From James.Winterbottom@andrew.com Wed Sep 2 17:19:03 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD4C3A6B7F; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:19:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.316 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.316 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.083, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VlnU+mFaz6Ro; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from andrew.com (smtp3.andrew.com [198.135.207.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30D53A63EC; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:18:12 -0700 (PDT) X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_910__2009_09_02_19_23_05 X-SEF-16EBA1E9-99E8-4E1D-A1CA-4971F5510AF: 1 Received: from acdcexbh1.andrew.com [10.86.20.91] by smtp3.andrew.com - SurfControl E-mail Filter (5.2.1); Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:23:05 -0500 Received: from AHQEX1.andrew.com ([10.86.20.21]) by acdcexbh1.andrew.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:59:51 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA2C29.754507F2" Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:59:49 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Emergency Services Workshop Asia, Registration is open Thread-Index: AcosKXSPO6+b0dPJSbm/+d2C8YaS/Q== From: "Winterbottom, James" To: "GEOPRIV" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Sep 2009 23:59:51.0292 (UTC) FILETIME=[75AB43C0:01CA2C29] Subject: [Ecrit] Emergency Services Workshop Asia, Registration is open X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:19:03 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA2C29.754507F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,=0D=0A=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=0D=0AHere is the link to register for the Emer= gency Services Workshop in=0D=0AAsia.=0D=0A=0D=0AThis is the week prior to = the IETF meeting in Hiroshima=0D=0A=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=0D=0Ahttp://113.29.237.5= 3/andrew/APESW/=0D=0A=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=0D=0ACheers=0D=0A=0D=0AJames=0D=0A=0D=0A= =20=0D=0A=0D=0A=20=0D=0A=0D=0A---------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------------=0D=0AThis message is fo= r the designated recipient only and may=0D=0Acontain privileged, proprietar= y, or otherwise private information. =20=0D=0AIf you have received it in er= ror, please notify the sender=0D=0Aimmediately and delete the original. An= y unauthorized use of=0D=0Athis email is prohibited.=0D=0A-----------------= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----=0D=0A[mf2]=0D=0A ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA2C29.754507F2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A
=0D=0A=0D= =0A

Hi All,

=0D=0A=0D= =0A

 

=0D=0A=0D= =0A

Here is the link to register for the Emer= gency Services=0D=0AWorkshop in Asia.

=0D=0A=0D=0A

This i= s the week prior to the IETF meeting in Hiroshima=0D=0A=0D=0A

 <= /p>=0D=0A=0D=0A

http://113.29.237.53/andrew/APESW/<= /font>

=0D=0A=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A=0D=0A

<= span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;=0D=0Afont-family:Arial'>Cheers

=0D=0A=0D=0A

James=

=0D=0A=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A=0D=0A
=0D=0A=0D=0A


-------------------------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------
=0D=0AThis me= ssage is for the designated recipient only&nb= sp;and may
=0D=0Acontain privileged, proprietary, or=  otherwise private information.  
=0D=0AIf = ;you have received it in error, please n= otify the sender
=0D=0Aimmediately and delete t= he original.  Any unauthorized use of
=0D=0A= this email is prohibited.
=0D=0A-------------------------= -----------------------------------------------------------------------
=0D= =0A[mf2]
=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA2C29.754507F2-- From rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Thu Sep 3 17:00:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A983A6964; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:00:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -16.823 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.823 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.776, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SfAFEUhvvKf4; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91603A67A1; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:00:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70) id 4E1AE314934; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:41:54 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20090903224154.4E1AE314934@bosco.isi.edu> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ecrit@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Ecrit] RFC 5582 on Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and Framework X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:16 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5582 Title: Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and Framework Author: H. Schulzrinne Status: Informational Date: September 2009 Mailbox: hgs+ecrit@cs.columbia.edu Pages: 17 Characters: 42078 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ecrit-mapping-arch-04.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5582.txt This document describes an architecture for a global, scalable, resilient, and administratively distributed system for mapping geographic location information to URLs, using the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) protocol. The architecture generalizes well-known approaches found in hierarchical lookup systems such as DNS. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This document is a product of the Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team USC/Information Sciences Institute From mlinsner@cisco.com Fri Sep 25 14:09:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEDD3A6908 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.506 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.304, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRwNH7xZRG2X for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0AE3A68C9 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:09:15 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwEAP/OvEpAZnme/2dsb2JhbACCJi6XCqUAiFMBj3cFhB4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,453,1249257600"; d="scan'208,217";a="59995941" Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2009 21:10:26 +0000 Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8PLAQsF031916 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:10:26 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8PLAQl7029932 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:10:26 GMT Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:10:26 -0400 Received: from [10.116.195.120] ([10.116.195.120]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:10:25 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:10:23 -0400 From: Marc Linsner To: "'ecrit'" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Hiroshima Agenda Thread-Index: Aco+JJhlOaSNrw+zJkORY/qimPIrZA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3336743425_1987236" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2009 21:10:26.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[9A3882E0:01CA3E24] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=817; t=1253913026; x=1254777026; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20 |Subject:=20Hiroshima=20Agenda |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22'ecrit'=22=20; bh=nrMP747xn3H2gdnBbXX3wgWV2cCNbMx90pMCmSerC44=; b=Yxvz/IKuhyHVbAs17p2BPqylKyctx841Icu+gsxzWlPvLOuhCqsmNSf/2g wT+MQ+o0HvIqgoPnGKmG1WDhg34L5jp4BRcjpFB8x0xLN8CZ8xjNs0HD+Y/L NdjxNrb3+E; Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mlinsner@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; ); Subject: [Ecrit] Hiroshima Agenda X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:09:16 -0000 > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3336743425_1987236 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit If you are planning to present your draft in Hiroshima, let us know, we are working on the agenda. Thanks, -Marc & Hannes- --B_3336743425_1987236 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hiroshima Agenda If you are planning to present your draft in Hiroshima, let us know, we ar= e working on the agenda.

Thanks,

-Marc & Hannes-
--B_3336743425_1987236-- From mlinsner@cisco.com Mon Sep 28 11:24:50 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9771A3A6916 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:24:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.297, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xlrtkuAaEEOS for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AD33A69EC for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:24:49 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao4FAN2cwEpAZnme/2dsb2JhbACCJS+XDaZgiFMBjjwFhB4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,468,1249257600"; d="scan'208,217";a="60363354" Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2009 18:26:07 +0000 Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8SIQ7DL027849 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:26:07 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8SIQ7v8004177 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:26:07 GMT Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:26:07 -0400 Received: from [10.116.195.123] ([10.116.195.123]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:26:06 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:26:05 -0400 From: Marc Linsner To: "'ecrit'" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Hiroshima Thread-Index: AcpAaSPPu0aG3MUmrkqHywrVf+Gdxw== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3336992766_1347749" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2009 18:26:07.0024 (UTC) FILETIME=[2503F300:01CA4069] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=955; t=1254162367; x=1255026367; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20 |Subject:=20Hiroshima |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22'ecrit'=22=20; bh=uRxa/ughvZTJTGjlrMol3efGa/jVMr5szMG4NUNk7Yk=; b=UoaWT2OFFfAwWTPazBexfTZPaq5tu0GC3KOoSKWYT/l+9H6yYNn6F6XZvN /XcxIfB9hrTV2SdF7a3jkcH6efmcNbK22tZezXJ3nMcYXdxxU3u24b+0/0ai Fpzzqu0NjJ; Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mlinsner@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; ); Subject: [Ecrit] Hiroshima X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:24:50 -0000 > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3336992766_1347749 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit We got very little response from our question about agenda items for Hiroshima. So, next question. Who is planning on attending the ECRIT meeting in Hiroshima? Thanks, -Marc & Hannes- --B_3336992766_1347749 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hiroshima We got very little response from our question about agenda items for Hiros= hima.  So, next question.

Who is planning on attending the ECRIT meeting in Hiroshima?

Thanks,

-Marc & Hannes-
--B_3336992766_1347749-- From mlinsner@cisco.com Wed Sep 30 05:48:23 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A843A682F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:48:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.492 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8G1O47digw9 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948993A693F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:48:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; l=745; q=dns/txt; s=sjiport01001; t=1254314985; x=1255524585; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20|Subject: =20Liaison=20from=203GPP|Date:=20Wed,=2030=20Sep=202009 =2008:49:08=20-0400|Message-ID:=20|To:=20"'ecrit'"=20 |Mime-version:=201.0; bh=HEz7XuuqdGIlESPISPyNaNfJYM6uT2K4AdFsNAsHIlU=; b=te26viSk28LIwJwj5vIDZgXo2LNR7tq8FaOttPRF+O4hCt1GqXjMUZSh 4dxkS1kNew4+6atBcKrbx/MQX+0JXViz+yDxjCMTQxraCOYyR9xVKwMM3 kZ3OaYnYrLK76JrfZruA3LGsCWJ7kg7hOKjw/XjBFwwyO7jY9TCKUC9No s=; Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=pass (partially verified [697 bytes] [TEST]) header.i=mlinsner@cisco.com X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiIFAF/wwkqrR7PD/2dsb2JhbACCJyyXCqY7iFsBkAgGhCc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,480,1249257600"; d="scan'208,217";a="249015797" Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2009 12:49:45 +0000 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8UCnjiE001831 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:49:45 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8UCnia3025227 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:49:45 GMT Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:49:44 -0400 Received: from [10.116.195.123] ([10.116.195.123]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:49:17 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:49:08 -0400 From: Marc Linsner To: "'ecrit'" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Liaison from 3GPP Thread-Index: AcpBzGZdvxPbY/pZTUe/q6zHB6vtBg== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3337145357_2934928" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2009 12:49:18.0537 (UTC) FILETIME=[6CA50B90:01CA41CC] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=697; t=1254314985; x=1255178985; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20 |Subject:=20Liaison=20from=203GPP |Sender:=20; bh=XsdhzdYBVX7i54p7d7QHON6bkaT+v3dSGVa606nFOi0=; b=q6EjU9qd6jZz0LfSaHvkE3OuB5I3js4iDf0/IuW5RbLYEOOy2YU3+/jMLG i9EijETC2MiX3NT9TMRyvK8glVkCqRSNUE/Bw7VavY7HPaTSalAAIAB1F3Ic x8OPsn3gb2; Subject: [Ecrit] Liaison from 3GPP X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:48:23 -0000 > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3337145357_2934928 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/577/ --B_3337145357_2934928 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Liaison from 3GPP https://datatracker.ie= tf.org/liaison/577/

