC3ebd3HaDFt61RW i9XTv7M5MHtsnDOdzWPJkp9MAUxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBltCzYwFvQ5Vtw/U9HAuMO+i5GT Q0LARGLBr+vsELaYxIV769m6GLk4hASOMEqc3j+PEcJZwijx4ch6VpAqNgEXiQcNj5hAbBEB dYmtq2+C2cwCIRLbus6zgNjCAvYSX858Z4eocZDY8fQb0FQOINtJ4sIqX5Awi4CqxIW3axlB bF4BC4nu2zOhFt9mlDi5ZxZYLydQ7/F3W8FmMgJd9/3UGqhd4hK3nsxngrhaQGLJnvPMELao xMvH/8DuFBXQk/hyD+QBDqC4osTyfjkQk1lAU2L9Ln2IKdYSO9Y2MkPYihJTuh+yQ5wjKHFy 5hOWCYwSs5Asm4XQPQtJ9ywk3bOQdC9gZF3FKFqcWpyUm25kpJdalJlcXJyfp5eXWrKJERiL B7f8NtjB+PK54yFGAQ5GJR7eB4Xu4UKsiWXFlbmHGCU4mJVEeP8FeIQL8aYkVlalFuXHF5Xm pBYfYpTmYFES5/V/qRguJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk2Xi4JRqYMxt41SO4w09VNWRs717aXnRrZ9+ c/as2t+94vPG8luvQ06KFCwK3nBbsFz0s+ME6zvM0xerPO/8J3ty08Z9e88G3X2afiNg+1kx 991bbv43mR9luH3ypFvhAobM2Vyn70s7vVi9/HJPt0JAk8VmjuX3Xp+9eO5+d78qw+GQqjq9 C/73WW9OyLulxFKckWioxVxUnAgAxSs2RcECAAA= Archived-At: Cc: "cose-chairs@ietf.org" , "cose@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:55:14 -0000 VGhhbmtzLCBJIHRoaW5rIGl0IGNvdmVycyB0aGUgcG9pbnRzIGRpc2N1c3NlZC4gSnVzdCBzb21l IG1pbm9yIHBvaW50cyBmb3INCmNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb246DQoNCiJTaGFyZWQgU2VjcmV0IHRvIEJ5 dGUgU3RyaW5nOuKAnQ0KDQpJIHVuZGVyc3RhbmQgdGhpcywgYnV0IG1heSBiZSBjb25mdXNpbmcg c2luY2UgdGhlIHRlcm0g4oCcc2hhcmVkIHNlY3JldOKAnSBpcw0KdXNlZCBlbHNld2hlcmUgaW4g dGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IGZvciB3aGF0IGhlcmUgaXMgY2FsbGVkICJCeXRlIFN0cmluZ+KAnS4gSQ0K ZG9u4oCZdCBoYXZlIGEgZ29vZCBwcm9wb3NhbCBmb3IgdGVybWlub2xvZ3kgdGhvdWdoLg0KDQoN CiJydW4gdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgSTJPU1AgZnVuY3Rpb24gZGVmaW5lZCBpbiA8eHJlZiB0YXJnZXQ9 IlJGQzM0NDciLz4gdXNpbmcNCnRoZSBzYW1lIGNvbXB1dGF0aW9uIGZvciBuIGFzIGlzIGRlZmlu ZWQgaW4gPHhyZWYgdGFyZ2V0PSJFQ0RTQSIvPi7igJ0NCg0KSXQgaXMgbm90IG9idmlvdXMgd2hh dCAg4oCcY29tcHV0YXRpb24gZm9yIG7igJ0gdGhhdCBpcyBiZWluZyByZWZlcnJlZC4NCg0KDQoN CkfDtnJhbg0KDQoNCg0KDQpPbiAyMDE2LTA1LTI0IDA2OjI4LCAiSmltIFNjaGFhZCIgPGlldGZA YXVndXN0Y2VsbGFycy5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+UGxlYXNlIGxvb2sgYXQgdGhpcyBhbmQgc2Vl IGlmIHlvdSB0aGluayBpdCBjb3ZlcnMgdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVkIGNoYW5nZXMuDQo+DQo+aHR0cHM6 Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL2Nvc2Utd2cvY29zZS1zcGVjL3B1bGwvMTUwDQo+DQo+amltDQo+DQo+DQo+ PiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPj4gRnJvbTogQ09TRSBbbWFpbHRvOmNvc2Ut Ym91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIEfDtnJhbiBTZWxhbmRlcg0KPj4gU2VudDog VGh1cnNkYXksIE1heSAxOSwgMjAxNiA2OjUyIEFNDQo+PiBUbzogSmltIFNjaGFhZCA8aWV0ZkBh dWd1c3RjZWxsYXJzLmNvbT4NCj4+IENjOiBjb3NlLWNoYWlyc0BpZXRmLm9yZzsgY29zZUBpZXRm Lm9yZw0KPj4gU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtDT1NFXSBGVzogSS1EIEFjdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1j b3NlLW1zZy0xMi50eHQNCj4+IA0KPj4gSGkgSmltDQo+PiANCj4+IEEgY291cGxlIG9mIHF1ZXN0 aW9ucyByZWxhdGVkIHRvIGFwcGx5aW5nIENPU0UgcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gaXNzdWVzIHdpdGgNCj4+ dGhlIGRyYWZ0DQo+PiBpdHNlbGYuDQo+PiANCj4+IDEuIEFzIHlvdSBrbm93IHdlIGFyZSBsb29r aW5nIGF0IGJ1aWxkaW5nIHNlY3VyaXR5IHByb3RvY29scyB1c2luZyBDT1NFLg0KPj4gRm9yIEVE SE9DIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gc3VwcG9ydCBYLjUwOSBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBiYXNlZCBhdXRoZW50aWNh dGlvbiBvZg0KPj50aGUgREgNCj4+IGV4Y2hhbmdlLiBXaXRoIFBTSyBhbmQgUlBLLCB3aGljaCBp cyBjdXJyZW50bHkgZGVzY3JpYmVkLCBFREhPQyBpcyBhbg0KPj4gZXhjaGFuZ2Ugb2YgQ09TRSBt ZXNzYWdlcy4gV2hhdCB3b3VsZCBiZSBhIG5hdHVyYWwgd2F5IHRvIGluY2x1ZGUgYQ0KPj5wdWJs aWMNCj4+IGtleSBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBpbiBhIENPU0VfU2lnbjEgb2JqZWN0LCB0aGUgcHVibGlj IGtleSBvZiB0aGUNCj4+Y2VydGlmaWNhdGUgaW50ZW5kZWQNCj4+IHRvIGJlIHVzZWQgYnkgdGhl IHJlY2lwaWVudCB0byB2ZXJpZnkgdGhlIHNpZ25hdHVyZSBvZiB0aGUgQ09TRSBvYmplY3Q/DQo+ PiANCj4+IA0KPj4gMi4gQW5vdGhlciB0aGluZyB3ZSBkaXNjdXNzZWQgcHJldmlvdXNseSB3YXMg dGhlIGRldGFpbGVkIHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24NCj4+Zm9yDQo+PiBkZXJpdmluZyB0aGUgc2hhcmVk IHNlY3JldCB3aXRoIEVDREgsIGFuYWxvZ291c2x5IHRvIHNlY3Rpb24gNy4zLjMgb2YNCj4+IGh0 dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLXRscy10bHMxMy0xMg0KPj4gDQo+ PiBJIG5vdGUgaW4gc2VjdGlvbiAxMi40LjENCj4+IA0KPj4gIiBUaGUgbWF0aGVtYXRpY3MgZm9y IEVsbGlwdGljIEN1cnZlIERpZmZpZS1IZWxsbWFuIGNhbiBiZSBmb3VuZCBpbg0KPj4gICAgW1JG QzYwOTBdLiAgSW4gdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB0aGUgYWxnb3JpdGhtIGlzIGV4dGVuZGVkIHRvIGJl IHVzZWQNCj4+ICAgIHdpdGggdGhlIHR3byBjdXJ2ZXMgZGVmaW5lZCBpbiBbUkZDNzc0OF0uDQo+ PiANCj4+ICAgIEVDREggaXMgcGFyYW1ldGVyaXplZCBieSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nOg0KPj4gDQo+ PiAgICBvICBDdXJ2ZSBUeXBlL0N1cnZlOiBUaGUgY3VydmUgc2VsZWN0ZWQgY29udHJvbHMgbm90 IG9ubHkgdGhlIHNpemUgb2YNCj4+ICAgICAgIHRoZSBzaGFyZWQgc2VjcmV0LCBidXQgdGhlIG1h dGhlbWF0aWNzIGZvciBjb21wdXRpbmcgdGhlIHNoYXJlZA0KPj4gICAgICAgc2VjcmV0LiDigJwN Cj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiBUaGVyZSBhcmUgYXQgbGVhc3QgdHdvIGtpbmRzIG9mIHNoYXJlZCBzZWNy ZXQsIG9uZSBpcyBhIHBvaW50IG9uIGENCj4+Y3VydmUsIGRlbm90ZWQNCj4+IGdeKGoqaykgaW4g UkZDNjA5MCwgb3IgYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmVseSBhIGNvb3JkaW5hdGUuIEFub3RoZXIgaXMgdGhlIGJ5 dGUNCj4+c3RyaW5nDQo+PiBkZXJpdmVkIGZyb20gZ14oaiprKSBvciBpdHMgY29vcmRpbmF0ZSwg dXNlZCBmb3Igc3Vic2VxdWVudCBrZXkNCj4+ZGVyaXZhdGlvbi4gIFRoZQ0KPj4gZm9ybWVyIGlz IGRlZmluZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgY3VydmUsIGJ1dCBub3QgbmVjZXNzYXJpbHkgdGhlIGxhdHRlci4N Cj4+IA0KPj4gRm9yIGV4YW1wbGUgaW4gdGhlIGNhc2Ugb2YgUkZDNzc0OCwgc2VjdGlvbiA2LjEs ICJBbGljZSBhbmQgQm9iIGNhbg0KPj50aGVuIHVzZSBhDQo+PiBrZXktZGVyaXZhdGlvbg0KPj4g ICAgZnVuY3Rpb24gdGhhdCBpbmNsdWRlcyBLLCBLX0EsIGFuZCBLX0IgdG8gZGVyaXZlIGEgc3lt bWV0cmljIGtleS7igJ0NCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiBTZWN0aW9uIDExIGluIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29z ZS1tc2cgbmljZWx5IGRlc2NyaWJlcyB0aGUga2V5IGRlcml2YXRpb24NCj4+Z2l2ZW4gdGhlDQo+ PiBzaGFyZWQgc2VjcmV0LCBidXQgSSBjYW7igJl0IGZpbmQgdGhlIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byB0aGUg ZXhhY3QgcHJvY2VkdXJlDQo+PmZvciBvYnRhaW5pbmcNCj4+IHRoZSBzaGFyZWQgc2VjcmV0IHN0 YXJ0aW5nIGZyb20gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NCj4+IA0KPj4gTm90IGluc2lzdGluZyBvbiBpdCBiZSBp bmNsdWRlZCBpbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiBGb3Igbm93IEkganVzdCB3YW50IGENCj4+Y29uZmlybWF0 aW9uDQo+PiB0aGF0IEkgaGF2ZW7igJl0IG1pc3NlZCBzb21ldGhpbmcuDQo+PiANCj4+IA0KPj4g R8O2cmFuDQo+PiANCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+PiANCj4+IE9uIDIwMTYtMDUtMTMgMDI6NDEsICJDT1NF IG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiBKaW0gU2NoYWFkIg0KPj48Y29zZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiBv biBiZWhhbGYgb2YgaWV0ZkBhdWd1c3RjZWxsYXJzLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+PiANCj4+ID5JIGJl bGlldmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHJlcHJlc2VudHMgYWxsIG9mIHRoZSBkZWNpc2lvbnMgdGhh dCB3ZXJlDQo+PiA+dGFrZW4gYXQgQkEuICBJIGhhdmUgYmVlbiB0aHJvdWdoIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBh IGNvdXBsZSBvZiB0aW1lcyB0byBsb29rDQo+PiA+Zm9yIHByb2JsZW1zIGFuZCBJIGJlbGlldmUg