[Geopriv] The 's' in HELD

I missed this in the changes for -06.  Please forgive my ignorance, but
I wasn't there at -71 and it appears that only the conclusion was
captured, not the rationale.  The minutes focus on whether there should
be a URI scheme or not, but make what seems (to me) to be a logical
leap:

          Question: Does this HELD: scheme require TLS? Ans: Yes. Then
it needs
          to be a HELDS: scheme.

I don't believe that the letter 's' addresses "concerns over referential
integrity" as stated by the held-06 change-log.  So can anyone justify
the above statement?  Is there some IETF guideline I don't know of that
states that URI schemes for protocols that use TLS have an extra 's'? 

Cheers,
Martin 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv