I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-sr-bench-meth-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2026-07-27
IETF LC End Date: 2026-08-03
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as an informational RFC
I have one nit

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

In section 2.3 end of paragraph 4 “ therefore the outgoing interface(s) must support the increased frame size due to the creation of the SRH and outer IPv6 attachment”. Should it be MUST and not must?