dGhhdCBpdCBpcyBub3cgcmVhZHkgZm9yIGEgd29ya2luZyBncm91cA0KPj4gPmxhc3QgY2FsbC4N Cj4+ID4NCj4+ID5KaW0NCj4+ID4NCj4+ID4NCj4+ID4+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0t LS0tDQo+PiA+PiBGcm9tOiBDT1NFIFttYWlsdG86Y29zZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBC ZWhhbGYgT2YgaW50ZXJuZXQtDQo+PiA+PiBkcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+ID4+IFNlbnQ6IFRo dXJzZGF5LCBNYXkgMTIsIDIwMTYgNToyMCBQTQ0KPj4gPj4gVG86IGktZC1hbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRm Lm9yZw0KPj4gPj4gQ2M6IGNvc2VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+ID4+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFtDT1NFXSBJLUQg QWN0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNvc2UtbXNnLTEyLnR4dA0KPj4gPj4NCj4+ID4+DQo+PiA+PiBB IE5ldyBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdCBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZnJvbSB0aGUgb24tbGluZSBJbnRlcm5l dC1EcmFmdHMNCj4+ID5kaXJlY3Rvcmllcy4NCj4+ID4+IFRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgYSB3b3JrIGl0 ZW0gb2YgdGhlIENCT1IgT2JqZWN0IFNpZ25pbmcgYW5kIEVuY3J5cHRpb24NCj4+ID4+b2YgdGhl DQo+PiA+SUVURi4NCj4+ID4+DQo+PiA+PiAgICAgICAgIFRpdGxlICAgICAgICAgICA6IENCT1Ig RW5jb2RlZCBNZXNzYWdlIFN5bnRheA0KPj4gPj4gICAgICAgICBBdXRob3IgICAgICAgICAgOiBK aW0gU2NoYWFkDQo+PiA+PiAJRmlsZW5hbWUgICAgICAgIDogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy0x Mi50eHQNCj4+ID4+IAlQYWdlcyAgICAgICAgICAgOiAxMTINCj4+ID4+IAlEYXRlICAgICAgICAg ICAgOiAyMDE2LTA1LTEyDQo+PiA+Pg0KPj4gPj4gQWJzdHJhY3Q6DQo+PiA+PiAgICBDb25jaXNl IEJpbmFyeSBPYmplY3QgUmVwcmVzZW50YXRpb24gKENCT1IpIGlzIGRhdGEgZm9ybWF0DQo+PmRl c2lnbmVkDQo+PiA+PiAgICBmb3Igc21hbGwgY29kZSBzaXplIGFuZCBzbWFsbCBtZXNzYWdlIHNp emUuICBUaGVyZSBpcyBhIG5lZWQgZm9yDQo+PnRoZQ0KPj4gPj4gICAgYWJpbGl0eSB0byBoYXZl IHRoZSBiYXNpYyBzZWN1cml0eSBzZXJ2aWNlcyBkZWZpbmVkIGZvciB0aGlzIGRhdGENCj4+ID4+ ICAgIGZvcm1hdC4gIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3BlY2lmaWVzIHByb2Nlc3NpbmcgZm9yIHNpZ25h dHVyZXMsDQo+Pm1lc3NhZ2UNCj4+ID4+ICAgIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGNvZGVzLCBhbmQgZW5j cnlwdGlvbiB1c2luZyBDQk9SLiAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudA0KPj5hbHNvDQo+PiA+PiAgICBzcGVj aWZpZXMgYSByZXByZXNlbnRhdGlvbiBmb3IgY3J5cHRvZ3JhcGhpYyBrZXlzIHVzaW5nIENCT1Iu DQo+PiA+Pg0KPj4gPj4NCj4+ID4+IFRoZSBJRVRGIGRhdGF0cmFja2VyIHN0YXR1cyBwYWdlIGZv ciB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGlzOg0KPj4gPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2Mv ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy8NCj4+ID4+DQo+PiA+PiBUaGVyZSdzIGFsc28gYSBodG1saXpl ZCB2ZXJzaW9uIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoNCj4+ID4+IGh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRt bC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNvc2UtbXNnLTEyDQo+PiA+Pg0KPj4gPj4gQSBkaWZmIGZyb20gdGhlIHBy ZXZpb3VzIHZlcnNpb24gaXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0Og0KPj4gPj4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5v cmcvcmZjZGlmZj91cmwyPWRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29zZS1tc2ctMTINCj4+ID4+DQo+PiA+Pg0KPj4g Pj4gUGxlYXNlIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBtYXkgdGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20g dGhlIHRpbWUgb2YNCj4+ID5zdWJtaXNzaW9uDQo+PiA+PiB1bnRpbCB0aGUgaHRtbGl6ZWQgdmVy c2lvbiBhbmQgZGlmZiBhcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnLg0KPj4gPj4NCj4+ ID4+IEludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0cyBhcmUgYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgYnkgYW5vbnltb3VzIEZUUCBh dDoNCj4+ID4+IGZ0cDovL2Z0cC5pZXRmLm9yZy9pbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHMvDQo+PiA+Pg0KPj4g Pj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4+ID4+ IENPU0UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+PiA+PiBDT1NFQGlldGYub3JnDQo+PiA+PiBodHRwczovL3d3 dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2Nvc2UNCj4+ID4NCj4+ID5fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPj4gPkNPU0UgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0 DQo+PiA+Q09TRUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPj4gPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vY29zZQ0KPj4gDQo+PiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fXw0KPj4gQ09TRSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4+IENPU0VAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4+IGh0 dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY29zZQ0KPg0KDQo= From nobody Fri May 27 09:46:05 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E198A12D76D for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:46:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8sG2zBWyKc6 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA74612D6DA for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:45:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=0wHRfFdN++GmE4hxYfcg0QKx9Rl/ffRXpz7g06onWBI=; b=bZbFPCpladEpStebbBc9EYI5SNK4/aajaKYCYTOmV1s+ooZqDbAbjUDFImRNxCEy2pEq2VbwGf6vEfLkWr1JcJ3gyImgfS0+cRODju9N/7EgWzpKRqrLfPDo9wsto83u+iuOPAs3ewcC9myPcRKlEWqC8i5UUkZF8fQ0LxsHyNA= Received: from SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.130.139) by SN1PR0301MB1648.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.130.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.497.12; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:45:52 +0000 Received: from SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.130.139]) by SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.130.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0497.025; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:45:52 +0000 From: Mike Jones To: Justin Richer , Jim Schaad Thread-Topic: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt Thread-Index: AQHRrWlMV/wYzD19KkK3uS4scB2I7p/NEuvQ Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:45:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> <659C8D5C-72B9-42E7-B6EA-B886FADC0D98@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <659C8D5C-72B9-42E7-B6EA-B886FADC0D98@mit.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mit.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [50.47.90.97] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f5caebb5-ff23-4d4a-73aa-08d3864e5d89 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0301MB1648; 5:MeNQ6WGzovrghu955BlWgiVjk7UBwrvDiLwlDUzM/XI3gFKs2rMzwzlTcRjVE3SzIYOpOlMi2v1J7ln6jB176+i5b3H8Fkc0RGVhGUWc7kNTx351HgYn/Qpb/MQCZanFAQCLZJl3S0hRLH8ph35lZg==; 24:XA9bpC/tnW8IdPlOGjL/BwcHIp5jP98gih/z/tRhgRFAqtqYaEhlsbfoabDtoAH5HvVtOBxoESDmcs9Cx/OokpThMacuT4P6q4tRWUeycd4=; 7:jmyPuWCUjl3t9a0ztkxUVqvp3JvjlxhLxFd/Qt/+5zkdtbZfj/n0PYo/5m4DosvBNFHnIiuc80YJwdAugdwI2Adauk18EZCKdqVaYoD8hyggTQMP0v89PnbtwA10P3XIRnpsbdswhxJm7vjdt1w0MGmYAtzHjYBbywaSSdbiyEkqvL4mWW0Zzxsa8u829wsrLtDxcLVkSnPQagIP2PiWzw== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(166708455590820)(192374486261705)(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; x-forefront-prvs: 09555FB1AD x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(13464003)(24454002)(377424004)(76176999)(92566002)(54356999)(189998001)(790700001)(5005710100001)(16236675004)(102836003)(11100500001)(6116002)(50986999)(3846002)(2900100001)(106116001)(2950100001)(5002640100001)(8676002)(3660700001)(10400500002)(9686002)(3280700002)(5003600100002)(230783001)(14971765001)(16601075003)(5001770100001)(122556002)(2906002)(19300405004)(99286002)(74316001)(5008740100001)(19625215002)(19617315012)(8936002)(586003)(10090500001)(33656002)(76576001)(86362001)(8990500004)(5004730100002)(10290500002)(1220700001)(19609705001)(77096005)(19580395003)(19580405001)(4326007)(66066001)(15975445007)(87936001)(2171001)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1648; H:SN1PR0301MB1645.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN1PR0301MB1645D8CD8DA268F62A587DA1F5420SN1PR0301MB1645_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2016 16:45:52.1732 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0301MB1648 Archived-At: Cc: cose Subject: Re: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:46:04 -0000 --_000_SN1PR0301MB1645D8CD8DA268F62A587DA1F5420SN1PR0301MB1645_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SnVzdGluLA0KDQpZb3Ugd3JvdGUgb24gdGhlIDEzdGggdGhhdCB3ZSBoYWQgdHdvIHdlZWtzIHRv IHJldmlldyB0aGVzZSBpc3N1ZXMgYW5kIEkgc2NoZWR1bGVkIHRpbWUgdG9kYXkgdG8gcmV2aWV3 IHRoZW0gYnV0IEkgZ290IHVwIHRoaXMgbW9ybmluZyBhbmQgZGlzY292ZXJlZCB0aGF0IHlvdeKA mWQgYWxyZWFkeSBjbG9zZWQgdGhlIGlzc3VlcyBiZWZvcmUgdGhlIHR3byB3ZWVrcyB3YXMgdXAg KHdoaWNoIHdvdWxkIGJlIGF0IDM6NDYgUGFjaWZpYyB0aW1lIHRoaXMgYWZ0ZXJub29uKS4gIEkg aG9wZSB0aGVyZWZvcmUgdGhhdCBpZiBJIHdhbnQgdG8gbWFrZSBjb21tZW50cyBvbiBhbnkgb2Yg dGhlIGNsb3NlZCBpc3N1ZXMgdG9kYXkgYXMgYSByZXN1bHQgb2YgbXkgcmV2aWV3cyB0aGF0IHlv deKAmWxsIHJlb3BlbiB0aGVtIHNvIEkgY2FuIGRvIHNvLg0KDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgVGhhbmsgeW91LA0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0tIE1pa2UNCg0K RnJvbTogQ09TRSBbbWFpbHRvOmNvc2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIEp1 c3RpbiBSaWNoZXINClNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgTWF5IDEzLCAyMDE2IDM6NDYgUE0NClRvOiBKaW0g U2NoYWFkIDxpZXRmQGF1Z3VzdGNlbGxhcnMuY29tPg0KQ2M6IGNvc2UgPGNvc2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc+ DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW0NPU0VdIEktRCBBY3Rpb246IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29zZS1tc2ctMTIu dHh0DQoNClRoYW5rcywgSmltLg0KDQpFdmVyeW9uZSwgcGxlYXNlIGxvb2sgb3ZlciB0aGUgY3Vy cmVudCBkcmFmdCBhcyB3ZWxsIGFzIHRoZSBpc3N1ZXMgbGlzdCAobW9zdCBvZiB3aGljaCBoYXZl IGJlZW4gbWFya2VkIOKAnENvbXBsZXRl4oCdLCBvciBvdGhlcndpc2UgcmVmZXIgdG8gc2VwYXJh dGUgZG9jdW1lbnRzKS4NCg0KaHR0cHM6Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL2Nvc2Utd2cvY29zZS1pc3N1ZXMv aXNzdWVzDQoNCldl4oCZbGwgZ2l2ZSBwZW9wbGUgdHdvIHdlZWtzIHN0YXJ0aW5nIHRvZGF5IHRv IGxvb2sgdGhpbmdzIG92ZXIgYW5kIGJyaW5nIHVwIGFueSBzaG93c3RvcHBlcnMsIHRoZW4gd2Xi gJlsbCBzdGFydCB0aGUgV0dMQyBpbiBlYXJuZXN0Lg0KDQog4oCUIEp1c3RpbiwgeW91ciBDT1NF IGNoYWlyDQoNCk9uIE1heSAxMiwgMjAxNiwgYXQgNzo0MSBQTSwgSmltIFNjaGFhZCA8aWV0ZkBh dWd1c3RjZWxsYXJzLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86aWV0ZkBhdWd1c3RjZWxsYXJzLmNvbT4+IHdyb3RlOg0K DQpJIGJlbGlldmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHJlcHJlc2VudHMgYWxsIG9mIHRoZSBkZWNpc2lv bnMgdGhhdCB3ZXJlIHRha2VuIGF0DQpCQS4gIEkgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHRocm91Z2ggdGhlIGRyYWZ0 IGEgY291cGxlIG9mIHRpbWVzIHRvIGxvb2sgZm9yIHByb2JsZW1zDQphbmQgSSBiZWxpZXZlIHRo YXQgaXQgaXMgbm93IHJlYWR5IGZvciBhIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgbGFzdCBjYWxsLg0KDQpKaW0N Cg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBDT1NFIFttYWlsdG86Y29z ZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgaW50ZXJuZXQtDQpkcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5v cmc8bWFpbHRvOmRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NClNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBNYXkgMTIsIDIwMTYg NToyMCBQTQ0KVG86IGktZC1hbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86aS1kLWFubm91bmNlQGll dGYub3JnPg0KQ2M6IGNvc2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmNvc2VAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQpTdWJqZWN0 OiBbQ09TRV0gSS1EIEFjdGlvbjogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy0xMi50eHQNCg0KDQpBIE5l dyBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdCBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZnJvbSB0aGUgb24tbGluZSBJbnRlcm5ldC1E cmFmdHMNCmRpcmVjdG9yaWVzLg0KDQpUaGlzIGRyYWZ0IGlzIGEgd29yayBpdGVtIG9mIHRoZSBD Qk9SIE9iamVjdCBTaWduaW5nIGFuZCBFbmNyeXB0aW9uIG9mIHRoZQ0KSUVURi4NCg0KDQogICAg ICAgVGl0bGUgICAgICAgICAgIDogQ0JPUiBFbmNvZGVkIE1lc3NhZ2UgU3ludGF4DQogICAgICAg QXV0aG9yICAgICAgICAgIDogSmltIFNjaGFhZA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgRmlsZW5hbWUgICAgICAg IDogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy0xMi50eHQNCiAgICAgICAgICAgIFBhZ2VzICAgICAgICAg ICA6IDExMg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgRGF0ZSAgICAgICAgICAgIDogMjAxNi0wNS0xMg0KDQpBYnN0 cmFjdDoNCiAgQ29uY2lzZSBCaW5hcnkgT2JqZWN0IFJlcHJlc2VudGF0aW9uIChDQk9SKSBpcyBk YXRhIGZvcm1hdCBkZXNpZ25lZA0KICBmb3Igc21hbGwgY29kZSBzaXplIGFuZCBzbWFsbCBtZXNz YWdlIHNpemUuICBUaGVyZSBpcyBhIG5lZWQgZm9yIHRoZQ0KICBhYmlsaXR5IHRvIGhhdmUgdGhl IGJhc2ljIHNlY3VyaXR5IHNlcnZpY2VzIGRlZmluZWQgZm9yIHRoaXMgZGF0YQ0KICBmb3JtYXQu ICBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcyBwcm9jZXNzaW5nIGZvciBzaWduYXR1cmVzLCBtZXNz YWdlDQogIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGNvZGVzLCBhbmQgZW5jcnlwdGlvbiB1c2luZyBDQk9SLiAg VGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBhbHNvDQogIHNwZWNpZmllcyBhIHJlcHJlc2VudGF0aW9uIGZvciBjcnlw dG9ncmFwaGljIGtleXMgdXNpbmcgQ0JPUi4NCg0KDQpUaGUgSUVURiBkYXRhdHJhY2tlciBzdGF0 dXMgcGFnZSBmb3IgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpczoNCmh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcv ZG9jL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29zZS1tc2cvDQoNClRoZXJlJ3MgYWxzbyBhIGh0bWxpemVkIHZlcnNp b24gYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0Og0KaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYt Y29zZS1tc2ctMTINCg0KQSBkaWZmIGZyb20gdGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIHZlcnNpb24gaXMgYXZhaWxh YmxlIGF0Og0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvcmZjZGlmZj91cmwyPWRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29z ZS1tc2ctMTINCg0KDQpQbGVhc2Ugbm90ZSB0aGF0IGl0IG1heSB0YWtlIGEgY291cGxlIG9mIG1p bnV0ZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgdGltZSBvZg0Kc3VibWlzc2lvbg0KDQp1bnRpbCB0aGUgaHRtbGl6ZWQg dmVyc2lvbiBhbmQgZGlmZiBhcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnPGh0dHA6Ly90 b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZz4uDQoNCkludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0cyBhcmUgYWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgYnkg YW5vbnltb3VzIEZUUCBhdDoNCmZ0cDovL2Z0cC5pZXRmLm9yZy9pbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHMvDQoN Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpDT1NFIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KQ09TRUBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86Q09TRUBpZXRmLm9yZz4NCmh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY29zZQ0KDQoNCg== --_000_SN1PR0301MB1645D8CD8DA268F62A587DA1F5420SN1PR0301MB1645_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1m YWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAy IDQ7fQ0KLyogU3R5bGUgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWws IGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJ Zm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIixzZXJpZjt9 DQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCglj b2xvcjpibHVlOw0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFu Lk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgljb2xvcjpw dXJwbGU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQpwLm1zb25vcm1hbDAsIGxpLm1z b25vcm1hbDAsIGRpdi5tc29ub3JtYWwwDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1uYW1lOm1zb25vcm1hbDsNCglt c28tbWFyZ2luLXRvcC1hbHQ6YXV0bzsNCgltYXJnaW4tcmlnaHQ6MGluOw0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1sZWZ0OjBpbjsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0K CWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLHNlcmlmO30NCnNwYW4uYXBwbGUtdGFiLXNw YW4NCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLW5hbWU6YXBwbGUtdGFiLXNwYW47fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTkN Cgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmki LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7DQoJY29sb3I6IzAwMjA2MDt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0KCXttc28tc3R5 bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O30NCkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0 aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4w aW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxl PjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIg c3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48 eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQi IGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8L2hlYWQ+ DQo8Ym9keSBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgbGluaz0iYmx1ZSIgdmxpbms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNs YXNzPSJXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZv bnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlm O2NvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjAiPkp1c3Rpbiw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0i TXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVv dDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Y29sb3I6IzAwMjA2MCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2NvbG9y OiMwMDIwNjAiPllvdSB3cm90ZSBvbiB0aGUgMTM8c3VwPnRoPC9zdXA+IHRoYXQgd2UgaGFkIHR3 byB3ZWVrcyB0byByZXZpZXcgdGhlc2UgaXNzdWVzIGFuZCBJIHNjaGVkdWxlZCB0aW1lIHRvZGF5 IHRvIHJldmlldyB0aGVtIGJ1dCBJIGdvdCB1cCB0aGlzIG1vcm5pbmcgYW5kIGRpc2NvdmVyZWQN CiB0aGF0IHlvdeKAmWQgYWxyZWFkeSBjbG9zZWQgdGhlIGlzc3VlcyBiZWZvcmUgdGhlIHR3byB3 ZWVrcyB3YXMgdXAgKHdoaWNoIHdvdWxkIGJlIGF0IDM6NDYgUGFjaWZpYyB0aW1lIHRoaXMgYWZ0 ZXJub29uKS4mbmJzcDsgSSBob3BlIHRoZXJlZm9yZSB0aGF0IGlmIEkgd2FudCB0byBtYWtlIGNv bW1lbnRzIG9uIGFueSBvZiB0aGUgY2xvc2VkIGlzc3VlcyB0b2RheSBhcyBhIHJlc3VsdCBvZiBt eSByZXZpZXdzIHRoYXQgeW914oCZbGwgcmVvcGVuIHRoZW0gc28NCiBJIGNhbiBkbyBzby48bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9u dC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7 Y29sb3I6IzAwMjA2MCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7 Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2NvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjAiPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyBUaGFuayB5b3UsPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmO2NvbG9yOiMwMDIwNjAiPiZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyAtLSBNaWtlPG86cD48L286cD48L3Nw YW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGEgbmFtZT0iX01haWxFbmRDb21wb3NlIj48 c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1 b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7Y29sb3I6IzAwMjA2MCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9h PjwvcD4NCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJtc28tYm9va21hcms6X01haWxFbmRDb21wb3NlIj48L3NwYW4+ DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLXRvcDpzb2xpZCAjRTFFMUUx IDEuMHB0O3BhZGRpbmc6My4wcHQgMGluIDBpbiAwaW4iPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+ PGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJy aSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5Gcm9tOjwvc3Bhbj48L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4gQ09T RSBbbWFpbHRvOmNvc2UtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10NCjxiPk9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiA8L2I+SnVz dGluIFJpY2hlcjxicj4NCjxiPlNlbnQ6PC9iPiBGcmlkYXksIE1heSAxMywgMjAxNiAzOjQ2IFBN PGJyPg0KPGI+VG86PC9iPiBKaW0gU2NoYWFkICZsdDtpZXRmQGF1Z3VzdGNlbGxhcnMuY29tJmd0 Ozxicj4NCjxiPkNjOjwvYj4gY29zZSAmbHQ7Y29zZUBpZXRmLm9yZyZndDs8YnI+DQo8Yj5TdWJq ZWN0OjwvYj4gUmU6IFtDT1NFXSBJLUQgQWN0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNvc2UtbXNnLTEyLnR4 dDxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9y bWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPlRoYW5rcywg SmltLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+RXZlcnlv bmUsIHBsZWFzZSBsb29rIG92ZXIgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZHJhZnQgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyB0aGUgaXNz dWVzIGxpc3QgKG1vc3Qgb2Ygd2hpY2ggaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1hcmtlZCDigJxDb21wbGV0ZeKAnSwg b3Igb3RoZXJ3aXNlIHJlZmVyIHRvIHNlcGFyYXRlIGRvY3VtZW50cykuJm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286 cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0 dHBzOi8vZ2l0aHViLmNvbS9jb3NlLXdnL2Nvc2UtaXNzdWVzL2lzc3VlcyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9naXRo dWIuY29tL2Nvc2Utd2cvY29zZS1pc3N1ZXMvaXNzdWVzPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8 L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5XZeKAmWxsIGdpdmUgcGVvcGxlIHR3 byB3ZWVrcyBzdGFydGluZyB0b2RheSB0byBsb29rIHRoaW5ncyBvdmVyIGFuZCBicmluZyB1cCBh bnkgc2hvd3N0b3BwZXJzLCB0aGVuIHdl4oCZbGwgc3RhcnQgdGhlIFdHTEMgaW4gZWFybmVzdC48 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+ Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+Jm5i c3A74oCUIEp1c3RpbiwgeW91ciBDT1NFIGNoYWlyPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxk aXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 YmxvY2txdW90ZSBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLXRvcDo1LjBwdDttYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjUuMHB0Ij4N CjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5PbiBNYXkgMTIsIDIwMTYsIGF0IDc6NDEgUE0s IEppbSBTY2hhYWQgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzppZXRmQGF1Z3VzdGNlbGxhcnMuY29tIj5p ZXRmQGF1Z3VzdGNlbGxhcnMuY29tPC9hPiZndDsgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxk aXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5JIGJlbGlldmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHJlcHJl c2VudHMgYWxsIG9mIHRoZSBkZWNpc2lvbnMgdGhhdCB3ZXJlIHRha2VuIGF0PGJyPg0KQkEuICZu