I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

< 

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

 >.

Document: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-05
Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
Review Date: 2016-03-23
IETF LC End Date: 2016-03-23
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary:

This document is basically ready for publication as an Experimental
RFC, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.

Major issues:  NONE

Minor issues:  NONE

Nits/editorial comments:

* idnits complains about the abstract not directly say this document
updates RFC 6613 and RFC 6614; the document does say "extends"
instead, which seems fine to me.

* idnits is complaining Copyright years are not matching; I assume
this will be fixed with the next update if not the RFC Editor

* idnits is complaining that in Section 3. "Forward and backward
Compatibility", there is an instance of "SHOULD not" that ought to
be "SHOULD NOT".

* idnits is complaining about "odd spacing" in Section 6.
"IANA Considerations" -- "containing  maximum response" ought to
be "containing maximum response"

* In Section 2. "Changes to Packet Processing", 'cloing' should be
'closing' in "cloing the TCP connection".

* In Section 3. "Forward and backward Compatibility", the
"backwward" in the section title isn't capitalized while the other
significant words are.


--
- m&m

Matt Miller
Cisco Systems, Inc.



Attachment:


signature.asc




Description:

 Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail