[Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS
Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 09:20 UTC
Return-Path: <songlinjian@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E642B126C19 for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KqPZrbpzqDQ for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x230.google.com (mail-ua0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648F2126BF0 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x230.google.com with SMTP id m47so5108360uae.6 for <doh@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YfvhZxXCFErnVozauPAcKFr0lbj9WguqV4NcDFHjVYQ=; b=I47QmoYXaED9mg73GFq5/vEXpuC5O/1gLxQzwvWR4QUZlhNFwIoRdiQj4Q2jbPZU0+ xYlC8Bb3qKGxaN31tQWIAtA8NuA2XARBaVl1/gy+vhSwlFLdaOqIpLwDvryE+tf3eb+m rHUho2C4aJUSMLj9uYFya4nec0Gf3us0eMY+2Anf2FT2mWWIs+XedG6BtpHdT1bZ0IsV VPzfA8lj2MpYj7s2Q8g9nJSOtNTX+5/QpT9OssQHyA7Zgs5eVfNmUXQoVvD8f3hzfbXV YO5Zh2K9DVSBGuq6wSI0b/tYDgWtx/2uCHG0ApX2o21f+dhWGOnLosr6Iqg2c6NN/v0G JHfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YfvhZxXCFErnVozauPAcKFr0lbj9WguqV4NcDFHjVYQ=; b=SeQRRvWMlFMnT7wFrk/rCBAm41zUghPYjAWwPVecpU9QdBZbEaA1h5AH/EZOCaGZD3 Yk64n/BuEM8iYZrHUH1U8sl7fj0VQVHfwu6aW5OoFjAZA0sraA5r/AmwFjfXtzKeN6be j9ZCN8djXOzxZ/hNo3bGVoTG1vbQCqWGEmpQe2IiW1f2DniKgSwcnYt1cxBS41vzU7ro CqzC+BVA4aMaPjpMUWTIRi2q9SD/XW6MNMpoArQvN6zVQQGlite28o4mR1SkYfunQiMl OVrA8LuAE+dTyNgtXtr4WrS2R3KBmZ19VFfUnenIrGV0fVTAlCDkrfohLh5nUfjosu99 vWRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GwLeFMKEdc4gkAu5RA+kU1QQfP04KL13MpURmL+DXecMeHPpTZ F5ekkh7/J1HhjCIZc5iDKjfsZJfIVDd4rk0s3eBu3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELt996396rXwaNUJFM1xnoU06gIzFtrAOj+Vq+QKaVsL1iC8aTizBM5Ccil9IpThWNcbE4tX/iKUVnhjHTXOUwY=
X-Received: by 10.176.69.182 with SMTP id u51mr15645788uau.93.1521710457147; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.43.143 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:20:56 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAObRXJDV5Oa_d_S12HT2jqBuO=-AHOuMH8eKrac3BZ2bDxixw@mail.gmail.com>
To: doh@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c11b8243fd72a0567fcd3e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/d_oqJghi1uvM_fCCo_Pre3iOnu4>
Subject: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:21:00 -0000
Hi, Although the dns-udpwireformat MIME type was defined, the dns wireformat data should not be treated as a datagram encapsulted in a HTTPs header but a new byte stream over HTTPs (similar with DNS TCP usage). No truncation loop is needed. Peopole may take it for granted, but It should be explicitely mentioned in this draft. I mentioned this before in other mails but I notice it is not mentioned in the latest 03 version. Best regards, Davey
- [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Davey Song
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Ray Bellis
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS manu tman
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Tony Finch
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS manu tman
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Tony Finch
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Davey Song
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Ray Bellis
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Davey Song
- Re: [Doh] No truncation for DNS over HTTPS Massimiliano Fantuzzi