Peter's Apps Report #1
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 07 May 2010 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BE33A686D for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2010 10:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.312, BAYES_50=0.001, SARE_RMML_Stock10=0.13, STRONG_BUY=2.488]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ipJYhPA0ocn5 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 May 2010 10:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF913A65A6 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2010 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com [64.101.72.158]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EB4D40E14 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 May 2010 11:08:21 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4BE44903.8090207@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 11:08:19 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Peter's Apps Report #1
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080907060501090809000400"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 17:08:35 -0000
Under Lisa's tenure as Area Director, I always looked forward to her reports about activities in the Applications Area. This is my first step at maintaining that tradition, although I'm not yet sure how often I will provide reports (perhaps after each IESG formal telechat and after each IETF meeting). This report covers IETF 77 through the IESG telechat on May 6, 2010. 1. WORKING GROUP STATUS ALTO Application-Layer Traffic Optimization http://tools.ietf.org/wg/alto/ The group held a successful meeting at IETF 77, which unfortunately I was unable to attend because I needed to chair another WG session. The chairs report good progress on the two WG drafts: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-protocol http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-reqs There is talk of holding a virtual interim meeting to maintain forward momentum, which I think is a great idea. CALSIFY Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification http://tools.ietf.org/wg/calsify/ No meeting at IETF 77. This group has only one document left to publish: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2447bis It's on my list to complete an AD review of that document next week. Ideally we will work to close down this WG in the relatively near future, because we need to make way for new initiatives. :) CORE Constrained RESTful Environments http://tools.ietf.org/wg/core/ The former "6LOWAPP" team was renamed to CORE upon WG formation. The group held its first meeting at IETF 77, with plenty of discussion about wire formats (HTTP subset vs. a binary syntax that's HTTP-like) and underlying transports (UDP only or also TCP?). There is no official working group document yet, but the group had an April 2010 milestone to select a WG document as a starting point for work on the Constrained Application Protocol ("CoAP"). The primary candidate seems to be this one: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shelby-core-coap I'll poke the chairs about issuing a consensus call. :) See also the requirements document: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shelby-core-coap-req HTTPSTATE HTTP State Management Mechanism http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpstate/ Successful meeting at IETF 77. The group is dedicated solely to updating documentation of HTTP cookies: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-08 Right before IETF 77, Eran Hammer-Lahav stepped down as co-chair because of other commitments, leaving only Jeff Hodges as chair. Given the limited scope of the WG and the great job being done by document editor Adam Barth, we'll probably stay with one chair unless Jeff asks for help. BTW this WG had made good use of the issue tracker, and most of the WG session at IETF 77 was devoted to closing out open issues: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpstate/trac/report/6 IRI Internationalized Resource Identifiers http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/ As with CORE, the IRI WG held its first WG session at IETF 77. As with HTTPSTATE, the IRI WG is dedicated to a single document, a revision of RFC 3987: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis Ted Hardie volunteered to get the group off the ground on a temporary basis, and has now been replaced by the duo of Marc Blanchet and Addison Phillips (yes, it takes two people to replace Ted!). Expect quite a bit of activity from Marc, Addison, and the document editors in the near future. OAUTH Open Authentication Protocol http://tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/ I could write an entire report about the OAuth WG, which I co-chaired with Blaine Cook before Hannes Tschofenig took over for me. The WG was chartered about a year ago but held its first WG session at IETF 77, and during that time the market has changed quite a bit, leading to a desire for something closer to OAuth 2.0 than the OAuth 1.1 that was originally envisioned (along with consequent milestone slippage). The IETF 77 session and follow-up discussions have been a bit disorderly, but out of that seeming chaos has emerged a specification that appears to have strong buy-in from most of the WG participants: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-02 The group will hold a one-day interim meeting on May 20, 2010, in Sunnyvale, California, for the purpose of working through open issues and coming to agreement on the path forward. Details are here: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/wiki/InterimMeeting VCARDDAV vCard and CardDAV http://tools.ietf.org/wg/vcarddav/ Successful meeting at IETF 77. The current working group items are an update to the core vCard format, as well as an XML representation of that format: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardxml Based on discussions at IETF 77 and shortly thereafter, these documents seem to be well on the way to being ready for WGLC. It's probably time for the AD to ping the chairs about that. :) In addition, draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav is in the RFC Editor queue, waiting on advancement of draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev as a normative reference. VWRAP Virtual World Region Agent Protocol http://tools.ietf.org/wg/vwrap/ VWRAP is the working group formerly known as OGPX (and before that the MMOX BoF, for those who remember the broader topics discussed at IETF 74). The group held a good meeting at IETF 77. A number of individual drafts are under consideration, but there are no WG items as yet. I really need to read through the entire corpus one of these days... 2. WG FORMATION & LIKELY BOFS "NEWPREP" We held a successful BoF at IETF 77 about approaches for updating or replacing Stringprep in application protocols. An updated charter for a working group has passed IESG internal review and will soon be published for external review. Discussion here: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep "URNBIS" Because there is interest in holding a BoF at IETF 78 about possible updates to the core specifications for Uniform Resource Names (URNs), we have formed a new mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn A first cut at a possible charter is here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/current/msg00002.html Join the list for discussion, but remember to post requests for URN namespace identifiers to the old urn-nid list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid 3. INDIVIDUAL DRAFTS I'm watching the following documents: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-desruisseaux-ischedule (this one is a bit farther out on my schedule, but I will review it during May) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-giralt-schac-ns (authors pinged about a revised I-D) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-hostmeta (I'll complete an AD review next week) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-urn-nena (author pinged about a revised I-D) Also watching http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oiwa-http-mutualauth informally -- I met with the authors at IETF 77 and hope to provide them with more structured feedback in the next few weeks. 4. MY DRAFTS Jeff Hodges and I are working on a draft about "Representation and Verification of Application Server Identity in Certificates Used with Transport Layer Security", which we hope will serve as a set of best practices for application protocols. We submitted an updated version on April 30 and are actively seeking feedback from application developers, certification authorities, and service providers. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check I'm also pushing to complete work on two documents for the XMPP WG, which was under Apps in its first instantiation (2002-2004) and is now under RAI. The XMPP WG has milestones to send rfc3920bis and rfc3921bis to the IESG in August, and once those are done I'll have even more time for my AD responsibilities. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis 5. IESG ACTIVITIES Now I know why area directors are so busy -- they need to review and comment on 500+ pages of Internet-Drafts every two weeks. Since joining the IESG at IETF 77, I have lodged DISCUSSes on the following I-Ds (and probably a few others I've forgotten): draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework-11 draft-ietf-mediactrl-ivr-control-package-08 draft-ietf-mediactrl-mixer-control-package-11 draft-ietf-sipcore-info-events-07 draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-03 draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-17 draft-ietf-netmod-yang-12 draft-ietf-keyprov-symmetrickeyformat-08 draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-12 draft-josefsson-kerberos5-starttls-08 draft-ietf-keyprov-pskc-05 draft-ietf-keyprov-dskpp-10 draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09 Do let me know if you think I'm being too tough on I-D authors. ;) 6. UPCOMING EVENTS As mentioned, the OAuth WG will hold a one-day interim meeting in the Bay Area on May 20. I will be attending the IESG retreat in New York City on May 23+24. Planning has started for IETF 78 July 25-30, 2010, in Maastricht, the Netherlands. Working Group chairs, send in your meeting requests before June 14: https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/wg/wg_session_requester.cgi If you want to schedule a BoF, please contact me or Alexey as soon as possible. The deadline is June 1. Instructions are here: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/bof-procedures.html 7. CONTACT & COMMUNICATION In my humble opinion, communication is a key to success (maybe that's why I've worked on instant messaging protocols all these years). Before IETF 77 I attempted to have one-on-one phone conversations with chairs of all the working groups I advise, and I plan to reach out to those folks again in the next few weeks. However, if you have any questions or concerns or ideas for improvement, please feel free to contact me via email, IM, or phone -- my contact information is here: https://stpeter.im/index.php/contact/ I think that's it for now! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- Peter's Apps Report #1 Peter Saint-Andre