YnNwO0kgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHRocm91Z2ggdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGEgY291cGxlIG9mIHRpbWVzIHRvIGxv b2sgZm9yIHByb2JsZW1zPGJyPg0KYW5kIEkgYmVsaWV2ZSB0aGF0IGl0IGlzIG5vdyByZWFkeSBm b3IgYSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGxhc3QgY2FsbC48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpKaW08YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8 YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tdG9w OjUuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206NS4wcHQiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+LS0tLS1P cmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS08YnI+DQpGcm9tOiBDT1NFIFs8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86Y29z ZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIj5tYWlsdG86Y29zZS1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPl0gT24g QmVoYWxmIE9mIGludGVybmV0LTxicj4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpkcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5vcmci PmRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnI+DQpTZW50OiBUaHVyc2RheSwgTWF5IDEyLCAyMDE2IDU6 MjAgUE08YnI+DQpUbzogPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmktZC1hbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRmLm9yZyI+aS1k LWFubm91bmNlQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4NCkNjOiA8YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86Y29zZUBpZXRm Lm9yZyI+Y29zZUBpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT48YnI+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbQ09TRV0gSS1EIEFjdGlvbjog ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy0xMi50eHQ8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpBIE5ldyBJbnRlcm5l dC1EcmFmdCBpcyBhdmFpbGFibGUgZnJvbSB0aGUgb24tbGluZSBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdHM8bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPmRpcmVjdG9y aWVzLjxicj4NCjxicj4NCjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdp bi10b3A6NS4wcHQ7bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTo1LjBwdCI+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5U aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGlzIGEgd29yayBpdGVtIG9mIHRoZSBDQk9SIE9iamVjdCBTaWduaW5nIGFuZCBF bmNyeXB0aW9uIG9mIHRoZTxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+SUVURi48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3Rl IHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tdG9wOjUuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206NS4wcHQiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9 Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGJyPg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5i c3A7VGl0bGUgJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7OiBDQk9SIEVuY29kZWQgTWVzc2FnZSBTeW50YXg8YnI+DQombmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDtBdXRob3IgJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7OiBKaW0gU2NoYWFkPGJyPg0KPHNw YW4gY2xhc3M9ImFwcGxlLXRhYi1zcGFuIj4mbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsm bmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgPC9zcGFuPkZpbGVuYW1lICZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOzogZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1z Zy0xMi50eHQ8YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iYXBwbGUtdGFiLXNwYW4iPiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyA8L3Nw YW4+UGFnZXMgJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7 Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7OiAxMTI8YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iYXBwbGUtdGFiLXNwYW4iPiZuYnNw OyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZuYnNwOyZu YnNwOyA8L3NwYW4+RGF0ZSAmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDs6IDIwMTYtMDUtMTI8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpBYnN0cmFj dDo8YnI+DQombmJzcDsmbmJzcDtDb25jaXNlIEJpbmFyeSBPYmplY3QgUmVwcmVzZW50YXRpb24g KENCT1IpIGlzIGRhdGEgZm9ybWF0IGRlc2lnbmVkPGJyPg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Zm9yIHNtYWxs IGNvZGUgc2l6ZSBhbmQgc21hbGwgbWVzc2FnZSBzaXplLiAmbmJzcDtUaGVyZSBpcyBhIG5lZWQg Zm9yIHRoZTxicj4NCiZuYnNwOyZuYnNwO2FiaWxpdHkgdG8gaGF2ZSB0aGUgYmFzaWMgc2VjdXJp dHkgc2VydmljZXMgZGVmaW5lZCBmb3IgdGhpcyBkYXRhPGJyPg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Zm9ybWF0 LiAmbmJzcDtUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcyBwcm9jZXNzaW5nIGZvciBzaWduYXR1cmVz LCBtZXNzYWdlPGJyPg0KJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7YXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gY29kZXMsIGFuZCBlbmNy eXB0aW9uIHVzaW5nIENCT1IuICZuYnNwO1RoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYWxzbzxicj4NCiZuYnNwOyZu YnNwO3NwZWNpZmllcyBhIHJlcHJlc2VudGF0aW9uIGZvciBjcnlwdG9ncmFwaGljIGtleXMgdXNp bmcgQ0JPUi48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpUaGUgSUVURiBkYXRhdHJhY2tlciBzdGF0dXMgcGFn ZSBmb3IgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpczo8YnI+DQo8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmll dGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNvc2UtbXNnLyI+aHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRm Lm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy88L2E+PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KVGhlcmUncyBhbHNv IGEgaHRtbGl6ZWQgdmVyc2lvbiBhdmFpbGFibGUgYXQ6PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly90 b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29zZS1tc2ctMTIiPmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMu aWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLWNvc2UtbXNnLTEyPC9hPjxicj4NCjxicj4NCkEgZGlm ZiBmcm9tIHRoZSBwcmV2aW91cyB2ZXJzaW9uIGlzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDo8YnI+DQo8YSBocmVm PSJodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9yZmNkaWZmP3VybDI9ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jb3NlLW1zZy0x MiI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvcmZjZGlmZj91cmwyPWRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29zZS1tc2ct MTI8L2E+PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KUGxlYXNlIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBtYXkgdGFrZSBhIGNv dXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRpbWUgb2Y8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvYmxvY2tx dW90ZT4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPnN1Ym1pc3Npb248YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tdG9wOjUuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0 b206NS4wcHQiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+dW50aWwgdGhlIGh0bWxpemVkIHZlcnNp b24gYW5kIGRpZmYgYXJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdCA8YSBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5v cmciPg0KdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+Ljxicj4NCjxicj4NCkludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0cyBhcmUg YWxzbyBhdmFpbGFibGUgYnkgYW5vbnltb3VzIEZUUCBhdDo8YnI+DQo8YSBocmVmPSJmdHA6Ly9m dHAuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzLyI+ZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0 LWRyYWZ0cy88L2E+PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+DQpDT1NFIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDxicj4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0 bzpDT1NFQGlldGYub3JnIj5DT1NFQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY29zZSI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcv bWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9jb3NlPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNw OzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_SN1PR0301MB1645D8CD8DA268F62A587DA1F5420SN1PR0301MB1645_-- From nobody Fri May 27 13:34:09 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A5712D8CC; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:34:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c0_mJMLWavrd; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205C912D62A; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hebrews (c-24-21-96-37.