I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-partial-02 Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu Review Date: 2022-11-20 Summary: This document extends PARTIAL SEARCH return option defined in RFC 5267. The document is ready, but the following nits should be considered before publication. General: this documents still has a normative reference to RFC 3501, which was obsoleted by RFC 9051. RFC 3501 is referenced multiple times in the draft. Nits (line numbers are from idnits): 90 This document defines an extension to the Internet Message Access 91 Protocol [RFC3501] for performing incremental searches and fetches. major: RFC 9051 should be referenced here instead of RFC 3501. 101 This document extends PARTIAL SEARCH return option originally nits: should it be "PARTIAL SEARCH" (used 4 times) or "PARTIAL search" (used 2 times)? 245 +------------------------------+---------------------+ 246 | SAVE PARTIAL COUNT [m] | all found messages | 247 +------------------------------+---------------------+ 249 Table 1 251 where '[m]' means optional "MIN" and/or "MAX" Question: If the SAVE + PARTIAL result options are combined with COUNT, MIN and MAX, what the result would be? The text above the table didn't cover this case.