I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2023-10-02
IETF LC End Date: 2023-10-11
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc but i have a question that i defined as a nit

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
The document was changed in 02 from experimental to standard track. There is text in the end of section 4 about the algorithm being experimental and from the mailing list i noticed that the reason to make it standard track is to allow using the TLVs by other WGs.  As an external observer i have no problem and noticed that the wg chairs approved it and made a comment that it is open to discussion on the mailing list. Personally i did not see much discussion so i am curious if this type of document with an experimental section is 
OK. Of course you could split the document to two documents one standard track and the other experimental but as i said this is up to the group and i have no real objection to publish the document as is.