--B_3337145357_2934928-- From hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com Wed Sep 30 06:35:28 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C823A6864 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:35:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.504 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.606, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpfr4xaYRjgi for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE683A659C for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8UDajGH032282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:36:48 +0200 Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (demuexc023.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8UDajQ4011191 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:36:45 +0200 Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:36:45 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:36:45 +0300 Message-ID: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4501BE7D30@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Service URN IANA Policy Thread-Index: AcpB0VE9kJjIrzhnSlCzwWVYadPtWA== From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2009 13:36:45.0412 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D83B240:01CA41D3] Subject: [Ecrit] Service URN IANA Policy X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:35:28 -0000 Hi all,=20 we discussed the need to change the IANA allocation policy for the definition of new top-level services within this working group a few times. With the http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy-00 proposal Henning and Andrea have describe the modification. We would change the allocation policy of top-level services from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review".=20 The policy for assigning labels to sub-services is left unchanged and may differ for each top-level service designation and must be defined by the document describing the top-level service. For the Service URN RFC (RFC 5031) two sub-services are defined, namely 'sos' and 'counseling'. The policy for adding sub-services to the 'sos' and the 'counseling' services, as defined in RFC 5031, is "Expert Review". In order to progress draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy-00 we would like to know whether someone has problems with this allocation policy change. Ciao Hannes & Marc From ted.ietf@gmail.com Wed Sep 30 09:43:02 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AF03A6870 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:43:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.191 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.408, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qe0zzAnauaZe for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f197.google.com (mail-pz0-f197.google.com [209.85.222.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534DE3A659B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pzk35 with SMTP id 35so6738822pzk.29 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:44:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=btLWt75U30Bw7mPzirjsTuZfrw4IX8UWSahRAWibV2o=; b=eKQbql/OZJax3s1iuOGI2c6eolnrvuBO9qYJ/T/1Bvz++i6av04/FWEy+W+rcWWu5N RBSGTF7vJVxVdbEjtIGcjLpUFsoAhaL5CwMGIO7MVoyeZZ9NhXMxpejiUfuaSKJY0PHY dLxzZF/XyWiPTsF2aCnhkBYzCUGHdvz+yEfgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=K1uWhEPQr2T2lZF9e1ap0jqCtTmBwQqJr1+hqkbljDvqE1rlBbmEEecV5mXvRTxQSG peOfol8YraxQZkn6QoD/a2OqDQ/Di/sqmsHkiAP5t82Z4skmlyPe7A0bquqQL4q2e26o VElVVn8I5FfoZP56BG6TVgBySpfAElTcn1hvE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.20.37 with SMTP id x37mr1413wfi.208.1254329062385; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:44:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4501BE7D30@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4501BE7D30@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:44:22 -0700 Message-ID: <6e04e83a0909300944n2cd0ded0xef54b1b671de42c4@mail.gmail.com> From: Ted Hardie To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ecrit@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Service URN IANA Policy X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:43:02 -0000 Howdy, I don't have any problems with this allocation policy, but I see two things in the draft that should probably change. The appointment should be by the IESG, not the RAI area director or directors; this is the traditional appointment mechanism and it allows other ADs to contribute, even if RAI leads. For services that are not SOS-related, other areas may have significant input. Second, some text in the document that describes the conditions under which new entries are approved or denied is very useful, as it guides the later incumbents in the role. In the URI space, for example, there are two strains of thought about minting new schemes: one is that it should be restricted to cases which absolutely cannot be met by an existing scheme; the second is that the schemes will be minted anyway and that registration largely serves to avoid interoperability problems. Having the working group provide general guidance on this point is very useful, in my opinion. My two cents, Ted On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: > Hi all, > > we discussed the need to change the IANA allocation policy for the > definition of new top-level services within this working group a few > times. With the > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy-00 > proposal Henning and Andrea have describe the modification. We would > change the allocation policy of top-level services from "Standards > Action" to "Expert Review". > > The policy for assigning labels to sub-services is left unchanged and > may differ for each top-level service designation and must be defined by > the document describing the top-level service. For the Service URN RFC > (RFC 5031) two sub-services are defined, namely 'sos' and 'counseling'. > The policy for adding sub-services to the 'sos' and the 'counseling' > services, as defined in RFC 5031, is "Expert Review". > > In order to progress draft-forte-ecrit-service-urn-policy-00 we would > like to know whether someone has problems with this allocation policy > change. > > Ciao > Hannes & Marc > _______________________________________________ > Ecrit mailing list > Ecrit@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit >