Subject: [Geopriv] RE: Radius-Geopriv: Civic vs. geospatial location information

From: "Adrangi, Farid" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:10:40 -0800

We also said that we can make all attributes / information-elements in
the draft optional.  Organization like GSMA, CDG, WFA will worry about
MUST/SHOULD. For example, GSMA IR61 and 3GPP CN4 specification require
only a subset of these attributes/information-elements.
BR,
Farid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Tschofenig Hannes
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:06 AM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Radius-Geopriv: Civic vs. geospatial location information
> 
> 
> hi all, 
> 
> currently the document says that civic location information MUST be
> provided. Jari proposed to change the MUST into a SHOULD.
> 
> we had a discussion on this issue during the geopriv meeting 
> and i had the
> impression that it is ok to change the MUST into a SHOULD. 
> 
> ciao
> hannes
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv