From Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com Fri Dec 2 09:10:26 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB1B21F8B26 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:10:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.448 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUxViYIzQ6xI for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB40521F8B25 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LVL00B496CXMY@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for forces@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:10:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LVL00JNO6CX3C@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for forces@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:10:09 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AFN16620; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:10:05 +0800 Received: from SZXEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.94) by szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:09:59 +0800 Received: from SZXEML526-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.40]) by szxeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.94]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:09:54 +0800 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:09:54 +0000 From: Tina TSOU In-reply-to: <20111202090635.1112.17639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: "forces@ietf.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_f7GPxAcdPO6+TiVAYxnCrw)" Content-language: en-US Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Thread-topic: New Version Notification for draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt Thread-index: AQHMsNG3sDq3guZDZ0qUI0yDO0Lth5XIyMg2 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: <20111202090635.1112.17639.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:14:12 -0800 Subject: [forces] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:10:26 -0000 --Boundary_(ID_f7GPxAcdPO6+TiVAYxnCrw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: > Date: December 2, 2011 1:06:35 AM PST To: > Cc: >, >, >, >, > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhiliang Wang and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces Revision: 00 Title: Analysis of Comparisons between OpenFlow and ForCES Creation date: 2011-12-02 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 12 Abstract: While both ForCES and OpenFlow follow the basic idea of separations of forwarding plane and control plane in network elements, they are technically very different. This document analyzes the differences between OpenFlow and ForCES technically from the aspects of goals, architecture, forwarding model and protocol interface. The two techniques can learn much from each other in their standardization process. The IETF Secretariat --Boundary_(ID_f7GPxAcdPO6+TiVAYxnCrw) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: December 2, 2011 1:06:35 AM PST
To: <wzl@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Cc: <shixg@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>, <james.huang@huawei.com>, <yxia@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>, <wzl@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>, <tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhiliang Wang and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:     draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces
Revision:     00
Title:         Analysis of Comparisons between OpenFlow and ForCES
Creation date:     2011-12-02
WG ID:         Individual Submission
Number of pages: 12

Abstract:
  While both ForCES and OpenFlow follow the basic idea of separations
  of forwarding plane and control plane in network elements, they are
  technically very different. This document analyzes the differences
  between OpenFlow and ForCES technically from the aspects of goals,
  architecture, forwarding model and protocol interface. The two
  techniques can learn much from each other in their standardization
  process.




The IETF Secretariat
--Boundary_(ID_f7GPxAcdPO6+TiVAYxnCrw)--