[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 01 November 2016 01:54 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D37129AB4; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17kojG-daUgr; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA1A1294B7; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id d2so11219321pfd.0; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=adCCGxiK7UAw1pYLhrqgOd7e25N43dWZITEY29tW5uw=; b=TZdR4fvaxzWahI1Pd8sM1r/Qc7fvTmCY9eqHg35a0qtnxFQ5U2e1JkDUbwcoRnpyLL pFgwew6XmOtW+C4ZPCh4Ckt08avuK1Ra/sTF+ZeUbvhILDaRPXdYP9oE3Ju6rxs7z65D VOPCBBGLlkBH5qseKEhP+u3sHZ173Ub2AUSf/aPffjg8NDDNS4jSEmmPM1JQBMi1A9Ny kjWHXbSnulc/FCgatjX4UwQfNaWXbWg7lTqg71zSDzes2mM3fDydZlemoo9lIo5wJvc4 v2JggX89dwbzK31fYBT5Q965HxJ5yxBj2CMpO0e1CQDYXB2ZcB6EOHipsyWY7vw1LL8i RQMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=adCCGxiK7UAw1pYLhrqgOd7e25N43dWZITEY29tW5uw=; b=DJ2BmnshVPN2h+FyKC30C2aWB8qn8vaV8KK6Du9qOL/4t7WAM9kefo+n0VjcElDBnG jZczUjRIaL9ORSKa3PgIZmow3T1vAawQuldY3iXl9nsHR0Cod0WolfoczHOncKLXT5Ws S5oi4F8DxZm2PVuWHhOHZ1AFUc8yegFQmGDZsfVKB0X0auZ43p+plytdpZwATSbAl/FF gM1AcHhizswKj7rAFJWECGJ/08n7bXGEI9lYRceAa+e6xGFtrQFVQfnsa+aOxsxPJag8 9KZk0buGIA/ovJslC2F6SHLqdaYMjo33QaCS2DVXgYL96TbeI9toTdDW6SxwjGcg7jec JBiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveN42fU4BZSNvtNjIijbEwBJ47RtoUDgJHmaSlK9YSMckovl0/K7THTV1VEpA0yfQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.170.79 with SMTP id x15mr45420177pgo.105.1477965258115; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76? ([2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm38183644pfk.54.2016.10.31.18.54.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
References: <b9c5ad42-3c48-e0d6-6c0f-5d7509ddf7fb@gmail.com> <9A1178EF-F6B3-42DF-A4A8-E0FCD675CF87@nic.cz>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <a4259dc8-3e05-752a-4955-a483f51da4dd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 14:54:18 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9A1178EF-F6B3-42DF-A4A8-E0FCD675CF87@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Ur5EbXXEolQ1kauezaHyLey9IU0>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 01:54:21 -0000
This didn't have a chance to be updated before the cutoff, so technically it's still "Ready with Issues", but I am completely happy with Lada's proposed changes. Regards Brian On 25/10/2016 20:56, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi Brian, > > thank you for the review. Please see my replies inline. > >> On 25 Oct 2016, at 01:07, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24.txt >> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter >> Review Date: 2016-10-25 >> IETF LC End Date: 2016-11-03 >> IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03 >> >> Summary: Ready with (minor) issues >> -------- >> >> Comments: >> --------- >> >> This seems to be a fine document. FYI I am not a YANG expert. >> >> There is a dissent on a point of principle in the WG archive at >> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg16705.html: >> "Given the historical opposition to revising models once they have been cast as RFCs >> that we have seen within the IETF, then I feel that avoiding incomplete models going >> to RFC is the best course of action." >> >> My understanding is that YANG models are intrinsically extensible, and this is >> noted in the Abstract and Introduction. So I don't find this dissent compelling. > > Indeed, this data model is intended as a basis for other models, e.g. for routing protocols. Several such model are already under way. > >> >> Minor Issues: >> ------------- >> >> 1) >> Re on-link-flag and autonomous-flag: Please consider adding a normative >> reference to the approved RFC-to-be draft-ietf-6man-multi-homed-host, >> as well as RFC 4861. That document specifies that having both these flags >> set to False is a legitimate combination, against current expectations. > > Will add. > >> >> 2) >> Did you consider doing anything explicit for ULA prefixes, or would >> this just be handled by special-next-hop/prohibit in border routers? > > > The "ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements" submodule just tries to cover the parameters specified in RFC 4861. I understand that configuration specific to ULA prefixes is an add-on to this base set, and this can be implemented via augmenting the core model from other modules. > >> >> 3) >>> Appendix B. Minimum Implementation >>> >>> Some parts and options of the core routing model, such as user- >>> defined RIBs, are intended only for advanced routers. This appendix >>> gives basic non-normative guidelines for implementing a bare minimum >>> of available functions. Such an implementation may be used for hosts >>> or very simple routers. >> >> IPv6 hosts should definitely not send RFC4861 router advertisements. >> Should that be stated in this appendix? > > Yes, good point, will do. > > Thanks, Lada > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > > > >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Ladislav Lhotka
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-n… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter