I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Sorry for the late review due to IET meeting. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.   Document: draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2012–4–1 IETF LC End Date: 2012–3–30 IESG Telechat date:   Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC .   Major issues:   Minor issues:   Nits/editorial comments:   In section 4 ” However, the broadcast capability on the PON enables the AN (OLT) to send one copy on the PON as opposed to N  copies of a multicast channel on the PON serving N premises being  receivers” I think the “being” before the last word should be deleted   General editorial comment is about page breaks which can be better like section 7 title is at the end of a page and the text is in the next page. Also some of the figures and their descriptions are split between pages.