I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-08 Reviewer: Francesca Palombini Review Date: 2019-08-26 IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-28 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication, but has minor issues/open points that should be fixed before publication. Major issues: N/A Minor issues / questions: * Section 3: At the end of season 3, you indicate that this new flag has no meaning in PCRpt and PCInitiate messages. RFC8231 defines that the SRP Object MAY be carried in PCErr as well, shouldn't there be such requirements (MUST be set to 0, MUST be ignored on reception) for PCErr? * In the following text (Section 4): "The PCE SHOULD NOT send control request for LSP which is already delegated to the PCE, i.e. if the D Flag is set in the PCUpd message, then C Flag SHOULD NOT be set." Why is there a SHOULD NOT instead of MUST NOT? In which situation could it be acceptable or useful to request control for a delegated LSP? Nits/editorial comments: * Terminology should also include a sentence about the reader being familiar with at least RFC8231. * Terminology could also include what SRP stand for. * Section 3. When introducing SRP, it would have been helpful to the reader to reference section 7.2 of RFC8231. * Section 3. "PCE sets the C Flag to 1 to indicate that, it wishes" -- remove "," * Section 3. "MUST be ignored on receipt" -- "MUST be ignored on reception" * Section 4. When introducing the D flag, it would have been helpful to the reader to reference section 7.3 of RFC8231. * Section 4. "Note that, the PCUpd message with C Flag set is received" -- "Note that, if the PCUpd message with C Flag set is received" (Please keep my address in the To: field if you want to make sure I see any response to this thread) Thanks, Francesca