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.21.96.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82DEB2CA06; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:34:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: =?utf-8?Q?'G=C3=B6ran_Selander'?= References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> <01f201d1b574$b491e8b0$1db5ba10$@augustcellars.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:34:04 -0700 Message-ID: <05dd01d1b857$1d77a1a0$5866e4e0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQFv/JeYi+kl86wFCwHOAHo/0sSXmQKWYCE2AYrVDYIBR88X+wJK6xyUoFMVLeA= Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 20:34:09 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G=C3=B6ran = Selander > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 6:55 AM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org; cose@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt >=20 > Thanks, I think it covers the points discussed. Just some minor points = for > consideration: >=20 > "Shared Secret to Byte String:=E2=80=9D >=20 > I understand this, but may be confusing since the term =E2=80=9Cshared = secret=E2=80=9D is used > elsewhere in the document for what here is called "Byte = String=E2=80=9D. I don=E2=80=99t have a > good proposal for terminology though. Yeah, I am still trying to come up with something better. >=20 >=20 > "run through the I2OSP function defined in = using the > same computation for n as is defined in .=E2=80=9D >=20 > It is not obvious what =E2=80=9Ccomputation for n=E2=80=9D that is = being referred. Does this mean that you did not figure out that it was a reference to a = section in the document (section 8.1) or that you did not understand how = n was computed in that section? Jim >=20 >=20 >=20 > G=C3=B6ran >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 2016-05-24 06:28, "Jim Schaad" wrote: >=20 > >Please look at this and see if you think it covers the required = changes. > > > >https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-spec/pull/150 > > > >jim > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G=C3=B6ran = Selander > >> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:52 AM > >> To: Jim Schaad > >> Cc: cose-chairs@ietf.org; cose@ietf.org > >> Subject: Re: [COSE] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> > >> Hi Jim > >> > >> A couple of questions related to applying COSE rather than issues > >>with the draft itself. > >> > >> 1. As you know we are looking at building security protocols using = COSE. > >> For EDHOC we need to support X.509 certificate based authentication > >>of the DH exchange. With PSK and RPK, which is currently described, > >>EDHOC is an exchange of COSE messages. What would be a natural way = to > >>include a public key certificate in a COSE_Sign1 object, the public > >>key of the certificate intended to be used by the recipient to = verify > >>the signature of the COSE object? > >> > >> > >> 2. Another thing we discussed previously was the detailed > >>specification for deriving the shared secret with ECDH, analogously > >>to section 7.3.3 of > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-12 > >> > >> I note in section 12.4.1 > >> > >> " The mathematics for Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman can be found in > >> [RFC6090]. In this document the algorithm is extended to be = used > >> with the two curves defined in [RFC7748]. > >> > >> ECDH is parameterized by the following: > >> > >> o Curve Type/Curve: The curve selected controls not only the = size of > >> the shared secret, but the mathematics for computing the = shared > >> secret. =E2=80=9C > >> > >> > >> There are at least two kinds of shared secret, one is a point on a > >>curve, denoted > >> g^(j*k) in RFC6090, or alternatively a coordinate. Another is the > >>byte string derived from g^(j*k) or its coordinate, used for > >>subsequent key derivation. The former is defined with the curve, = but > >>not necessarily the latter. > >> > >> For example in the case of RFC7748, section 6.1, "Alice and Bob can > >>then use a key-derivation > >> function that includes K, K_A, and K_B to derive a symmetric = key.=E2=80=9D > >> > >> > >> Section 11 in draft-ietf-cose-msg nicely describes the key = derivation > >>given the shared secret, but I can=E2=80=99t find the reference to = the exact > >>procedure for obtaining the shared secret starting from this draft. > >> > >> Not insisting on it be included in this draft. For now I just want = a > >>confirmation that I haven=E2=80=99t missed something. > >> > >> > >> G=C3=B6ran > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2016-05-13 02:41, "COSE on behalf of Jim Schaad" > >> >> on behalf of ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > >> > >> >I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that = were > >> >taken at BA. I have been through the draft a couple of times to > >> >look for problems and I believe that it is now ready for a working > >> >group last call. > >> > > >> >Jim > >> > > >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > >> >> drafts@ietf.org > >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM > >> >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >> >> Cc: cose@ietf.org > >> >> Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line = Internet-Drafts > >> >directories. > >> >> This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and > >> >>Encryption of the > >> >IETF. > >> >> > >> >> Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax > >> >> Author : Jim Schaad > >> >> Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > >> >> Pages : 112 > >> >> Date : 2016-05-12 > >> >> > >> >> Abstract: > >> >> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format > >>designed > >> >> for small code size and small message size. There is a need > >> >> for > >>the > >> >> ability to have the basic security services defined for this = data > >> >> format. This document specifies processing for signatures, > >>message > >> >> authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This = document > >>also > >> >> specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > >> >> > >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > >> >> > >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time = of > >> >submission > >> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at = tools.ietf.org. > >> >> > >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> COSE mailing list > >> >> COSE@ietf.org > >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >COSE mailing list > >> >COSE@ietf.org > >> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> COSE mailing list > >> COSE@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > >=20 > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Sat May 28 17:12:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA9E12D14E for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 17:12:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.646 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bs-i5hTUVJs5 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 17:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE59612D169 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074422-78fff70000005530-7a-574a33cb60c9 Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 95.20.21808.BC33A475; Sat, 28 May 2016 20:11:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u4T0Bsks002050; Sat, 28 May 2016 20:11:54 -0400 Received: from [192.168.128.57] (static-96-237-195-53.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [96.237.195.53]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u4T0Bq6o024779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 May 2016 20:11:53 -0400 To: Mike Jones , Jim Schaad References: <20160513001947.31649.3013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <03f201d1acb0$38068cf0$a813a6d0$@augustcellars.com> <659C8D5C-72B9-42E7-B6EA-B886FADC0D98@mit.edu> From: Justin Richer Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 20:11:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------587C0F17032FE0A98A3E7361" X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT1z1r7BVusHiVoMW0rVNZLVZP/85m sXfaJxYHZo+Nc6azeSxZ8pPJo3XHX/YA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujB+b3jAVnJ7LWHG5extr A+OnnC5GTg4JAROJyft2M4HYQgJtTBIzj6l2MXIB2RsZJS5PXccI4dxmknj0+CdYlbCAlcS/ fSuZQWwRgSiJBz+vM0EU/WOUuD77OliCWUBCovnFc3YQm01AVWL6mhawZl6g5pbezywgNgtQ /PCqGWA1ogIxEtu7JrND1AhKnJz5BKyGUyBRYtqLFVAzwyQmbPvJNIGRfxaSsllIUhC2mcS8 zQ+ZIWx5ieats4FsDiBbTWJZqxKy8AJGtlWMsim5Vbq5iZk5xanJusXJiXl5qUW6pnq5mSV6 qSmlmxjB4e6itINx4j+vQ4wCHIxKPLwdQl7hQqyJZcWVuYcYJTmYlER5mS57hAvxJeWnVGYk FmfEF5XmpBYfYpTgYFYS4TXSAyrnTUmsrEotyodJSXOwKInzBkUeCxMSSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJ ynBwKEnwnjECahQsSk1PrUjLzClBSDNxcIIM5wEavgWkhre4IDG3ODMdIn+KUVFKnPesIVBC ACSRUZoH1wtKRwlvD5u+YhQHekWYlxmYnIR4gKkMrvsV0GAmoMELWDxABpckIqSkGhibSnZ8 3a03/354+5eTdhvrznw+1eSbvdaVuaF8ffH1Sfufx15UOFOebnZf2OLP183zA7KEOVgYSrYf m8pzN/Ok8dsDr/vmOZ/Ykq/pZyXBx7mi5cWGvs3FO0TcZN9tO/hK5N7fKevuzjDap1oXlvTZ MnaayoOe/KuhkemBjc9O8B37Umm3puGSEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA+iQsxSIDAAA= Archived-At: Cc: cose Subject: Re: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 00:12:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------587C0F17032FE0A98A3E7361 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mike, I think it's a little ridiculous to expect a fully two-week window to be open to the exact minute from which it was specified in email, a medium which is prone to delays and delivery oddities at the best of times. The review period was in fact two weeks long and was closed on the calendar day specified. I'm sorry that this confused you. Maybe I'll start saying "fortnight" instead so that people realize the implied loose granularity? Regardless, in case anyone else is still confused: the WGLC will close sometime on June 10. You've got almost two weeks, people, don't put off your reviews until the last second. As for the present: Whatever issues you may have discovered during your review on the last day can still be brought up. WGLC isn't the *end* of comments, it's a period *for* comments. You can comment on closed issues without my reopening anything, and thus I will not be reopening any issues. However, as the document is currently in WGLC, I would prefer if you bring the review to the list as requested in the WGLC email. If you've got something to say about COSE then now is a really, really good time to say it. Thank you, -- Justin, your COSE chair On 5/27/2016 12:45 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > > Justin, > > You wrote on the 13^th that we had two weeks to review these issues > and I scheduled time today to review them but I got up this morning > and discovered that you鈥檇 already closed the issues before the two > weeks was up (which would be at 3:46 Pacific time this afternoon). I > hope therefore that if I want to make comments on any of the closed > issues today as a result of my reviews that you鈥檒l reopen them so I > can do so. > > Thank you, > > -- Mike > > *From:*COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Justin Richer > *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2016 3:46 PM > *To:* Jim Schaad > *Cc:* cose > *Subject:* Re: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > > Thanks, Jim. > > Everyone, please look over the current draft as well as the issues > list (most of which have been marked 鈥淐omplete鈥, or otherwise refer to > separate documents). > > https://github.com/cose-wg/cose-issues/issues > > We鈥檒l give people two weeks starting today to look things over and > bring up any showstoppers, then we鈥檒l start the WGLC in earnest. > > 鈥 Justin, your COSE chair > > On May 12, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Jim Schaad > wrote: > > I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that > were taken at > BA. I have been through the draft a couple of times to look for > problems > and I believe that it is now ready for a working group last call. > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: cose@ietf.org > Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and > Encryption of the > > IETF. > > > Title : CBOR Encoded Message Syntax > Author : Jim Schaad > Filename : draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt > Pages : 112 > Date : 2016-05-12 > > Abstract: > Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format > designed > for small code size and small message size. There is a need > for the > ability to have the basic security services defined for this > data > format. This document specifies processing for signatures, > message > authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. This > document also > specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-msg-12 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org . > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > --------------587C0F17032FE0A98A3E7361 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Mike,

