Hi,




I have reviewed this document as part of the security 
directorate's ongoing

effort to review all IETF documents being processed by 
the IESG.  These

comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area

directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just

like any other last call comments.




Some of my comments are following.




 




Comment 1:

The title of this document focuses on flow 
binding in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO, However it is not clear how flow binding is 
supported in the NEMO? Is the mobile router operation in NEMO same as mobile 
node operation in Mobile IPv6?




Comment 2:

Is flow summary mobility option is one 
sub-option of Flow Identification Mobility Option or one independent new 
mobility option? 




 







Comment 3:




Should the HA, CN and MAP all support this 
specification? If HA does not support, how to direct inbound flows to 
specific addresses since one or more flows may bind to a care-of 
address?




 




 




B. R.

Tina

http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html