Re: [dispatch] FW: New Version Notification for draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket-00.txt

I am ok with this.

*BUT* I still want to again raise the question whether we should be 
thinking in general about the porting of existing protocols to new 
transports.

The RTCWEB effort is putting a lot of emphasis on rapid session startup 
and connection establishment. In that environment it is attractive to 
think about having lots of protocols run over data channels, so they can 
take advantage of multiplexing and quick startup. This could apply to 
BFCP and MSRP that are working on websocket transports. And how many 
more will there be?

Because websockets and data channels will be similar from an API 
perspecitive, perhaps it would be possible to define a transport mapping 
that works for both. But that won't help unless both are actually 
implemented.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 3/12/13 10:02 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in the DISPATCH WG session, we are doing an official call
> for comments/agreement to move this work item to the BFCPbis WG.  If
> folks could please respond if they support this or provide comments if
> you do not.
>
> As discussed in the meeting, if we get agreement, the chairs/ADs would
> update BFCPbis WG charter to include this work item and forward to WG
> and IESG for review/approval.  The WG would then need to decide
> whether to adopt this specific document towards that WG deliverable.
>
> Please respond no later than Friday, March 22nd, 2013.  Silence will
> be taken as agreement.
>
> Thanks,
> Mary
> DISPATCH WG co-chair
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Victor Pascual Avila
> <victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have submitted a new Internet draft to describe the WebSocket
>> Protocol as a Transport for the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP).
>> We are looking forward to your review comments.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket-00
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -Victor
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/13 6:17 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket-00.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Victor Pascual and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Filename:       draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket
>>> Revision:       00
>>> Title:          The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Binary Floor
>>> Control Protocol (BFCP)
>>> Creation date:  2013-02-15
>>> Group:          Individual Submission
>>> Number of pages: 9
>>> URL:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket-
>>> 00.txt
>>> Status:
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket
>>> Htmlized:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pascual-dispatch-bfcp-websocket-00
>>>
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>    The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication between
>>>    clients and servers.  This document specifies a new WebSocket sub-
>>>    protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
>>>    Control Protocol (BFCP) entities to enable usage of BFCP in new
>>>    scenarios.  This document normatively updates
>>>    [I-D.draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis] and
>>>    [I-D.draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dispatch mailing list
>> dispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>