I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2011-12-17 IETF LC End Date: 2012-01-06 IESG Telechat date: 2012-01-05 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a proposed standard. There are some minor issues. Minor Issues: The semantics of the relation type are quite clear, though the introduction does not make a particularly compelling case for an RFC. The registration requirements of RFC 5988 require little more than the creation of a specification; that specification could be created anywhere (say, in [W3C-PUBRULES]). I find the motivations described in the introduction to be not compelling. A more generic description would help. A superficial reading might infer that the W3C is the only potential customer of this work, although it's clear that any organization that concerns itself with IPR rights (IETF included) might use it. It would be better if the specific use case were kept as an example, rather than the primary motivation. The field of applicability seems very narrow. It would help if the draft could better motivate the creation of a machine-readable marker of this type. That is, it might describe a use that a machine would have for this relation type. On face value, there is no reason that this should not be a standards track document, aside from the above concerns. Nits: Including explanatory statements like the following: (The