[13:03:26] --- cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com has joined
[13:03:42] <cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com> Starting the ad-hoc meetin
[13:04:47] --- spencerdawkins has joined
[13:05:00] --- cgn has joined
[13:05:30] --- rohan has joined
[13:08:44] --- bhoeneis has joined
[13:12:28] <spencerdawkins> who just asked the question?
[13:12:32] --- dumdidum has joined
[13:13:40] <rohan> can someone please take notes for the chat room?
[13:13:45] --- dwillis has joined
[13:13:59] --- cgn has left
[13:14:31] <dwillis> We are supposed to have lost the net at 1200, so it could go down anytime.
[13:16:03] --- saverio.niccolini has joined
[13:17:09] --- lixia has joined
[13:19:44] <rohan> cookies are being handed out in the meeting
[13:20:54] --- dumdidum has left: Replaced by new connection
[13:22:12] --- cgn has joined
[13:29:37] --- mnvakil has joined
[13:29:54] --- cgn has left
[13:35:54] --- saverio.niccolini has left
[13:40:16] <spencerdawkins> cullen - can you help me with your last question after the meeting?
[13:42:08] <cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com> yes
[13:42:10] --- dumdidum has joined
[13:42:20] <spencerdawkins> thks
[13:45:20] <dwillis> We're now discussing Philip Mathews' slides on NAT traversal.
[13:45:53] <cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com> Philip's key point is that we need to design for NATs from the beginning
[13:46:25] <dwillis> AS opposed to simply giving up on design anything for IPV4 and encouraging . . . the universal deployment of IPV6.
[13:46:42] <dwillis> Bye!
[13:47:10] <dwillis> they seem to be yanking our access points.
[13:48:31] <cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com> We can use go to P2P mode and cary on the confernce
[13:49:57] --- cullenfluffyjennings@gmail.com has left
[13:50:01] --- dwillis has left
[13:50:12] --- rohan has left
[13:59:09] --- mnvakil has left
[14:04:15] --- dumdidum has left
[14:07:03] --- lixia has left
[14:07:23] --- spencerdawkins has left
[14:17:13] --- bhoeneis has left