I think it's a little ridiculous to expect a fully two-week window to be open to the exact minute from which it was specified in email, a medium which is prone to delays and delivery oddities at the best of times. The review period was in fact two weeks long and was closed on the calendar day specified. I'm sorry that this confused you. Maybe I'll start saying "fortnight" instead so that people realize the implied loose granularity? Regardless, in case anyone else is still confused: the WGLC will close sometime on June 10. You've got almost two weeks, people, don't put off your reviews until the last second.

As for the present: Whatever issues you may have discovered during your review on the last day can still be brought up. WGLC isn't the *end* of comments, it's a period *for* comments. You can comment on closed issues without my reopening anything, and thus I will not be reopening any issues. However, as the document is currently in WGLC, I would prefer if you bring the review to the list as requested in the WGLC email.

If you've got something to say about COSE then now is a really, really good time to say it.

Thank you,

聽-- Justin, your COSE chair

On 5/27/2016 12:45 PM, Mike Jones wrote:

Justin,

You wrote on the 13th that we had two weeks to review these issues and I scheduled time today to review them but I got up this morning and discovered that you鈥檇 already closed the issues before the two weeks was up (which would be at 3:46 Pacific time this afternoon).聽 I hope therefore that if I want to make comments on any of the closed issues today as a result of my reviews that you鈥檒l reopen them so I can do so.

聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Thank you,

聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 -- Mike

From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Justin Richer
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:46 PM
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Cc: cose <cose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt

Thanks, Jim.

Everyone, please look over the current draft as well as the issues list (most of which have been marked 鈥淐omplete鈥, or otherwise refer to separate documents).聽

We鈥檒l give people two weeks starting today to look things over and bring up any showstoppers, then we鈥檒l start the WGLC in earnest.

聽鈥 Justin, your COSE chair

On May 12, 2016, at 7:41 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:

I believe that this draft represents all of the decisions that were taken at
BA. 聽I have been through the draft a couple of times to look for problems
and I believe that it is now ready for a working group last call.

Jim



-----Original Message-----
From: COSE [mailto:cose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:20 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: cose@ietf.org
Subject: [COSE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts

directories.

This draft is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption of the

IETF.


聽聽聽聽聽聽聽Title 聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽: CBOR Encoded Message Syntax
聽聽聽聽聽聽聽Author 聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽: Jim Schaad
聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Filename 聽聽聽聽聽聽聽: draft-ietf-cose-msg-12.txt
聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Pages 聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽: 112
聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Date 聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽: 2016-05-12

Abstract:
聽聽Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is data format designed
聽聽for small code size and small message size. 聽There is a need for the
聽聽ability to have the basic security services defined for this data
聽聽format. 聽This document specifies processing for signatures, message
聽聽authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR. 聽This document also
聽聽specifies a representation for cryptographic keys using CBOR.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-12

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-msg-12


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of

submission

until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose


--------------587C0F17032FE0A98A3E7361-- From nobody Tue May 31 06:44:43 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietf.org Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6510D12D107; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:44:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160531134441.18599.8170.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 06:44:41 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, cose-chairs@ietf.org, cose@ietf.org, kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com Subject: [COSE] cose - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96 X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:44:41 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Kepeng Li, a Chair of the cose working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Area Name: Security Area Session Requester: Kepeng Li Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours Number of Attendees: 50 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: ace core oauth abfab sacm radext dime tls Second Priority: dane httpauth kitten saag Third Priority: httpbis sidr Special Requests: ---------------------------------------------------------