I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq  .   Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.   Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-mediation-protocol-07 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2013-10-25 IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-25 IESG Telechat date: NA       Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some comments.     Major issues: none   Minor issues: none     Nits/editorial comments:   -[Page 3], Section 1, "The specifications in the IPFIX protocol    [RFC7011] have not been defined in the context of an IPFIX Mediator    receiving, aggregating, correlating, anonymizing, etc... Flow Records    from one or more Exporters. " not clear after the "etc...".   Maybe it should be "etc., Flow Records from one or more Exporters." ?     -[Page 3], Section 1, "An overview of the technical problem is covered in section    6 of [RFC5982]: loss of original Exporter information, loss of base    time information, transport sessions management, loss of Options    Template Information, Template Id management, considerations for    network considerations for aggregation.   " Last part of the sentence uses "considerations" twice. Please revise for better clarity. Also in html format, "section 6 of [RFC5982]" points to section 6 of the draft and not the RFC.   -[Page 8], Section 3, Figure 1: Caption should say "IPFIX Message Header Format"   -[Page 12], "Figure 3 shows the Template Mapping for the system shown in Figure 2." Where is Figure 3? Is the text above Figure 3 caption on page 13 considered to be the figure? If so it is a bit confusing. This comment applies to other figures as well. Suggestion, use ascii art to draw boxes around the text. General comment about figures: some of them span across pages, it would be good to revise those.   -[Page 18], just before Section 5.1, it would be good to introduce sections 5.1 and 5.2. -[Page 19], just before Section 6.1, it would be good to introduce it. -[Page 23], just before Section 10.3, it would be good to introduce sections 10.3 and 10.4.         Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com