I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-??
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2022-08-12
IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-17
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Draft is ready with nits for a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 1 (please see below)

Nits/editorial comments: 4 (please see below)

Minor:
- Sec. 3.6: Note that Type is "TBD" here.  Should this be 1046, as shown in
 Table 1?  (Or is the use of 1046 still under discussion?)

Nits:
- I note that certain acronyms --- IGP, NLRI, ASLA --- are not defined.  I suspect that these are well-known in the community, hence need no definition.  Just in case they are not, you may consider expanding the rare ones on first use.
- Sec. 1: s/Flexible algorithm is called so as/Flexible algorithm is so called because/
- Sec. 2: s/Definition(s) (FAD) advertised by a node is/Definition(s) (FAD) advertised by a node is (are)/
  Reason: symmetry in the sentence construction 
- Sec. 3.6: Is Figure 7 missing the trailing "//" for sub-TLV tpes?

Thanks.