[babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-applicability-04

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4819130E30; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:46:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDVN9o-AyKWa; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A8A130E62; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id p83-v6so11224544iod.12; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7D6k7V2n+xtoSmSs/RqDb4Kn7/AK9f7kX98utdyqfRc=; b=lGXW8fah2LCPCRHMrgsH6yWCgw2X5veShyUu3lco+KXdaz8/8cf+P6PvM40g54gW3p 1xB8LiXdvwQ+RBJYrjQrz1e4fY80lpZ5RcxoBwA0f2TTezpUbeREd/vydFTuH75Rlyn7 PrZhhSPip+Aa9vOxciS3YHBTQDzrh2rnXCfFDqGaIulaswZRhwR7Or2rTdXznuEaeNkD S164AdXMZOZShj4pnOG6+QEmDHVi63dmwZ67C2jwGC12n9eZgVYtwo5EoR37Oi5zmsu4 oGLu+WEckSOchpxV0Qx12u9VzIfgch1VfUGRHZoR8RLlb/qxrcyRCMGCOmqiuT8yRHGK xRQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7D6k7V2n+xtoSmSs/RqDb4Kn7/AK9f7kX98utdyqfRc=; b=cas5YnShf3CF8BTZWATBxY4Nkw+pmSrrZ3fm/h8bwfq+nK1UeXSDptVGk1F15fcdU9 KzjELeO1wMEDy3wFzW3vJS65u7z8nFeAZcP8lElXaa9LGhxeI8zKCBvYyf7mPl9gONsU EReX+UkH4vcGKTXZw0TIHQHi1C9s6eLXsHLt7kNIREWzvV/gZN9hUAIbKy0J6fbXxLns FUxcI1reemLo4lonVBw0GgPytBoQbGKRrmZn98IZbRad6v6hmC67E1XSoxT6jWQVMAkq S0uXX9FiMpVmof5glSsB9DtOjf37mfHckQb/P7cxy0kfxOURZgxyE4Z1KTLzTgdenS7G xfVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKskzakdoe6AnSvADLI7ia51+YaQxxu82IR14Dp8nyuNFLn9f9k SVZiLxAtDLrbEXQ0gf8K2MUr/hDeXmZI2ywN9f7897dXxS0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5d9N7wDGdxSPVhsUiAOFlYJoTL7DNXqtIT7I1U8HrH0PXsRTV9xyoiHqPnDMKmtakz+ZRC6fbq7OwZPtZV7IGE=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:acc5:: with SMTP id v188-v6mr669009ioe.66.1541576811382; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 23:46:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 02:46:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHvxTTypXnJGn0bt7+ot6xMaJSQSHO3Tp8j0UL+1Z5zwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Cc: babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003c9058057a0e522a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/n4lehwYM7mA8rVzDUNlPslBKjR0>
Subject: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-applicability-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 07:46:59 -0000

Looks good except that a typo seems to have been introduced in the last
update. In particular, in Section 2.2

OLD
   o  strict monotonicity of the metric: for any metric M and link cost
      C, < C + M;
NEW
   o  strict monotonicity of the metric: for any metric M and link cost
      C, M < C + M;
         ^^

Although this is a pretty minor change, i think the draft should be fixed
before publication is requested.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com